PU - Angelical Dreams Productions - All Activity

RE: Disagreeing with "mudmans" review

Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:03:24 PDT

True Amateur Models (0)

07-16-09 08:03am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Vince (2):

For the record ...

We show this user has created several accounts (we've suspended a number of dupes) all wanting to give good marks to this site.

View Thread (1)

RE: Ryan W's Review

Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:01:49 PDT

True Amateur Models (0)

07-16-09 08:01am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Ryan W (3):

For the record ...

We show this user has created several accounts (we've suspended a number of dupes) all wanting to give good marks to this site.

View Thread (1)

RE: messmer's Review

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:37:39 PST

True Amateur Models (0)

01-23-09 07:37am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To WeeWillyWinky (88):

No need to apologize, www. Peoples' tastes differ and while you like "on all four shots" taken from behind they leave me cold, especially when only the butt is showing and there are a LOT of those. If it were a whole body shot, showing the model's face, I would find it exciting as well. I am glad you agree with most of the rest of my assessment. And I forgot about the picture naming, that too drove me crazy, why not give each set of a model her name and if she has more than one set add a 2 or 3 to the name. It could be so simple.

View Thread (2)

RE: messmer's Review

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:31:54 PST

True Amateur Models (0)

01-23-09 12:31am

REVIEW REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (88)

To messmer (123):

Sorry you were disappointed, Mes. I feel guilty because I gushed over the site in reply to a comment of yours here.

I agree with most of what you say, although I find myself enjoying some of the pictures here more than those at any other site I've joined thus far. Why that is I can't exactly say. There are things going on at a subconscious level that we aren't quite aware of and maybe don't understand. It could just be that I love the all-fours shots, and this site gives you every conceivable angle of that view, as if you are actually there behind the model.

That being said, yes, a site like this, which is 99 percent photo-driven, absolutely needs zipfiles. Especially when the photo sets contain numerous pictures from the exact same perspective. The man behind the site needs to do a LOT more editing of sets, and he needs to get more creative. The sets are repetitive, as you said, and could be cropped by seventy percent in a lot of cases. Furthermore, the pics are not named uniquely, and saving them becomes even more of a chore.

As far as navigation goes, yes, it needs a lot of work.

I am, by turns, very pleased and very displeased with my experiences here thus far. I was wowed at first, but that feeling has waned, except for the moments when something really resonates with me.

Sorry again.

View Thread (2)

RE: Are The Picture Sets Zipped Now?

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:19:17 PST

True Amateur Models (0)

01-16-09 06:19pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To WeeWillyWinky (88):

After reading your replies I tend to agree with you, www. A blend of LVPanty and True Amateur Models would indeed be something to drool over. I hate to see that LVP are switching style because I prefer full size, full back to skimpy any time. Thanks for bringing up the subject of zip when it comes to LVP, if they don't zip then I will make a move to subscribe to True Amateur Models first, especially since you mentioned some mature women in the mix! :-) Thanks, I will check with the webmaster of LVP re. zip.

View Thread (5)

RE: Are The Picture Sets Zipped Now?

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:54:58 PST

True Amateur Models (0)

01-16-09 09:54am

COMMENT REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (88)

To messmer (123):

Just had a look at LV Panty's preview. Looks like he is branching out a bit and featuring more modern, skimpy-type undies. My memory of the models was a bit fuzzy as well. They are indeed beautiful, but there are plenty of girl-next-door types we well.

View Thread (5)

RE: Are The Picture Sets Zipped Now?

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:36:53 PST

True Amateur Models (0)

01-16-09 09:36am

COMMENT REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (88)

To messmer (123):

Hi Mes,

A few things:

First, there are quite a few more models over the age of thirty at True Amateur Models than I originally thought. The guy behind the site doesn't seem to care about age. One model is in her fiftees. He doesn't care much about looks, either. I did notice some portrait style pics in older sets, but far and away his preference is landscape. As I said, the four full sets I took so far are landscape in their entirety: no portrait shots at all.

About LVPanty: I'm glad you're thinking of joining. It's been a while since I was there, but picture-wise it is second to none in the panty-genre, if you take in all factors such as fidelity to niche, pic size, and quality. **I don't recall if the sets at LVPanty are zipped**. You might want to contact the webmaster about that. I don't remember zips there, and I have none on file. My memory is shot, however. The video section is nothing to rave about either.

Also, bear in mind LVPanty is old-school. Full-sized, and predominantly full-backed, undies are the order of the day. There is not a fixation on cotton, which I know you don't like, but there is quite a bit; but even so there is nothing teeny-bopperish whatsoever. The variety of fabrics and styles is wide. The models are beautiful. It's not an amateur site. I believe you can see a few sample pics on the preview. I know you're cautious about which sites to join and I'd hate for you to think you blew your money.

A blend of LVPanty and True Amateur Models, with a vid section on par with Panty Amateur, would be a perfect site for me and I'd stay with it permanently!

View Thread (5)

RE: Are The Picture Sets Zipped Now?

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:15:22 PST

True Amateur Models (0)

01-16-09 08:15am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To WeeWillyWinky (88):

Hi www, I just took another look at the site and can see, just from the previews, how it would be very appealing. I love the naturalness of the models, so much so that I might forget about my vow never to join a site that doesn't zip!! Especially if most pics are in landscape!

But first things first for a panty lover, I decided, even though my dollar continues to drop, to subscribe to another site you recommended, LV Panties, very soon, possibly as early as next week.

But after that one this site is definitely on my "must subscribe to" list now. It's just too tempting and I trust your taste!

View Thread (5)

RE: Are The Picture Sets Zipped Now?

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:10:01 PST

True Amateur Models (0)

01-15-09 10:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (88)

To messmer (123):

No, mes, there are no zips.

Interesting, me finding your comment here, since I gave you a passing thought almost as soon as I joined. Why? Because every single picture is in landscape format! All of 'em, at least the ones I've seen thus far, and that's four full sets with over a hundred pics each. I joined last night after seeing some dazzling pics at a TGP.

Latest pics are big, at 1500x1126, and they look great on my 22 inch monitor, even though they don't completely fill it.

BUT: **no zips**. My arm is still hurting from all the clicking I did last night. The models here run the gamut from dead plain to cute as hell. Most of them are average to nice looking young ladies you'd see anywhere: true amateurs. This site gives you a real sense of intimacy with the models, even though there are hardly any videos. I'm not a photography buff at all and I can't judge these pictures in a technical or artistic context, but they certainly are stimulating. I found myself being truly, physically turned-on, which hardly ever happens to me at an adult site anymore. I had all but given up hope! My pic collecting has for a long time been mostly a spirit-lifting hobby, without much lift anywhere else, if you get my drift.

Each to his own, they say, and this site won't be for everyone. I'm a panty-lingerie nut but there is hardly any of that here; and yet these pics still work for me, in the way that naughty pictures are supposed to work. ;)

Not many mature models, but there are a few. I will do a full review after a bit of time here. I am very happy I joined, though it is a lot of work without zips.

View Thread (5)

True Amateur Models Comment

Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:35:09 PDT

True Amateur Models (0)

10-03-08 07:35pm

COMMENT by messmer (123)

Are The Picture Sets Zipped Now?

Can one of the current subscribers to this site tell me if the picture sets can now be downloaded zipped. The site sounds interesting but I won't bother subscribing if I have to laboriously save the pictures one by one.

Visit True Amateur Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Bret's Review

Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:40:04 PDT

True Amateur Models (0)

10-02-08 05:40pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Bret (0):

Good review. Better than my first one. :-) One question, are the picture sets downloadable in a zip file or do they have to be downloaded one by one as a previous reviewer states? Would make all the difference to me if I decided to subscribe to a site.

View Thread (2)

RE: Bret's Review

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:33:54 PDT

True Amateur Models (0)

09-30-08 12:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by wiild1 (13)

To Bret (0):

Hey Bret, thanks for a detailed review. Some people here don't trust new users that add a very favourable review as the first review. You might want to reconsider the VERY high rating or let us know your point of reference: what other sites have you been member of, why is THIS site worth a 98?

View Thread (2)

RE: True Amateur Models - Highly Recommended Amateur Website

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:26:27 PDT

True Amateur Models (0)

09-30-08 12:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by wiild1 (13)

To Bret (0):

Hey Bret, you posted a review on the same date as your comment, with pretty much the same content: overflowing positive feedback.

What's the purpose of this comment? It may come across as advertisment of the site?

View Thread (1)

True Amateur Models Comment

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:12:58 PDT

True Amateur Models (0)

03-21-07 03:12pm

COMMENT by Vince (2)

Disagreeing with "mudmans" review

I totally disagree with "mudmans" review. I joined adp models about 4 months ago and it has always been one of my favorite amateur sites. I kept my membership active for the whole 4 month period until my credit card got stolen out of my wallet. I have recieved a new one so I'll be signing back up with the site. The pictures are very high quality, crisp and clear looking and they are not "smallish" either. They are 1024x768 which will fill up your entire monitor screen. To me, that is just perfect because I do not have to scroll over to see the entire picture.

The guy that runs the site shoots all of his own content so it is very exclusive. The updates are done every single week like clockwork and when the updates happen, there are normally about 300-400 pictures that are put onto the site! Most of the paysites that I've joined before only updated with about 100 pictures per update. With this site, you get HUGE updates.

Another thing that I really like about this site are the positions that the girls get into and the upclose pictures. There are LOTS of "spread shot" style pictures. For a 1 month membership, the site is $24.95 which is a very good price. I remember reading somewhere that there are nearly 30,000 pictures on it too. I understand that reviews are basically peoples "opinions" but when I saw "mudmans" review on adp models, I had to comment on it since it seems to be so inaccurate.

Visit True Amateur Models - View Replies - Add Reply