PU - NetZ Inc. - All Activity

RE: My "Comment" about this site.

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:37:33 PDT

Babysitter Pass (0)

10-19-11 12:37pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To TheBlueDot (0):

I wish you would have posted a comment prior to joining because I could have told you that the site isn't worth a dollar. This is all leased material and a lot of it is a few years old or more.

View Thread (2)

RE: My "Comment" about this site.

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:51:21 PDT

Babysitter Pass (0)

10-18-11 05:51pm

COMMENT REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To TheBlueDot (0):

Thanks for the warning. This would be a site I'd consider joining but I'll be more cautious now.

View Thread (2)

Babysitter Pass Comment

Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:37:37 PDT

Babysitter Pass (0)

10-18-11 04:37pm

COMMENT by TheBlueDot (0)

My "Comment" about this site.

They did have a video or two from stars that I like, that I haven't seen anywhere else. I.e. Nicole Ray, Lexi Belle, Dani Cole, Amai Liu, Niki Rhodes.

The so called Network of sites; exploitedbabysitters.com, momdadandababysitter.com, and creamedbabysitters.com are dead. No updates since 9/30/10. And today is 10-17-11.

I got suckered in for the month plan. At least I got video with stars I like, but the quantity and quality of the videos suck. Learn from me, don't even think about joining. Heck I took a chance, but they really should just shut these sites down.

Visit Babysitter Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: elonlybuster's Review

Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:05:35 PDT

Exploited Babysitters (0)

09-02-08 04:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To elonlybuster (39):

Thanks for the input. It is very helpful. There are several models on the site that appear everywhere, but I suspect that the videos of them on this site are exclusive just by the genre.

I'm thinking about dropping $25 when I can schedule my time to do a 100% drain of all videos in one month. Shouldn't be hard if they have only 50-60 vids.

View Thread (3)

RE: elonlybuster's Review

Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:25:17 PDT

Exploited Babysitters (0)

09-02-08 03:25am

REVIEW REPLY by elonlybuster (39)

To Monahan (37):

My subscription was a few months ago (almost a half year if not more) so I didn't feel completely right stating that information because some sites have sudden changes to attract more people. But at the time of my subscription as far as I could tell the girls are exclusive. I've never seen any of them on any other sites, but at the same time there was nothing stating that you'd only see the girls here.

The amount of videos was about 50, which is a decent number. The quality is nothing special, just expect to see a bumpy camera every so often.
And this was a full subscription, but it was only active for about a week before I canceled my subscription, which actually was very smooth.

Again I apologize for the lack of information in the original review, but as I said my subscription was a good time ago so this information I did not feel completely right in posting as some sites go through changes and updates for the better.

View Thread (3)

RE: elonlybuster's Review

Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:46:43 PDT

Exploited Babysitters (0)

09-01-08 01:46pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To elonlybuster (39):

Looks like, from the preview, this site has a good quantity of good looking babes doing fun stuff. I can deal with the chatter (I tend to turn the sound off during the sex scenes because there's usually nothing worth listening to).

1. Are the videos all exclusive? (I'm guessing they are by the nature of your comments.)
2. Can you estimate the number of models/videos on the site?
3. Did you sign up for the 7 day trial before you went for the full deal? If so was it as restricted as was reported in an earlier review?

View Thread (3)

RE: grokal's Review

Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:56:43 PST

Exploited Babysitters (0)

12-08-07 04:56am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To grokal (1):

Thanks for the warning about the trial. Sorry you had to take one for the team!

View Thread (1)