PU - ADI Ventures, Inc. - All Activity

RE: Good content, but not updated very often

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:57:35 PDT

Guys Get Fucked (0)

09-11-11 07:57pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To Kelon (0):

Sadly all the sites owned by the parent company have more or less been dead for a couple of years. At first they started to post new updates using content from some of their other sites and then they would post new update when in fact that was the same update for 2 months. I used to be a huge fan of their strapon lesbian site. I eve rejoined this year because they had a couple of new updates but I notice that the site isn't really updating anymore.

Of course this site can't use content from their other sites because of the type of sex it's about but the pattern is the same in regards to updates. It might be worth joining once but definetely not staying for more than a month and coming back may not be wise unless you see a lot of new updates since your last visit. Their dating system is not very accurate.

View Thread (2)

RE: Good content, but not updated very often

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:16:35 PDT

Guys Get Fucked (0)

09-11-11 04:16pm

COMMENT REPLY by gaypornolover (14)

To Kelon (0):

It's awful when a site claims to update regularly and then doesn't. It's an odd business decision because once you join an non-updating site and have downloaded and looked at all you want, there's simply no reason to remain a member long-term.

View Thread (2)

Guys Get Fucked Comment

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:22:27 PDT

Guys Get Fucked (0)

09-11-11 09:22am

COMMENT by Kelon (0)

Good content, but not updated very often

I gave this site a try for one month starting in August 2011; I have enjoyed the site overall and felt that they have some good (but not great), exclusive content. My main issue with the site is that it implies, every time you enter the site, that the most recent update was that day - however, over the course of the month I was a member, I did not see a single piece of new content added to the site, and all of the picture/video sets that were listed as "coming soon!" were still listed as coming soon by the end of the month, including a set that had 2/4 videos available. Ultimately, this site is worth a look if you enjoy this type of content, but given the infrequent updates, it's not worth remaining a member.

Visit Guys Get Fucked - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: extremely disappointed

Sat, 07 May 2011 23:07:40 PDT

Tushy Massage (0)

05-07-11 11:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by devmsr (0)

To pat362 (235):

i now stand corrected!...well, at least the problem is corrected! lol ;)

i can now view the vids..

i am happy ;)

thanks pat

View Thread (4)

RE: extremely disappointed

Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:19:53 PDT

Tushy Massage (0)

04-29-11 10:19am

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To devmsr (0):

Whatever was wrong must be fixed because I've downloaded 2 videos and both are fine. They may have had server problems. I'd have no suggestion beyond emailing them or whichever credit card processor you used.

View Thread (4)

RE: extremely disappointed

Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:32:49 PDT

Tushy Massage (0)

04-28-11 07:32pm

COMMENT REPLY by devmsr (0)

To pat362 (235):

YES!!! that is exactly what happens!! it downlads as a wmv but its only some small amount like 1.1kb!! and nothing opens...any advice?? may i try to send you an email via your account on here?

thanks!!

devmsr

View Thread (4)

RE: extremely disappointed

Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:17:53 PDT

Tushy Massage (0)

04-28-11 06:17am

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To devmsr (0):

I'm a member of strapon lesbian which is from the same company. I've used both IE and Firefox with the site and I had no problem downloading and watching the videos. I assume they offer the same kind of video files as your site. That was the good news. Now the bad news is that I have just tried to download 2 videos and both of them were bad files because they were only 1.1Kb.

View Thread (4)

Tushy Massage Comment

Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:36:02 PDT

Tushy Massage (0)

04-28-11 01:36am

COMMENT by devmsr (0)

extremely disappointed

cannot download or watch any of the videos!!!!

if i use opera, it takes me to this page...

-----------------------------------------------------------------

The Movies Page is Password Protected:

You only need to enter your username & password one time to enter the movies page.
After that you will be able to watch all the videos without problems.

The username and password are the same that you used to login to TushyMassage.com

Click Here To Login To Movies Page

------------------------------------------------------------

so i click to log in and nothing happens!!

then in firefox..it says it downloads and nothing plays...i have the wmp 11 that it says to have...

i emailed support..lets see if they reply..

in the meantime, very disappointed!!

Visit Tushy Massage - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Wed, 26 May 2010 11:37:43 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-26-10 11:37am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To pat362 (235):

You are probably right.

That slightly underhand practice sort of backfired on them in that sense.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (9)

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Tue, 25 May 2010 18:32:18 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-25-10 06:32pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To Capn (27):

I agree but can you imagine the number of extra members they might have had if they'd offered the 18.95$ amount upfront instead of this reatrded way? I believe they would still be in business if they had gobe that route.

View Thread (9)

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Tue, 25 May 2010 02:21:31 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-25-10 02:21am

COMMENT REPLY by Jay G (63)

To pat362 (235):

Thanks for the info! It is much appreciated.

View Thread (9)

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Mon, 24 May 2010 22:31:34 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-24-10 10:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To pat362 (235):

I think you can lump that in with the practice of only offering a discounted rate when you go to cancel.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (9)

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Mon, 24 May 2010 18:24:24 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-24-10 06:24pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To Capn (27):

I'm not sure how I found out but I think it's because some sites used to offer a special price for those that had gone through the join page but hadn't actually joined. I suspect that they thought that it's better to get a customer with a lower join amount than no customer at all. It borders on the less than honest approach to getting new customer since that special price should be available upfront but I never complained since it saved me some serious money.

I still try it with some sites to see if they might offer a lower join amount.

View Thread (9)

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Mon, 24 May 2010 10:22:16 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-24-10 10:22am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To pat362 (235):

What a load of 'Hoop La' to have to go through, Pat. :0(

I am intrigued by how on Earth you discovered it though. :0/

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (9)

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Mon, 24 May 2010 09:06:23 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-24-10 09:06am

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To Jay G (63):

Since my info on these sites is almost a year old. I can't be sure if they won't change their mind about DRM. If and when they do then you might want to give them a try. The content may not be recent but they should have a fairly good library. I hope this strick still works. I know that when I used to join Strapon lesbian. There was a truck to get a ful membership for under 20$. You would go to the join page and fill out all the info but not click accept. Instead you press the back button all the while holding the control button down so that you can get a special join page where the price was only 18.95$. If it weren't for that. I don't think I'd have ever joined them because 30$ is just too much money for a single site

View Thread (9)

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Mon, 24 May 2010 08:49:49 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-24-10 08:49am

COMMENT REPLY by Jay G (63)

To pat362 (235):

Pat,
I appreciate you excellent information. I was tempted to join the site for the "multiple girls watching a spanking" stuff, but then came the DRM just in time to stop me.

There are so many interesting spanking sites out there at reasonable prices; I don't want to waste my time with poor quality DRM or even free poor quality "tube" sites. In the 1980's or 1990's I might have been interested, but not now.

View Thread (9)

RE: DRM means it's not yours to keep

Mon, 24 May 2010 08:15:51 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-24-10 08:15am

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To Jay G (63):

DRM would be a new thing for these guys because they didn't have it in the past. Of course the bigger problem is that all the sites owned by this company are dead and have been since last year. Don't be fooled by the sites claim of latest update. I was a repeat member of strapon lesbians and the last time I joined the site in 09, I found that things had degenerated badly. You had to log on for each video. You did not get a full new scene each week. It's really too bad because I still think that what they offered was really good and was not available anywhere else.

View Thread (9)

RE: Awesome Site!

Mon, 24 May 2010 08:13:20 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-24-10 08:13am

COMMENT REPLY by Jay G (63)

To BiAmy (0):

I was tempted to put a "No trust" but know that's not fair if you are a real consumer. You have a right to your opinion.

As a spanking collector I find the DRM ruins the site. I'm willing to pay for product, but only if I can keep it. Your writing seems too cute and too "professional" to be an honest review, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and not check the "No trust" box.

View Thread (1)

Bad Tushy Comment

Mon, 24 May 2010 08:06:49 PDT

Bad Tushy (0)

05-24-10 08:06am

COMMENT by Jay G (63)

DRM means it's not yours to keep

DRM "Digitally ruined media" ;) ruins this site. All the videos you download are no longer playable when your membership expires. NOT a site for collectors.

Visit Bad Tushy - View Replies - Add Reply

Tushy Massage Comment

Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:11:35 PDT

Tushy Massage (0)

04-03-10 11:11pm

COMMENT by robotpanda (0)

Not as advertised.

I joined tushymassage site on 4/1/2010 and it has some real problems. There were two videos in particular I was interested in they advertise in their tour. One video has DRM and when you try to enter the DRM information to watch it, it says the license has expired on the file itself. Making it unwatchable. The other video, despite being on the tour, is not on the site at all. Amongst their mess of ads built into the video lists is a pay-per-view site that does have the video. Needless to say, I was pretty ticked to have the video be promised with membership, not be there, and then have them try to sell it to me for $6.95. On top of all that, my antivirus program went off on the ppv site with "JS:Downloader-LP [Trj]". Join at your own risk.

Visit Tushy Massage - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: My suggestions for next update

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:32:53 PST

Strapon Lesbians (1)

12-18-09 06:32pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To sikampret (0):

I've read that the Vanity & Janine scene is not worth spending money to get. You will have a very hard time to get shemales with females scenes involving American or European pornstars. I've seen a few videos but they are are. If you are curious then look for stuff from Joey Silvera at Evil Angel.

View Thread (7)

RE: My suggestions for next update

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:09:38 PST

Strapon Lesbians (1)

12-17-09 08:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by sikampret (0)

To pat362 (235):

I've been on lez cuties too.
Years back i like BDSM whippedass, but now i don't really like it.
Just like simple strap lez.
Yeah that shemale with female usually coming from South American, like Brazil. Too bad a little from US, recently i see is Vanity with Janine.

View Thread (7)

RE: My suggestions for next update

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:36:40 PST

Strapon Lesbians (1)

12-17-09 06:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To sikampret (0):

I don't know if you've ever seen Lez Cuties. They have some strap-on
scenes but most are with dildos or multi-finger penetrations. The theme is anal in Lez Cuties. If you decide to join Lez Cuties then do so from pix and video because membeship to that site gives you automatic acces to Lez Cuties as well as quite a few other sites.
If you don't mind the BDSM then Whipped Ass is also a good one. I can't think of one site that has shemales with females unless it's a South American one.

View Thread (7)

RE: My suggestions for next update

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:55:45 PST

Strapon Lesbians (1)

12-17-09 03:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by sikampret (0)

To pat362 (235):

Hi pat362.
Thx for your info on this site.
Any suggestion another site with strap-on lez and shemale fucking girls.
i've been on welivetogether, shemalesfuckgirls, dirty101, tgirlsongirls, lezbohoney.

View Thread (7)

RE: My suggestions for next update

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:44:11 PST

Strapon Lesbians (1)

12-17-09 02:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To sikampret (0):

Hi sikampret.
I thought you were a member so I didn't mention it but be advised that the quality and ease of downloads was getting worse when I was still a member earlier this year. I used to be able to get a special price whenever I tried to join. Once you pick the join page fill out all the information but do not press the confirm button but instead press the back button. Make sure that you do not have any poppu blockes on. I used to get a pop up window that dropped the membership to 19$.

View Thread (7)

RE: My suggestions for next update

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:58:55 PST

Strapon Lesbians (1)

12-16-09 08:58pm

COMMENT REPLY by sikampret (0)

To pat362 (235):

Yes you're correct i've never been member of this site.
Right now i check the site on tour they updated with adding shemale, that's a good point from me.
This site is best 'cause i love strap-on lez and shemale fucking girls.

View Thread (7)

RE: My suggestions for next update

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:49:43 PST

Strapon Lesbians (1)

12-14-09 06:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (235)

To sikampret (0):

I assume that you've never been a member of this site before. I've been a member of this site more than once. The last time was in May of this year and let me tell you that it's a dead site. They used to update with a complete scene once a week. They don't anymore and most of the updates are in fact scenes from their other sites. Their worst offense is that they do not have the correct name for the performers. I'm glad you have enjoyed the content but I recommend you do not stick around for more than the month.

View Thread (7)

Strapon Lesbians Comment

Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:41:09 PST

Strapon Lesbians (1)

12-14-09 04:41pm

COMMENT by sikampret (0)

My suggestions for next update

Straponlesbians is the best site i've ever seen.
On the future i hope they update with :
- More Mix it with shemale fucking girl, because they can cum for real.
- More double penetration.
- Plz No men, this is lesbian site ! should be 0% Men.
- Balance use pussy and anal
- Force kissing : clip on page 25 with Karen and Keesha, my fave, good dome, but no kissing, it would be the best clip if Keesha force kissing, kiss her moouth or shoulder while doggystyle for example, on Karen while she fuck hard.
- A little slap, but not to much, to much is not good.
Straponlesbians story iss all about pissed off and disrespect, a little slap is good for them.

And the last, for me good clip if "victim" big boobs, standard boobs stil ok, but no flat chest. Flat chest good for the "man".
And my fave sex positions is spoon, missionary and the best is any standing positions.

That's my suggestions and opinion.

Visit Strapon Lesbians - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Oh No, DRM!!

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:02:49 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-24-09 12:02pm

COMMENT REPLY by Colm4 (10)

To StevieG (0):

Damn that's bad. I used to be a member and was planning to continue soon. Guess I have to wait til they come back to their senses.
Thanks for the info.

View Thread (4)

RE: Oh No, DRM!!

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:53:34 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-21-09 07:53am

COMMENT REPLY by StevieG (0)

To Colm4 (10):

'fraid so mate. The pattern up till the last 6 updates was to supply the movie in 4 parts, or a single wmv (sometimes drm'd, sometimes not) and mpg (not drm'd). The last 6 updates only give options to stream or download a drm'd wmv.

View Thread (4)

RE: Oh No, DRM!!

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 04:54:17 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-20-09 04:54am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Colm4 (10):

If it helps ...

Our editors found the WMV files were using DRM while the MPEG do not *appear* to using it.

View Thread (4)

RE: Oh No, DRM!!

Sun, 20 Sep 2009 04:27:53 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-20-09 04:27am

COMMENT REPLY by Colm4 (10)

To StevieG (0):

Are you really sure? It says nothing on the site about it. Isn't that DRM statement on this site just an outdated one?

View Thread (4)

Tushy Lickers Comment

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:04:36 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

09-18-09 08:04am

COMMENT by StevieG (0)

Oh No, DRM!!

Sad to see that Tushy Lickers has gone to DRM. Unless you haven't already been through their excellent back catalogue I'd advise staying away. Updates were always slow (1 movie a week) but the last 5 or 6 have all been DRM & there has been no update at all for the past week or so

Visit Tushy Lickers - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: dont bother with it

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:32:27 PST

Tushy School (0)

01-27-09 08:32am

COMMENT REPLY by Jay G (63)

To littlejoe (17):

Great news! Really appreciate your reply! Thanks.

View Thread (3)

RE: dont bother with it

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:40:08 PST

Tushy School (0)

01-26-09 05:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by littlejoe (17)

To Jay G (63):

the newer vids are higher resolution, have better looking models, better scenarios & much longer penetration. i believe the update setup is still the same, but at least now you can download them as a whole movie as well

you can get the membership for $20 if you click all the way to the ccbill signup page and then click back. if you have pop-ups off you usually get a window says a $20 special offer

View Thread (3)

RE: dont bother with it

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:45:27 PST

Tushy School (0)

01-26-09 03:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by Jay G (63)

To littlejoe (17):

Joe, I take it your opinion of the site has improved from "Don't bother with it"?

I'd like more information if it's now worthwhile. I've been tempted before, but your warning kept me from it.

View Thread (3)

RE: Please - No more shills for this site

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:38:16 PST

Sleeping Tushy (0)

01-24-08 02:38pm

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To littlejoe (17):

Not sure what a spam bot means in this case, but I do know there's quite a difference between "quite good" and a perfect score. Unless things have changed since I saw a couple of their episodes (maybe a year ago), the video quality alone was enough to drop their score. 320 resolution doesn't exactly put you on top of the heap by any stretch of the imagination.

I also think that someone telling me what my porn preferences are, as in, "This site has everyone's fantasy in it", could only come from the mind of someone trying to sell a site. Is it quite good? Maybe. Is it my fantasy? Nope, sorry. Is it a perfect site? HELL no!

View Thread (5)

RE: Please - No more shills for this site

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:32:02 PST

Sleeping Tushy (0)

01-24-08 09:32am

COMMENT REPLY by littlejoe (17)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

im not a spam bot and for this kind of site its quite good

View Thread (5)

RE: Please - No more shills for this site

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:52:58 PST

Sleeping Tushy (0)

01-24-08 12:52am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To jd1961 (95):

I agree that it's working pretty well, as you point out, though shills do have their ways.

I think I got a "good shilling" once in reply to my review of Jenni's Secrets. This "Walter" came on and blasted my review, one that I'd put a lot of time into. His attack was the very first thing he did as a "member." After that, he posted three pud reviews of his own in 10 minutes time, which I think he did in a rather half-assed attempt to make himself look legit.

View Thread (5)

RE: Please - No more shills for this site

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:26:03 PST

Sleeping Tushy (0)

01-23-08 01:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (218):

The system is still working though, I remember when I joined, all these 7th rate sites were listed in the top 10. So now these shills stick out like sore thumbs.

View Thread (5)

RE: Please - No more shills for this site

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:17:24 PST

Sleeping Tushy (0)

01-23-08 02:17am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

Thanks for posting this. What are these people THINKING?? ARE they thinking?

View Thread (5)

Sleeping Tushy Comment

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:46:32 PST

Sleeping Tushy (0)

01-22-08 11:46pm

COMMENT by RagingBuddhist (47)

Please - No more shills for this site

We get the message - it's the bestest, most wonderfullest site ever. We don't believe you - but we get the message.

Visit Sleeping Tushy - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Davit's Review

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:34:29 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-21-08 02:34pm

REVIEW REPLY by Davit (46)

To Robare (6):

Most welcome indeed. Maybe you'll join and give your own review. You may find other aspects worthy of comment that I didn't, or just offer an alternative viewpoint (which is what user reviews are all about).
Regards.

View Thread (4)

RE: Davit's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:42:42 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-20-08 12:42pm

REVIEW REPLY by Robare (6)

To Davit (46):

Thank-you, sir, for your responses, time, and consideration.

View Thread (4)

RE: Davit's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:19:49 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-20-08 12:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by Davit (46)

To Robare (6):

Hi Robare

OK, I'll try and answer your questions mate.

Firstly, yeah, *generally speaking* the updates come in pairs of updates for couples (each the reverse role of the other in terms of recipient) or if it's a threeway then there tends to be 3 updates, where each girl has her turn at being the recipient of the other two. They tend to be not very long - although there are some that go up as long as 11 minutes, but these are in the minority. The shortest one I have is 2mins 11 secs, again in the minority. I'll amend my average to maybe 8 minutes (but that's a best guess - don't expect me to go through my entire collection and work out the exact average, please, I don't want to get pedantic).

Bitrate seems to be mainly 521kbps/320x240. There are also a handful (on my hard drive at least) that are twice this (1060kbps/640x480). This surprised me when I checked this just now, so I played a couple to get a fresh idea of how they look, compared to the many other vids I have. And, very importantly, they *look* much lower res than the stats would suggest. One possible reason is that they've come from a lo-res source - or possibly that the conversion software is substandard. This, of course, is pure conjecture, I can only speak objectively about how they physically look when played. And they do look quite low res and grainy - although, as I said in my review - still watchable.

Your final question about orgasms - in all honesty, I'm not convinced that most of the orgasms portrayed here are genuine. As with most sites, there's little or no evidence of real white 'girl goo' to be seen (the only definitive proof of female orgasm really). But at the same time, the girls don't 'overact' and do seem to be really having a great time together, and most of the climaxes - whether real or not - are the result of anal stimulation principally, and sometimes, but not always, aided by vaginal stimulation simultaneously. The emphasis is definitely on tongue to ass. And the camera is good at getting that shot - after all, it's the whole point of the site.

Hope this helps, but if you have any more questions, or if I have been unclear, please ask away!
Regards
Davit

View Thread (4)

RE: Davit's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:14:04 PST

Tushy Lickers (0)

01-20-08 11:14am

REVIEW REPLY by Robare (6)

To Davit (46):

So, are you able to give us the resolution and bitrate figures? If they're MPG or WMV, then that information may be available in Windows Media Player.
Also, from looking at the site's promotional pages, there appear to be, at present, 172 video and photo sets available and they appear to have been updating once a week for at least a year. There are no sample videos or photos (beyond what "right-click, save image as" provides) available. And, I got the impression from reading your review that there were usually two files per update, one where model A is a recipient and one where model B is a recipient, and that each of these files is 6-7 minutes in duration. Can you confirm?
And, of the movies you've seen, are these models actually having orgasms and by anal stimulation alone?

View Thread (4)

RE: Jimmyboi's Review

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:11:12 PST

Bad Tushy (0)

01-18-08 01:11pm

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To Jimmyboi (0):

Jimmiboi, I've been surfing for spanking for as long as I had the net, but always found the previews for this site pretty tame "patty-cake" stuff.

Is there hard spanking inside? If so, why do you think the previews are so mild compared with other spanking sites?

You gave it a 100. Is this because of extra pretty girls, or do you prefer the more "fun" "patty-cake" stuff? I'm very curious because I've joined dozens of sites over the years but skipped this one because it seemed so mild. Thanks!

View Thread (1)

Bad Tushy Comment

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:49:33 PST

Bad Tushy (0)

01-15-08 06:49pm

COMMENT by BiAmy (0)

Awesome Site!

This site delivered what they stated on the front page! Me and my Husband were looking for something new and different and found this site last night! We joined and started with the first movie we came too! WOW my husband got really excited and after awhile we both got so turned on we actualy tried a few of the scenes that we saw!

Well just wanted to write a review for this site and let everyone know that this site is awesome. The videos and pic's are great and the upclose action was just awesome.. Thanks for letting me ramble on hehe..

Hugs
Amy

Visit Bad Tushy - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Getreal's Review

Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:10:59 PDT

Tushy Lickers (0)

10-03-07 12:10am

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To Getreal (7):

I was a member of one of their sister sites. I found the videos to be too short and just when it looked like things where going to get really interesting the scene ended. No Zip files where a disappointment. If the site was grouped with several others for the same asking price it would be worth the monthly asking price. I would rate the site more like a 70.

View Thread (1)

RE: apoctom's Review

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:28:14 PDT

Strapon Lesbians (1)

08-19-07 10:28am

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To apoctom (145):

Thanks!

View Thread (3)