PU - M3 NYC - All Activity

Jerkoff Instructors Comment

Mon, 07 Feb 2011 01:22:03 PST

Jerkoff Instructors (0)

02-07-11 01:22am

COMMENT by otoh (34)

You want me to do what?

I'll confess to finding this appealing for some reason... there's kind of a pretty intense teasing aspect to the whole premise (as well as the nylon angle, which always works for me).

But having seen the sample, I agree with TBP that the quality could be better (although I don't think it matters on photos - stills are missing the point of this, which is the girls talking).

And $30 is a little high for a relatively small site - not bad for the whole network, but there's not much else there that grabs me. Still, will keep an eye on it...

Visit Jerkoff Instructors - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: CM4286's Review

Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:38:06 PDT

Pure Smoking (0)

07-23-09 08:38pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To mbaya (344):

I'll have to second that and go so far as to say 480 X 320 is NOT acceptable by any means. Maybe in the early 2000's but nowadays, the standard should be at least 720 X 480 but I will admit that by the end of this year, 1280 X 720 should be the standard and become average.

View Thread (2)

RE: CM4286's Review

Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:22:24 PDT

Pure Smoking (0)

07-23-09 01:22pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To CM4286 (6):

I have to disagree with the characterization of the videos as large. 480x320 is barely acceptable. I would consider even 720x480 to be inadequate.

View Thread (2)

RE: CM4286's Review

Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:21:09 PDT

Shibari Dolls (0)

06-22-09 10:21am

REVIEW REPLY by CM4286 (6)

To mbaya (344):

There is quite a lot of graphic sexual content: the sex tends to be quite rough and very male dominant (of course) but as is the case with content from Japan, the performers' genitals are pixelated. Contextually it didn't detract much for me, because the larger act contains many elements of sadistic treatment; there was still plenty to enjoy.

View Thread (2)

RE: CM4286's Review

Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:50:24 PDT

Shibari Dolls (0)

06-16-09 01:50pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To CM4286 (6):

Is it just bondage? Is there any sex at all?

View Thread (2)

Fist Freaks Comment

Sat, 16 May 2009 03:23:32 PDT

Fist Freaks (0)

05-16-09 03:23am

COMMENT by ace of aces (179)

Question

a member of that site here who can tell me something about it?

Visit Fist Freaks - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Jay G's Review

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:10:44 PDT

Fetish Network (0)

03-25-09 04:10am

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To TheSquirrel (30):

For quality, Kink.com is heads and shoulders above the rest, except for their desire to often set their scenes in dingy dungeons (but that's part of their Kink).

The Fetish Network really seems to be a collection of separate and mostly small websites that include many "one man operations" from all over the world (Germany & Japan are well represented) and old spanking and fetish films transferred to video (Pure Spanking & Perfect Spanking).

Elite spanking seems to be a collection of used video from Germany's Spanking Server site and is, at least, has better lighting than the many dark spanking sites.

The old stuff with poorer quality does give me the nostalgic thrill, however, of when I first saw kinky videos a few decades ago and they were like a naughty and forbidden peek into something very private and personal.

View Thread (2)

RE: Jay G's Review

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:03:36 PDT

Fetish Network (0)

03-24-09 09:03pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To Jay G (63):

I had been thinking about maybe joining, but from reading your review, there doesn't appear to be too much quality here, even though there seems to be quantity. I'm not crazy about the quality of vids from RealSpankings either. In fact fetish material in general seems to be a little behind the rest in picture quality.

View Thread (2)