PU - Paper Street Media, LLC - All Activity

RE: Warning about this site

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:38:44 PST

Innocent High (4)

03-11-10 07:38am

COMMENT REPLY by 1618to1 (0)

To exotics4me (365):

Thanks. This is a good tip but I'd rather completely steer clear of companies that conduct themselves dishonestly.

Cheers,
Steve

View Thread (2)

RE: Warning about this site

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:30:10 PST

Innocent High (4)

03-10-10 04:30am

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To 1618to1 (0):

You can sign up on Innocent High through Epoch. On the sign-up page, you click "Backup credit card" and it is Epoch. The cross sales are all gone and you even get a discounted price offer to stay when canceling of $14.95/month.

View Thread (2)

Innocent High Comment

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:01:29 PST

Innocent High (4)

03-10-10 01:01am

COMMENT by 1618to1 (0)

Warning about this site

When you cancel the subscription, they force you to sign up for a trial to another site. When you cancel that subscription, it forces you to sign up for two more sites! What a scam. I decided to get a new debit card number to prevent these crooks from draining my bank account. This has taught me to only trust sites that use CCBill or Epoch which I've never had an issue with.

Visit Innocent High - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: exotics4me's Review

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:19:36 PST

Innocent High (4)

02-25-10 02:19am

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To Wittyguy (71):

From the ones I have downloaded, including the newest updates, the long end is still only 1050. They do have huge sets though, one had over 300 photos in it.

View Thread (8)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:08:14 PST

Innocent High (4)

02-17-10 06:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (79)

To exotics4me (365):

I though it was weird that they'd have some new girls but list on the prview pages some older ones. I guess they showcase more popular gilrs or something. Thanks for the info. I'll take a more indept look at some of the other sites because innocent high doesn't seem to have what I prefer.

View Thread (8)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:51:57 PST

Innocent High (4)

02-17-10 03:51pm

REVIEW REPLY by Wittyguy (71)

To exotics4me (365):

Hey Exotics: Just wondering what the current pic size is right now. I was a member a few years ago and just curious if they've boosted their pic dimensions at all.

View Thread (8)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:55:51 PST

Innocent High (4)

02-16-10 09:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To pat362 (79):

Hey Pat,

I checked on this, the three newest updates showing up for me are, Breanna Benson, Melanie Jane and Misty Stone.

On those three you mentioned, the release dates in the membership section are:
Dakoda: 1-8-08
Bree: 1-22-07
Kinzie: 7-31-06

The Innocent High site itself seems to be very well maintained with a update list by date or alphabetical. The other sites in the network are pretty much listed in order of release, but none of those have that many updates to begin with. Also of note, if you like these models that are on Innocent High, most of them also have a set on Solo Interviews as well. Hope that helps

View Thread (8)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:12:13 PST

Innocent High (4)

02-16-10 07:12pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (79)

To exotics4me (365):

I don't know if the preview page is correct but they have Bree Olson has the most recent update and not too far after than Dakoda Brooks and Kinzie Kenner. Dakoda left the biz early last year and I haven't heard a single thing from Kinzie in over a year. See those kind of things always make me nervous. It's not that the updates aren't new but when you teell me that star that is no longer doing porn is on your site then I wonder where you had that video?

View Thread (8)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:59:00 PST

Innocent High (4)

02-16-10 06:59pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To pat362 (79):

The updates on Innocent High are all dated. The other sites are not and that is why I had some trouble figuring out their update schedule. What it does show though are the sites that are still updating. It's kind of a strange way they do it, one minute clips on Monday, photos/screencaps on Tuesday and full scene on Wednesday. They do have a nice "update" section that shows each update as they are coming in. I'm still hesitant about anything more than a month. The archives are good enough for the 1 month deal though.

View Thread (8)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:53:05 PST

Innocent High (4)

02-16-10 06:53pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (79)

To exotics4me (365):

Thanks exotic.

Are the updates dated? I get kind of nervous when I see pornstars that aren't really active in the most recent updates.

View Thread (8)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:00:21 PST

Innocent High (4)

02-16-10 11:00am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (44)

To exotics4me (365):

Nice solid review stuffed with details and opinions. Took a look at the site preview. I think some of the girls are a little old to be in high school. Were they held back for further instruction in sexual behavior?

View Thread (8)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:03:51 PST

Innocent High (4)

12-15-09 04:03am

REVIEW REPLY by Colm4 (10)

To TrashMan (103):

I'm a member of this site for several months now and like to mention some changes since the time of this review:

- A new site was added to the network called herfreshmanyears (somewhat similar to innocenthigh).
- No extra login required for network sites.
- Solo interviews unfortunately stopped updating. OyeLoca and therealworkout (and the aformentioned herfreshmanyears) are the only updating sites.
- All sites who are still updating, have now a streaming option. And this goes for all movies, even from several years ago.
- There is still no search, but you can view all girls in alphabetical order or view the updates by date added.

View Thread (3)

Innocent High Comment

Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:36:08 PDT

Innocent High (4)

10-02-09 01:36am

COMMENT by Doug62 (0)

Billing Change

PSMhelper(Main)
Epoch(Backup)

Visit Innocent High - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: MargulisAZ's Review

Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:50:01 PDT

Solo Interviews (1)

07-21-09 11:50pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (39)

To MargulisAZ (82):

Good review. I was debating whether or not to join this site - Thanks for saving me some money.

View Thread (1)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:15:58 PDT

Innocent High (4)

06-15-09 12:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (34)

To mbaya (276):

I totally agree. Another excellent review by Trash Man. The network looked very promising when going onto the preview site, but thanks to Trash Man;s review it's clear that the majority of the "bonus sites" are just archived old stuff.

I'm seeing how this is becoming a more prevalant practice...advertising a big network that turns out to be a collection of dormant sites, usually with crappy quality.

View Thread (3)

Innocent High Comment

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:48:01 PDT

Innocent High (4)

03-14-09 08:48pm

COMMENT by Goldfish (39)

Needs a little work

This site has some good content and if you like the school girl uniforms definitely check it out.

After a second visit to the site I was a little disappointed they hadn't upgraded the resolution of the videos. The updates on the bonus sites are little to nil.

Visit Innocent High - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: TrashMan's Review

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:02:01 PDT

Innocent High (4)

03-10-09 11:02am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (276)

To TrashMan (103):

Very thorough and complete review. Congratulations on breaking the century mark for reviews.

View Thread (3)

RE: jd1961's Review

Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:55:14 PST

Innocent High (4)

11-28-08 07:55am

REVIEW REPLY by uscue (35)

To Denner (200):

I've been a member for months. Truly nothing to hide, good amount of stuff with regular updates. I will say that for guys that like latina's, the bonus site Oye Loca is worth it to me. Innocent High is the best of the sites though. I actually like a lot of the older content...more girls that you don't find on every site. However, my favorite video is Tommy. Girl knows what she's doing.

View Thread (2)

RE: jd1961's Review

Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:00:41 PST

Innocent High (4)

11-28-08 07:00am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To jd1961 (95):

Man, I'm not here to please our old buddy jd1961 - but again I read his reviews - everytime - and enjoy this one.
I know we can find a lot of stuff with Lexi Belle, Bree Olsen, Aubrey Adams ect. at for exampel Videobox (and a heck of a lot of others places).
But take a look at the previews for this site too!
Here are some great models in a mix of US, latina, euro and asians. You can browse through 45 pages and with preview of every single video - as far as I can see. Nothing to hide here - thats how a porn-site should present itself.
It looks worth it.
Don't you just hate those site where they offer no previews at all - I've learned (costly) to stay away from sites like that.

View Thread (2)

RE: uscue's Review

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:52:09 PDT

Innocent High (4)

08-15-08 04:52am

REVIEW REPLY by 2 Free K (9)

To uscue (35):

Charlotte muthafuckin' Stokely!! Where has she been?

That ass is Twilight Zone.

View Thread (4)

Oye Loca Comment

Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:54:51 PDT

Oye Loca (0)

08-04-08 02:54pm

COMMENT by lurifax (0)

Amendmenet Re. CCBill's usury

The day before yesterday (last Saturday) I contacted 'oye loca' to inform them about CCBill's practices.

I am pleased to let you know that today I received the following email from 'oye loca':

Subject: usury by CCBill
Date: 2008-08-02 12:08:35
Priority: 2

Response:
-----------------
Hello,

We have switched Epoch to our primary biller so you should be sent there when you try to sign up. Please try that out and let us know if it works for you.

Visit Oye Loca - View Replies - Add Reply

Oye Loca Comment

Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:21:24 PDT

Oye Loca (0)

08-02-08 05:21pm

COMMENT by lurifax (0)

A warning about CCBill�s usuries to residents outside of the US$ zone�

On many websites I have noticed that CCBill charge in one�s local currency � in my case, in GBP.

I thought that this was a �nice� (and convenient) service.

But, this is a typical example of �THE WOLF CLOTHED AS A SHEEP�!

Working out what it should cost in GBP, and compare the result with what CCBill charges; I found that CCBill is slapping on 39+% above the basic rate of exchange.

More than a week ago I sent an email to CCBill, titled �usury�, asking how they could justify this exorbitant fee.

Surprise, surprise, CCBill did not reply � did not even bother with supplying the standard bullshit one is used to from banks�

In summary: they have shown; not only are they committing �daylight robbery� but the 24/7 �service�, they brag about, is @ their discretion (And convenience!) but may well be 0/7.

Visit Oye Loca - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: FAKE PREVIEW

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 07:38:27 PDT

Oye Loca (0)

06-07-08 07:38am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To uscue (35):

Hey uscue
Your're right about the fine amount of content in general - which include the bonus sites - like Innocent High. (BTW: Just not my cup of tea (Innocent High). But we all got our preference...
After I got my irritation of bad previews off my chest, I browsed the whole content- also bonus sites. And some is NOT bad at all.
BUT, uscue - when you go for a specific site - like Oye Loca (and for this user: not regarding the bonus sites, which has less interests to me) - in search for what you believe is some special content - you feel a bit annoyed when you do NOT get what is prommised at the preview - Well, see you agree with me on that point.
So: I do not understand why they don't give you the entire "works" that you see in the preview.
PU's should tell them that....

View Thread (3)

RE: FAKE PREVIEW

Fri, 30 May 2008 15:44:47 PDT

Oye Loca (0)

05-30-08 03:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by uscue (35)

To Denner (200):

Hate it too. Honestly don't recall any from Oye Loca (haven't downloaded from them in a while) although I will say that overall the network has loads of content. Innocent High has enough to last a month's membership and I can overlook not including the interviews on the other sites.

View Thread (3)

RE: FAKE PREVIEW

Thu, 29 May 2008 12:17:57 PDT

Oye Loca (0)

05-29-08 12:17pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (71)

To Denner (200):

Thanks for the heads up on this one. I hate the misleading tours and previews on sites and encourage everyone to post them in their reviews or comments.

View Thread (3)

Oye Loca Comment

Thu, 29 May 2008 09:32:58 PDT

Oye Loca (0)

05-29-08 09:32am

COMMENT by Denner (200)

FAKE PREVIEW

Just joined this one - it looked good.
Plenty of stuff here with SOME great latin girls filmed south of the border - but just SOME. Others are of US-origin - maybe 50/50 - not sure yet.
BUT what's really annoying is the difference between preview-videos and full videos - we have been here before about the previews "A LOT BETTER THAN WHAT YOU GET INSIDE".
Man, that's it: This sexy girl in one preview - see for yourself - "Ginyer" - does a sexy strip/dance in the preview.
BUT: When you get inside and download the whole video (450 Mb) there is NO sexy strip/dancing - almost just wham-bam-thank-you-mam.
That's preview for you!!!!!
Honestly, fellow PUs, I hate it sincerly when I get cheated by those kinds of fake previews. So, now your're warned.

Visit Oye Loca - View Replies - Add Reply

Innocent High Comment

Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:06:20 PDT

Innocent High (4)

04-21-08 07:06pm

COMMENT by Wittyguy (71)

A Decent Site

I was a member there in late 2007. I don't want to do a review because of the time lag since I was there. I will generally note that the pictures for the new sets are full screen size or larger while the older sets were slightly smaller. The videos were generally good as well. My only real complaints were that most of the sets only offered a few positions which led me to burnout a little on the site given its niche schoolgirl status and some questionable picture cropping. If I were reviewing it I'd probably give it an 80 to 82 score. I will note that the bonus sites are not worth the bother.

Visit Innocent High - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: uscue's Review

Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:18:17 PST

Innocent High (4)

12-05-07 09:18am

REVIEW REPLY by elephant (24)

To uscue (35):

Cheers for the info , I'll put it into my site wanna be member list

View Thread (4)

RE: uscue's Review

Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:28:32 PST

Innocent High (4)

12-05-07 04:28am

REVIEW REPLY by uscue (35)

To elephant (24):

I haven't been a member in a while so I can't tell you if that limit is truly in place, but the limit didn't seem to be there when I was a member even though it was listed as having a limit. I download alot and never was blacklisted.

View Thread (4)

RE: uscue's Review

Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:37:50 PST

Innocent High (4)

12-01-07 07:37am

REVIEW REPLY by elephant (24)

To uscue (35):

Can anyone tell me if they still have a daily download limit of 500Mb. I won't bother joining if they do.

cheers

View Thread (4)

RE: DivBZero's Review

Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:49:35 PDT

Solo Interviews (1)

03-18-07 03:49pm

REVIEW REPLY by DivBZero (13)

To uscue (35):

Hi there,

You've made a really good critique of my review! I'm so pleased you've took the trouble to reply.

On balance the 51 score is overly harsh on my part, and certainly driven by two factors:

a) Description not matching content.
b) Difficulties in cancelling subscriptions (in T&Cs it points at ccbill when in fact they use Paycom, ccbill is mentioned but this option wasn't available at sign-up).

So I wasn't best disposed as I wrote the review. It does however ask the question, what is hi-resolution? and if pixels are not quoted on the tour then their version of 'full' resolution should be available to sample.

I did enjoy the poses and content of this site.

thanks again ...

Double regards

DivBZero

View Thread (3)

RE: DivBZero's Review

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:35:56 PDT

Solo Interviews (1)

03-13-07 10:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by uscue (35)

To DivBZero (13):

I haven't checked solo interviews yet, but their network sites OyeLoca and InnocentHigh do indeed have high quality pics. Or rather, just to be safe, i'll say they are smaller in size (700x1050) but high quality regarding how they look. They don't look anything like vidcaps or amateur-ish. They look like any other sites High-Res pics but smaller in size. Video quality wasn't DVD quality like some great sites but wasn't worse than any other regular site and I never questioned it until reading the review.

I agree that this site is not as good as the other sites in the network, but does it really deserve a 51? Is that based just on the pics (it is mainly a video site)? I'd think, based on the things you pointed out that they did wrong, that the site would be in the 70's, described as: Average, some things done right, some things done wrong or 60's: does more wrong than right, low recommendation.

51 just seems low for a site costing 17.84 a month with 4 other sites included (over 100 vids all together), has a score of 78 by TBP and five 80's out of seven other sites reviews, no DRM or download limit (not anymore). Even a site with vidcaps only would be at least Average with all those added at that price, but this site DOES have actual higher quality pics, just not as high (pixels) as others which you wouldn't notice unless you used a program that showed pixels like photoshop or irfanview.

View Thread (3)

RE: DivBZero's Review

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:45:19 PDT

Solo Interviews (1)

03-13-07 02:45pm

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (252)

To DivBZero (13):

Thanks for the info

View Thread (3)