PU - Web Works Ltd - All Activity

RE: Rip-Off Site in my Opinion

Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:27:24 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

09-08-10 02:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by Tom22 (6)

To anyonebutme (14):

The site must have reported to "The Best Porn" that it was to be a FULL trial in order for "The Best Porn" to list it as such. And I guess I don't understand what is "disingenuous" about "bashing" a site based on a trial subscription. Especially when they advertised for a Full trial and it appears not to be. Seems to me that in that case, a "bashing" is in order.

View Thread (2)

RE: Rip-Off Site in my Opinion

Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:57:35 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

09-07-10 09:57pm

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To Tom22 (6):

I don't know if it's a ripoff or not, I just think it's a bit disingenuous to bash a site based on a trial subscription. Maybe it was never supposed to be a full access trial, that this site has their facts wrong? I don't know.

View Thread (2)

Asian Pervert Comment

Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:12:25 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

09-07-10 06:12pm

COMMENT by Tom22 (6)

Rip-Off Site in my Opinion

My account was suspended after I canceled the rebill from a two day trial subscription. Now when I try to logon - all I get is this page: http://members.yankmyplank.com/error/403/

Also it appears it is NOT a FULL trial, I could not find any of the HD videos that are shown on the AsianPerverts preview page. This network is a rip-off in my opinion. I'm glad I only lost 3 bucks.

Visit Asian Pervert - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: oogles's Review

Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:55:49 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

07-11-09 01:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To oogles (9):

That makes sense to me.

View Thread (6)

RE: oogles's Review

Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:01:25 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

07-10-09 09:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To oogles (9):

I hope you do not feel like I'm giving you a hard time when I say these next few things. First, you do state that there is value here and you can get it in one day. It would be better to describe what is actually of value and why. Second, I say this because, you can get a cheap 3 day full access trial to the content for only $2.95 and a lot of members use this option for lower end sites like this. So, if there is any value, would the trial be worth it to get what is offered? I am just saying this stuff to help get a better understanding for newer reviewers to get a thought process on the site as a whole for others to get a better understanding to what the site has to offer. I do agree that the site is definintly in the lower end and everyone has bias in their reviews. I am not slamming your review or any of your thoughts. Plus, I've read your other reviews and I've found most to be quite informative and you can only get better as time goes on, I am just trying to help out in maybe hoping that some feedback like this may help you go a bit more in depth in future reviews. Please don't take my replies as being insulting. Why? Because like I said before, I did enjoy your past reviews and I do look forward to your reviews in the future!

View Thread (6)

RE: oogles's Review

Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:23:33 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

07-10-09 06:23pm

REVIEW REPLY by oogles (9)

To GCode (99):

I see your point.

I guess the review was short because there really isn't much content at all; I did state that you could get anything of value from the site in a very short time, but perhaps I should have elaborated a bit on it.

View Thread (6)

RE: oogles's Review

Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:59:06 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

07-10-09 12:59pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To oogles (9):

Fair enough. I suppose I just did not feel from what you provided in the review was sufficient enough to justify a 50. Usually when a site scoes such a high or low rating from a user, the user can go on forever on how well or bad the site was and this review seemed to be just a short tid bit about an average site that neither you liked or completely disliked. Plus, it seemed that you were just dissatisfied to the point to write a few bad things about the site to let others know rather than provide a large amount of facts why the site is the worst of worst made me feel that maybe the site was not as bad as you stated. However, I have never been a member nor am I prospecting to join, I was just a bit unclear why the score was a 50. Plus, I'm not saying that your opinion is invalid, so I hope you did not feel that I am coming off that way. Keep up the reviews and I hope to see more soon!

View Thread (6)

RE: oogles's Review

Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:56:45 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

07-10-09 02:56am

REVIEW REPLY by oogles (9)

To GCode (99):

GCode, not in this case. There really is a paltry amount of content. I read and re-read the other review and the only thing I agree with is that the girls look like locals and are not pros.

I gave it a 50 rating because out of all the sites I have tried it was the worst. I would have given it somewhere around 20 if a lower rating were possible.

There is much better content available free.

View Thread (6)

RE: oogles's Review

Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:38:41 PDT

Asian Pervert (0)

07-09-09 07:38pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To oogles (9):

You don't think that the exclusivity of the site brings any value to the site at all? Exclusivity in the Asian niche is a rarity and I have to think that this may bring SOME merit to the site. While the video options appear to be a bit dated, how do they look? TBP states an okay bitrate, if they are quite clear that has to bring some more points right? A 50 is the lowest of the low, maybe you do think it's garbage but do you think it's one of the worst sites ever made? You could be right, but I just don't see it being this way from some of the info from TBP or the info stated in your review.

View Thread (6)

RE: killspears's Review

Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:51:18 PDT

Gag A Gay (0)

03-26-08 05:51pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To killspears (0):

This isn't a review - it's spam

View Thread (1)

RE: killspears's Review

Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:47:25 PDT

Anal Daughters (0)

03-26-08 03:47pm

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To killspears (0):

If you can list a con, it can't be a 100 - come on now. A little realism in the score would be nice.

How about telling us the number of models, videos and photo sets. Are the videos DRM protected? What are the dimensions of the vids and photos? Is the site easy to navigate, are all the models hot, or just some? Is it solo content, or g/g or b/g?

I understand that not everyone spends hours on their reviews, but a little effort would be appreciated.

View Thread (1)

Tickle Horror Comment

Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:52:34 PST

Tickle Horror (0)

03-04-08 06:52pm

COMMENT by Porn Lover (0)

Tickle Horror Fetish Site

The site navigation could do with some improvement, but it was fairly easy to get around to the pictures and movies.

it's on the top 3 of the tickle sites that i'm a member of.

It would be great if they also offered ipod movied, but they currently don't.

Visit Tickle Horror - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: terrible quality!!

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:03:45 PST

Hand Job Girlz (0)

12-29-07 08:03am

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Bob3655 (0):

Well, aside from the terrible quality and the fact that they haven't updated in over 6 months, how is it? Funny stuff!

View Thread (1)

Hand Job Girlz Comment

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:15:07 PST

Hand Job Girlz (0)

12-29-07 01:15am

COMMENT by Bob3655 (0)

terrible quality!!

this site would be a lot better if it wasnt for the god forsaken terrible quality. also they havent updated in over 6 months. go figure.

Visit Hand Job Girlz - View Replies - Add Reply