PU - Scotty JX - All Activity

RE: Major Recycling Going on Here

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:49:07 PST

Action Girls (0)

01-31-12 09:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To ipg386 (0):

They also don't seem to be doing any location shoots like they used to. Perhaps they just can't afford it with the current state of the porn economy. Too bad. I liked that stuff.

View Thread (1)

Action Girls Comment

Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:38:18 PST

Action Girls (0)

01-30-12 10:38pm

COMMENT by ipg386 (0)

Major Recycling Going on Here

Regarding the picture sets, the site is re-dating its old pic sets and claiming they are "new." The site has some stunning pics - at times - but compared to my last join several months ago I see very little that's truly new. The site is somewhat deceptive: specifically emphasizing its sets by date posted when many of the sets are old ones with new dates. If you've never joined, however, try the 3 day full trial for $4.95, it's a great deal, but as a prior member looking for new stuff, I found it lacking even at the dirt cheap price.

Visit Action Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

Action Girls Comment

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 05:49:49 PDT

Action Girls (0)

09-26-10 05:49am

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Speaking of Non-Nudity

The current poll is about nudity and sexuality. So here's a sideshow: Actiongirls has, for this entire month, had nothing in its stock of new photos but non-nude material. And frankly, I think they look pretty awful as well. It sure isn't what I'd signed up for (6 month subscription, stupid-stupid-stupid me!).

I haven't been able to equate any of them with sexuality, btw. ;)

Visit Action Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Four Bones to Pick

Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:17:12 PDT

Action Girls (0)

06-26-10 05:17am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To PinkPanther (44):

OK. Now it finally all makes sense!

View Thread (4)

RE: Four Bones to Pick

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:11:03 PDT

Action Girls (0)

06-25-10 09:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Drooler (218):

I think you've got it now - ActionGirls.com is Scotty JX's project to complete his Masters in Behavioural Psychology - and pay for grad school.

View Thread (4)

RE: Four Bones to Pick

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:52:40 PDT

Action Girls (0)

06-25-10 05:52pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To PinkPanther (44):

LOL. It is an aMAZing bunch of pages to get through, authenticate through, AND scroll through. It's 3-D hell. Makes me wish I WERE an ant.

Or perhaps it's designed by empirical behaviorists and the whole thing is an ongoing research project, and we ARE, in fact, the ants!

View Thread (4)

RE: Four Bones to Pick

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:45:18 PDT

Action Girls (0)

06-25-10 05:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Drooler (218):

Yeah, I think I was able to take advantage of viewpornstars once when I had an ActionGirls trial membership, which is all I've ever paid for. That's a drag about the more recent galleries not allowing you to access them.

This is a fun site when you can get access to the material, though it's designed by ants - or some other maze-loving critters.

View Thread (4)

Action Girls Comment

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:51:43 PDT

Action Girls (0)

06-25-10 02:51am

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Four Bones to Pick

Two and half months ago, posted a favorable comment about this site. I also joined soon after, and now I have a few warnings for those interested.

First, the maximum pixel resolution on new photos is their "super large," which is about 2000 pixels (sometimes exactly, sometimes a little less). But the site is still advertising "2722 PIXELS RES." to this very moment.

Did somebody just make a little mistake and just kept copying and pasting it? I mean, they're not just lying, are they?

The second problem is that although you get access to Viewpornstars, too, getting there is a hassle. You have to look around to find the entry point, turn off your popup blocker, click the Viewpornstars collage icon, then click this little button in a popup. Then the windows to the site open.

And then there's a third problem, and this one is really bad. The more recent galleries and zips prompt you for a usepass that you don't have! And not having it, you're up the River Shits.

I've emailed them twice about Viewporstars access problems. The responses: NOTHING. And that's problem #4.

So buyer, beware!

Visit Action Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Worth a Look!

Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:25:00 PDT

Action Girls (0)

04-09-10 09:25pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Drooler (218):

I really like Action Girls - I'm more into the action and humor stuff than their glam stuff. Susana Spears' drunk Superwoman is just awesome.

Their update schedule never made me want to join for a full month, but their $5/3 days is a great deal, as you say.

View Thread (1)

Action Girls Comment

Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:17:59 PDT

Action Girls (0)

04-09-10 07:17pm

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Worth a Look!

It's $5 week in Droolerland, I guess. This site offers 3 days at that price. Have been a member before and although it was tough at first, having to put up with with confusing navigation and usepass boxes popping up too often, I finally tamed it.

There's some nice stuff here along with the "action" stuff that I myself don't care much for. (Women in grease paint, body oil, and dom uniforms welding weapons and baring their teeth is not my idea of sweet hunnykins.)

What's really great is that they've recently moved to a larger max photo size, 2722 px (was 1722). There's plenty of content I've not seen elsewhere of girls like Crissy Moran, Amy Reid, etc.

Here's a good place to start: http://actiongirls.com/Actiongirls-Recruits/index.html

Visit Action Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

View Pornstars Comment

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:44:36 PST

View Pornstars (0)

01-16-08 10:44pm

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Skip it

This site has little exclusive material. It has loads of non-exclusive stuff, most of which you'll find on other sites, sooner or later, with zip files (which this site doesn't provide).

But for photo lovers, the #1 reason to skip it is that it takes GOOD jpegs, compresses them WAY down, and tacks its ugly little watermark on them in the lower right corner.

Example: They just put up a photoset of Marketa Brymova (Workout). The pics are 1063x1600, but the file sizes are only 82 to 95K or so. You can see the pixel halo around in places where the blue background meets her skin.

I haven't seen this set anywhere else so far, but mostly likely it will show up in better shape at one of the Babelicious bonus sites, or Babelicious itself, or another site with lots of non-exclusive stuff.

Have seen plenty of it at other sites.

Visit View Pornstars - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: SnowDude's Review

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:47:56 PDT

Action Girls (0)

08-29-07 06:47am

REVIEW REPLY by Boobs4ever (22)

To PinkPanther (44):

the reason I see why they dont take the hd route is because they want you to buy the dvd:s being realesed instead of download and get perfect qaulity I think Vividmovies have that strategic aswell when what Ive heard there quality isnt the best compared to other sites.

View Thread (4)

RE: SnowDude's Review

Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:27:13 PDT

Action Girls (0)

07-25-07 07:27pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To SnowDude (214):

It's kind of amazing that this site has not gone the HD route. I agree also with the comments on the horrible navigation.

This site gets major points from me for the originality and the quality of their images - why they don't respect their own work by presenting it in high-res versions is a true mystery.

I joined for the trial a couple of times, but after the last time I gave up. you are supposed to get a bonus sub to a related porn star site, but I wasn't able to access that bonus no matter where I tried clicking from and the support on this site is non-existent as well.

There are just too many cons for a site that has so much going for it in terms of an original concept that I find very appealing and really hot women photographed beautifully.

View Thread (4)

RE: SnowDude's Review

Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:49:36 PDT

Action Girls (0)

07-25-07 01:49pm

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To Boobs4ever (22):

Hey Boobs Dude!

That's a valid point, but I think it's the same quality for the full subscription since TBP reviewers said something similar. It's a real shame since the concept is pretty original.

-SD

View Thread (4)

RE: SnowDude's Review

Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:15:08 PDT

Action Girls (0)

07-25-07 04:15am

REVIEW REPLY by Boobs4ever (22)

To SnowDude (214):

Nice review thanks!! What Im thinkin of is if there was anything saying that quality would bee better under monthly subscription. Otherwise I think Im gone wait until this site gives you better quality to join. What wondering is on the free tour you can look on Poster previews how much does the posters improve on the trail compared to the poster preveiws?

View Thread (4)