PU - Class Media - All Activity

RE: selphy's Review

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:07:18 PST

Oldje (4)

02-12-12 09:07am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To selphy (15):

Considering about 250 quality videos are on the site, I would have no complaints. That is a lot, when you take into account that this is a niche that is catered to by very few sites. While I have not joined this site, by its reputation and your positive comments, I am sure I would give it a higher score.

View Thread (4)

RE: selphy's Review

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:10:54 PST

Oldje (4)

02-07-12 12:10am

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (92)

To selphy (15):

Nice review, and I agree with almost all of your points. At this stage I wonder why they even bother with the RealMedia crap, I thought the same thing when I was a member here.

View Thread (4)

RE: selphy's Review

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:09:17 PST

Oldje (4)

02-06-12 12:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by selphy (15)

To Denner (227):

Thanks for your comment.
When I rate a site, at the first, I usually observe the price/quality.
In this case the overall quality is low: I think that you have to upgrade ALL the old files you store on your server, otherwise (if you want to sell the content of the site at 30 euro) you have to offer more (bonus site, other Parent sites...).
They have more than 400 videos, but about 150 are not usable.
The content of the site is 85, the vids quality is 45...., the average is about my rate ...:)

View Thread (4)

RE: selphy's Review

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:46:48 PST

Oldje (4)

02-05-12 08:46am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To selphy (15):

Fine review, fine update for this rather special site..

But when that's said - I do not agree with the score (no big deal: the score is personal) - but still: this site is certainly one of a kind.

Some of my favorite stash is from this site - and even the material from way back when the vids-quality was close to lousy - and in the terrible Real Media.

Today the content is simply great - but agree with one very significant item:

The site should definitely UPGRADE/reedit the old vids!!!

View Thread (4)

Oldje Comment

Sat, 12 Nov 2011 01:11:11 PST

Oldje (4)

11-12-11 01:11am

COMMENT by Oswaldo (0)

Over priced

Ok I got Class 3some included but for 26GBP this site is not worth the money despite there being some really gorgeous babes on it. some of this stuff is on Beauty and The Senior which is cheaper and real player only for the first 30 pages or so is a non-starter though they now use WM player. No zip files for photos though class 3 some does-small selection of photos too. I got sucked in by the attractive home pages of both, no way I would renew my membership.

Visit Oldje - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: pat362's Review

Thu, 02 Dec 2010 07:35:52 PST

Oldje (4)

12-02-10 07:35am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To pat362 (235):

Look forward to the review of ferro...
And yes, over a long period that kind of good material in Oldje (especially those great teen-models, of course) has spoken for the site - it's hard to find anything close.........and too bad about updates, again - because they really did/do have some fine content regarding even well known top teen models doing that special deal at Oldje...got my vast amount of Oldje saved - and keep going back to it from time to time.

View Thread (9)

RE: pat362's Review

Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:43:01 PST

Oldje (4)

12-01-10 06:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (235)

To Denner (227):

I don't think I'll be back anytime soon and that's becaue I don't think they update all that much anymore. I haven't seen a new update since I joined them. Sadly I can't find many other site that do as good a job as Oldje. I joined ferro network last week so you should see a review very soon. They have a couple of sites in their network that deal with a similar subject.

View Thread (9)

RE: pat362's Review

Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:47:08 PST

Oldje (4)

12-01-10 06:47am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To pat362 (235):

Missed this review at first - but now:

Very fine work here, pat!
As a former member twice, I think you come around the best possible way at both pros and cons...(bottom line, too.)

And about the cons - that's really where the WM or owners should take a look - they might learn something - here's four VERY essential cons - if they'd take care of those, this could be close to a top site...

View Thread (9)

RE: pat362's Review

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:29:34 PST

Oldje (4)

11-26-10 02:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (235)

To mbaya (344):

I guess they probably have at least half of oldje's video. It might be worth it for someone who likes the content but doesn't want to pay the cost Oldje is charging.

View Thread (9)

RE: pat362's Review

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 04:26:47 PST

Oldje (4)

11-26-10 04:26am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To pat362 (235):

I am not a member at the moment. However, when I wrote my review last December there were 160 videos.When TBP updated the site facts on 8/28/10 they counted 182.

View Thread (9)

RE: pat362's Review

Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:10:44 PST

Oldje (4)

11-25-10 06:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (235)

To mbaya (344):

I know they have some of oldje's content but no way of knowing just how much. Do you know how many videos are at beauty and the senior?

View Thread (9)

RE: pat362's Review

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:18:46 PST

Oldje (4)

11-24-10 11:18pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To pat362 (235):

I loved beautyandthesenior. I just checked the current price, which is $19.94. A great deal for almost or maybe even the same content.

View Thread (9)

RE: slutty's Review

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:11:06 PST

Class 3Some (2)

11-23-10 03:11pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To slutty (92):

Another solid review.

View Thread (1)

RE: pat362's Review

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:02:02 PST

Oldje (4)

11-22-10 02:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (235)

To lk2fireone (116):

Thanks lk2fireone.

I've added some info on the bonus site. I would have prefered if the site was cheaper that 30 Euros but I almost never use pricing in my score. I noticed that a lot of oldje's content also appears on beatyandthesenior.com. If anyone likes the oldnyoung fetish but doesn't want to pay as much then that site might be of interest to someone.

View Thread (9)

RE: pat362's Review

Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:14:24 PST

Oldje (4)

11-22-10 01:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To pat362 (235):

Nice review, covers what seems to be the main points.

Two main strikes against the site for me:
1. Site seems very expensive at around $38/month.
2. I'm not into young-old fetish.

There are other cons you noted, but the high price alone is a deal-breaker for me. Unless there was a lot of really excellent content that was easily accessible, I can't see paying that much money. There are plenty of good sites that cost far less.

You didn't mention bonus sites. With a membership, is this the main or only site? Or do you get access to a bunch of other sites as well?

I know I'm spoiled, but paying $20/month for Met-art, which is a mega-site, makes paying for a smaller site seem very expensive. I like some video network sites, but paying for a limited 1-site membership, unless that site is exceptional, is a poor use of my porn dollars.

View Thread (9)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:29:45 PDT

Oldje (4)

06-07-10 06:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (22)

To pinkerton (30):

Thanks for your reply, pinkerton. I think your tastes and mine simply differ, which is fine of course. I don't think I was unfair, since tastes and opinions do differ. Price was not the main reason I gave it a low score, but rather for the other reasons I stated. If you look at my profile and my other reviews, you'll see what I personally am looking for and did not find at oldje, despite its uniqueness and potential. Anyway, thanks for your reply!

View Thread (8)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:24:44 PDT

Oldje (4)

06-07-10 01:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by pinkerton (30)

To BabyGetReal (22):

Hmmm, I think you've been a bit unfair on the content of this site.

I've seen much of the content of this site and I have to say I was quite impressed at how (ironically) fresh it seemed, probably because the guys were less "stunt cock" than found in a standard porn site, and I must admit I found the sight of a gorgeous young woman sucking and fucking a much older guy to be a real turn-on.

In most of the vids the guy does pay the girl(s) a lot of oral attention and there are are more 69s and longer-duration clit-licking than in most other sites. I can't say I found the sex boring and repetitive, but some of the scenes are quite humourous, esp. one outdoor scene where just after the guy cums on her face, a cat walks up and curls by her head. Priceless!

I particularly liked the scenes (with Lucky and with Suzy Diamond - yes there are a few porn regulars here, Claudia Rossi, Patricia whateverhernameis and Jennifer Stone) where the girl is getting fucked lying flat on her belly.

The cumshots aren't as impressive as your average site but many of them are good, check out "The Wine Bar" scene for example.

If I was a current member I'd probably review and rate it 78% or more, but as you mention in your review, it is very expensive at around 30 euro, so maybe that's why you rated it quite low.

View Thread (8)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Thu, 27 May 2010 02:55:19 PDT

Oldje (4)

05-27-10 02:55am

REVIEW REPLY by Gazette Risque (49)

To BabyGetReal (22):

They could certainly benefit from a search engine or some kind of search mechanism.
As for the video I recommended. It's mostly the angles that did it for me. Still nothing really special but I just thought I'd share my findings.

Too bad you didn't like it very much but not really a surprise as it's hard to find a really good video there ;)

View Thread (8)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Wed, 26 May 2010 17:54:05 PDT

Oldje (4)

05-26-10 05:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (22)

To Gazette Risque (49):

Dear magaman, Thanks for your comments and for naming a title that you like. I downloaded that one too. (It is laborious to find a specific title since there is no search mechanism provided at Oldje, and you can't even use the browser's find to look for a word in the title on the current page -- since the title is in a graphic!) Sorry, but there's nothing in "Working Girl" that seems better to me than in the others I've checked from Oldje. Anyway, I do appreciate your feedback!

View Thread (8)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Tue, 25 May 2010 07:52:51 PDT

Oldje (4)

05-25-10 07:52am

REVIEW REPLY by Gazette Risque (49)

To BabyGetReal (22):

Great review. You certainly make some very good points.

The fake cumshots is what bothers me the most about the site. Sure the acting is terrible but I've seen worse... The communication between the actors and director is obviously what's killing this site.

A while ago I finally found a video that I kept. Well, I kept many but this one I actually like so I recommend it ;)

Working Girl is what the video is called. I still have some issues with some of the angles in this clip and the acting and actor. But it's worth a watch in my opinion.

Anyway, great review!

View Thread (8)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Mon, 24 May 2010 20:09:30 PDT

Oldje (4)

05-24-10 08:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (22)

To Belthazar (0):

Dear Belthazar, I really, really do appreciate your recommendations of specific titles -- something that too few PU reviewers bother to do. I downloaded and watched all of your recommended titles. I am sorry to say that none of them changed my opinion or seemed to me to deviate from the ~30 I had already seen. In "Burglar is paying" I agree that she is a little more real and less passionless than most, with some really nice hip movements, but still the woman seems in the main unresponsive -- just there to please the man. None of the women at Oldje seem genuinely horny or able to get real satisfaction from these men. The woman in "Hot seduction in the snow" was especially beautiful in the high-resolution of that video, and I saved that one even though she was unresponsive. Thanks for the titles!

View Thread (8)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Sat, 22 May 2010 18:06:12 PDT

Oldje (4)

05-22-10 06:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by Belthazar (0)

To BabyGetReal (22):

This site really works for me, because i like old guys with young ladies even if I am 33 years old. I understand that every man has different taste. I have about 120 vids from this site, so i will post some titles i think worth.
Girls - many of them are European experienced pornstars
Men - I recognized only one or two former pornstars
Fake cumshots - quite common even in mainstream porn industry :) - in My little secretary with a wett pussy.. - You can clearly see girl loading her mouth with water mixed with sugar.
Titles i like: Tall and Mini, Hot seduction in the snow, Crazy sex obsessed bitch, Apples of desire, Hot Car Wash, Burglar is paying, At the garbage dump, Students Enquiry, Extra Lessons etc.

View Thread (8)

RE: BabyGetReal's Review

Fri, 21 May 2010 19:13:38 PDT

Oldje (4)

05-21-10 07:13pm

REVIEW REPLY by BabyGetReal (22)

To BabyGetReal (22):

This is a continuation of my review because I ran out of room:

There were a couple of videos where I found the teasing and foreplay erotic (sunny side of noise, puzzle of lust) but once the sex started, it was boring and passionless.

The site has a large number of videos (29 pages with ~20/page, so at least several hundred). After downloading 30 and finding them very consistently unerotic, I ran out of patience and quit. I was hoping to find the occasional exception with chemistry, fun, arousal, orgasms, horny girls, but didn't. If someone else found such videos at this site, please tell me the TITLES -- I still have 28 days left of my subscription!

View Thread (8)

Oldje Comment

Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:45:18 PDT

Oldje (4)

06-14-09 07:45am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

Updates?????

Been a member for about three week here - and in that time:
No updates!!!

So now you know - I cancelled - and if they still have no updates before my membership expires - I'll be back with a change of my review of the site - TOO bad, because the content is overall pretty good, but concerning updates....lousy.

Visit Oldje - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:17:49 PDT

Oldje (4)

06-03-09 09:17am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Denner (227):

Thanks, Denner. I missed that "no bonus sites!"

View Thread (3)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:43:39 PDT

Oldje (4)

06-03-09 05:43am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To messmer (123):

Hey messmer - well, I thought so too - but none of them are included as bonus-sites (my loing/password didn't work at any of them) - so I put "no bonus-sites" in cons...

View Thread (3)

RE: Denner's Review

Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:59:02 PDT

Oldje (4)

06-02-09 12:59pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Denner (227):

Nice detailed review, Denner. I went to take the tour and saw 11 other sites listed on the top left of the page. Are they part of the deal or would you have to subscribe to those separately? Thanks.

View Thread (3)

RE: tikkit's Review

Sun, 31 May 2009 09:35:33 PDT

Oldje (4)

05-31-09 09:35am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To tikkit (3):

Fine review, tikkit - just remembered this site - and along with Droolers earlier preview - this one helps a lot....

View Thread (2)

RE: tikkit's Review

Thu, 21 May 2009 00:22:07 PDT

Oldje (4)

05-21-09 12:22am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To tikkit (3):

Probably the scenes are short because the Viagra wears off?

View Thread (2)

RE: Drooler's Review

Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:13:37 PST

Oldje (4)

03-02-09 05:13am

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks. And, yes, I've had bad experience with McAfee, too. McAfee has a worse effect on program performance than most viruses.

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:23:07 PST

Oldje (4)

02-28-09 02:23pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Jay G (63):

It's about $39 US, approximately. That's at 1.27 euros to the dollar. I tried to find out exactly what I'd been charged at my credit card website, but I've run into snags.

And that's a long story. I'll cut to the lesson: Don't use McAfee (or "McFuckafee," as I now call it.) for your anti-virus. I've been regretting that all this month.

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:49:49 PST

Oldje (4)

02-28-09 01:49pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To mbaya (344):

First question: No.

"How long" question: Segment length varies a lot. Samples:
6:30, 13:54, 9:30, 7:03, 4:11, 12:40

WMV quality question: Kbps on the WMVs varies a lot, too. Samples:
4157, 3496, 3321, 7509, 3674, 2538, 2873. These begin with some of the most recent end with a couple from when they started doing WMVs.

That's about all I can give in quality stats. I'm not fluent in "video."

Some of us here pay in Euros directly, so I really couldn't factor in price that much, though my score for it isn't quite as high as some.

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:16:29 PST

Oldje (4)

02-28-09 01:16pm

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To Drooler (218):

Another very entertaining review. I've been tempted before, but never know how much it will cost since the billing is in euros and there's extre conversion charges on my credit cards when I buy in euros.

Do you know what the approximate cost is in dollars (including conversion fees)?

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:29:16 PST

Oldje (4)

02-28-09 10:29am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To Drooler (218):

Sounds interesting to me. Do you get access to any of the other sites from the same people? How good is the WMV quality? Any statistics as to quality? How long are the videos? Since it is so expensive, how did that affect your evaluation? Thanks.

View Thread (5)

RE: Multi-month pricing is unclear

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:50:33 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

02-20-08 02:50pm

COMMENT REPLY by Marianna (40)

To asmith12 (124):

:)

View Thread (3)

RE: asmith12's Review

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:06:39 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-29-08 07:06am

REVIEW REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To PinkPanther (44):

> The price has kept me away.
I'm not surprised; $50/month is really outrageous.

> for such a determinedly rough sex site.
I don't think it's really "rough", there are much rougher sites out there (such as SadoSlaves). Personally I'm not a big fan of rough SM (and especially don't like "abuse" theme), so what turned me on about FunnyBDSM was it's funny part.

View Thread (2)

RE: asmith12's Review

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:09:54 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-28-08 09:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To asmith12 (124):

I remember being turned onto this site when it was called "Brutal Violence" - that's putting it out there. I've never been a member, so I've only seen clips here and there. The price has kept me away. I've been attracted by how attractive a lot of the women on the site are, unusual, in my opinion, for such a determinedly rough sex site.

View Thread (2)

RE: KodiakCS's Review

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:37:47 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-28-08 07:37am

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To asmith12 (124):

Really apprecate your feedback. I'll keep an eye out for more of your rerviews. Thanks!

View Thread (3)

RE: KodiakCS's Review

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:30:34 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-28-08 07:30am

REVIEW REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Jay G (63):

> how it compares to Sex & Submission or Chanta's Bitches or Fucked and
> Bound, all sites that I really enjoy.
Depends on your preferences (see my reviews of SexAndSumbission, FuckedAndBound and FunnyBDSM). For "Real BDSM" stories SexAndSumbission IMHO wins hands down, with FuckedAndBound going close second (can't comment on ChantasBitches).

> is the action "fakey?"
For stories NOT labeled as "Real BDSM" - yes, definitely; for "Real BDSM" ones - probably not.

> Interesting stories or just silly stuff?
Depends on your point of view: for me they're interesting, but I won't make any representations :-) - for some they can easily be "silly stuff". Take a look at descriptions of "Heil Dickler" and "Court of Justice" series in public area of the site - they're pretty much accurate.

View Thread (3)

RE: Multi-month pricing is unclear

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:08:06 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-20-08 07:08pm

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Marianna (40):

Well, everybody here has some fetish; I admit I have plenty of them :-).

View Thread (3)

RE: Multi-month pricing is unclear

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:21:02 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-20-08 04:21am

COMMENT REPLY by Marianna (40)

To asmith12 (124):

what a site :)

View Thread (3)

Funny BDSM Comment

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:16:21 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-18-08 09:16am

COMMENT by asmith12 (124)

Multi-month pricing is unclear

On site, when subscribing, they just say "90 days membership eur 89.95. Auto renewed every 90 days", and there is no mention of 69.95 price when renewing (which PU/TBP tells about). Would be nice to make it consistent one way or another.

Visit Funny BDSM - View Replies - Add Reply

Funny BDSM Comment

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:09:53 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-18-08 09:09am

COMMENT by asmith12 (124)

EUR pricing on PU/TBP

IMHO the way price in EUR is shown on PU/TBP sites ("$34.95 (Euros recurring)") is a bit misleading: "$" implies dollars, and with current rate difference between EUR and USD it's quite a big difference; is it possible to change the display to make it less confusing (for example, to show it as "EUR34.95 (recurring)")?

Visit Funny BDSM - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: KodiakCS's Review

Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:05:37 PST

Funny BDSM (0)

01-06-08 06:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To KodiakCS (7):

Good review, but I have more questions.

The euros-conversion has kept me away from this site that I would've tried otherwise. I've been tempted, but wonder how it compares to Sex & Submission or Chanta's Bitches or Fucked and Bound, all sites that I really enjoy.

The newer models seem extremely pretty, but is the action "fakey?" Interesting stories or just silly stuff? Any opinions?

View Thread (3)

RE: djwolf's Review

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:29:53 PST

Oldje (4)

12-29-07 08:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To djwolf (61):

This site appears to be offline?? Have you had any access problems?

View Thread (1)

RE: Quality?

Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:05:53 PDT

Oldje (4)

10-17-07 08:05am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To djwolf (61):

This site has ONE serious problem: The videos are all in RealPlayer-format - and that's a bummer.
Else there are fine videos with the very special content of older guys doing the most beautifull eateuropean girls here - some you will not find anywhere else. And yes, there are some fine blowjobs here - the facials I do not remember so much about, but some I remember. Fine site again, except from the video-format - strage that a fine site like this still goes for this lousy format.....

View Thread (3)

RE: Quality?

Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:30:26 PDT

Oldje (4)

10-16-07 07:30pm

COMMENT REPLY by troglodite (69)

To Drooler (218):

I can't see myself joining a site that uses realvideo format for their vids. I thought about this one a long time ago and passed on it for that very reason. I love Real as a company, but I don't like using realplayer for vids.

View Thread (3)

RE: Quality?

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:03:03 PDT

Oldje (4)

10-15-07 04:03pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To djwolf (61):

I joined once several months ago. The vids were in RealPlayer format and looked OK, but not great, and were smaller than 640x480. The girls were hot, and the action was real. I was surprised at what a turn on it was watching the tight lovely babes fucking old men, some of them really scruffy and fat.

Sorry, but I don't recall about facials, but BJs there were.

My favorites were Lucky and also Sarah (maybe different names on Oldje). Lucky did lots of good doggie. Sarah took it took it from the back, face down flat on the floor. Wow!

View Thread (3)

Oldje Comment

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:55:17 PDT

Oldje (4)

10-15-07 03:55pm

COMMENT by djwolf (61)

Quality?

Hi. I've checked out the preview pages here which look good. Just want to know a bit more. Are the girls all genuinely young with tight bodies? Does the action look realistic? Are there many blowjob/facial scenes?

Thanks.

Visit Oldje - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: DutchDoctor's Review

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:41:30 PDT

Oldje (4)

04-13-07 12:41am

REVIEW REPLY by DutchDoctor (8)

To roseman (253):

Nice to hear that, Roseman!
Maybe you'll find some of those girls in this site...

View Thread (2)