PU - MatureMoney - All Activity

RE: Antar's Review

Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:28:25 PDT

Mature Mega Pass (0)

10-16-11 01:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by Antar (1)

To dracken (213):

Sure but i thought that stuff like that has already been said previously. Think of this review as an update to what has already been said. That's why i focused on their change in the content of this network which is now focusing on solo and lesbian scenes. HD videos are about 700Mo-1Gb. Old scenes that haven't been remastered are about 200Mo-500Mo. Has i ve said, they update daily (about 2-4 scenes per update). But the key element is to know what you re looking for. If you re looking for hardcore male/female content then i wouldn't recommend this network anymore because of what i ve said in my review. If you re mainly interested by solo/lesbian content then this network will grant you 100% satisfaction.

View Thread (2)

RE: Antar's Review

Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:09:14 PDT

Mature Mega Pass (0)

10-15-11 11:09am

REVIEW REPLY by dracken (213)

To Antar (1):

Hey man, good review, but to be honest it would really be more helpful if you added some more details. Number of videos available, sizes of videos and more description of how the content looks.

Stuff like that helps the quality of your review and will get you more points. :)

Good luck

View Thread (2)

Mature Mega Pass Comment

Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:12:13 PDT

Mature Mega Pass (0)

08-05-11 09:12am

COMMENT by Chipster (3)

Incredible Content has expanded !

An incredible collection of amateur europeans of all body types and ages. Particularly appealing is Old and Young Lesbians, the kissing is intense as well as the sex.

Large files take over an hour to download, but there is streaming HD and Standard def, the standard def will take 20 minutes using a Flash Capture program.

Once again, outstanding collection

Visit Mature Mega Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Expensive & Comprehensive?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:18:26 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 06:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To pat362 (235):

I see your question has been answered by someone who knows a lot more about the site than I, Pat. I've never been a member but came across a lot of their material when I still subscribed to the usenet. I liked their solos more than H/C at the time so didn't pay much attention how much there was of each. My guess wouldn't be accurate anyway because I only saw what people liked and posted.

View Thread (8)

RE: Expensive & Comprehensive?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:28:35 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 05:28pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To malikstarks (8):

Thanks. I have to put that one on my future join list

View Thread (8)

RE: Expensive & Comprehensive?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:39:42 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 03:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by malikstarks (8)

To pat362 (235):

Yes, plenty of hardcore, I'd say about 50-50. I was a member many years ago (I'd say 2006 or 2007). Not sure how it's changed since.

View Thread (8)

RE: Expensive & Comprehensive?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:49:18 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 01:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To messmer (123):

Is there a lot of hardcore content?

View Thread (8)

RE: Expensive & Comprehensive?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:56:48 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 10:56am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To messmer (123):

Yes, I am not into the artificial glam look either.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (8)

RE: Expensive & Comprehensive?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:43:07 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 10:43am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Capn (27):

I agree about their need to be more selective, some of the models are a bit hard to look at! :-) Yet, rather they than some glossy Eastern European Model. To me it's all so artificial.

View Thread (8)

RE: Expensive & Comprehensive?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:37:42 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 10:37am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To messmer (123):

I fully concur, but I do think they should be a little more selective.

Especially at that kind of ante. ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (8)

RE: Expensive & Comprehensive?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:34:08 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 10:34am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Capn (27):

You see, Capn, that's exactly the appeal of the site for me. Just as in Village Ladies most of the models are far from glamorous but that's how I like it: unlikely models doing porn. I am not enamored of glamour porn, that's why I got so little out of the original 21Sextury. What stops me from subscribing to this site is that last time I tried they were going to charge me CA $ 77.00!!

View Thread (8)

Mature.nl Comment

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:45:57 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-23-11 08:45am

COMMENT by Capn (27)

Expensive & Comprehensive?

There seems to be little in the way of samples.
It is difficult to pick up what the content is actually like.

From what I can see from the models listings, they aren't exactly picky who they feature either. :0/

There are some nice looking ladies, but they appear to be in the minority.

Cap'n. :0(

Visit Mature.nl - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Bluesurfer's Review

Sun, 20 Mar 2011 09:37:20 PDT

Old And Young Lesbians (1)

03-20-11 09:37am

REVIEW REPLY by elephant (47)

To Bluesurfer (0):

There looks like there might be the odd gem in there but mainly the women are not much to look at and for this price $50 dollars for what I would only download around 10 vids it wouldn't be worth the price.

View Thread (2)

RE: Bluesurfer's Review

Fri, 18 Mar 2011 06:19:35 PDT

Old And Young Lesbians (1)

03-18-11 06:19am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To Bluesurfer (0):

Did you find most of the women attractive? I did not.

View Thread (2)

RE: mbaya's Review

Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:38:38 PDT

Old And Young Gangbang (1)

06-07-10 05:38am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To mbaya (344):

Oh, mbaya - not yet. Been using my 'porntime' lately browsing for vintage erotica (1980-1990) - a lot of goodies out there, if your're into that.
But the site in question is on my list, for sure.
Be back

Cheers!
Denner

View Thread (8)

RE: mbaya's Review

Sun, 06 Jun 2010 12:30:33 PDT

Old And Young Gangbang (1)

06-06-10 12:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To Denner (227):

Denner, Did you ever check out this site? I am curious as to your opinion.

View Thread (8)

RE: mbaya's Review

Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:27:34 PDT

Old And Young Gangbang (1)

04-23-10 07:27pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (235)

To mbaya (344):

Thanks for the info. That might be a deal breaker for me. I kind of enjoy the porn far more when I know the performers. The price is also quite steep. I just joined Woodman Casting and that's a 54$ investement so I don't think I'll be joining this one anytime soon.

View Thread (8)

RE: mbaya's Review

Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:17:44 PDT

Old And Young Gangbang (1)

04-23-10 03:17am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To pat362 (235):

I did not recognize a single woman on any of the network sites.

View Thread (8)

RE: mbaya's Review

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:19:09 PDT

Old And Young Gangbang (1)

04-22-10 06:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (235)

To mbaya (344):

Great review mbaya.

Are there any known actresses on the sites. I took a look at a couple of sites but I didn't see any familair faces.

View Thread (8)

RE: mbaya's Review

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:37:38 PDT

Old And Young Gangbang (1)

04-22-10 08:37am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To mbaya (344):

First: I know, that your're 'legit' and 'straight' about your reviews/scores (you have always been).
Second: Along the way some extremes seem to go in my direction, too - you develop new interests along the almost endless porn highway - as times go by...so this could take me to another/new line of porn - be back, if/when I've joined....
Thumbs up! (again)

View Thread (8)

RE: mbaya's Review

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:22:08 PDT

Old And Young Gangbang (1)

04-22-10 08:22am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To Denner (227):

I think you know that I am not one to give out high scores like this unless I really like a site a lot. I did. Two warnings though. First the network has only one other site that focuses on teens and older men. You may feel that makes this too expensive. Second, I like extreme sex and factored that into my score. I am not sure you will like it as much as I did. If you give it a try, please post your impressions.

View Thread (8)

RE: mbaya's Review

Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:10:26 PDT

Old And Young Gangbang (1)

04-22-10 08:10am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To mbaya (344):

Wow, what a fine review....
I'm not a great fan of gangbang in general - but a fan of sites like grandpasfuckteens.com and somewhat of oldfartsyoungtarts.com. - but even if this is 'gangbang' - the site (preview) and first of all this review makes me even more curious.
And in spite of the price - a 95 from mbaya - got to take a very close look - the bottom line here in this review has given me that drive...

View Thread (8)

RE: stangace20's Review

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:18:00 PDT

Mature Mega Pass (0)

10-30-09 02:18pm

REVIEW REPLY by dracken (213)

To stangace20 (2):

Thank you for sharing, I remember my first reviews and chuckle at how short and simple they were.

Speaking of which, you don't want people to chuckle at your reviews do you? People around here have seen some pretty long and thought provoking stuff in their lifetime. Try to put more time and effort as well a objectivity in your review. It will make it look much better. Also read other reviews and see what people comment on. It will get you more points and more trust votes.

View Thread (2)

RE: stangace20's Review

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:21:04 PDT

Mature Mega Pass (0)

10-30-09 09:21am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To stangace20 (2):

I think they make it abundantly clear that they are all about old, not very pretty women. Their main page is proof of that. They definitely cater to a taste that is non-mainstream, to a niche within the niche of mature. I like them for this difference but would never subscribe because of the high price. Seen in that light your score might just be a tad low because you (maybe) were expecting something along the lines of Anilos, AllOver 30, Aunt Judy's, Older Women etc. For the sake of those who ARE interested and have the cash it would have been nice to have some details on the material offered. Don't let me discourage you, though. My first reviews were even shorter than yours! :-)

View Thread (2)

RE: This site actually costs 55-60 dollars!!??

Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:17:22 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-08-09 10:17pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To james4096 (126):

This is a case of not keeping up with the times. This site has been around on the net for years and while it probably had a lock on the mature market five to seven years ago it doesn't seem to measure up price-wise to all the competition that's emerged since. It also seems to have fallen behind on quality since their vids max out at 720 pixels and they don't seem to have large sized pics. Even if I lived in Europe I'd be thinking twice before plunking down 40 euros for a membership.

View Thread (2)

RE: This site actually costs 55-60 dollars!!??

Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:44:44 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-08-09 07:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To james4096 (126):

You are right, that is insane. The only way I can see paying anything remotely close to the price is if the site is covering a unique niche and doing a damn good job of it. For example something like "midget lesbians having sex while skydiving" niche and making a lot of great videos in HD. That might warrant the price because it is likely the only place it will ever be seen. But this site does not seem to have anything that other mature women sites would not have. Perhaps they feel that since we pay $20 to see 20 year olds and $30 for allover30 they feel they should follow the pattern and ask for $60 for 60 year olds! Or perhaps an escort come with the membership fee.

Seriously though, $60 a month is simply suicide. They could probably charge half that and get ten times the members. I guess someone was very, very high when deciding the price.

View Thread (2)

Mature.nl Comment

Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:29:24 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

07-08-09 04:29pm

COMMENT by james4096 (126)

This site actually costs 55-60 dollars!!??

I'm not saying that the content might not be great. I have no idea, but how do they charge that much and stay in business?
What could make any site worth that much? And these are old broads and from what I see a lot of them are not great looking. Don't get me wrong, I do like mature ladies, but come on!
That's insane.

Visit Mature.nl - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Jutti24's Review

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:03:23 PST

Mature Mega Pass (0)

02-10-09 05:03am

REVIEW REPLY by Jutti24 (8)

To Wittyguy (83):

It *is* pricy.
I guess if the dollar improves again the price might drop again.

Though they do have a huge amount of content.
I can't comment on the two websites you mentioned as I haven't tried them yet.

View Thread (2)

RE: Jutti24's Review

Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:45:41 PST

Mature Mega Pass (0)

02-06-09 03:45pm

REVIEW REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To Jutti24 (8):

Pricey ain't the word for it. $60 for a month (40 euros)??? I think I'll stick with Anilos or Allover30 and save a few bucks. I'd hope they have a huge amount of content for that price.

View Thread (2)

Mature.nl Comment

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:48:08 PDT

Mature.nl (0)

10-21-08 11:48pm

COMMENT by lensman888 (0)

Great site

This site is well worth a visit it has a vast selection of movies and loads of bonus sites , the only gripe I have is that some of the files are very large but apart from that its great.

Visit Mature.nl - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Outrageous Terms and Conditions

Fri, 16 May 2008 16:10:35 PDT

Mature Toilet Sluts (0)

05-16-08 04:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Toadsith (48):

> Sometimes it requires as little acknowledgment as taking the document
> into your possession.
As far as I've heard, usually in such cases courts are VERY reluctant to upheld these conditions :-), so it's mostly a weapon of frightening customers who're going to complain. Still, whenever I notice such conditions, I feel that such guys are trying to cheat me, so why I should do business with them, especially if there is a choice?

View Thread (6)

RE: Outrageous Terms and Conditions

Fri, 16 May 2008 15:48:33 PDT

Mature Toilet Sluts (0)

05-16-08 03:48pm

COMMENT REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To asmith12 (124):

That would indeed be wise :-) Though you might be surprised the terms and conditions you have inadvertently agreed to in the past. Sometimes it requires as little acknowledgment as taking the document into your possession. Trains were covering all kinds of crazy conditions by just printing them very small on the train ticket and stating that by taking the ticket you agreed to the conditions. I think in the end they got in trouble for that, but it worked for a while, lol

View Thread (6)

RE: Outrageous Terms and Conditions

Fri, 16 May 2008 04:44:58 PDT

Mature Toilet Sluts (0)

05-16-08 04:44am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Goldfish (63):

> doesn't it make more sense to give us your experiences with five or ten > sites you've actually joined?
My understanding this is a completely different thing. The question as I read it was about sites out there, not about sites one cares to join (which means pre-selection process, especially for PU users). I think poll results confirm my interpretation too (I don't think that somebody was mistreated by 75% of the sites he joined).

> if there is disclosure of elements in the site that you may not like > in the free area or the terms and conditions, isn't that ethical
> business practice? I think it is.
Yes, and you should note that there were several sites I've considered "probably ethical but definitely not worth to join", so it's not about liking or disliking free area, but an estimate of chances of them lying in free area (if garbage site doesn't promise anything, it's ok, but if it says they have daily updates, it's suspicious). About terms and conditions, I didn't say these guys are necessarily unethical, but outrageous terms and conditions make me quite suspicious, so I wrote "unethical: unclear" for them. Sure this whole exercise is all about personal interpretation, but I hope mine isn't too far out :-).

View Thread (6)

RE: Outrageous Terms and Conditions

Fri, 16 May 2008 04:31:19 PDT

Mature Toilet Sluts (0)

05-16-08 04:31am

COMMENT REPLY by Goldfish (63)

To asmith12 (124):

asmith. I understand what you're doing but doesn't it make more sense to give us your experiences with five or ten sites you've actually joined? I believe that's the point of the poll. Besides, if there is disclosure of elements in the site that you may not like in the free area or the terms and conditions, isn't that ethical business practice? I think it is.

View Thread (6)

RE: Outrageous Terms and Conditions

Fri, 16 May 2008 03:35:07 PDT

Mature Toilet Sluts (0)

05-16-08 03:35am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (124)

To Toadsith (48):

> In business in general it is common practice to reserve as many rights as you can think of...

You're right, but on the other hand everything has it's limits. I'm reading documents I'm signing VERY carefully, and I'm sure that if my bank would write "we reserve the right to charge you for excessive inquiries at our sole discretion", I wouldn't be a client of that bank :-).

View Thread (6)

RE: Outrageous Terms and Conditions

Fri, 16 May 2008 00:05:44 PDT

Mature Toilet Sluts (0)

05-16-08 12:05am

COMMENT REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To asmith12 (124):

I don't usually read the Terms and Conditions but I'll bet this isn't all that uncommon. In business in general it is common practice to reserve as many rights as you can think of with no concern as to if it will or will not hold up in the court of law. If you had it written down in the first place it can do nothing other than help you. So they write it down and hope for the best. If you check the policies of many companies outside this industry you'll find the same thing. The company I work for reserves everything excluding possibly enslaving your offspring to pay off debts incurred. Though we might have an addendum that covers that.

View Thread (6)

Mature Toilet Sluts Comment

Thu, 15 May 2008 15:13:11 PDT

Mature Toilet Sluts (0)

05-15-08 03:13pm

COMMENT by asmith12 (124)

Outrageous Terms and Conditions

From http://www.nolimitweb.nl/terms.htm :
"The occurrence of complaints from Customers, inquiries, Credit Backs or Charge Backs with respect to the Client's program or service may be cause for termination of this Agreement if such events occur with unacceptable frequency as determined in the sole discretion of the Company. In addition, The Company reserves the right to charge the Client reasonable fees and recover its expenses on account of Credit Backs, Charge Backs, or excessive customer inquiries." - have anybody seen anything like this? These guys seem to reserve the right to charge members as much as they wish, at their sole discretion.

Visit Mature Toilet Sluts - View Replies - Add Reply

Mature Toilet Sluts Comment

Thu, 15 May 2008 15:10:04 PDT

Mature Toilet Sluts (0)

05-15-08 03:10pm

COMMENT by asmith12 (124)

Random Site comment

This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on
http://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical".

Ok, here goes the price of reviewing RANDOM sites :-(. But to maintain experiment as clean as possible I shouldn't avoid even as filthy stuff as this is (sorry guys who love it, it's not my cup of... oh, forget it).

Review of non-member area of the site is easy: there is only one page, so there isn't that much to see, but there is a movie on this page, so it isn't that uninformative after all. There are very few promises on this page, so there aren't much things to break (except for content being filthy enough, which is somewhat confirmed by sample WMV), but there is one interesting thing there in their "Terms and Conditions" (http://www.nolimitweb.nl/terms.htm , see my other comment to this site for a quote). I have no idea if some provisions was EVER used by them, or if similar conditions are present for any of the other sites, but this is IMHO nothing short of outrageous (they seem to reserve the right to charge members at the site discretion).

Bottom line: not only content is filthy, Terms and Conditions are not less filthy and I would stay away from sites with such Terms and Conditions at any cost.

Visit Mature Toilet Sluts - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: little rabbit's Review

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:30:23 PST

Mature Mega Pass (0)

01-18-08 04:30am

REVIEW REPLY by little rabbit (3)

To little rabbit (3):

"you seem to contradict yourself a bit".

When I see some known mature sites with a rating of 87, I have to rate this one with a 90.
It's not so complicate, just a necessary consistency.

And as I also list all the pro / cons I see, and also why I give such a rate, everybody can consider about.

Just have to read all what I wrote.

View Thread (4)

RE: little rabbit's Review

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:30:19 PST

Mature Mega Pass (0)

01-17-08 06:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To little rabbit (3):

The further explanations do make it clearer why you would rate this a better than average site but, at least to me, you seem to contradict yourself a bit. In your original review you said it was repetitive: "the "screennplay" is really too repetitive : fucking, fucking and fucking". Now you're mentioning at least some variety, with lesbian and solo scenes.

I guess it's just a case of differing opinions when it comes to what makes a site rate higher. To me, even daily updates of women I find attractive will grow stale very quickly when there's very little "chemistry", as you put it. If too many of the models on a site are doing the same thing as the next, I don't know that I could put that site in the excellent category. A good example would be my re-review of ifeelmyself.com. It still has it's charm to me because they update daily and it's still very amateurish, but it's becoming so... damn... repetitive. Kind of like if I were eating roast beef sandwiches everyday for a month - I think I'd start to hate roast beef.

View Thread (4)

RE: little rabbit's Review

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:06:42 PST

Mature Mega Pass (0)

01-17-08 04:06am

REVIEW REPLY by little rabbit (3)

To little rabbit (3):

Why I gave a 90 ?
It's very easy to understand : at mature.nl, the models look really like amateurs mature models.
With all other mature sites, the models have a monotonous looking.

Just take a look at allover30.com, for instance, to see what they will offer for the 2 next weeks....

And silicone chemistry, for one half of the models.

The videos are always with the same screenplay : a boring interview, and after this, 3 videos with a dildo, lying for 10 minutes on her back.

2 or 3 stagged crapelos, and : "Next One".....

Totally boring.

At least, at mature.nl, there are a little of lesbian show, and some good ones solo show.

And the most part of the models are not looking like a Playmate being past her prime.

The best could be a site with the AbbyWinters.com chemistry, and models from 40 to 60.
THis surely will come, but it's a dream, now.

View Thread (4)

RE: little rabbit's Review

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:28:16 PST

Mature Mega Pass (0)

01-16-08 10:28pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To little rabbit (3):

If I've read you right, you've compared this site to other mature sites, they seemed popular, so that somehow means this site deserves a high rating? I'm just not too clear why you would give a site a 90 when you find it so boring, repetitive and lackluster.

Also, unless you join only sites with models, like MetArt or Femjoy, or masturbation or lesbian sites, I think you'll be sadly disappointed with most sites you might have a look at - I think it'd be safe to say that most hardcore sites will have at LEAST one guy for every woman.

View Thread (4)

RE: Looks ok, but speed?

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:14:23 PDT

Teens Love Old Men (0)

09-21-07 04:14am

COMMENT REPLY by igolli (6)

To Denner (227):

I have logged into my mature.nl account a few minutes ago. The speed was ok for browsing and dowloading. I would say the speed is average. Not fast but not noticeable slow in a way that downloading starts to be a pain

View Thread (1)

RE: igolli's Review

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:14:49 PDT

Teens Love Old Men (0)

09-20-07 06:14am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To igolli (6):

Good review from igolli.
This site seems to be worth looking into and according to igolli it looks like it's dutch.
Heavy price, though.

View Thread (1)

Teens Love Old Men Comment

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:06:20 PDT

Teens Love Old Men (0)

09-20-07 06:06am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

Looks ok, but speed?

Seems to be a fine niche-site in same category as Oldje..
Tried to browse - and the speed here was very slow. Wonder if it's the same when you join the site...

Visit Teens Love Old Men - View Replies - Add Reply