PU - Little Mutt.com - All Activity

RE: hi def videos since...?

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:44:57 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

09-15-11 12:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by bibo (0)

To Marko (Webmaster):

Thank you! :)

View Thread (2)

RE: hi def videos since...?

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:09:16 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

09-15-11 11:09am

COMMENT REPLY by Marko (Webmaster)

To bibo (0):

Hey,
We've been shooting Hi Def since February of 2007.

View Thread (2)

Little Mutt Comment

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:28:39 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

09-15-11 06:28am

COMMENT by bibo (0)

hi def videos since...?

When did they start adding hi def videos? Can any current member tell me the month/year?

Thank you in advance!

Visit Little Mutt - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: BradlyH's Review

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:15:52 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-11-11 12:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by BradlyH (11)

To tangub (103):

Yes, they have increased in size, I can get ones that are 1600x1067, but they are usually just close up shots. All sets very, Small to large. Like i said in my review i would love an option to choose what size i would like to view the material in. I found the older sets are a smaller, which is the case in most sites that are a bit established.

I wouldn't let that minor con discourage you, if you were on there back in 2007 i think you would defiantly like it now because of how much content must have been updated on the site and the larger pictures.
I'm spoiled anyways, i usually View in 4000 pixels.

Erica Ellyson is what first brought me to that site :)

View Thread (2)

RE: pat362's Review

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:02:34 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-11-11 10:02am

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To rinto (0):

I really liked what I saw before joining them. It was a different story afterwards. Even without the slow downs. The content is not what I thought or hoped it would be. They have a couple of really beautiful models but I prefer my porn a little more hardcore and my lesbian porn has to be more passionate.

View Thread (10)

RE: pat362's Review

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:40:03 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-11-11 09:40am

REVIEW REPLY by rinto (0)

To pat362 (233):

My comment really had to do with the policy of slowing the site for everyone because 'someone' does something which displeases the owners.

That's patently absurd.

FWIW I really like what I've seen from LittleMutt. But I ain't joinin'.

View Thread (10)

RE: pat362's Review

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:28:53 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-11-11 06:28am

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To rinto (0):

Hi rinto.

I'm not sure if the site is still deadly slow. I asked the person who did the most recent review if that was the case but he hasn't replied yet. As much as the site has a many super cute girls. I can't say that there's a lot of heat in most videos. It's not softcore porn but it certainly isn't hardcore either. It's about midcore.

View Thread (10)

RE: BradlyH's Review

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:09:20 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-11-11 02:09am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (103)

To BradlyH (11):

Thanks for the update on this site Brady. I was just looking through my Little Mutt archives to try and figure out when i was last here and looks to be somewhen in 2007. As you say a wonderful collection of models and i think this site was where i first discovered some of my current favorites such as Georgia Jones and Faye Reagan but sadly the picture size didn't go beyond 1200px back then. Have the photos increased in size at all since then?

View Thread (2)

RE: pat362's Review

Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:03:31 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-11-11 01:03am

REVIEW REPLY by rinto (0)

To pat362 (233):

It's ridiculous for a site to slow ALL users' access because a single user is 'downloading excessively'. Thanks for this useful report- I won't be joining.

View Thread (10)

Little Mutt Comment

Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:27:56 PST

Little Mutt (2)

12-06-10 05:27pm

COMMENT by miko5 (0)

A masseuse with hairy hands ?

Lol !!! I signed for this site a few months ago only for the g/g massage videos which I really like it. The older g/g massage videos are really hot despite the over use of toys ( Hello g/g video makers...we hate toys, ok ? )and some are very well done to be fair with the guy running this site. But suddenly and for no clear reason at all, this guy decided to jump in and start massaging the girls himself ( ????!!! ). Now the massage videos are simply horrendous with this guy and his hairy hands touching the girls. He's having fun and we get screwed. Not me, not anymore.

Visit Little Mutt - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: An annoyingly slow site

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:28:58 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-23-10 06:28pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To Goldfish (63):

I emailed the webmaster almost immediately, asking for a refund because of script issues. I even waited all weekend before downloading anything, hoping that would make refunding my money easier to accept. All I finally got was a reply, directing me to their TOS, saying that no refund was possible and asking me what script problems I was having.

As it turns out, there's a setting that's easily changed in Firefox that lengthens the time it takes for a script to timeout. So now, instead of having to click a popup on every page change to allow the script to finish, all I have to do is wait the usual 10-20 seconds. It's ANNOYING AS HELL!

I haven't emailed them back about this yet, but I *am* going to send them a link to this comment as soon as I post this.

View Thread (7)

RE: An annoyingly slow site

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:18:38 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-23-10 06:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To anyonebutme (14):

Flash and Java are up to date here, but I don't think this is a flash or Java issue. Because Pat mentioned having the same issue, I think it's safe to assume that this is a known issue with the site.

View Thread (7)

RE: An annoyingly slow site

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:04:14 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-23-10 06:04pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To mbaya (344):

I shouldn't have been surprised, but there are way too many piercings and tattoos and way to much toy play for my taste. The only real consolation I get here is that the models come off as amateurs.

View Thread (7)

RE: An annoyingly slow site

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:47:17 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-18-10 02:47pm

COMMENT REPLY by Goldfish (63)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

Hey RB, That's a bummer you're getting the script error. Did you try reporting it to the the Web master? Maybe they'll fix it and give you your money back.

I've been a member of this site a few times and have always enjoyed it. Hopefully this technical glitch is just that and they correct it promptly.

View Thread (7)

RE: An annoyingly slow site

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:35:00 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-17-10 06:35pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (233)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

This was the main reason why I did not enjoy my membership on little mutt. As much as I'd like to give them another chance. Comments like these mean that I won't. The preview page are fine but man is it a pain in the a.. once you're a member. There were some evenings that I couldn't log in and on those that I did manage to log in. It was about a minute to go from one page to the next.

View Thread (7)

RE: An annoyingly slow site

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:03:21 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-17-10 10:03am

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

What did you think of the content of the site?

View Thread (7)

RE: An annoyingly slow site

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:44:51 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-16-10 10:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

Their tour pages come up very fast for me at the current moment, and my maximum internet connection speed doesn't come close to even 600kbps, I would *love* to have that speed ;)

As always, check you have the most current versions of Adobe Flash & Java installed on your computer - and with Flash there is an install for IE and a separate install that covers all other browsers.

View Thread (7)

Little Mutt Comment

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:30:09 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

08-16-10 08:30pm

COMMENT by RagingBuddhist (47)

An annoyingly slow site

OK - I run an older version of Firefox and I'm used to dealing with some loss of functionality like this. Every page - even when returning to a previously loaded page or opening a single picture - gives me this popup:

A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script will complete.

So... I go to my "speed browser", Opera 10, and I see that it's still taking way too long for all the elements to load. That's annoying enough. But add to that their download speeds. Under 600kbps with a download manager?

This has got to be one of my most regrettable signups. To see any appreciable amount of this site, I'll have to dedicate way too much time to it.

Visit Little Mutt - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: who is Kenney

Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:18:13 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-25-10 06:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (233)

To jikoty (0):

I wish you luck on this one. This would drive me nuts if I had only a first name and little else to go on and I really wanted more. As far as I can tell. He has done only one scene back in 2006 and it might have been a boyfriend/girlfriend scene.

View Thread (1)

Little Mutt Comment

Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:43:26 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-25-10 05:43pm

COMMENT by jikoty (0)

who is Kenney

Does any body know the guy name Kenney in this site? He is kind of cute, please, reply. thanks

Visit Little Mutt - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: dracken's Review

Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:35:23 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-16-10 08:35am

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To dracken (213):

I'm curious to know about the surfing and downloading speed. I was a a member late last year and I was very disapointed in the overall speed. It's bad enough when a download is slow but it was so damn slow surfing through the site. I'd click on an icon and I'd have to wait 30 seconds or more for something to happen. I also had some issues with downloading because I'd click on the icon and nothing would happen. I don't use and download manager.

View Thread (6)

RE: dracken's Review

Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:44:30 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-14-10 10:44am

REVIEW REPLY by dracken (213)

To Marko (Webmaster):

Thank you for understanding my position. I know it can often be annoying dealing with customers and all I wanted was a bit of cutesy. I have changed my review to reflect what you noted and I browsed my collection of videos I saved from your site once more. There is some great stuff there, keep up the good work :)

View Thread (6)

RE: dracken's Review

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:46:40 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-13-10 08:46pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To dracken (213):

Just to kinda reinforce and add to what may be wrongly worded statements by the reviewer, dracken, but I felt that as far as reading this review that I would expect Russian models as well. Clearly, dracken stated a language barrier was involved and with that stated and the combination that 'anyone who wants to see more Russian girls...', I'd definitly see this as a Russian site with these words. However, the webmaster states that this is not so I think there is a legit argument for the response that is not a Russian site nor contains Euro women and should maybe be re worded to get it straight. However, I can see where dracken is coming from if the models do not talk much in the videos because this is something that is very dominant in euro videos. But, that is if the models do not actually talk which was pointed out by dracken.

I'm not trying to say either one of you are wrong or right, nor trying to take sides. I can just see how the webmaster could see this review as portraying a Euro site when the site is not, while I can see how the reviewer could think this was a Euro site. Good luck and I hope this may add more insight between both of your discussions as a third party.

View Thread (6)

RE: dracken's Review

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:24:25 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-13-10 06:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by Marko (Webmaster)

To dracken (213):

Sorry for my harsh tone but I find it difficult to be compared to the Russian sites who are mostly cookie cutter sites that repeat the same formula over and over. There are a few great Russian sites like Masha's World, part of the Diesel Network with amazing girls. We take pride in the diversity of our content. Email me at webmaster@littlemutt.com and I'll extend your membership so that you can have a better look. As far as talking, look at our confessions videos, many of our girl/girl videos, including "Babes in the Woods" with Faye Reagan and Georgia Jones, and many others.

View Thread (6)

RE: dracken's Review

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:55:06 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-13-10 05:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by dracken (213)

To Marko (Webmaster):

Just saying what I felt like while browsing your site. It feels virtually identical to many Russian sites (which are registered in the states)that offer girls 18 to 24. Also I am not sure where you hid the talkative girls, but I didn't see them.

Anyhow I was just saying that your site is better than others that have the same feel, thanks for the harsh tone. I will make sure to note your friendliness towards consumers and not renew my membership.

View Thread (6)

RE: dracken's Review

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:48:10 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-13-10 05:48pm

REVIEW REPLY by Marko (Webmaster)

To dracken (213):

What in the world made you think LittleMutt is Russian site? We are an American / California site and our girls speak English and they talk a lot. We are not posing as a "Russian teen sex site", we have been around for eight years. Far longer than the Russian sites. There are, as of today, 558 videos (about 25% in HD at 3000Kb/s) and as many still galleries with solo, hardcore girl/girl and boy/girl. We offer naturally beautiful fresh young girls 18 to 24 years.
Please, before you review a site get your facts right.

View Thread (6)

RE: pat362's Review

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:55:20 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

10-17-09 06:55am

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To Goldfish (63):

Sadly for me it's too late. My membership ended on the 13th. To add insult to injury. I tried to log in on the 12th, but kept on getting refused. I noticed that they put up a note saying that someone was downloading excessivelly and that was the reason for the slowdown. I might be willing to believe that if it was for just a couple of times but I had problems for 3 weeks. I hope it's just technical but if it isn't then they aren't going to be able to keep getting new mebers

View Thread (10)

RE: pat362's Review

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:19:10 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

10-16-09 08:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by Goldfish (63)

To pat362 (233):

I've joined Little Mutt a couple times and really enjoyed the content. I was a member just a few months ago and I don't recall any download issues. Hopefully it's just a temporary glitch. That doesn't help you of course, even if it is!

View Thread (10)

RE: pat362's Review

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:12:56 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

10-11-09 07:12pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To lk2fireone (116):

This is exactly how I feel about this site. I joined 3 weeks ago and I did download a couple of scenes at first. I don't rememebr having as many problems downloading at the time and then I only came back a week later. That's when I noticed the slowdown navigating and the unbelievably slow download speed. Needless to say I didn't do any downloads and I've been visiting every few days and trying to download but I get the same speed.

Too bad because I was really hopeful.

View Thread (10)

RE: pat362's Review

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:05:57 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

10-11-09 07:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To Monahan (37):

I hope that's not the case because that is a really dumb decision. This almost guarantees the site will disatisfy any new member.

I wonder how many like me have kept an eye on the site and were about to make the plunge and may now not bother. That is sad because there does look like really good stuff. At least I can cross this one from my list.

View Thread (10)

RE: pat362's Review

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:52:27 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

10-11-09 01:52pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To pat362 (233):

Personal psychology can be a funny thing. I've been a member of a few sites where I've had problems with the site (navigation, downloading, whatever), and after the problems, I don't bother using the site, even though my membership may have several more weeks left on it. I've paid for the use of the site, but don't use it because I got so frustrated that it just wasn't worth the bother.

View Thread (10)

RE: pat362's Review

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:11:30 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

10-11-09 12:11pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To pat362 (233):

The $15 price works just for one month. It rebills at $30, so is it possible they've deliberately put the brakes on downloads so a new member can't drain the site during the half price month?

View Thread (10)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sun, 31 May 2009 12:39:00 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

05-31-09 12:39pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

If you use the PU/TBP link to the site, you will also get the $19.95 rate for the first month...recurs at b$29.95.

View Thread (1)

RE: Tattoo ratio?

Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:54:26 PST

Little Mutt (2)

12-03-08 08:54pm

COMMENT REPLY by IKnoPorn (22)

To TheRizzo (23):

Sure, TheRizzo, anytime, glad to be of help.

However, in the interest of being objective, after I wrote this, I did notice that many other users here on PU have written much more detailed reviews, and given it much higher marks than me, so you may want to review them (if you haven't already) before totally making up your mind.

As I said, it was 2 years ago that I joined, maybe the site has gotten better? Although from the sound of it (tattoos? ugh!) probably not.

Sorry to sound wishy-washy, I'm just trying to be objective, one man's treasured porn is another man's recycle bin fodder.

One site I belong to now is EuropeanGlamourGirls.com, and while it's a bit plain, and the photosets are repetitive from model to model, the girls are gorgeous and there isn't a tattoo in sight (at least, none I've found yet!). You might want to check this one out, the tour is just like the actual site (except obviously if you're a member you get access to the content).

I'll be making a review of this site soon.

Good Luck!

View Thread (5)

RE: Tattoo ratio?

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:06:05 PST

Little Mutt (2)

12-02-08 11:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To IKnoPorn (22):

Awesome detailed response, and I really appreciate how in depth you went. Based on your opinion and the tour with some of the heavily tattooed girls I am going pass.

Thanks again!

View Thread (5)

RE: Tattoo ratio?

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:23:35 PST

Little Mutt (2)

12-02-08 10:23pm

COMMENT REPLY by IKnoPorn (22)

To TheRizzo (23):

I can't comment on the tatoos on this site (other than to say that in general I agree they are a major turn off).

What I can comment on is, I was a member 2 years ago, and as solo sites go, this one is near the bottom of my list. Unlike many other sites I've joined, from this one, I have deleted almost all of content. The site just didn't cut it for me, the photography is repetitive and the girls often appear bored, or worse, they fake it, in the videos.

On the plus side, the photos and videos were pretty sharp, if that makes a difference. The site has a somewhat amateur feel, but almost too much so - like having a model take off all of her makeup and put her under a fluorescent light.

One thing I did notice, is that I even deleted Carli Bank's content from this site, which for me is almost sacrilege. From what I remember it just didn't do it for me, and for me to do that to one of my favorite models (it was a while ago I deleted it), it must have been her worst.

So that's my mini-review. I'd give the site a 60 based on my recollections.

View Thread (5)

RE: Tattoo ratio?

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:52:52 PST

Little Mutt (2)

12-02-08 03:52pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To jd1961 (95):

Yeah the first girl on their tour has massive tats on her legs. Major turnoff to me.

View Thread (5)

RE: Tattoo ratio?

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:02:20 PST

Little Mutt (2)

12-02-08 02:02pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To TheRizzo (23):

Nothing turns me off more than a tattooed woman.

And if this is an American site (I never joined) there's bound to be a ton of them.

View Thread (5)

Little Mutt Comment

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:39:30 PST

Little Mutt (2)

12-02-08 10:39am

COMMENT by TheRizzo (23)

Tattoo ratio?

Based on the tour there is some extremely cute girls, but a few girls featured with big tattoos which I don't really like. Anyone been a member and can tell me the ratio of girls with big tattoos vs none? I don't mine girls with the small hearts or butterflys etc.

Visit Little Mutt - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Goldfish's Review

Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:18:53 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

09-07-08 04:18am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To Goldfish (63):

I read at your cons section that downloading speeds are slow.
What kind of internet connection do you own and what's the maximum download speed that this site gave you ?

View Thread (1)

RE: nygiants03's Review

Fri, 23 May 2008 09:46:24 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

05-23-08 09:46am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To nygiants03 (160):

good review. i think i try that site out.

View Thread (1)

Little Mutt Comment

Thu, 22 May 2008 21:59:20 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

05-22-08 09:59pm

COMMENT by nygiants03 (160)

Familiar and Not So familiar

-some familiar faces like Carli Banks, new porn star Meggan Malone, Faye Reagan, Peaches, Sarah Blake, Sadie Sweet, Sandy Summers, Micah Moore, Nikki Nine and Amber Rayne. But even they seem to be very natural in the videos, or in the beginning of there porn career. But most of the other girls are new faces to me.

Visit Little Mutt - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: powerman's Review

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:36:18 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

04-27-08 02:36pm

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To JBDICK (20):

The strange thing is, that there are a lot of socalled free sites - I don't know their exact term - they have several shortcuts to previews you don't get when you just browse the specific site.

Like:
http://www.russianangels.info/

http://www.teenmovies.info/

http://www.lighthousemovies.com/

And yes, Lupe - don't think she updated for a year...

View Thread (6)

RE: powerman's Review

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:25:17 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

04-27-08 01:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (20)

To Denner (227):

Hi Denner

is there an easy way to find out if a site is updating regularly...apart from them telling you. I just wondered whether the fact that google indexes sites, there must be a way that google can tell you how much they have to update in terms of statistics or is there another service that we PU could use...

This would be an invaluable information and can swing joining up...like you say...nothing worse than joining only to find that the site hasn't changed...i recently did this with LittleLupe.com...very disappointed. If she had a real regular site she would be worth millions...

View Thread (6)

RE: powerman's Review

Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:10:32 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

04-24-08 08:10am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To powerman (28):

We all have different taste.
But this site I'd consinder worthless in many ways.
I gave it 72 a while ago and returned - just for the heck of it.
Still this site offers very little in new material.
After rejoining I have the same feeling - never again!

View Thread (6)

RE: powerman's Review

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:43:39 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

04-23-08 12:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To powerman (28):

"I like this site because the gals are for the most part real American teens (this is refreshing in our world of farming out the porn talent to Eastern Europe) and not some aloof Eastern European long legs who look like they don't want to do what they are doing, don't speak a word of English, or look like they belong as bait to foolish Americans in a movie like "Hostel" where hot Eastern Europeans lure horny backpackers to their deaths!"

Yeah, I just hate it when some Euro-blondie with tatooed-on eyebrows and shapely gams looks at me and says, "NICE?" over and over again because she's too lazy to learn MY language and then lures me into a dark corner in an alley in Budapest or Prague and those electric saws come out to carve my face up.

American girls would never do that.

View Thread (6)

RE: powerman's Review

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:35:43 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

04-23-08 07:35am

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To powerman (28):

What about the updates? Are they updating regularly?

View Thread (6)

RE: Any Anal Content?

Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:49:24 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

04-22-08 07:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To apoctom (145):

I know this reply is a little late, but the front page now distinctly shows anal play. Solo, but anal play none-the-less.

View Thread (1)

RE: powerman's Review

Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:08:02 PDT

Little Mutt (2)

04-22-08 06:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To powerman (28):

Very helpful review.

View Thread (6)

Little Mutt Comment

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:02:47 PST

Little Mutt (2)

01-23-08 10:02am

COMMENT by apoctom (145)

Any Anal Content?

I saw this site and the discounted price. I visited the tour pages which says that there is analingus and anal. However, there wasn't any in the preview movies. Could a current or past member shed some light as to how much anal content is on this site?

Thanks.

Visit Little Mutt - View Replies - Add Reply