<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Scotty JX - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/site_company.html?id=419</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15033</guid>
		<title>View Pornstars Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15033</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/viewpornstars/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/viewpornstars.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter View Pornstars&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/viewpornstars/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Pornstars&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-16-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:44pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Skip it&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					This site has little exclusive material.  It has loads of non-exclusive stuff, most of which you'll find on other sites, sooner or later, with zip files (which this site doesn't provide).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But for photo lovers, the #1 reason to skip it is that it takes GOOD jpegs, compresses them WAY down, and tacks its ugly little watermark on them in the lower right corner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example:  They just put up a photoset of Marketa Brymova (Workout).  The pics are 1063x1600, but the file sizes are only 82 to 95K or so.  You can see the pixel halo around in places where the blue background meets her skin.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I haven't seen this set anywhere else so far, but mostly likely it will show up in better shape at one of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/babelicious/&quot;&gt;Babelicious&lt;/a&gt; bonus sites, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/babelicious/&quot;&gt;Babelicious&lt;/a&gt; itself, or another site with lots of non-exclusive stuff.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have seen plenty of it at other sites.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=391&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit View Pornstars&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15033&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15033&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:44:36 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_7570</guid>
		<title>RE: SnowDude's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6406#7570</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/actiongirls/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/actiongirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Action Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/actiongirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Action Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-29-07 06:47am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1557&quot;&gt;Boobs4ever&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1557&quot;&gt;21&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=98&quot;&gt;PinkPanther&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=98&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					the reason I see why they dont take the hd route is because they want you to buy the dvd:s being realesed instead of download and get perfect qaulity I think Vividmovies have that strategic aswell when what Ive heard there quality isnt the best compared to other sites.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6406#7570&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:47:56 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6414</guid>
		<title>RE: SnowDude's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6406#6414</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/actiongirls/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/actiongirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Action Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/actiongirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Action Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-25-07 07:27pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=98&quot;&gt;PinkPanther&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=98&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					It's kind of amazing that this site has not gone the HD route.  I agree also with the comments on the horrible navigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site gets major points from me for the originality and the quality of their images - why they don't respect their own work by presenting it in high-res versions is a true mystery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I joined for the trial a couple of times, but after the last time I gave up.  you are supposed to get a bonus sub to a related porn star site, but I wasn't able to access that bonus no matter where I tried clicking from and the support on this site is non-existent as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are just too many cons for a site that has so much going for it in terms of an original concept that I find very appealing and really hot women photographed beautifully.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6406#6414&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:27:13 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6412</guid>
		<title>RE: SnowDude's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6406#6412</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/actiongirls/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/actiongirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Action Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/actiongirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Action Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-25-07 01:49pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1557&quot;&gt;Boobs4ever&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1557&quot;&gt;21&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					Hey Boobs Dude!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's a valid point, but I think it's the same quality for the full subscription since TBP reviewers said something similar. It's a real shame since the concept is pretty original.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-SD
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6406#6412&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:49:36 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6408</guid>
		<title>RE: SnowDude's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6406#6408</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/actiongirls/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/actiongirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Action Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/actiongirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Action Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-25-07 04:15am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=1557&quot;&gt;Boobs4ever&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=1557&quot;&gt;21&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					Nice review thanks!! What Im thinkin of is if there was anything saying that quality would bee better under monthly subscription. Otherwise I think Im gone wait until this site gives you better quality to join. What wondering is on the free tour you can look on Poster previews how much does the posters improve on the trail compared to the poster preveiws?
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6406#6408&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:15:08 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>