PU - Digibros Productions s.r.o. - All Activity

RE: Beware! Dissatisfied/Can't get in

Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:04:27 PDT

Cute Panty Girls (1)

08-06-08 11:04pm

COMMENT REPLY by MargulisAZ (64)

To joel (0):

That's odd. You know, when I was a member of Paulmarkhamteens I had that happen to me on occasion. It seemed that there were two different kind of log in screens, and if it was a certain one it always worked, where as the other one never worked. Frustrating to be sure.

View Thread (1)

Cute Panty Girls Comment

Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:02:49 PDT

Cute Panty Girls (1)

08-06-08 09:02pm

COMMENT by joel (0)

Beware! Dissatisfied/Can't get in

Had more than one evening that I couldn't log on. Even if you click "remember password", this website erases it EVERY TIME. Then, it makes you type in your password manually 3 or 4 times, sometimes cutting you off saying "Too many access attempts from this computer. Contact customer support." Problem is, there is no support link outside the member's area! Content is not great either, many sets I've seen before, and not very big, even with the bonus sites.

Visit Cute Panty Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:13:03 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

02-20-08 03:13pm

REVIEW REPLY by Marianna (40)

To WeeWillyWinky (70):

nice site!

View Thread (4)

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:15:25 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

12-20-07 04:15am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To WeeWillyWinky (70):

And there's another one: Daisy Beach. They have 3 pic sizes up to 3000px and a lot of panty/almost-nude. Personally, I hated it for this reason, but you might like it. It's never been reviewed so far.

View Thread (4)

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:32:45 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

12-20-07 02:32am

REVIEW REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (70)

To Drooler (156):

Thanks. I'll have a look.

View Thread (4)

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:43:27 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

12-20-07 01:43am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To WeeWillyWinky (70):

Since you like girls in panties, you ought to check out nextdoor-models (put w's in front, .com at end). I've been there a couple of times myself and the pics are at 1800px. Thing is, I prefer nudity, and there wasn't that much -- though a small percentage of the galleries, especially of Riley Shy and Amy Reid, got hot and naked.

View Thread (4)

Cute Panty Girls Comment

Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:36:27 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

12-19-07 06:36pm

COMMENT by WeeWillyWinky (70)

apologies

I shouldn't have said the pics are mostly second-rate. I think I'm getting jaded from all the stuff I've seen and the tremendous availability of this kind of material.

The truth is, this would be an excellent place to start for someone who's interested in the panty/lingerie niche and hasn't had a lot of experience on the net.

Visit Cute Panty Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Not non-nude

Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:07:02 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

12-13-07 04:07am

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (108)

To WeeWillyWinky (70):

thanks a lot for youre indeed specific answer. i think i won`t try that site mainly because of the non exclusive point

View Thread (3)

RE: Not non-nude

Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:34:48 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

12-13-07 12:34am

COMMENT REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (70)

To ace of aces (108):

Hi ace of aces,

Vids first, since that is most people's main interest:

I've only been a member for two days, but so far I've downloaded about a dozen or so vids. Two are long, good-quality (640x480,2000 kbps) handjob scenes where the only panty content is about thirty seconds in the beginning. Both clips are over eleven minutes long; two of the vids are lower quality (320x240,705 kbps) masturbation clips where the panties stay on, both about ten minutes long; then there's a very good quality (768x576, 2009 kbps) masturbation vid with toy which runs three minutes; there are also a few mild spanking vids here of fairly low to middling quality. There's a couple teaser vids and a stripping/interview vid. This is definitely a softcore site and NOT a non-nude site. It seems to me that it's a grab-bag of various types of content with panties figuring somewhere in the mix. Some of the material looks familiar, like the handjob vids, but I can't place them. There are lots of vids here and by the looks of the thumb-links there is more than likely more masturbation. As for the pics, same thing: a lot of the sets are similar to the ATK/Teen-Flood type of softcore: full nudity, occasional masturbation/toy stuff. The material is not exclusive, as I am sure I've seen quite a few sets at other sites. Again, the quality is hit and miss. Most of it is negligible.

View Thread (3)

RE: Not non-nude

Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:07:55 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

12-12-07 04:07am

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (108)

To WeeWillyWinky (70):

do you know if they have softcore content? (mastrubating etc. or only teasing?)

View Thread (3)

Cute Panty Girls Comment

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:23:37 PST

Cute Panty Girls (1)

12-11-07 11:23pm

COMMENT by WeeWillyWinky (70)

Not non-nude

I've just done a quick scan through the 47 pages of sets here and most of them contain nudity. The vids seem to be mostly non-nude (though some of the vidcapped thumb-links show nudity), but the pic sets aren't.

Visit Cute Panty Girls - View Replies - Add Reply