PU - C. Weiss - All Activity

RE: ABOUT PRICES

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:26:53 PDT

LBFM (0)

08-27-09 11:26am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To SUKUMVIT (0):

Generally, it's caused by a site using "regional pricing". You can see it's been discussed (at length) in our forum and elsewhere at PU. As you can guess, it's not a practice that's especially popular with users.

Some users have found if they contact the site via email, the site owner will honor the price given here at PU.

View Thread (1)

LBFM Comment

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:25:27 PDT

LBFM (0)

08-27-09 05:25am

COMMENT by SUKUMVIT (0)

ABOUT PRICES

I've noticied that many sites, for exmple LBFM, give his price 30$ monthly, but when you try to join by credit card, the price is 30 euros (that mean about 41$. Why?

Visit LBFM - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:29:32 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-28-08 08:29am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To lurifax (0):

That was my bad ... I grabbed the price from the LBFM listing rather than the one they entered for g-queen.

But, as it happens, there was a typo... $39 recurring at $44 when it should have been $49 recurring at $44

So, while I made the mistake in which prices I posted, your prompt did let us catch the typo. Thanks

I'm told the price is correct now.

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:53:32 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-28-08 07:53am

COMMENT REPLY by lurifax (0)

To Khan (Staff):

There has been a mix-up.

The prices given by the editors are the prices for 'lbfm' - not 'g-queen'!

The correct prices are on page http://www2.g-queen.com/eng/join.html

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:39:40 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-28-08 04:39am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To lurifax (0):

The editors list the price based on what they find when they visit the site. I show they currently list the site as:
Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $54.95 (3 months, non-recurring)

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:42:31 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-27-08 06:42pm

COMMENT REPLY by lurifax (0)

To Khan (Staff):

Thanks, it is a start...but did you got the price right?

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:19:19 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-27-08 06:19am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To lurifax (0):

As an aside ...

The site has now been added. You may enter your remarks at
http://www.pornusers.com/review/gqueen/

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:22:45 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-26-08 06:22pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To lurifax (0):

If you look at the logo for this site is states "porn reviews by the people." Point being that it is by the people and not by professionals. Of course there will be some lame reviews and some others who take more pride in it and do a much better job.

As for where to find shaved Japanese girls, I really could not say because it is not something I have gone after. The point being that shaved girls is not an unusual niche American, European, Oriental or otherwise. Getting a Japanese shaved girl would be no more difficult to get an American shaved girl and does not warrant such costs.

A recent posting was about Ass Smoothies. That is unique, I have not seen that done in many places. It does not command $50 even though if that is something you truly wanted you would have to pay that.

I honestly do not know how many shaved Japanese sites are out there, but it is certainly more than the amount that feature ass smoothies.

I might suggest looking for this niche from sites that actually are Japanese. It would look a little strange and perhaps be strange to read if translation does not work correctly, but I am sure you can find many sites that way.

I just do not feel that this site has the niche cornered to the point that it can charge whatever it wants.

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:07:12 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-26-08 06:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by lurifax (0)

To badandy400 (103):

Firstly I want to apologize for not having noticed before that �www2.g-queen.com� has a daily download limit of 1.5GB (the last item on F.A.Q.), which makes the site less interesting: No information is given about the video clips sizes, which makes one doubt if it is possible to download the lot (presently 121 of them) within a month.

That apart, (I quote ��something that is not truly unique��) maybe you would be generous enough to let me know where else one may find a plentitude of Shaved Japanese girls?

I have seen enough amateurish drivel (�reviews�) to let myself into that business. It is, in my opinion, better left to the professionals. Besides � they are paid for it.

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:06:35 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-26-08 11:06am

COMMENT REPLY by lurifax (0)

To Khan (Staff):

An email was sent to the admin. @ TBP before my comments were posted.

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:26:03 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-26-08 05:26am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To lurifax (0):

You say: "By now TBP has been notified about the existense of 'g-queen' and hopefully we shall see a review of it within a reasonable time. "

I haven't seen any "notification" from you about the site. Only it's mention here. In future, if you want a site listed, please email the URL to "support [at] pornusers [dot] com"

In the meantime, I've passed this one to the TBP Editors.

View Thread (10)

RE: Before spending your $$ on this...

Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:07:26 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-25-08 08:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To lurifax (0):

Well, one things worth mention is that the site you recommend is a $50 per month site. That price is absolutely absurd considering the content. $50 for 1.5 MBit video of something that is not truly unique will not sit well with most of us. Many of use have been feeling it when we pay $30 for a site!

I understand the download limit, and split site issues though. Those are two of my largest NO-NOs for websites.

A review of the site would be nice, but TBP may not jump on that simply because the cost makes it a site that the majority is less likely to join and they need to focus on sites that are most likely to help people.

On that note. Why not simply write a review yourself. You already know the ups and downs of both sites so why suggest that someone else spends their time and money when you already have.

View Thread (10)

LBFM Comment

Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:31:33 PDT

LBFM (0)

10-25-08 02:31pm

COMMENT by lurifax (0)

Before spending your $$ on this...

...compare the site with:
http://www2.g-queen.com/eng/index.html
!!!

For ages I have been pissed off by 'merchants' who pretend to sell you the moon - without delivering more than half a glance of it.

A niggardly 1GB/day is exactly that.

Noty only, but: The sister 'company' is doing the same, and the only reason, which I can imagine, for the very existance of the split into two websites, is their way to maximise the amount of money, whhich they can drain off you.

Caveat Emptor! (Let the byer beware!)

Moneywise, 'g-queen' cost you more/month, but check what you get...

You decide what is better value for your money!

As yet, TBP has not made a review on 'g-queen', which is to my astonishment... However, they can't be everywhere at the same time...

By now TBP has been notified about the existense of 'g-queen' and hopefully we shall see a review of it within a reasonable time.

Visit LBFM - View Replies - Add Reply