PU - ModFX International - All Activity

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:51:20 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

09-08-08 08:51am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (29)

To atrapat (44):

Good news. Looks like that $5 drop will get them another $20 from me.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:10:02 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

09-08-08 12:10am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (44)

To Monahan (29):

JFYI, they have recently lowered the price back to $19.95.

View Thread (9)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:01:20 PDT

Next Door Lana (1)

08-24-08 05:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To LanaLopez (0):

Spam. Yeech.

View Thread (3)

RE: atrapat's Review

Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:57:50 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

08-23-08 05:57am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Monahan (29):

Ahhh ... so you were.
My bad. Sorry for any confusion.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:35:52 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

08-22-08 10:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (29)

To Khan (Staff):

I was correcting williamj's review that mentioned a $19.95 price by pointing out that PU is showing a $24.95 price.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:34:56 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

08-22-08 06:34pm

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Monahan (29):

Checking now I'm still seeing the $24.95 price so either you need to get a fresh cookie OR else they are using regional pricing.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:07:49 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

08-22-08 03:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (44)

To Monahan (29):

Glad that you found my review useful. It was my second review ever but I feel it's still accurate. Ever since I discovered Jaime Hammer's site, what's offered here is what I expect in other solo sites and most fall short for one reason or another. That's why this site stays at the top of my list of reviews.

If you like her personality, let me suggest that you try to make it to one of her webcam chats. As for her major assets, she is currently working mainly for her site so this is almost the only place where you can find her recent pictures and videos. She recently did, though, some pretty awesome sets for Digital Desire, which were being released here even before they were available at DD.

One more detail that, IMHO, sets this site apart is that there was a message board thread asking site members about their opinion prior to raising the price. They also added multimonth membership options then.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:46:45 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

08-22-08 11:46am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (29)

To atrapat (44):

Looks like the price went up. The PU advertised price is $24.95.

Apart from that your review tells me that this is a great individual model site. There are so many sites out there that are totally dormant and are there only to suck some cash from unwitting horndogs who happen by.

I really like Jaime Hammer for her obvious major assets but also from a personality standpoint.

Your review was very informative and tells me that this site could be a one month deal where I can go in and drain the site in a month's time then sit it out for a year or so before I go back in to update my collection.

Great review. Thanks.

View Thread (9)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:24:45 PDT

Next Door Lana (1)

06-01-08 05:24am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To atrapat (44):

"As for the webmastering, I have also occasionally found small glitches at other modfx sites (wrong watermarks, dead links) but the webmaster has always solved them and got back to me once notified. You will probably get him to add the missing photoset pretty fast if you contact him."

It's not a missing photoset per se, but a zip file; when you attempt to open it, it tells you "no files to extract" even though it's some 25MB in size. I went ahead and just used the slideshow feature to gather up the photos one at a time, and that worked OK. Didn't take long.

I think that webmasters would rather be contacted directly about a problem on their site, but I actually prefer to report it in a review. They provide a product, and it costs us money as it is currently live, so it's a "consumer/reviewer-to-provider" relationship. They need to keep on their toes. Were I in their shoes, the same kinds of expectations would apply.

And it comes down to one simple and sensible idea: check your work BEFORE it goes live. (Don't expect your customers to do this job for you, post hoc.) It amazes me how often certain webmasters drop the ball in this way. They're flakes.

And if the problem is fixed, I'll amend the review. And on this site it was the only one "glamour" set that had this problem, so it's hardly a big deal. I'd say the Lana Lopez webmaster is doing a pretty good job overall.

View Thread (3)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:26:53 PDT

Next Door Lana (1)

06-01-08 04:26am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (44)

To Drooler (156):

Great review as usual.

Regarding the zipsets, it's a common feature in most sites in the network and I agree there's little interest in them but for the more devoted fans. You buy them also through ccbill and get a 3-day non-renewing membership to a section where you can download a single zip file.

Take into account, though, that most of the models in the network do very tame stuff and they take it a bit further only in these sets. There's even a model who doesn't pose fully nude but in the zipsets (Flo Jalin). People must be buying them, because there are already 12 sets... I believe the zipsets are as much a way to get extra income as a way to reduce as much as possible the diffusion of those images.

I really like the way the sites in this network are organized. What I like the most is that the sites show in the free tour exactly what you will get when you join. Every site should do that. I see that at Next Door Lana you have to be a member to get past the second page but in the free tour you know anyway the exact count of sets you will get once you join. I agree, though, that video quality could be improved.

As for the webmastering, I have also occasionally found small glitches at other modfx sites (wrong watermarks, dead links) but the webmaster has always solved them and got back to me once notified. You will probably get him to add the missing photoset pretty fast if you contact him.

View Thread (3)

Hanna Hilton Comment

Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:56:20 PDT

Hanna Hilton (0)

04-26-08 08:56am

COMMENT by atrapat (44)

Penthouse Pet. Now a Vivid Girl

It was a surprise when she did a pretty decent boy-girl scene with her boyfriend for Brazzer's Network's new site Real Wife Stories. It was supposed to be a one-time thing but she announced a couple of days ago via MySpace that she has signed a contract with Vivid. It would be interesting to know what the contract says about outside work and ownership of this domain.

I was a member of this site about a couple of months ago. Newest updates announcements make me think that the site still is an interesting collection of Penthouse Pet Hanna Hilton's softcore / glamour galleries and videos. My review for this site wouldn't be much different from the one I did for I Love Andie (another site in the same network) except that this one has more content (it was launched a couple of months before), there probably aren't as much explicit shots and there is no chat at all. Pictures should also be 1200x780 and videos, 600x480.

ModFx International has the good policy of always listing all the updates in the free section, so once inside you will almost certainly get the 23 photo sets and 23 videos plus one new update a week (gallery or video). There is no mention to the Vivid contract on the site, though.

Visit Hanna Hilton - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: atrapat's Review

Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:14:17 PDT

I Love Andie (1)

04-22-08 06:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (234)

To atrapat (44):

Nice review.

View Thread (6)

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:32:12 PDT

I Love Andie (1)

04-21-08 11:32am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (29)

To atrapat (44):

Yet another reason to resubscribe to FTV Girls and Twistys. Thanks for the info., atrapat. I appreciate it.

View Thread (6)

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:21:11 PDT

I Love Andie (1)

04-21-08 11:21am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (44)

To Monahan (29):

FTV Girls, Twistys Treat of the Month, Danni.com Girl of the Month, ALS Angels to name just a few. She has also appeared in several adult DVDs: solo, lesbian and one rare boy-girl scene for Wicked Pictures.

View Thread (6)

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:14:31 PDT

I Love Andie (1)

04-21-08 11:14am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (44)

To williamj (7):

Just checked ALS Angels website and it's definitely the same model. I don't know when the ALS Angels pictures were taken. Those at her official site tour are quite recent (taken in January 2008). Maybe that could explain the differences you see. It could also depend on camera angles.

View Thread (6)

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:16:20 PDT

I Love Andie (1)

04-21-08 10:16am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (29)

To atrapat (44):

Thanks for a great review. I really was thinking about this site but based on the "tour" it looked rather skimpy as you just confirmed. But I haven't seen Andie on any other site. Can you give us a few of the other sites?

View Thread (6)

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:23:26 PDT

I Love Andie (1)

04-21-08 09:23am

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (7)

To atrapat (44):

I saw a model named Andie Valentino in ALS Angels just recently. But it doesn't look like the model in the web site reviewed. The girl in ALS was a bit curvy and I think a bit hotter.

View Thread (6)

RE: atrapat's Review

Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:46:00 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

04-20-08 03:46am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (44)

To williamj (7):

Thanks for your interest in my review. I'm a newbie but, the way I see it, the rating of "Excellent - Site is near perfect, best in its class. Highly recommended" is perfectly justifiable in this case.

The key is "best in its class". I've been member to several other American professional Individual Models sites (Porn Stars and published Glamour models alike) and few come close to deliver half as this. You may not like Jaime Hammer's looks or personality (probably not worth joining, then) or expect every adult site to be a gynecology textbook (this site is clearly not one) but the quality of the product and the high degree of involvement of the model with her site is undeniable and way higher than most other similar Individual Models sites.

The cons are not that big. After all, seeing nobody but the website model in an official website is what you join for not to just get "girlfriend" updates of models you are not interested in. Images and videos are currently big enough to fill most screens. HD quality is cool but I don't look for it so I listed them as cons for those who do. Maybe a bit too few images in the galleries but more could become repetitive in a softcore model.

On the other hand, the site is currently clearly misscategorized at PU: it should by no means be in the Porn Stars category but Softcore or Glamour. If you look at it as a Porn Stars site, you will be very disappointed.

Also, the TBP official review is 2 years outdated although I'm in awe that they updated the site facts after my review. For completeness, let me state again that half the galleries (the most recent ones) are available as zip files and that the content is not amateur in any sense.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:12:19 PDT

Jaime Hammer (1)

04-19-08 04:12pm

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (7)

To atrapat (44):

After reading all the Cons and the Bottom Line comment my jaw dropped when I saw you rate it 90? How can you justify such a high score?

View Thread (9)

ModFX Models Comment

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:50:11 PDT

ModFX Models (0)

04-18-07 05:50pm

COMMENT by King (27)

Nice pictures out there

I was a member of this site about 2 years ago and I can recommend it if you love top class models pictures. I could not find more beautiful selection of girls. It is a softcore site and videos are (were) taken during photo sessions.

Visit ModFX Models - View Replies - Add Reply