PU - eTech Marketing Inc. - All Activity

All Over 30 Comment

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:34:41 PST

All Over 30 (7)

02-20-10 05:34am

COMMENT by Capn (11)

Any Change?

Am I right in thinking that on the whole the outfit selections are largely unchanged?

I am always hoping for more appropriate mature attire:
Formal, smart casual , real uniform etc which I do appreciate there is as well, but I still see a few tacky play uniforms featured in recent update section.

Does that impression hold true in the members area?

What sort of ratio are we looking at?

Thanks.

Cap'n. :0)

Visit All Over 30 - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: No more daft outfits

Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:15:11 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-05-10 04:15pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To Auxilia (3):

Okay, we're on the same wave length on that subject! :-)

View Thread (10)

RE: No more daft outfits

Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:39:19 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-05-10 11:39am

COMMENT REPLY by Auxilia (3)

To messmer (57):

Well some of the lacy stuff was OK, but some of the apparel looked a little, well cheap. I just prefer my ladies to start off wearing more!

View Thread (10)

RE: No more daft outfits

Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:17:43 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-05-10 11:17am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To Auxilia (3):

I'm glad you didn't take offense. Still wondering what you meant by the lacy section being daft? This happens to be my favorite section and my complaint always was that any model wearing underwear at all was being put into that niche, watering it down considerably. :-) I would honestly like your opinion.

View Thread (10)

RE: No more daft outfits

Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:10:28 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-05-10 11:10am

COMMENT REPLY by Auxilia (3)

To messmer (57):

Dude! None taken at all!

I guess what I was trying to say (badly) was that I like costumes PROVIDED they are done well! St Mackenzie's does it VERY well IMHO, Fets.com used to long ago. Any costume genre done on the cheap looks exactly like that - cheap!

View Thread (10)

RE: Playing to the strengths of the niche?

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:49:01 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-04-10 03:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To mr smut (36):

Mr. Smut wrote:

Here's a quote from a new model at AllOver30 :-)

"I am an exhibitionist and my day job requires me to look prim and proper all day but i sometime rebel and dont wear knickers under my work clothes that keeps me feeling randy all day."

My response to the model: "But .. but .. darling, we'd love to see knickers under your clothes and then watch you take them off slowly. You may be excited about being so daring but some of us like you fully wrapped and then have you gradually reveal yourself."

I always feel badly that "Village Ladies" is such a gawd-awful site when it comes to quality. The models are often too plain, the pictures are too small and outdated, I'm not sure if they have videos, but their emphasis on featuring ordinary woman dressed in ordinary clothes (complete with some old fashioned ordinary undies) push my buttons every time. How I dream of a site that contains High Res pictures and videos along those lines!

View Thread (6)

RE: No more daft outfits

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:34:53 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-04-10 03:34pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To Auxilia (3):

Oops, just looked up who you might be and came across your review of St. Mackenzies. Quite obviously one of us likes school girl outfits. No offense was intended. :-)

View Thread (10)

RE: No more daft outfits

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:28:10 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-04-10 03:28pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To RagingBuddhist (39):

"I'm with you on the French maid outfits, although it's not quite as bad as angel wings. If I ever see a woman on this site with angel wings, I'll be absolutely done with it!"

Couldn't be worse than those phony nurses' outfits made of vinyl. :-)
I think I hate all uniforms. School girl outfits (usually worn by mature women) are another pet peeve.

View Thread (10)

RE: No more daft outfits

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:15:14 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-04-10 03:15pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To Auxilia (3):

I'd be interested to know what you found "daft" in the lacy ladies category? I always took them to task for not being lacy enough. Is that what you mean? Another question: are the ladies equipped with a bit more underwear during their shoots these days? I found that most wore the absolute minimum and could switch from business suit to stark naked in five pictures. One of the photographers took our complaints to heart and promised to go undies shopping for more exciting picture sets for those of us who like a more gradual strip rather than see the models come to the set commando style. :-) See my comment a bit farther down.

View Thread (10)

RE: No more daft outfits

Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:00:52 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-02-10 11:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (36)

To RagingBuddhist (39):

It's Mature Housewives or Furry Housewives (recent example is Erica) if lots of pubes can be seen to be more precise ;-) I've just taken another look at Andie's latest Elegant Ladies update that's more like it! I was happy to see Beata do some jogging. India F with glasses is a stunning 9 to 5 lady.

All in all I'm quite happy and have signed for another 3 months yesterday :-)

But I agree that angel wings are a no-go ... this simply sucks!

Cheers,
Smut

View Thread (10)

RE: No more daft outfits

Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:56:14 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-02-10 12:56pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (39)

To Auxilia (3):

I'm with you on the French maid outfits, although it's not quite as bad as angel wings. If I ever see a woman on this site with angel wings, I'll be absolutely done with it!

I think you meant "homey", although some of the women ARE a bit on the homely side. ; - ) And I believe the category name you're looking for is what they just call Mature Women - a kind of a generic catch-all for shoots that didn't fit the other niches/fetishes.

View Thread (10)

RE: No more daft outfits

Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:53:49 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-02-10 12:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (11)

To Auxilia (3):

I appreciate the support.

Their concept is fine. It is just to me I feel the webamsters & some of their photgraphers are stuck in the teenage porn mindset.

Cap'n :0/

View Thread (10)

All Over 30 Comment

Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:00:30 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-02-10 12:00pm

COMMENT by Auxilia (3)

No more daft outfits

I agree with Cap'n, above. Ill fitting 'French Maid' outfits HAVE HAD THEIR DAY!

My favourite content on this site were in no particular order:

9 to 5 ladies (office and sports wear)
elegant ladies (evening wear)
a category which used 'homely' setting and casual everyday - can't remember what it was called

The lacey ladies category was I thought a bit daft. I also thought their M/F and much of their F/F material was a bit poor.

Visit All Over 30 - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Playing to the strengths of the niche?

Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:56:19 PST

All Over 30 (7)

12-02-09 06:56am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To Capn (11):

Again a matter of taste in women - guess we all have difference preferences - but I'll still agree with Capn: at a site like this I'll expect/hope for women like the kind you take an extra look at down at the supermarket ( and would not mind to go home with and fuck, LOL)....

View Thread (6)

RE: Playing to the strengths of the niche?

Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:33:01 PST

All Over 30 (7)

12-01-09 11:33pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (11)

To RagingBuddhist (39):

Not really.

Effectively I'm pushing for formal & casual.
I am saying they shouldn't try & ask them to do & wear the same things as a 'teenager.' :0)

View Thread (6)

RE: Playing to the strengths of the niche?

Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:13:10 PST

All Over 30 (7)

12-01-09 10:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (39)

To Capn (11):

I can't say I agree with this assessment. I've joined this site a few times myself, and I like the idea of their changing clothes and playing out different roles from set to set. Older women who can go from evening gown to street clothes and pull 'em both off (no pun intended) are really appealling to me. If I'm reading you right, you're suggesting that older women should all fit one mold - the elegant older woman. I think that would get boring pretty quickly.

View Thread (6)

RE: Playing to the strengths of the niche?

Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:09:28 PST

All Over 30 (7)

12-01-09 10:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (36)

To Capn (11):

Here's a quote from a new model at AllOver30 :-)

"I am an exhibitionist and my day job requires me to look prim and proper all day but i sometime rebel and dont wear knickers under my work clothes that keeps me feeling randy all day."

Cheers,
Smut

View Thread (6)

RE: Playing to the strengths of the niche?

Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:45:37 PST

All Over 30 (7)

12-01-09 06:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (79)

To Capn (11):

Hmm, I have always found that each model gets like 3-4 shoots in a huge varying amount of outfits. The categories were 9-5, elegant, housewife, and some others that I remember. With that said, I think there is a lot of content outside of glamour at this site. Read my reply to mr smut's recent review as to why I feel I get the most dissatisfied with this site (and mature sites in general).

My 2 cents...

View Thread (6)

All Over 30 Comment

Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:58:56 PST

All Over 30 (7)

12-01-09 03:58pm

COMMENT by Capn (11)

Playing to the strengths of the niche?

..I honestly don't think so.

I have been a member on and off for a few times, but could never put my finger on why I was always dissatisfied.

I think this is it.

A mature site should concentrate more on the elegance of a mature woman....not dress her in glam clothes that make her look a bit cheap and sad. :0/

...or make her perform like a mainstream porn star.

Have her dressed prim & proper either formal or casual...
It gives the impression she wouldn't dream of stripping naked for the camera. It then adds a lot to the eroticism when she does. ;0)

Visit All Over 30 - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: mr smut's Review

Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:26:06 PST

All Over 30 (7)

11-30-09 11:26pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (79)

To mr smut (36):

mehh, I find the rate of finding daily updates a burden for mature sites with this site as no exception. The true 'mature' niche calls for a discrepancy amongst models and the need to update daily has put a damper on this site. With that said, this is true for the other two 'big' sites of the niche, anilos and karups mature women. As stated before amongst other convos in the forums and replies, I do see the 'plus' of daily updates for most users. However, in a niche like this where models appear to be scarce, in my opinion; the update scheme dampers the content. Don't get me wrong, I have reviewed and agreed that this site is superior in its niche but the need for such quick updates seems to create poor material in my opinion. This includes model selection and actual scene footage. I just wish that this niche would not want to update so damn quick and focus on good, quality mature models that are not only great looking but stay true to the niche. This meaning, as a member, I found a lot of these models here to be a bit unattractive. I do not believe these models are bad looking to age but I can imagine them not even be attractive while they were in their younger years. Why? because the need to update so quickly and not discriminate.

Anyways, I feel I'm ranting a bit and I want to aknowledge that this review is well founded. I can totally see why the score is as high as you gave it but I just felt as a member that the model selection could be a bit more regulated. Thanks for the review and believe me, I am a lover of mature content as well!

View Thread (1)

All Over 30 Comment

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:53:12 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

10-08-09 11:53am

COMMENT by Chipster (3)

Saw TORI on a TGP, had to rejoin !

I had let my subscription to AO30 lapse, in order for them to build up new sets. Saw TORI on a TGP, had to rejoin immediately after feasting my eyes on those samples ! Happy to see many new models on the site. Also my previous favorite YOLANDA has some girl-girl sets added since I left. Waist long hair, full figure !

Visit All Over 30 - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Capn's Review

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:32:26 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-11-09 11:32pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (11)

To WeeWillyWinky (82):

I would find that a real irritation.
You got too bored & distracted to read through a few lines of text.
So think how it would be for me waiting for a download of something I don't want & then having to watch it & write a review of it! :0/

:0)

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:47:11 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-11-09 08:47pm

REVIEW REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (82)

To Capn (11):

Hi Capn,

In regard to not commenting on videos: I see your point, since you don't care for video, but there is a way to be simple and totally objective about commenting on it. For instance, download a few, and get some basic stats, for instance:

"Vids are mostly 640x480, bitrates averaging about 2000k." This doesn't pass any real judgment on them and you don't have to look at them at all, and the information can be helpful to people who are considering a subscription. You might also touch on other points, as in, do they contain a music track, does the videographer yakkety-yak his way through the vid, or perhaps he believes he is the Fellini of porn and films everything while standing on his head...

Even if this info has been passed on by other reviewers, it still improves your own review and makes it more complete. I'm more of a pic guy myself, so I understand where you're coming from.

I didn't read through the whole exchange so apologies if someone has already said all of this.

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:56:33 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-08-09 03:56pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (11)

To GCode (79):

Formal, casual, everyday clothes, yes, that is what I prefer.

Well, as I listed in my cons, I don't care for the hardcore or the videos. I am not into lesbianism either TBH.

I don't take it that you are trying to give me a hard time, on the contrary, I enjoy the exchange of opinion. :0)

As regards the video issue.
I don't see a lot of point watching if I don't enjoy it.
It is not as if I am being paid for it. LOL!
Not being an enthusiast for them, I doubt my opinion would be of any use to folk anyway.
I think it fairer just to be up front about it & say I won't pass comment on them.
I suppose I could add some statistics referring to them?

You see where I am on this?

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:41:24 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-08-09 03:41pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (79)

To Capn (11):

I am getting a better understanding and can agree to an extent on how you feel about a mature woman dressed in glam. However, the main point I'm getting at is that is like 1/4, if not less of the content on this site is glamour; so I don't understand how this can be a such a huge setback for you. I'd say more than half of the photos are featuring the women in everyday clothes. Isn't that what you want? (confused).

I am not trying to give you a hard time at all. But, I am just trying to understand your scoring for the site. A site that mixes up content with solo, lesbianism, and hardcore should be more praised, even if the solo content is what you want mostly. I just don't see how this is a negative aspect of a site and worthy of points being reduced.

Right on with the only commenting on only photography. However, I only think doing this will be a set back for your reviews in the future to not include some info on them. But, to each it's own.

But, to sum it up, I don't think I'm going to fully understand the scoring of this review without some more clarification about as to why certain aspects are cut down. However, these are opinion based reviews and just because I don't understand or fully agree with the review does not mean I am right. Thanks for your time.

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:47:22 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-08-09 01:47pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (11)

To GCode (79):

Thanks for your comprehensive response.

Everyone's perceptions & opinions vary
That is what makes a site like this so interesting in being able to exchange views.

What I am trying to get at with the glam clothing remark is that in some cases it can come over as mutton dressed as lamb, especially on a mature site & this one is no exception to that IMO.
I think mature ladies often look at their best in formal or casual attire.

The reason I will probably always refrain from comment on videos in any review I write is I don't care for them. I rarely if ever watch them, so on that basis it would not be fair to comment on them.
By & large, hardcore similarly does not appeal to me.

I hope you can understand better where I am coming from on this! ;0)

:0)

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:44:58 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-08-09 10:44am

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (79)

To Capn (11):

I'm a bit confused as far as the mainstream glam remark? Maybe just the elegant ladies category but I found more than half the outfits to be regular attire worn to the mall or them doing regular household chores. I think there is a superior mix of glam with different outfits. Plus, there is a lot of working woman attire (I.E.: secretary) which I would never qualify as glamour at all.

I do agree with the fact that not all models are beauties. I think this is due to the site trying to update so much quickly that they cannot pick and choose quality models for updates. But, with talks about this with messmer and others, one person's gem of a woman can be another person's hag.

I'm not trying to ridicule or be negative, but I dislike the fact that this review had no comment about the videos. It's not fair for the site which has both quality photography and videography to only be judged on your opinion of the quality of photography. But, this is just my opinion.

To move on, while personally I think the score is a bit low, I just can't figure out why the score is so low. 77 is a bit average for this site in my opinion. All I can see for the reason that the site is scored a bit lower than I think is because you think there is too much glamour photos, it features hardcore plus solo, and not all the models are hot? Interesting.

Thanks for the review and welcome to PU. I hope to see more reviews soon. Take care.

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:49:54 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-07-09 12:49pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (11)

To RagingBuddhist (39):

Well, the wider you range a site the more likely there is material included which won't appeal.

Given that it is a niche site, I think it is a mistake to try and go mainstream with it.
That goes for the outfits & the nature of the material. Glam wear & matures don't always sit well together either.

Just the way I see it. :0)

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:40:15 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-07-09 12:40pm

REVIEW REPLY by RagingBuddhist (39)

To Capn (11):

I can't argue the score you gave the site if it didn't work for you, but I don't understand how you can knock it for trying to appeal to a wide range of tastes. I guess you could call women over the age of 30 a niche, but it's not like they're a women in chocolate sauce site and they started branching out into vegetable based condiments. Being over 30 isn't really a constriction (unless you have a need to get asked for ID at the bar). I guess I'm just not sure how offering variety can be a bad thing. One of the things I've always liked about AO30 is that just about every update includes something from a different category. A new model, a solo video, a new picture set from an existing model, etc.

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:36:24 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-06-09 10:36am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (11)

To messmer (57):

How very true! :0)

View Thread (10)

RE: Capn's Review

Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:31:19 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

09-06-09 10:31am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To Capn (11):

I agree with the points you made, Capn, but here we have once again one of those attempts by a site to make it right for everyone and for you and me their effort has backfired while others are delighted to finally find the hardcore they've been looking for. Chacun a son gout, I guess, I just wish there were more sites for mon gout!

View Thread (10)

RE: Demand for quick updates affects quality plus niche

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:54:33 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

07-30-09 10:54am

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (79)

To messmer (57):

I found this to be the only basic burden of the site, that and the videos being a bit underpar in terms of technicalities. It's a shame that this site and Anilos are the only two basic good sites for mature content. Oh, and that Karups one too I guess? Well keep me posted if there are any stand out updates but until that, I think I may just be happy with my monthly purchase until next year or so.

View Thread (2)

RE: Demand for quick updates affects quality plus niche

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:17:39 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

07-30-09 08:17am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To GCode (79):

I'm a bit late in responding to your comment but just want you to know I agree with you, now that I have re-subscribed to this site. The promise of HD Videos made me do it! There have not been too many downloads of picture sets on my part because many of the models are indeed not very attractive.

View Thread (2)

RE: Site became noticeably better - at first glance!

Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:46:55 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

07-16-09 10:46am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To mr3633 (9):

You're very welcome. It was a pleasure!

View Thread (4)

RE: Site became noticeably better - at first glance!

Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:09:04 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

07-15-09 11:09am

COMMENT REPLY by mr3633 (9)

To messmer (57):

Messmer,
Thanks very much for taking a look into my request. I appreciate you taking the time to respond.

View Thread (4)

RE: Site became noticeably better - at first glance!

Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:57:53 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

07-14-09 12:57pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To mr3633 (9):

Hey mr3633, you made me do some extra work :-) because I usually don't go to the hardcore area of this site (I use Video sites for that) but by a rough count there are approx. 240 b/g videos and about 400 b/g picture sets available. Mind you g/g is lumped together with b/g but the majority of the scenes appear to be b/g. If you were NOT a member some time ago please keep in mind, if you should be tempted to subscribe, that only the newer shoots are being offered in HD and that I complained in my review some time ago about the poor video quality at that time. Now the site is a delight.

View Thread (4)

RE: Site became noticeably better - at first glance!

Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:30:32 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

07-14-09 11:30am

COMMENT REPLY by mr3633 (9)

To messmer (57):

Messmer,
Thanks for the update. Can you advise as to how many hardcore scenes (boy/girl) are on the site? I was a member some time ago and it seems I was a bit disappointed by the quantity (unless I'm confusing this site with another).

View Thread (4)

All Over 30 Comment

Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:02:52 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

07-14-09 09:02am

COMMENT by messmer (57)

Site became noticeably better - at first glance!

I was going to edit my previous review and up the score by ten points but because too much time had lapsed I would have had to write a new one so I'll praise AO30 through this comment:

This site has gone through a very positive change. Since May, most videos are now available in HD 1280x720, 3751 kbps format, there has also been a vast improvement when it comes to the picture sets, they are now being offered at 1600x2400 and many of the older sets are being remastered to the new, larger size. Hooray, it's an unofficial 95 for AO30 now.

Oh, yeah, almost forgot: all of the new interviews I have watched so far were conducted by WOMEN while all the scenes (so far) were devoid of embarrassing comments by male videographers, that's got to count for another couple of points. If I don't watch myself I'll give this site a hundred yet! :-)

P.S. July 16: I should clarify one statement a bit: Since May all NEW models are being shot in HD, in today's large update there was not a single HD quality video to be found because this site still updates from mostly older stock that was shot before May. They do make a good effort to convert picture sets and videos but, in my estimation, it will be a while before all the daily updates contain HD.

P.P.S. July 30: There has not been a single update in HD videos this week. I am hugely disappointed because the presence of HD (finally!!!) was my one and only incentive for re-subscribing. I feel I have been scammed and take back anything complimentary I have written in this remark. Picture sets are still mostly unimaginative and boring with the ladies constantly forgetting to bring enough underwear for a shoot.

P.P.P.S August 12: The end of a disappointing month. I like the site and wish it well but will give it some time to really improve before I will re-subscribe.

My intial gushing seems to have been premature because there are a lot of videos offered to this day that are of inferior quality (compared to HD) and as I stated above their photographers have to get a bit more inventive, a lot more inventive. One good sign, one of their photographers went shopping this weekend for some old-fashioned lingerie. We'll see if it will show up in the sets in three months, or so.

Visit All Over 30 - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: GCode's Review

Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:30:06 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

04-01-09 07:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To GCode (79):

Thanks GCode, I was a member of this site only recently so my biggest and only question was: how is the video quality now? I know I was very disappointed at the time of my subscription and after a while only downloaded the interviews in order to get to know the models a bit better. I'd be back in a flash if they would upgrade their videos to "Anilos" quality. Everything else I held forth on above was just idle chitchat! :-)

View Thread (5)

RE: GCode's Review

Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:18:14 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

04-01-09 07:18pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (79)

To messmer (57):

To each it's own :) Thanks for the comments on the review! If you have any other questions about the site let me know.

View Thread (5)

RE: GCode's Review

Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:15:22 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

04-01-09 06:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To GCode (79):

You're right about those twenty-aomething MILFs, they should never be in the mature category. And I do agree that there are some downright "hags" on this site. But not that many .. not to me, anyway. :-)

View Thread (5)

RE: GCode's Review

Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:57:05 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

04-01-09 04:57pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (79)

To messmer (57):

I suppose you are right but this site has some downright hags :) I am quite open to all women and I even don't mind some more of the 'ugly' women going at it or you could even say plain janes. This site has a lot of beautiful older women and plain janes. However, I lump these two categories in terms of attractiveness together because I think they both have great qualities that most can agree on. I am not trying to sound superficial but I understand that concept of others finding certain qualities better than others. As I think I said in a post on the forum, I think the overall consensus of men know what an attractive woman is and can agree on what a total hag is. Were talking about porn here and I'm not gonna get in to personality cause that's a whole diff concept. For example, a plain jane can be totally hot to me cause she is totally down to earth and a playboy bunny can be totally disgusting to me because she's a downright bitch. However, in porn, I wanna see the playboy bunny and not the plainer jane if I have a choice. And by looking at anilos, I see this concept being put in to the place. That site looks great as far as the content is and I think they are on a great pace to give this place a run for their money. So I guess what I'm trying to say is if the standards were lifted just a little, I'd prolly give this a low score in the 90's, maybe it's opinion based but it's just how I feel. However, I prolly would deduct points if they went out and got these 20 something 'milfs' I see on all these other 'mature' sites. Maybe, if they would just not worry about updating so much, they can find better quality models. And by the way, I don't mind a 'lesser' attractive model being thrown in to the mix every once in awhile, just not daily :)

View Thread (5)

RE: GCode's Review

Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:05:51 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

04-01-09 04:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (57)

To GCode (79):

Nice and thorough review, GCode. Thanks for the information regarding the video quality. Reading between the lines I guess they're not quite up to "Anilos" standards yet.

If I may be allowed one observation, though, when it comes to the attractiveness (or lack thereof) of some of the models. I used to belong to a binaries usenet group before spam took over and invariably someone would speak up in connection with a posting and say,(not to me): "Can't you post anything better than these pictures of old frumps", while another would say about the same model: "Hey, thanks, for posting sets of this woman, she's been a favorite of mine for a long time!" I don't think a site can be judged by the attractiveness of its models when tastes are so dramatically different.

Just a casual observation accompanied by a mea culpa because I did the same thing. You may have noticed that I gave the site a slightly lower score than you, and in my case it was because of the terrible quality of the picture sets some of the photographers put out.

Imagine my surprise when one of my most despised photographers turned out to be someone else's highly praised favorite! :-)

View Thread (5)

All Over 30 Comment

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:18:03 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

03-24-09 08:18pm

COMMENT by GCode (79)

Demand for quick updates affects quality plus niche

Hello,
I joined this site earlier in the month after scanning good reviews from others here. However, when it comes to the quanity of the site which is great, the quality of the models tends to be affected imho. But, I do know that the niche of real mature models gets in the way of finding a lot of models because of reasons I'll get in to some other time. Therefore, I have to say that the models here that I find attractive are far in between the lousy ones. I'm thinking the demand for new models and quick updates is the culprit. Don't get me wrong, this site does A LOT of things right and is near perfect in all those aspects. Also, I understand quick updates is very attractive to customers. I just have to say, a lot of these models look like they weren't even attractive in their teens, 20's, or even now. I feel I have an okay eye for natural, mature women and I know women can blossom even more as time goes on but c'mon...Does anyone else agree or what. I think updating less here would get more quality models, which I think this place needs.

Visit All Over 30 - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: How good are the videos now?

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:18:07 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

03-24-09 09:18am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (57)

To GCode (79):

Don't I wish that the webmaster of that site would look in and decide to do something about the definition of his videos. There's wmv and then there is wmv. On some sites it's almost HD quality but on AllOver30 the videos are usually a bit too blurry and washed out for me. I love that site and would like nothing better than to see it improve in that ONE area!

View Thread (2)

RE: How good are the videos now?

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:48:46 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

03-23-09 07:48pm

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (79)

To messmer (57):

I'm gonna do a new review pretty soon for this site but the videos seem to be the same as the older ones. Same WMV and MPEG formats at the. They look okay I suppose but def not up to par with what I've seen on plenty of other sites.

View Thread (2)

All Over 30 Comment

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:05:57 PDT

All Over 30 (7)

03-18-09 11:05am

COMMENT by messmer (57)

How good are the videos now?

I was a member of this site some time ago and while I liked it in general for catering to the fans of mature women their videos were horribly inadequate. How are they nowadays? Anything approaching HD quality yet?

Visit All Over 30 - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Fantastic mature site

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:22:43 PST

All Over 30 (7)

02-27-09 06:22pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (71)

To Pornviewer (5):

I've actually never joined but I know that I have seen B/G scenes on some tgp sites and you might find some on the tour. How much b/g they have I can't really say. You might try posting a comment under AO30 here at PU to see if someone else knows more than I do.

View Thread (8)

RE: Fantastic mature site

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:05:12 PST

All Over 30 (7)

02-27-09 05:05pm

COMMENT REPLY by Pornviewer (5)

To Wittyguy (71):

Is AO30 just softcore? Any male/female hard core sex?

View Thread (8)

All Over 30 Comment

Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:24:04 PST

All Over 30 (7)

01-03-09 09:24am

COMMENT by TheRizzo (23)

Yummy Lilli

Have you guys seen Lilli on All Over 30 yet? My oh my. 48 years old with great big tits. These are the kinda girls I want them to add more of down the road.

Visit All Over 30 - View Replies - Add Reply