PU - Crystal Lizard - All Activity

RE: non nude site

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:57:17 PDT

CL Studio (0)

06-19-09 08:57am

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (173)

To mbaya (276):

funny funny, how i hate that non nude content. should think about making a site with holiday pictures and sell it monthly for 34,95 $ :)

every commercial of sexnumbers is more interesting then such sites LOL

however beeing trapped means, having money wasted. that`s a pitty

View Thread (5)

RE: non nude site

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:57:28 PDT

CL Studio (0)

06-18-09 09:57am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (44)

To mbaya (276):

My brain started to short out from trying to figure out the difference between porn, eroticism, a shoe catalog, and this pay site.
I would need a new brain before I started to think about PU/TBP standards. Though I am sure the PU/TBP standards are exceedingly high. (I don't want the PU staff kicking me off the site because I am not showing sufficient respect for their high moral standards and whatnot.)
Personally, I am not into shoe catalogs. But I don't mind looking at photographic books of movie stars. That is not erotic(I don't think), but the older movie stars had some great-looking women. Head shots, wearing lovely dresses, or even casual, they had glamor, an aura, just beautiful to look at.

View Thread (5)

RE: non nude site

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:54:45 PDT

CL Studio (0)

06-18-09 09:54am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To mbaya (276):

mbaya said: "However it is listed on TBP. This makes me wonder what standards TBP has regarding non nude sites being listed."

Perhaps you missed it, we made an announcement back in May of 07 that we started listing non-adult sites

http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4133

View Thread (5)

RE: non nude site

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:30:40 PDT

CL Studio (0)

06-18-09 09:30am

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (276)

To lk2fireone (44):

You bring up a good point. The site is part of a network that does have some nudity and even insertions, so this restriction it mentions is apparently self imposed. Is this site porn? In my opinion, I don't think so either. However it is listed on TBP. This makes me wonder what standards TBP has regarding non nude sites being listed.

View Thread (5)

RE: non nude site

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:53:45 PDT

CL Studio (0)

06-18-09 08:53am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (44)

To mbaya (276):

Since the site is non-nude, maybe it qualifies as some sort of fetish. But does it qualify as porn?

Some people have a fetish about shoes, but I would not classify a shoe catalog from some retail store as porn, even though a shoe fetishist might use the catalog to excite himself/herself.

From Wikipedia, which is not a dictionary but an encyclopedia:
"Pornography or porn is the depiction of explicit sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexually exciting the viewer. Pornography makes no claim to artistic merit, unlike erotica which does."

This site is non-nude, and I assume there is no "depiction of explicit sexual subject matter". So why would it be considered porn?

Or maybe the site is supposed to be erotic.

But if a book store had a photographic book with pictures from this site, I doubt they would classify the book as either pornographic or erotic.

View Thread (5)

CL Studio Comment

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:25:43 PDT

CL Studio (0)

06-18-09 06:25am

COMMENT by mbaya (276)

non nude site

The site has the following disclaimer: "Note! Our site contains neither porno nor nude materials being under restriction." This doesn't keep them from charging $34.95 per month.

Visit CL Studio - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Mr Fountain's Review

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:28:27 PDT

DL Assistant (1)

06-14-08 05:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by Mr Fountain (46)

To Wittyguy (71):

Yeah, I'm in to my second week for membership. The quality is still proving to be good; though for 39.95? Though there are many pics I liked. The models are really hot looking performers that do amazing splits. The pics can be enlarged to fit 1280 x 800 without noticeable degradation on the picture. Those the vids have a lot of these performers doing their exercizes; splits in the air; bending over.
If you like watching this type of thing. I would recommend this site.For just one month though..considering the price...

View Thread (2)

RE: Mr Fountain's Review

Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:51:17 PDT

DL Assistant (1)

06-03-08 03:51pm

REVIEW REPLY by Wittyguy (71)

To Mr Fountain (46):

Thanks for the review here. I've seen some of the crystal lizard stuff on tgp sites and wondered how good the content was (I realize crystal and diamond lizard are 2 separate entities). Good review.

View Thread (2)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:52:23 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-08-08 03:52pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To badandy400 (99):

Hi badandy400

Thanks for the reply.

I agree with you...this could be much hotter because a fair few of the girls were pretty.

I forgot about the pain with the photos...painful.

The best thing they do is the most dangerous thing...they potray themselves to be better than they are, and I was caught by the trap. Their preview page has their best girls on it in good size photos.

It's like one of those Hotels you see in the Holiday brochure then when you arrive and see your room (the one without the view) you think...I've been ripped off.

Cheers

View Thread (10)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:46:07 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 08:46pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (99)

To JBDICK (19):

That is too high of a price. A few months ago was there and I thought paying $30 was too much. Even the newer "HD" videos are no where near up to par. The photos are kind of a pain to download. Another case where Download Them All comes in handy.

Some of the scenes do have a sexual hint to them, but others are more like watching a gymnastics practice. That can be hot, but it could be a lot hotter!

View Thread (10)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:15:40 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 01:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To Toadsith (48):

Hi Toadsith

interesting about the cam stuff. Something I've never tried, but I know exactly what you are saying...

If I did it, I'd chose one the US ones because I know I'll feel better about it. I can see why the Met-Art would be okay though and the girls are Perfect...I guess they do get paid more, but they probably also have the respect of that business because it is so big, and I would imagine for them, there are times where the girls can chill out and chat together...

On these poor eastern sites, there's a sense of isolation, like lonely...very sad

Cheers

View Thread (10)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:10:01 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 01:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To JBDICK (19):

Haha - indeed I'd probably have to bring along my opera glasses to see the dancers as closely as the websites can provide.

On the other topic though - it is indeed saddening to actually converse with some of these impoverished girls, it was the main reasons I stopped dealing with pay-per-minute live cam sites. It was all very depressing. The girls really didn't have a lot of choices for income and they were rather uncomfortable with the whole deal.

On the other hand, I did like the cam service Met Art provided - there the girls did whatever they wanted and would simply chat with whomever they found the most interesting. Much happier environment - I'm guessing the girls got paid better as well.

View Thread (10)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:47:50 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 12:47pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To Toadsith (48):

Toadsith

seems we have the same dry sense of wit.

attractive girls doing splits and what not, clothed, I can just go buy a ticket to a ballet and watch it live...

...you'd get arrested for being that close with your camera.

your comment...
ballet drop-outs that decided it was a better gig than unemployment. Some of the girls were exquisitely beautiful, but the cringe factor could be pretty high.

I can totally tune into that...it starting off being a curiousity trip for me at first but that soon wore off and I started feeling sad coz you can just tell the driver here is not the same as the girls from Prague or San Fernando Valley (who love it because they've been de-sensitised). these girls look lost...like you say, looking for a wage.

View Thread (10)

RE: Pornusers take note.

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:41:34 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 12:41pm

COMMENT REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To Khan (Staff):

Hi Khan

Credit to honesty and to the Team...

that's why TBP and PU are as hot as the content under review. Keep up the Good Work guys.

You know what...this is what you get from TBP & PU...

TRUST

something priceless for FREE.....AWESOME.

View Thread (2)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:26:06 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 12:26pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To williamj (9):

hi williamj

Hope the review was informative. I try and give a different type of review to most. more from my gut feel.

only a small point but this was below average quality for above average price...I think they had their calculators the wrong way round when they had that meeting...half the price is still a lot...don't be taken in by the 100,000 photos, they've probably included the thumbnails in that count.

Cheers

View Thread (10)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:23:29 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 12:23pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To Boobs4ever (22):

Hi Boobs4ever

Yep. I was vunerable, it was late, my wife was in bed and I fancied looking off the beaten track...

found it by chance and thought, I'll try that, but like you say in your reply, I got drawn in by the Previews. Some of the older photos are actually smaller than these newer ones...

What would be good is if Porn Sites could measure themselves against an induxtry standard like BSI - British Standards Institute...

Hey I think I might be onto an idea.

Anyway, thanks for the reply.

You're on my list to read your reviews. Need to make sure I'm up to scratch with my peers.

View Thread (10)

RE: Pornusers take note.

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:11:25 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 10:11am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To JBDICK (19):

Thanks but the real credit goes to the TBP Editor

Thanks again for the site suggestion.

View Thread (2)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:31:08 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 09:31am

REVIEW REPLY by Boobs4ever (22)

To JBDICK (19):

nice one there prewiev site looks really tempting but the prize turns me off. If they would go down to $19.99 I would probably not hestitate when it looks diffrent to what I normally see

View Thread (10)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:46:25 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-07-08 07:46am

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To JBDICK (19):

$39.95 is a bit expensive for average porn quality.

View Thread (10)

RE: JBDICK's Review

Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:58:36 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-06-08 01:58pm

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To JBDICK (19):

I don't know if it is actually the case, but Porn Users lists all these sites as Non-Nude porn. I've just never quite grasped the point of NN Porn - that is like trying to buy one of those cheesy softcore pornos from Blockbuster, save your cash. I was a member of CL Erotic a long while ago - but even half of that site was NN Porn, if I wanted to see attractive girls doing splits and what not, clothed, I can just go buy a ticket to a ballet and watch it live.

I know what you mean about the odd props and uncomfortable expressions on the girls, CL Erotic had the same problems. I feel like these are ballet drop-outs that decided it was a better gig than unemployment. Some of the girls were exquisitely beautiful, but the cringe factor could be pretty high.

View Thread (10)

CL Pass Comment

Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:20:51 PDT

CL Pass (1)

04-06-08 10:20am

COMMENT by JBDICK (19)

Pornusers take note.

I mentioned this site to webmaster on Saturday 06 April 2008.

He has already listed the site along with the associated sister sites, so I could review it.

Now that is FAST...and the record on TBP (thebestporn) is spot on.

Wow, You'd da Man. Thanks Khan. I will do a review in the next few days...

In the interim, as a taster, this membership gave me access to 4 sites. The video is always the same, cute gymnast, dressed accordingly, same studios (maybe 4 at the most), two chairs, a gym ladder and a camera...Action...the girls stretch themselves accordingly. Not a lot of dance type movement, no music, no talking, lots of unsure shyness by the girls, especially when the camera is probably about 6 inches away from heaven and the girl is balancing in the splits across two chairs. The last thing the girls are thinking of is being sexy...more to follow in the review.

Visit CL Pass - View Replies - Add Reply