PU - Blue Pixels Co. - All Activity

RE: superporn's Review

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:03:40 PST

Zoe Fuck Puppet (0)

01-04-10 12:03pm

REVIEW REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To superporn (0):

Hi superporn and welcome to PU. Just wanted to note that a site that only updates 2x a week and has slow uploads is not worth a score of 100. We try and encourage people to be objective in their scoring, not just giving high scores because they really like a particular model. If you don't want to catch grief for your review then I would suggest reworking your review a little.

View Thread (1)

RE: Obejction! - regional pricing here

Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:20:56 PST

Zoe Fuck Puppet (0)

01-03-10 03:20am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To mr smut (40):

As soon as I see any regional pricing shit, I'm gone.

For good.

Cap'n. :0E

View Thread (1)

Zoe Fuck Puppet Comment

Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:56:14 PST

Zoe Fuck Puppet (0)

01-03-10 12:56am

COMMENT by mr smut (40)

Obejction! - regional pricing here

I've read that 100 points rave review and wanted to see what the site's intro looks like. Well not that impressing to me (I'm not into T-girl fetish to be honest) but I found at least one flaw that would keep me from giving more that 85-90 points no matter how good the site would be an how exact it fulfills the need of someone being in that particular fetish.

Regional pricing is the very obvious flaw I found. As of today a customer in Europe will have to pay about $34 to access the site :-(

Cheers,
Smut

Visit Zoe Fuck Puppet - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: poiu's Review

Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:02:30 PST

Zoe Fuck Puppet (0)

01-02-10 04:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by superporn (0)

To poiu (14):

To be honest I liked the site. I dont agree with this review in its major critisms. The site updates twice a week and the content is of a very high quality involving some of the Uk's best tgirl porn stars.

View Thread (3)

RE: hogosos's Review

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:45:45 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-27-09 08:45am

REVIEW REPLY by walnut (0)

To hogosos (0):

Beuatiful Girl???? DUDE you need you eyesight checked. Butt f**king ugly!!!

View Thread (7)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:39:20 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-14-09 07:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (218):

"Gripping"??

LOL

View Thread (15)

RE: Site reviews

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:00:46 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-14-09 06:00am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To badandy400 (103):

I've always found that when someone understands the reasoning behind a rule, that it help them remember it. It usually also guides them should they ever have a situation where they wonder if a specific action would be breaking the rule or not. Given that, I certainly don't mind explaining the reasoning that went into this rule.

I didn't see your question as being argumentative, at all. Hope you didn't see my reply (in any way) as chastisement for asking.

But yeah, as you've demonstrated with your hamloaf, we tend to have different standards when we've received something for free.

haha ... and I'm getting too old to want a lot of drama so I can't see, "because I fucking said so" as an answer I'll be giving any time soon. :)

View Thread (11)

RE: Site reviews

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:31:36 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-13-09 08:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To Khan (Staff):

This explains the idea pretty well. It has been a year since I read the terms, and yes I did actually read them. I truly can see what you mean. It is kinda like me eating hamloaf, it is only good when it is free. It is not something I would pay for. Free things always seem better, but unfortunately there are not many free porn sites that are worth the page space they would take to even type in here.

I was not trying to be argumentative, I just had not though this issue through as well as you guys apparently have. As I frequently say, you guys have thought of everything!

Simple solution. Next time time one of us asks something like this, instead of explaining it in length just say "because I fuckin said so!" It is so much more dramatic and would act as a reminder to read the terms and rule every now and then. Speaking of which... Seriously though, thanks for the explanation. Your philosophy on this makes perfect sense.

View Thread (11)

RE: Site reviews

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:31:16 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-13-09 07:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To badandy400 (103):

Well, the short answer is, because it's against our Terms. You'll find it mentioned on both the Terms page : Review Rules, #4 under "Are there any other specific rules I need to know?" It's also is mentioned in the FAQ: #6 under General Questions Because it's against the terms each user here agreed to, I saw no need to explain further in my reply.

But, since you specifically asked ...

Since we do not list sites that are normally free of charge, writing reviews for those sites (like TGP's) is moot. So the only types of sites my remark would be addressing are sites we list ... pay sites.

There are a number of reasons we do not allow Reviews to be submitted based on free access. Among those are...

As you mentioned, they undermine the integrity of an unbiased review. Another issue is we needed to totally remove the temptation of users contacting webmasters asking for free access to write reviews. We had a problem with that early on and beefed up the wording in our Terms to address this problem. We also had webmasters offering free access to users (or to some users) in exchange for a review. Again, the fact that the reviewer got special treatment can call into question the ability to be totally unbiased.

We want users to be able to trust reviews they read here. We work very hard to see that the system isn't abused in any way. Doing reviews for sites you haven't visited or for sites you've gotten free access to is against the spirit of what our site represents.

Oh, and the problem with "special cases" is that once you start rationalizing exceptions, there's really no end to it. One can always come up with "good reasons" why they should get free access to pay sites "this one time". In the end, allowing it would not be worth letting the camel's nose in the tent ... if you know what I mean.

Hope that better answers your question.

View Thread (11)

RE: Site reviews

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:53:46 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-13-09 02:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To Khan (Staff):

Khan

Even to a site that normal does charge? I understand that there are no reviews to things such as TGPs. I only mention this as a special circumstance. The idea was to have a trust worthy, usual member here have a chance to poke around this site and construct a review of the actual content without having to fork over the membership money.

I can understand as well not wanting people to have free access in exchange for writing reviews. I had not thought of this before, you guys think o everything! I can see it being very hard to write an objective review for someone after they gave free access. Plus I would want to know that people were not being paid off for writing less than truthful reviews to boost the site.

Although I think in this special case it may be appropriate, I can certainly live with your decision after figuring out for myself why you do not want them. You should have explained why exactly you do not allow this in your reply, but that is okay I figured it out, I think. If I am wrong about why please let me know!

View Thread (11)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:49:20 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-13-09 02:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Khan (Staff):

"A Triumph!"

"The MUST see anal site this season!"

"The Best Porn Site of the Year!"

"Gripping!"

View Thread (15)

RE: Site reviews

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:47:08 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-13-09 04:47am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To badandy400 (103):

badandy400 said: "Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review."

Actually, that wouldn't work since we don't allow Reviews based on free access. Sorry. :(

View Thread (11)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:31:28 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-13-09 12:31am

COMMENT REPLY by james4096 (126)

To Khan (Staff):

Good work there fearless leader.
I logged on today and saw 3 new reviews for this site. Hardly a coincidence.

I wonder who coordinated this flood of reviews.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:25:49 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 08:25pm

COMMENT REPLY by turboshaft (24)

To Khan (Staff):

Great decision!

Hope they, or just the one person posing as multiple users, gets the message.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:19:33 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 08:19pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To Khan (Staff):

I 100% agree with this. As I always say, you guys seem to get everything right around here when it comes to these decisions. I was hoping all of our work would not get deleted, there is some good stuff there.

View Thread (15)

RE: Site reviews

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:13:54 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 08:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To GCode (99):

That is what I am worried about. Sometimes it can be better to be known as a site that has fake reviews written by site operators or "end of the Earth" fans than to not be known at all. I just hope that people looking for this type of site take the time to look at all the comments and replies to the reviews.

The site might be good, I honestly can not comment there. And that is exactly the problem, after all these recent reviews I still can not even speculate on the quality of the site because the reviews are not usable. I was hoping out of al of this to at least have one good, solid review come from someone who has been there on their own accord and can give us some honest perspective. But I certainly would not ask any of our members to pay the site simply to have that review.

Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review. I say it would have to be someone that has been a member here for at least a few months and more than 20 positive trust votes. This way it would well established that these reviews would have the user's best interest in mind. If the site is not worth joining people need to know, and it very well could be that the site lives up to all the hype. I for one am not going to pay them just to satisfy my ever so slight curiosity.

As for PU getting abused. We can abuse them back. Besides I am sure if this abusive shill reviewing gets out of hand the staff will take addition measures. One perhaps being to mandate for this site the review must have a score of 5 or so and must fill out at least half of the personal question in their profile. This is just one idea, but I am sure they have their methods.

View Thread (11)

RE: Site reviews

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:46:15 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:46pm

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (99)

To lk2fireone (116):

Great decision by Khan and thanks for letting me know.

-GCode

View Thread (11)

RE: Site reviews

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:43:11 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:43pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To GCode (99):

Definitely save your money by not joining this site.

In case you missed it, PU will not accept any reviews of this site for 30 days, because of the suspicious reviews.

I pasted below the comment by Khan announcing that no reviews will be accepted:
..................
..................

Khan - PU Staff 03-12-09 06:52pm
Talk Back TRUST USER? YES (1), NO (0)

OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Due to the sudden and unexplainable number of new users submitting unusually high scores this past week ... at least a few shown to be shill activity, we are temporarily suspending Reviews for this site.

We'll revisit this decision after 30 days. But until then, any and all Reviews submitted for this site will be summarily declined.

We're sorry for any inconvenience this may cause but feel this action is warranted to curb the high score reviews that contain little or no substance.

View Thread (11)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:39:14 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To TheSquirrel (30):

Yes, I see Talk Back badge and my Trust vote registered.

Thanks for the heads up. You have a good eye for detail.

Regards.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:30:42 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:30pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To Khan (Staff):

Ik2 - Look under the comment and your vote is there, even though it doesn't register if you ring up his profile.

Khan - Yeah I sorta figured you'd have to be the one who decides on the trust votes! You shoulda been a judge.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:26:16 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To lk2fireone (116):

Look at the top of the page. He has a talkback badge. It's under "Khan PU Staff."

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:25:30 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:25pm

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To lk2fireone (116):

RE: Trust Rating

haha ... funny one guys. Actually it's just a fluke that it even offers a trust rating for staffers. You'll note the badges don't show on my profile. Still, I appreciate the vote of confidence.

Oh, and TheSquirrel, just be sure to leave a reason if you cast a negative vote. BTW, you do know who typically approves the no trust ratings, right? ;) But I promise, if you cast a no trust vote and leave a reason, I'll apply the same loose standard to that as I would if you were casting it for anyone else.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:24:47 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:24pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To TheSquirrel (30):

What kind of badge does he have? When I look at his profile, I see no badges. Maybe you meant he has a club (to hit PU miscreants over the head with).

Actually, when I look at his profile, it does not show any Trust votes, not even mine.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:23:25 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:23pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To Khan (Staff):

Sounds reasonable. I sort of guessed you and Rick must have been working on something in the background. They were really taking the piss.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:20:58 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:20pm

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To TheSquirrel (30):

For now, we're going to leave them ... along with the many replies made by the regular users here. We feel this will actually serve as a better warning than giving the site a clean/blank slate.

We reserve the right to revisit this decision at a later time.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:19:29 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:19pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To lk2fireone (116):

As a natural subversive with an evil sense of humour I was tempted to press the "no" button. But the poor old bugger doesn't deserve it.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:17:00 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:17pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Khan (Staff):

I approve your decision. I was not planning on joining this site anytime in the near future, anyway.

I notice that you have a 0 score for Trust Rating. I will go boldly where no man has gone before, and give you my trust.

But to get your Trust badge, you will need many more votes.

View Thread (15)

RE: OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:11:52 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To Khan (Staff):

At last! Hooray! How about removing all the ones that have already been done?

View Thread (15)

Kim's Anal Heaven Comment

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:52:16 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 06:52pm

COMMENT by Khan (0)

OFFICIAL NOTICE !!

Due to the sudden and unexplainable number of new users submitting unusually high scores this past week ... at least a few shown to be shill activity, we are temporarily suspending Reviews for this site.

We'll revisit this decision after 30 days. But until then, any and all Reviews submitted for this site will be summarily declined.

We're sorry for any inconvenience this may cause but feel this action is warranted to curb the high score reviews that contain little or no substance.

Visit Kim's Anal Heaven - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Site reviews

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:48:17 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 05:48pm

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (99)

To badandy400 (103):

Yeah, the more I think about it I'd rather not even give my money for a review of this site. But who knows, maybe I'll just do it out of spite :) Seriously though, stinks that this site gets abused like this by places. I'm sure they have gotten plenty of hits out of curiousity...

-GCode

View Thread (11)

RE: hogosos's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:02:53 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 05:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by Jeffrey99 (27)

To hogosos (0):

That's cool and all, unless you don't want your reviews taken seriously? If you do, then you need alot more detail. As for Bam it's in your face, that all has to do with what your desktop resolution is at. If it's at 640x480, then yeah anything image will be life size. If it's like most of us here and alot bigger, say 1440x900, then a 640x480 image is nothing more then a thumbnail.

Your review has no facts, it's nothing more then opinion.

View Thread (7)

RE: Site reviews

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:07:24 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 02:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To GCode (99):

I was thinking about the same thing, but I do not think they deserve our money at this point.

View Thread (11)

RE: hogosos's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:05:49 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 02:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To hogosos (0):

How long would it take to simply look for us? Also, there is no reason to jump all over us over typos. We can all appreciate getting you jollies from whatever does it for you, but a lot of us are collectors as much as we are pervs. So we really want to know that is on the site.

View Thread (7)

RE: higgy's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:55:20 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 01:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To higgy (0):

Yup....going to have to do a lot better than that. Give us some actual information. You guys need to give up on this people, we are not buying into it.

View Thread (7)

RE: higgy's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:54:24 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 01:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To turboshaft (24):

I couldn't agree more. What I want is lots of information before I spend my time and money.

View Thread (7)

RE: higgy's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:45:40 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 01:45pm

REVIEW REPLY by turboshaft (24)

To Jay G (63):

One of the recent "reviews" for this site -- now deleted -- had some its pros listed in the cons section.

There is certainly nothing wrong with liking different things, but if you truly do then the review should reflect that in the details.

View Thread (7)

RE: Site reviews

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:27:40 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 01:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To GCode (99):

Save your change. The opinion of most of the PU members that commented on the recent glowing reviews of this site is that the reviews were not trustworthy. The older PU members think this is just a scam, hyping the site to get new members to join.

You appear to think the same.

View Thread (11)

RE: higgy's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:18:16 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 01:18pm

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To higgy (0):

Porn users like LOTS of information about a site. We've often been members of dozens of sites before, and many of us have been burned by sites that promise a lot more than they give when the curtain opens up and you've paid the entry fee.

Different people like different things and that's good. I, for example like very pretty trannies as well as pretty girls and some kinky stuff like anal, bondage & spanking. Therefore I really try to be sympathetic toward those who like different things (as long as they're legal).

What I want here is information about actors/actreses, video style, quality, quantity, responsive webmaster service, and so forth.

General rule: the con part of a review is VERY important since we want to be warned before throwing our money away. So, if there really are no cons because you are a real fanatic about a site, there should be LOTS of "pro's" to explain why this site is so far above the rest.

Best wishes,

Jay

View Thread (7)

RE: Fake Reviews Warning!

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:16:55 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 01:16pm

COMMENT REPLY by turboshaft (24)

To badandy400 (103):

Justification for a high score, as well as lots of exclamation points, is what reviews should be about. We are all biased in some way or another, but I think a 100 or 99 can be validated, especially with the higher character counts that are allowed for reviews.

These reviews barely even read as advertisements, they just come across like every spam subject line we have had to read as we empty out the junk mail folder.

Is there a way to temporarily block reviews for this site until the flood of enthusiasm recedes some?

View Thread (11)

RE: hogosos's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:15:22 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 01:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by hogosos (0)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

Hi Jeffery. About the resolution......all I know about that is that when you click on Kims pics....BAM!! Its in your face. Im a pervert just like the rest of you assholes! I dont know about resolution.....I just know about jackin my cock to sum good shit!
I am not a fake.....I just love Kims stuff and I know she is in the UK and I am over here in the U.S. wishin I was lickin her ass!

View Thread (7)

RE: hogosos's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:09:58 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 01:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by hogosos (0)

To badandy400 (103):

Sounds to me as though you all are from a competitors site and are talking shit. Good...don't buy it! (And this is making the site look BACK?) (your quote)
I am having a hard time with people that complain about something they have never seen. So fine....stay away and save the good shit for us who know.
You stated "everything in this review I could have written, and I never subscribed to this site".......what the fuck does that mean?
If you never subscribed, then how the fuck do you know?
All I know is that Kim is the #1 when it cums to nasty!
THAT my friends is what porn is all about.

View Thread (7)

RE: higgy's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:35:51 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 12:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by turboshaft (24)

To higgy (0):

This is getting pretty irritating! What is this, the fifth non-review for this site? At least this one is 90 instead of 100.

View Thread (7)

RE: higgy's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:32:21 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 12:32pm

REVIEW REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To higgy (0):

Man, what is the deal with this site? A never heard of niche that suddenly gets a bunch of glowing reviews from newbies with no content to any of the reviews. Spam conspiracy or coincidence? I choose the former unless the reviews on this place start getting better.

View Thread (7)

RE: higgy's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:44:02 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 11:44am

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To higgy (0):

Pro's and Con's are lacking. How many videos are there right now before you might rejoin? Are the vids HD? What about the pictures, are they exclusive and high res? MORE INFO PLEASE.

View Thread (7)

Kim's Anal Heaven Comment

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:38:31 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 11:38am

COMMENT by GCode (99)

Site reviews

Yo,
What's the deal with this site getting a new review almost daily from new users? Is there a deal or something I don't know about. I would consider myself pretty experienced in shemale sites and this site has never been on my peak interests list to join. Plus, these reviews are all really short and tell me nothing about this site. I went to it just to see what it is about and it looks like an average solo site. Maybe I should scrounge up some change and join this place so everyone can get a solid review.....

-GCode

Visit Kim's Anal Heaven - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: hogosos's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:29:55 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 10:29am

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To hogosos (0):

This is yet another very subjective review to a site that has had a lot of attention because of these type of reviews. There is no fact in this, only personal opinion. It read the same as the other reviews that have been scrutinized and I again suspect it is the same person or someone from the same group being asked to write these and told what to say.

Everything in this review I could have wrote, and I have never subscribed to this site. If you read the first review written by JoeMushashi you can see that he complains about a lack of cum shots. And guess what, that is the only real con listed here. Image that, a site where a shemale wears boot and nylons, of course they do it is to make the performer appear more feminine.

The simple fact of the matter is that this review really did not tells us anything new and I must concur with Jeffrey with the conclusion that this is yet another ad. Seriously, we are not buying t and this is making the site look back, thus we will not buy a membership to the site and warn others against it.

View Thread (7)

RE: hogosos's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:53:14 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 09:53am

REVIEW REPLY by Jeffrey99 (27)

To hogosos (0):

Could use alot more detail in your review. Example, what's the image resolution? How about the video resolution? How often is the site updated? As of know your review is more of a ad, then a review. You make your review sound fake.

View Thread (7)

RE: Dillon's Review

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:51:48 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-12-09 07:51am

REVIEW REPLY by hogosos (0)

To Dillon (0):

I have to tell ya that I have seen many T-Girls over the past few years, but the legs and cock on this girl is to die for. I had a fuckin instant hard-on when I saw Kim. As a few of you have stated, you gotta like it to love it, well I love Kim.
She even personally e-mailed me a couple of times thanking me for my subscription. She has many members to her site, but her fine looks coupled with her personal touch is second to none!
There is not a part of her body, that I wouldn' gladly put my tongue!
I fuckin worship her, man!

View Thread (8)

RE: Fake Reviews Warning!

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:32:12 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-11-09 07:32pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To pat362 (235):

Exactly, you do not think Videobox should get a 100 (you never have reviewed by they way) but you can see why I score it so highly based on my review and the replies to the review. I gave it a 100 with many reason that are very important to me. Since everyone is different we all rate things a little different but overall we are fairly consistent. If you reviewed and score them you would likely give them a high score, but if you did not I would suspect that you would give a number of valid reasons and why those reasons are important to you.

I agree. Keeping an eye on things is all of our jobs, not just the staff. Of course the staff is needs to keep things right here because they are financially invested in this site's success. We are invested by time and the fact we like being here doing our part to contribute to the porn world. So of course we must react when someone comes along to pee in our porn pool. This is why the PU staff gave us the option to of assigning "trust" to people, and this is especially effect I believe because we can say we do not trust people as well as trust them. The "NO" trusts are very important. They make ill-agenda people stick out. And since the staff have gone through the work of making this place for us we should help them out by stepping on bad people's balls!

View Thread (11)

RE: Fake Reviews Warning!

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:13:56 PDT

Kim's Anal Heaven (0)

03-11-09 07:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To badandy400 (103):

Giving videobox a 100 score may have been a little high, but in your defense that site is amazing for people that want to download porn movies instead of buying them. It's important that we all police the reviews because we have a few newbies that might fall prey to the B.S reviews that have been appearing. I've always thought that the most important thing that PU does is prevent others from being taken in by fake reviews.

View Thread (11)