PU - BCash4you - All Activity

RE: Drooler's Review

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:08:59 PST

Ariel's Blog (1)

11-18-08 02:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (154)

To lk2fireone (6):

I don't even remember how I stumbled upon it, but I'm there several times a week, looking for new sites, checking their "news," or hunting down an alias (the latest was Era Aliska Olena Anna). It's great.

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:39:24 PST

Ariel's Blog (1)

11-18-08 10:39am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (6)

To Drooler (154):

Many thanks for the heads up on eurobabeindex.

www.eurobabeindex.com is a great resource. I hate to think of all the effort that some people used to make it. Would warp my mind to try to cover all those web sites checking out their favorite models.

Seriously, that is one great index, with the model's aliases, a nice photo to identify her, and the web sites she appears at.

There's also the linked forum thread for the model, with pics and links.

Could easily spend weeks or months looking through this site.

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:27:13 PST

Ariel's Blog (1)

11-16-08 11:27am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (154)

To lk2fireone (6):

Thanks for all of the info. Another name that Ariel has gone by is Piper Fawn, which is the one I use for her in my "stash" since there are other models named Gabriela and Ariel.

A good place to find the various aliases of the Euro models is at www.eurobabeindex.com. A search for "gabriela" will find Ariel (etc.) and a good list of the sites she's appeared in.

I agree about the Magoo approach. I'd rather the girl look real instead of being photoshopped into some kind of "art" object (with high-intensity red hair or whatever).

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:06:42 PST

Ariel's Blog (1)

11-16-08 09:06am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (6)

To Drooler (154):

Nice, informative review.

Just a side note: If you like the model Ariel: Two of the best photosets I saw of her were posted at Met-art and Metmodels.

The Met-art set was posted 2005.01.04, named "Presenting Gabriela", by Magoo.

The Metmodels set was posted 2006.07.22., named "Fresh", by Magoo.

Ariel was named Gabriela at both Met-art and at Metmodels at that time.

She currently goes under the name of Ariel A. at Met-art.

I don't like the way Magoo colorizes his pictures. I like more lifelike, realistic color tones on the model.

But Ariel really looks like a yummy young girl-next-door in these two photosets, especially the Metmodel photoset. Like you said in the review, the expressions on a girl's face can change a photo from boring to interesting/attractive or vice versa.

She's a sweet, sweet girl, I'd really like to bite into (In my dreams).

More recent photosets of Ariel at either Met-art or Metmodels do not compare to the earliest sets. Glaring hair color, excessive makeup, whatever, she is just not presented as attractively as before. Is there some technical reason why a girl with red hair is more difficult to photograph so that her hair does not look like a dye-job?

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:04:45 PDT

Ariel's Blog (1)

09-19-08 12:04am

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (58)

To Drooler (154):

I would join but seems just so so .
darn she looks hot.

View Thread (5)

Ariel's Blog Comment

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:37:04 PDT

Ariel's Blog (1)

06-21-08 05:37am

COMMENT by apoctom (144)

Redhead Thoughts

As a huge fan of redheads, I was in awe when I found this model on DailyNiner.com. She has a website under the name Ariel, but also went by Piper Fawn and Faith Lightspeed.

I've only seen the few photos on DailyNiner and her site's preview, so I was wondering if anyone had seen her other work, any videos, or had any comments about the site. Thanks.

Visit Ariel's Blog - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: I agree with Drooler

Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:44:26 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

04-12-08 02:44am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (154)

To CactusJack (0):

Yes, it isn't as if we first apply eyedrops then immediately look at porn. You might have read the webmaster's reply to my "Watch4Blurriness" comment. Art? Right. How very compelling.

And about the vids, I agree agree agree. Who knows? They might be the antidote to a Ritalin overdose.

I like vids that are paced slowly enough in the right places and that pick it up when it's time, but with continuity of motion and "connection." Such videos are few and far between.

I could care less how "professionally" the video editors work in fades, corner wipes, color shifts, and other such petty tricks every 1.3 seconds.

View Thread (1)

Watch 4 Beauty Comment

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:37:26 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

04-11-08 12:37pm

COMMENT by CactusJack (0)

I agree with Drooler

Big, blurry and granulated pictures are not the reason why I pay to join a site either.

Most of the sets are super soft-core and are not erotic or sexual, but try to be in their themes and titles.

The choppy/bouncy fast-paced video editing is probably the worst thing about the site. About the only thing I desired after watching them was a Dramamine pill and a motion-sickness bag.

Like the Hegre-Art site, this one seems to be more focused on travel locations, clothes, props, shadows, etc. rather than on the clear, pure sexual energy/beauty of the model herself.

About the only good thing I have to say is that they pick the best and hottest models from all the other sites. But as I said, in the end, they way in which they're shot leaves a lot to be desired, and is more of a let down than a turn on.

Visit Watch 4 Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: exotics4me's Review

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:05:32 PST

Erotic Dreams 4 You (1)

01-21-08 07:05am

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (301)

To PinkPanther (30):

That is interesting and strange all at the same time. I received an email that was for the 4 dream sites at $24, when I joined it. Now it makes me wonder if I also had W4B as well, and didn't realize it? I have had similar feelings towards sites, especially Eve's recently, but Eve's site, from the way I understand is now being ran by one guy, and I can only imagine what it would be like trying to answer hundreds of back emails. On an off topic note, he extended my account and isn't charging me, since I had paid for a multi-month account.

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:58:00 PST

Erotic Dreams 4 You (1)

01-17-08 05:58pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To Marc01 (Webmaster):

And just for the record - 2 days since Marc forwarded the e-mails that I forwarded to him (thank you, Marc) and 6 weeks since I first e-mailed Watch4Beaty's support, there has been NO response.

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:14:41 PST

Erotic Dreams 4 You (1)

01-15-08 06:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To Marc01 (Webmaster):

I forwarded you the e-mails that I had sent to Watch4Beauty's support e-mail with no response.

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:35:59 PST

Erotic Dreams 4 You (1)

01-15-08 09:35am

REVIEW REPLY by Marc01 (Webmaster)

To PinkPanther (30):

PinkPanther, can you mail me on marc@kproduction.eu

I'll assure you that we'll answer you. Please clarify your situation in the mail and i'll try to get you what you want.

Kind regards,

Marc

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:12:33 PST

Erotic Dreams 4 You (1)

01-13-08 11:12am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To exotics4me (301):

I've got a bait-and-switch complaint about this site. When I joined, they said - on the confirmation of my joining - that "for the life of my membership", I could get 40% discount on all of their related sites, including Watch 4 Beauty. Then a couple of months later, Watch 4 Beauty, decided to include this site in their membership and withdrew the discount. I e-mailed them about this - several times - and received absolutely no response.

They've got some very juicy content, but I refuse to spend any more money on sites that not only have questionable business practices, but don't even have the courtesy to respond to e-mails from their members.

View Thread (5)

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:38:02 PST

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

01-10-08 01:38pm

COMMENT REPLY by Marc01 (Webmaster)

To PinkPanther (30):

Good to know as well is that Monika Vesela (http://www.monikasdreams.com/), not reviewed over here if i'm right, has been added to the EroticDreams4you.com as well. Don't forget you get access to all 4 sites (for free) when you signup to Watch4beauty .

View Thread (5)

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:33:52 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

08-25-07 05:33am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (154)

To PinkPanther (30):

Thanks for the heads up! I'd been through Nikky's site and am not so sure if it has had any further updates. "Ambra" is a gift from heaven! Verunka is a rare, mysterious, warm/cool type.

Maybe you'll do a review of this package? I'd really appreciate it if, assuming you do, you'll say how many galleries and videos are in each of the sites. I know it means "taking inventory," but I'm sure many PornUsers will definitely appreciate the effort.

Thanks again, PinkPanther! (Mancini music playing in the background ...)

View Thread (5)

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:00:17 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

08-24-07 07:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To Drooler (154):

FTI - the people that run Watch4Beauty.com just started a new site - eroticdreams4you.com - it is basically a package deal of 3 of their sologirl sites, nikkysdreams.com, verunkasdreams.com & ambrasdreams.com

It was too good a deal to pass up after a brief perusal of two of the sites included. These girls are smoking! The photography is awesome! The videos are outstanding!

It's more "erotica" than hard-core porn, but if you like gorgeous women presented well, it's worth a look - makes me think of joining Watch4Beauty again, because the 5000 kb pics and the full-screen vids look outstanding - no blurriness, as I have seen with other sites, including, with some pics, ALS Scan.

View Thread (5)

RE: Denner's Review

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:51:27 PDT

Pretty 4ever (1)

08-18-07 08:51am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (146)

To Drooler (154):

Thanks for the comment from Drooler.

We can hope that the people at Pretty4ever read both (My review and Droolers comment).

After all, we ARE the users AND customers!

View Thread (2)

RE: Denner's Review

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:42:44 PDT

Pretty 4ever (1)

08-18-07 04:42am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (154)

To Denner (146):

I second the comment about cutting off the top of the girl's head, her arms, part of an ass cheek, etc. For God's sake, the photos go up to 3456px, so all of the girl can be in a shot. No need to get so damned space-efficient that we have to chop away at the subject with a photo editor.

But there's one exception: legs from the upper thighs down can be cut off in those shots where the girl presents her lovely behind -- without her hands grabbing it in every shot. And please have her looking at the camera! I hate it when they look uninterested.

Technically, this comment's for you Denner, but I want photographers and content editors to read this, too.

Thanks for the review; it presents the important info in concise form.

View Thread (2)

Pretty 4ever Comment

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:03:30 PDT

Pretty 4ever (1)

08-16-07 11:03am

COMMENT by Denner (146)

SWEET.................

Just joined.

This looks great. If you're into Nubiles this is the new thing.

But the amount is quite low - compared to, yeah Nubiles.

Here is some great looking teens like Lena and the fantastic and cute/sexy Natasha which you can see on Teendreams (photos only in TD)(her name in TD is Larina)- I'm into blonds - but this gal is just half brunette or something - but watch her video at Pretty 4ever - wauw - there is a semi-good preview with 2 outdoor videos of this cute gal.

Try to be back soon with a review

EDITED: Fellow users: Please hold - like Drooler I have not quite gotten into the videos - for now they seem to have very slow download - and the quality does not look that swell........I'll get back!!!!!!!

Visit Pretty 4ever - View Replies - Add Reply

Pretty 4ever Comment

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:03:30 PDT

Pretty 4ever (1)

08-15-07 06:03pm

COMMENT by Drooler (154)

Has its pros

Joined this site about 10 days ago. There are only about 40 photosets and fewer vids, but on the plus side the photos ALL max at 34xx pixels and are available in that and two smaller sizes, all sizes in zip or a la carte. Everything I've seen here is exclusive.

The models are Russian and these babes are HOT! The photography is generally very good, with some exceptions (poor lighting, poor focus ... the usual stuff).

It's affiliated with Watch4Beauty, but I think it's better in that you always know what the pic sizes are going to be and it doesn't have the ridiculous artistic pretensions of W4B ("That's not blurriness; that's art!").

Not crazy about the lesbian stuff here, which comes up occasionally, although one set with blond Lena and a brunette, Julia, on a couch has some nice pics of Julia's ass.

(More Lena, too, PLEASE!!!)

Please don't ask me about the vids as I haven't looked at them and don't plan to. Softcore vids I'm not into.

Visit Pretty 4ever - View Replies - Add Reply

Watch 4 Beauty Comment

Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:26:30 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

07-05-07 08:26pm

COMMENT by jd1961 (78)

The Models

I joined this site yesterday, and so far I have to say that the models are outstanding! I was pleasantly surprised. Also, the photography is more erotic than some of the other similar sites. I'll do a review when I spend more time there.

Visit Watch 4 Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Mon, 07 May 2007 03:18:46 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

05-07-07 03:18am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (154)

To kutloch (Webmaster):

You say, "We do not say that all of our sets are 5000px." True. Your site says, "Resolution 5000px." Do you expect visitors to interpret that to mean that not all of the sets include 5000px?

You say, "You have to login again only if your session expires." In my experience, the sessions were much shorter than at most sites. How long is a session?

You say, "We are erotic art magazine so some of our sets are artistic. That is why they seems to be blurry. We do not think it is a mistake - it is a different kind of photography. [...] we know this style should be allowed to be art."

OK, fair enough. But understand that some users do not prefer what you do, and they might not even agree with your ideas about art. What I said about W4B is an expression of my likes and dislikes. Others may agree with me, or not, but I think that people who do agree should know.

Finally, I've been a member of W4B several times myself, so you can count me among members who have supported the site. And now I know better what to expect in the future. But I might join again sometime anyway.

View Thread (5)

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Mon, 07 May 2007 03:00:54 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

05-07-07 03:00am

COMMENT REPLY by kutloch (Webmaster)

To Drooler (154):

Let me answer some questions and announce some facts:

- W4B contains exclusive content, only few very old sets were created in cooperation with different company and these sets are also available on MetArt. 99.9% of W4B content is exclusive.

- We offer 5000px resolution photos shortly. All of our previous photo sets were issued again in high resolution. If they were not available, they are only 2560px (max size). We do not say that all of our sets are 5000px.

- Our downloads are not restricted, you have to login members area and than you can download what you like. You have to login again only if your session expires. We are powered with fast servers and connection.

- We are erotic art magazine so some of our sets are artistic. That is why they seems to be blurry. We do not think it is a mistake - it is a different kind of photography. We are cooperating with prefessional photographers and printed magazines so we know that this style should be allowed to be art. We are different and we are proud of it. We have good suppoort in our members.

View Thread (5)

Watch 4 Beauty Comment

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:48:32 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

03-20-07 04:48pm

COMMENT by Drooler (154)

Watch4Blurriness

Have been checking out w4b with their new "5000px" feature -- prominently displayed on their homepage. Not all of the pics go to this size, but many do, and some older ones top off at various smaller sizes (2400, 2560, 2880, 3600 etc.).

The trouble is, some of the pics are REALLY BLURRY. (Was that a cloud that just passed by my monitor?)

All in favor of BLURRINESS (head, backside, or TOTALLY as it is sometimes at this site), say "Aye!"

And BTW, not all of the pics are "exclusive," as some have shown up at MetArt, Babelicious, etc -- where they're generally better in quality and size. cc: theBestPorn.

Finally, w4b offers "unlimited downloads," but it makes you log in over and over! So add "relentless hassle" to that. It's just a so-so site, I think.

Visit Watch 4 Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

Marketa 4 You Comment

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:02:49 PDT

Marketa 4 You (1)

03-15-07 03:02pm

COMMENT by Drooler (154)

Marketa4U 5000 px teaser

I've just gone through Marketa4U with the brand new claim that it now offers images at 5000px. Make that "up to" 5000 px -- their actual claim. It' not a lie, but here's something that's absolutely true and you should know this: most of the updates of previously posted galleries now max at 2560px instead of the earlier 2000px. A few max at 3600, and a few max at close to 5000.

Visit Marketa 4 You - View Replies - Add Reply