PU - TonyBucks Co. - All Activity

18 Stream Comment

Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:29:33 PST

18 Stream (5)

12-11-11 10:29pm

COMMENT by slutty (92)

Trial

Just thought I'd point out your login for the trial appears to work with other TonyBucks sites aside from Spunky Bee and Rough 18 as the site says. I tried it with TinSeks and it worked fine there.

Downloads are slow, and I agree with WittyGuy, that it probably isn't worth hanging around here for long.

Visit 18 Stream - View Replies - Add Reply

18 Stream Comment

Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:07:56 PST

18 Stream (5)

12-09-11 02:07pm

COMMENT by jeremiah22 (0)

LOGON PROBLEMS

Warning - I've tried for about an hour to log into the site, and it won't let me despite typing in the correct username and password, as well as the security code.

Does anyone have any idea why I can't login?

Visit 18 Stream - View Replies - Add Reply

Spunky Bee Comment

Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:26:50 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

06-08-11 10:26am

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

9 bonus sites now being offered with Spunky Bee membership.

I don't know if it was server error or what, but the sign-up page for Spunky Bee is again showing that you get 9 bonus sites with membership in Spunky Bee.

The membership price is the same (or lower) as at any of the other Tony Bucks sites. And if you join through Spunky Bee, you get the greatest number of bonus sites. Join through one of the other Tony Bucks sites, you will pay the same or higher membership, but get access to fewer bonus sites.

My guess is that the bonus membership offer that was not shown during the last few days was because of a server error, and not because the offer had been withdrawn.

But as Pat362 said, before signing up, it pays to be clear about what bonus sites you are getting or not getting.

The only Tony Bucks site you don't get as a bonus is the Twinkie Movies site (gay porn), which I hadn't even realized was a part of Tony Bucks.

If you haven't been a member before, I think there is enough content at the different sites to make joining at least once a worthwhile experience. A number of attractive teen models, mostly gentle hardcore sex, less gonzo style.

Visit Spunky Bee - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: No bonus sites currently included with membership?

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:39:38 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

06-07-11 10:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To lk2fireone (116):

I had joined through Spunky Bee before as well, after reading the previous comments about Teenburg being included, since I was more interested in TB than Spunky, but it was $10 cheaper. I got 9 sites with Spunky Bee, but there is definitely something different on that join page now. Seems like when I joined it, about 3 months ago, there was a box with the 9 included sites on it. Good content on this network, but I couldn't see paying that full price for any one of the sites without at least some access to the others.

View Thread (4)

RE: No bonus sites currently included with membership?

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:12:36 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

06-07-11 07:12pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To lk2fireone (116):

I also joined her site for the same reason but her site offered all the other sites on the join page. There is no way I would rejoin without that being made clear before I press the confirm transaction button.

View Thread (4)

RE: No bonus sites currently included with membership?

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:09:59 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

06-07-11 07:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To pat362 (235):

I'm guessing this is a temporary thing. I previously joined through Spunky Bee, because, like you say, it offered access to all the sites at Tony Bucks. The other sites cost the same amount, but all offered access to fewer sites in the network.

If Spunky Bee has truly become a stand-alone site, with no access to other sites in the network, then few people will join this site, I believe.

View Thread (4)

RE: No bonus sites currently included with membership?

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:01:36 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

06-07-11 07:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To lk2fireone (116):

The reason why I joined her site was because she was the only one offering all of the other sites. I just checked some of the other sites and they have different permutations of site included with one membership. There simply isn't enough content on Spunky's site to warrant the price she charges for her site as a stand alone.

View Thread (4)

Spunky Bee Comment

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:51:22 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

06-07-11 05:51pm

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

No bonus sites currently included with membership?

Normally, when you join one of the Tony Bucks sites, you get included with your membership access to at least a few of the other Tony Bucks sites. The number of bonus sites can vary, depending on which site you join through.

But currently, it appears that you get 0 bonus sites when joining Spunky Bee. If that is true, that makes the Spunky Bee site very expensive, considering the limited amount of content at this site, and the slow update rate.

When clicking on the sign-up page for Spunky Bee, I do not see any bonus sites listed.

Visit Spunky Bee - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:34:15 PDT

18 Stream (5)

04-15-11 10:34pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To careylowell (17):

"Can a tripod be an unaffordable luxury?"

I don't know if most guys shooting porn have discovered the tripod yet. But the videos at this site are less herky-jerky than at some sites which can almost give you motion sickness.

I gave you a positive trust rating on 02-19-09 with the following comment: "Good reviews, more recent ones with lots of details."

So I don't think there's anything wrong with your reviews. I think they provide a good flavor of the sites you write about (details and opinions beyond the basic site statistics).

But thanks for the thumbs up on my review.

And I also agree with your idea that most East European models are getting paid peanuts compared to what American models make. That's a good part of the reason why there was such an explosion of porn coming out of East Europe: the cheap production costs.

But what I am really thankful for is the number of physically attractive young models. Some of them are truly lovely. More on the softcore side, but a number in hardcore as well.

View Thread (7)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:28:13 PDT

18 Stream (5)

04-15-11 04:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by careylowell (17)

To lk2fireone (116):

I'd give the site a score somewhere in the mid-80s 'cause of the rawness to most vids. Can a tripod be an unaffordable luxury? I realize this amateur feel would be a plus in many rater's eyes, those who do not care for the overly polished flicks from the US. While I've not an iota of proof I suspect these gals are getting their love canals reamed for peanuts compared to an American porn starlet's takehome.
I can't think of another site where both genders are on display under the models section. Is this important? No, but its certainty unique in my experience.
I enjoyed yer bottom line cts and wish my own reviews were as well written.

View Thread (7)

RE: pat362's Review

Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:15:18 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

03-20-11 06:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (235)

To lk2fireone (116):

I agree that anal is not for everyone but I thought I should mention it since Abigaile and many of the models on the other sites have done iton a few sites. There is plenty of content to satisfy many people but I don't think this is a group of sites that requires a long term membership and I can't see myself rejoining in a year to get whatever they will have added since my last visit.

View Thread (2)

RE: pat362's Review

Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:26:50 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

03-20-11 11:26am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To pat362 (235):

I know there are anal fans out there, just like there are fans of feet, shoes, and almost everything else (including pee and snot and other kinks). The human mind is funny. I know it's different strokes for different folks, but anal doesn't make me all excited and tingly. Take it or leave it, as far as I'm concerned. Straight vaginal is plenty good for me.

I'm a current member here.

The update rate is very erratic.

View Thread (2)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sat, 05 Mar 2011 05:52:01 PST

Spunky Bee (2)

03-05-11 05:52am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To devmsr (0):

I don't know how many bonus sites Spunky Bee is currently offering, if any.

If you are interested in joining this site, you could send an email to tech support at Spunky Bee asking how many bonus sites are included with a membership to Spunky Bee.

I do know that at least some of the other sites in the network are offering additional bonus sites with a regular membership. You can get an idea of what bonus sites each one offers by going to the signup/join page for each individual site.

But the best way to check would be to send an email. Hopefully they would respond quickly with the information you want.

View Thread (8)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sat, 05 Mar 2011 02:48:58 PST

Spunky Bee (2)

03-05-11 02:48am

REVIEW REPLY by devmsr (0)

To lk2fireone (116):

does anyone know if this offer of 9 bonus sites still stands?

i have looked up spunkybee.com on a few review sites and not one of them shows spunkybee.com as having ANY bonus sites...

View Thread (8)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:54:03 PST

Teen Dorf (1)

01-22-11 04:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by mlanminh (2)

To lk2fireone (116):

I agree. Even though the videos are full hd, the picture quality is not very clear, color is too reddish and dark. Poor choice of camera angles, camera man opted not to clearly show intercourse scene in many cases. You

View Thread (1)

18 Stream Comment

Mon, 20 Dec 2010 07:19:59 PST

18 Stream (5)

12-20-10 07:19am

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

Really nice preview section option.

18stream site has a very nice preview section option that I wish more sites would offer.

In the public preview section, you get a large-sized thumbnail of each video in the site. The thumbnail usually gives you a good idea of what the model looks like. Even better, by clicking on the thumbnail, you get a free, 1-minute preview of the video, that gives you a good idea of the video quality (definition, clarity, and a very brief glimpse of the sex-action).

This is a wonderful way to give the prospective member a great idea of what the site contents are, and a good idea of what the models look like.

And site members can use the same previews as well, to help decide which videos they want to examine in greater detail.

Visit 18 Stream - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:00:29 PST

Teenamite (2)

11-09-10 10:00am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Denner (227):

Thanks for the kind words, Denner. And it would certainly be a lot easier, as well as cheaper, if all networks sold a general admission membership to all their sites (hopefully, for the same price they charge for membership to a single site, or a selected number of "bonus" sites).

But why would they want to make it easy on us paying customers? Their job (as they see it) is to try to grab as many dollars and euros as they can from our outstretched hands. That is the beauty of capitalism: helping people get rid of their filthy lucre. :)

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:53:07 PST

Teenamite (2)

11-09-10 09:53am

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To lk2fireone (116):

Thanks for the heads up. Pre checked cross selling makes me gnash my teeth. That's one more that doesn't get my money. Material is good, but no sale.

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:42:18 PST

Teenamite (2)

11-09-10 09:42am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To TheSquirrel (30):

Fuck Studies is part of the TeenMegaWorld network, or maybe it's called the Royal Cash network, or the Royal Cash network.

That network is a solid teen network.

If you do sign up for that network, be sure to look for the pre-checked trial that will sign you for a 3-day trial to some other site. That trial turns into a high-priced subscription to the other site unless you cancel if you are accidentally hooked into a subscription. There's no reason to get the trial, so make sure you uncheck the box.

Only a few of the sites in the TeenMegaWorld network are currently updating. But there is plenty of hardcore teen content to look through.

The navigation is poor, the search is poor. But you can't have everything.

There are some very sharp (good clarity, good definition) videos at this network (TeenMegaWorld). The action is almost all gonzo: 2 or more teens banging away. But you have a lot of good-looking teen girls at this network.

The above is talking about the TeenMegaWorld network, not the TonyBucks network of my review.

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:10:33 PST

Teenamite (2)

11-09-10 09:10am

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To lk2fireone (116):

Well done, another informative review. I am still tempted by this network. The Fuck Studies review by Pat also makes that network sound good. My comments on Messmer's Video Box review sums up how I feel at the moment. Not sure whether any site deserves my money. Doesn't sound like any dirty tricks on this network though.

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:00:09 PST

Teenamite (2)

11-09-10 09:00am

REVIEW REPLY by Lionheart (47)

To lk2fireone (116):

Wow, exceptional review. This is one of the most detailed reviews on the site, keep up the good work!

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:02:54 PST

Teenamite (2)

11-09-10 08:02am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To lk2fireone (116):

Thanks to lk2 for a damn fine review of another Tony Bucks-site...
Like lk2fireone states:
"What makes this site different from the other sites in the network? I don't know. Many of the sites are interchangeable. But as a marketing ploy, they put some videos in this site, some in a different site, and each site is supposed to have a different theme. You could put most of the TonyBucks videos into one giant site.............." (sorry I shortened it from here)

But guess that's a good point - these TB-sites has a lot in common - and guess with Teenburg as the top one, and than again maybe not.....

Still it would/could be somewhat great if TB, too - made a NETWORK-site (all included) - like so many others - at least it'd save us PUs some money...
And yes, lk2 - there's certainly some great material at those sites...

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:06:07 PST

Springtime Beauties (1)

11-07-10 02:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To lk2fireone (116):

I just thought I should let you know because I had thought MPV was updating, too, and they weren't, and I got burned. "Supposedly," indeed. I figure if one of us pays for the risk, and in this case I took it, and things turn out to be less satisfying than they were "supposed" to be, tell!

That little updater part of the My Precious Virgins homepage, I found, cannot be trusted. BTW, it currently says: "Updated Daily. Current Update: November 7, 2010."

Yeah sure. I got burned the last time. (What did I just say? "The LAST TIME!")

BTW it had never entered my mind to be critical of your review. I was just pitching in my words of caution, based on experience.

View Thread (3)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:54:08 PST

Springtime Beauties (1)

11-07-10 09:54am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks for the update on My Precious Virgins. I'm not perfect, but I try to be generally factual in my reviews. So I wrote in the review: "Or choose the My Precious Virgins site, which has a similar photo style, and is supposed to be currently updating."

I did not know if they were currently updating, which for many smaller sites can be an on-or-off proposition, which is why I wrote the "supposed to be currently updating."

But since you were a recent member, you have the facts to back you up.

Also, a large part of my reviews are personal opinions. So even though I gave the SpringTime Beauties site a low score, someone else might find the site to be a much better value or experience.

Sometimes, when you read movie reviews by "major" film critics, you wonder if they are writing about the same movie, when they can score the same movie so differently, both high and low.

View Thread (3)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:29:55 PST

Springtime Beauties (1)

11-07-10 09:29am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To lk2fireone (116):

Yeah, this site stopped updating while I was in the middle of a membership, in Jan 2009 (as you noted).

Be careful with My Precious Virgins. I was last a member there a few short months ago and it had stopped updating, too. Besides that, they'd left unfixed a bunch of webmastering mistakes, such as not thumbs but full images in some of the gallery preview pages, making them slow or impossible to load and very dicey for viewing (scroll right, scroll right, scroll right ...).

Just because there's a script (or a real person) behind that latest update date at MPV doesn't mean they're updating. I fell for that. Let me be the last to.

View Thread (3)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:54:42 PDT

Teen Burg (2)

10-26-10 08:54am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To lk2fireone (116):

Fine/great review, lk2 - and I got to say VERY thorough!

Been at Teen Burg and other of the US Tony Bucks-sites at least a couple of times earlier - one thing, though: I'd never forget that the material is based on providers - a lot the same as other so called easteuro pornsites, like TeenSexMoves ect. from that Cyrups Co. - but still Teen Burg has a lot to offer in cute models - AND I quite agree on your score....

BTW: Really dig that: "This is the town where I should have grown up" - even if it's only a dream - and in an easteuro place/country where most porn production is now controlled by the mob...But we, PUs - can still enjoy those cute models far away from the dirt... LOL.

View Thread (3)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:45 PDT

Teen Burg (2)

10-26-10 06:27am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To TheSquirrel (30):

If you do decide to join the TonyBucks network, check to see which site offers you the best deal. Joining through Teen Burg gives you 6 bonus sites. Joining through Spunky Bee gives you 9 bonus sites, for the same price. The Spunky Bee membership includes the Teen Burg site and almost all the TonyBucks sites.

The models at this network are the standard Eastern European models. Not any skinnier than usual. There are even a few girls that have breasts that are medium to large sized. But most have the smaller breasts that are grown in the wilds of Eastern Europe. :)

View Thread (3)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:51:34 PDT

Teen Burg (2)

10-26-10 05:51am

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To lk2fireone (116):

Thanks for the comprehensive review IK - this is one of the sites I have been pondering over whether to join. It sounds like a good possibility. Only thing that puts me off a little, is that teen shouldn't always mean thin. There are teens around with a good figure. It seems Teenburg have never heard about puppy fat, because most of the models do look like they need a good meal. Okay, I'm being picky again. Looks like a reasonable site.

View Thread (3)

RE: Site has zip files for photosets.

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:47:37 PDT

Teen Burg (2)

10-19-10 11:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by TonyBucks (Webmaster)

To lk2fireone (116):

lk2fireone, thank you very much for your reviews!

We will change zip file feature asap so that members will not be confused saving files. Thank you for pointing that out!

Cheers,
Tony

View Thread (1)

Teen Burg Comment

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:22:34 PDT

Teen Burg (2)

10-19-10 05:22pm

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

Site has zip files for photosets.

TBP states site does not have zip files for photosets.

Photosets do have a zip file, you just have to know how to find it.

There is a single zip file for each photoset (only 1 size of photo to download).

First, select a photoset you want to download from the general index page, or from the listing for the photosets for that model. Go to the page for the photoset you want to download. Select the "VIEW High Quality Pictures" hot link. That brings up a new page, which has pictures from the photoset of that model. Select the "Download full archive" hot link. Your computer will save the zip file with the filename "all.zip".

You will need to rename the file before you download another photoset zip, or you risk overwriting the previous zip file you downloaded (unless you have changed the location you are downloading to, or have moved the previous zip file from the selected download target folder, or have changed the name of the zip file you are downloading from the default name).

Sorry for the bit about overwriting the previous "all.zip" file. Most of you already know that. :)

Visit Teen Burg - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen Dorf Comment

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:20:05 PDT

Teen Dorf (1)

10-17-10 05:20pm

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

Contents are dated.

TBP states the content is not dated. But each file (video or photoset) is listed with the day and month it was posted to the site. Also, the files are listed in reverse chronological order at the site, listing each file from newest to oldest in that order.

Visit Teen Dorf - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 03:52:01 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

10-15-10 03:52am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (103)

To lk2fireone (116):

Thanks for the extra info lk2fireone.

View Thread (8)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 03:25:40 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

10-15-10 03:25am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To tangub (103):

No zips for springtimebeauties is still the case.
I like photos, but the ones I like are the high quality that you find at metart, justteensite, mplstudios, etc. The photos here at springtimebeauties are much lower quality (with no zips). So even if the site had zips, in spite of the cute models, I would not save these photos. That's just me. Because the photos are low quality, in my opinion.

Edit01: I also like a small amount of photoshopping, because I think it makes the models look better. But there is no photoshopping in these photos. You see all the freckles and moles and whatever on these girls. I just like a little glossier appearance.

They do have some very yummy models, though. Thanks for mentioning the site. :)

View Thread (8)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:51:43 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

10-15-10 02:51am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (103)

To lk2fireone (116):

Thanks for an interesting review. On checking out the bonus sites here the preview of the one called Spring time Beauties caught my eye with lots of cute models but on checking out Drooler's review of it from 2 years ago seeing "No Zips" listed in the cons means i will probably give it a miss. Have you checked out this site and is "No zips" still the case.

View Thread (8)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:18:36 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

10-12-10 08:18am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To lk2fireone (116):

lk2......sincerely thanks for this info/update - about network/which site/sites...(sorry, did not remember the comment in question).
The above is really a great help - not only for this user - but for PUs in general - to get the best deal for our money.
Great input.

View Thread (8)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:41:07 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

10-12-10 07:41am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Denner (227):

Denner, I explained this in a comment before, but if you do choose to join this network, it can make a difference which site you join through.

For the last month or more, the network has been offering bonus sites when you join any one of their sites.

For most sites, the 1 month membership is $29.95.
To join the 18 stream site the 1 month membership is $34.95.

With all the the different memberships, you can get a different number of bonus sites. By different memberships, I mean which specific site you choose to join through.

If you choose the 18 stream, you pay $34.95 and get 2 bonus sites.
If you choose the SpunkyBee, you pay $29.95 and get 9 bonus sites.

One of the bonus sites included when you join through SpunkyBee is the 18 Stream site.

If you join through other sites in the network, you pay $29.95 and get less than 9 bonus sites (maybe 6 or less bonus sites).

So join through the SpunkyBee site, you pay $29.95, and get full access to 10 of the network sites.

That is the based on what I see being offered currently. The network can change their offerings in the future. But that is what has been offered for the past month and more.

The network said it would end the special bonuses over a month ago, then they extended the offer by 2 weeks, then they extended the offer by 2 more weeks. That I know of. They might have been extending it in the past that I don't know about.

View Thread (8)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:31:26 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

10-12-10 06:31am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To lk2fireone (116):

FINE review, lk2...., thanks.
Never seen this site before - did not know the girl/model.
But she sure looks cute/sweet at the preview...
A good hint for the list of a possible joining...

View Thread (8)

RE: Warning: No recent updates at site.

Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:38:50 PDT

Spunky Bee (2)

10-04-10 10:38am

COMMENT REPLY by TonyBucks (Webmaster)

To lk2fireone (116):

Thank you for your attention lk2fireone!

I am back from my vacation and now we update site often! You may see my new sets in different styles and also my sex with guys ;)

Also you have free access to all Tonybucks sites for the whole time of your subscription so it worth paying. Excuse me my English :)

Luv,
Bee

View Thread (1)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:54:07 PDT

Rough 18 (1)

09-25-10 09:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (92)

To lk2fireone (116):

Curious, I never had any problems downloading from any of this company's sites. Perhaps the files were so big your connection timed out after a while, I dunno. Partial WMV downloads sometimes work for me...

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 05:03:37 PDT

Rough 18 (1)

09-25-10 05:03am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To slutty (92):

slutty, the reason I gave the site an extra-low score was because I could not see a lot of the material. I need to download the video file before I can view it. And after downloading a couple of video files, I was not able to download any complete files because the download would stop after downloading about 1 GB (the file would be incomplete). And you can't play a partial file, you need the entire file to unzip it to get a playable file. So my experience with this site was very frustrating.

Obviously, if you did not encounter the problems I did (made worse by my slow DSL download speed of 150 KB/s), then you would score the site higher than I did.

But like I mentioned elsewhere, a site score can depend a lot on the personal experience you (or I) have with that site.

I would be interested in reading your review of this site, or any of the other sites in this network. That would also give PU members further information on the sites, that could be helpful.

There are definitely some good-looking models at this network.

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sat, 25 Sep 2010 03:00:49 PDT

Rough 18 (1)

09-25-10 03:00am

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (92)

To lk2fireone (116):

Hey man, interesting review. I actually kind of liked some of the material on this site, probably just cause I thought the Flora model was cute. I agree the site navigation is poor, but it is consitent with all of the network sites. And the site is small. But I think it was kind of nice to have a somewhat "lighter" BDSM site, instead of the crazy rought stuff you often see - or at least in the scenes I downloaded. Also, in my experience scenes from sites in this niche often run quite long.

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 04:33:16 PDT

Rough 18 (1)

09-19-10 04:33am

REVIEW REPLY by RustyJ (116)

To lk2fireone (116):

Great review that made me laugh! Too bad the site wasn't as high quality as the review ;)

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:01:35 PDT

Rough 18 (1)

09-18-10 11:01am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Denner (227):

Thanks for the support, Denner. I wanted to download a few videos from the site to see what they were like. But as I said in this review, I can't currently download a complete video file. And a partial file is not playable. That is why I gave the site an extra-low score.

There are other sites in the network that are much better.

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:04:24 PDT

Rough 18 (1)

09-18-10 10:04am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To lk2fireone (116):

Another fine review from lk2.
No matter if you're a fan of BDSM or not - this is still one of the Tony Bucks sites - AND I think lk2fireone has made an exceptional fine review here - AND what to avoid...simple as that...

View Thread (6)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:39:26 PDT

18 Stream (5)

09-17-10 02:39pm

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (92)

To lk2fireone (116):

I went the spunkybee route that you recommended, seemed like the best offer.

combative was the word I meant, I am a typo king.

View Thread (7)

RE: Special offer extended.

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:06:57 PDT

18 Stream (5)

09-17-10 06:06am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To lk2fireone (116):

Well, lk2 - with that dl speed the 3-days trials are not attractive, agree - man, do really consider a faster connection.

About the exclusive - I think it has to be a matter licensed material - I've seen a lot of those vids elsewhere at some russian or other easteuro sites - and I guees even at the S&S Royal Limited (Teensexmovs, Teensexmania ect.)

But no matter: I also agree here - generally quite a lot of attractive models...

View Thread (5)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:35:24 PDT

18 Stream (5)

09-17-10 01:35am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To slutty (92):

slutty, I took it as a compliment that you basically agreed with my review. I did not intend my reply as showing any disagreement. I just tend to ramble a lot, and sometimes people read into my words ideas I did not mean at all. You did not come off as compative (though I am not really sure what compative means).

There's a lot of the network I haven't seen myself. Or downloaded.

I assume you joined the network through the spunkybee site? Or did you find another site with a better offer?

View Thread (7)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:12:14 PDT

18 Stream (5)

09-17-10 01:12am

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (92)

To lk2fireone (116):

I agree that scoring is very subjective, and I wasn't intending to throw it out there as a disagreement with you, that was just my opinion of the network so far - sorry if I came off as compative. I have been pleasantly surprised so far, and there are a good number of models I hadn't ever seen before. The outdoor sex site and light bondage site are both pretty decent as well.

I haven't downloaded a huge amount of stuff from here yet, but I'll have to check out Klara.

View Thread (7)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:45:10 PDT

18 Stream (5)

09-17-10 12:45am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To slutty (92):

There is a model named Klara at this site that is also called Aurita and Vera at the site. She started in porn maybe a year ago, and is appearing on a lot of different sites in both softcore and hardcore, at TeenMegaWorld network, Nubiles, and other sites. I think she even has 1 photoset at Met-art. I find her very attractive, and her videos at this site are among the best of the site. You might want to check her videos out at this site.

There are two other models named Klara at this site. I thought the video of the model named Klara with only one video at this site, listed as "Kaspar and Klara on video", that downloads as 252.wmv, is a good video.

I think that scoring a site is very subjective, and the score itself is only a very general opinion. Just like one critic might think a movie is excellent while another critic thinks the movie is just good or just OK, or possibly a waste of time, people will find different values in a porn site.

I gave the site a very high score because I liked the way the girls were treated with respect or affection instead of being treated as sluts or whores like many gonzo videos show.

But someone else could give the site a score of 80 or even 70 and I
wouldn't really disagree with their score, because that is their opinion.

I could have given the site a score of 80 myself, with no problem. I know that PU/TBP appears to believe a score represents something solid, but I do not. When I read a review, I am less interested in the score, which is a very general guide of the reviewer's opinion, than in the details of the review, what the person likes and dislikes about the site.

As far as acting as a possible guide to my joining the site, a lot depends on whether my tastes agree with the reviewer's. Many sites that get very high scores are not sites I would ever join, because I don't like the content of the sites.

I agree that navigation is not perfect. But I have a slow DSL connection, and what really helps me is having nice-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like. That makes it much easier for me to decide whether to view the video. At other sites in the network, there is no good-sized thumbnail, so I have to try streaming, which sucks for me with slow DSL, and some sites don't even have streaming. With no streaming, then I have to download the video, which can easily take two hours or more. So that's why I said the navigation is good, because for me, it's so much better than what some of the other sites have.

View Thread (7)

RE: lk2fireone's Review

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:04:25 PDT

18 Stream (5)

09-17-10 12:04am

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (92)

To lk2fireone (116):

Good review man.

I would say, that while the navigation is better than the rest of the network, it isn't exactly good (different models listed under same name, same model listed under different names, etc.). There are also some duplicate scenes across the network. Also, download speeds are a bit inconsistent for my tastes.

All the same, I agree with most of your points, I'd probably score it a smidge lower - maybe 86 or something including the bonus sites.

I agree that the material is definitely better than most euro sites, and plenty of American ones.

View Thread (7)