PU - FatPays LLC - All Activity

Cuties In Tights Comment

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:18:43 PDT

Cuties In Tights (0)

03-18-09 10:18pm

COMMENT by Wittyguy (83)

Quality Maybe Lacking ...

I just joined the sister site to this one, Cutiesinstockings.com and reviewed it with a score of 73. Given that a lot of models look the same on their model listing in the tour and the limited tours are basically identical I'm assuming the quality is about the same. The "cuties..." sites are mostly pic sites. I found the quality to be average at best and no zips on the cutiesinstockings site so I'm assuming the same quality standards translate over to this one too. You get a decent trial offer of $8 for 3 days of unlimited access (you don't get both sites with this offer) but you may want to save your money or go elsewhere.

Visit Cuties In Tights - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: This lot are also shonks

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:06:46 PST

Naked Novices (0)

02-12-09 04:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To ramscrota (12):

We all should complain when we experience dishonesty.

View Thread (3)

RE: This lot are also shonks

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:25:33 PST

Naked Novices (0)

02-12-09 07:25am

COMMENT REPLY by Anth (0)

To ramscrota (12):

I like the word 'shonks' too.

It's one of those words you just know you've heard, but not sure where from, but automatically know its meaning.

But I came here after reading your reply to my Scoreland / ScoreGroup comments, or I should say my ScoreGroup Debacle notice.

I will definitely avoid this site too.

I have to also add this is a superb feature of TBP to allow users to do this. It would be better if they could also give these comments to these shiester websites that undertake this practice to get an explanation as why the did this.

Sort of like a Porn version of Watchdog.

View Thread (3)

RE: This lot are also shonks

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:49:38 PST

Naked Novices (0)

02-10-09 04:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To ramscrota (12):

I like that word "shonk". Cant' say I've heard of it before. Sounds like a name that should have it's place in the PU vocabularly as an unscrupulous vendor.

View Thread (3)

Naked Novices Comment

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:22:47 PST

Naked Novices (0)

02-10-09 03:22pm

COMMENT by ramscrota (12)

This lot are also shonks

These people are shonks. I signed for the 3-day trial, and found that I had been signed up for several other sites for 'free three-day trials'. Of course, the catch was the you had to cancel memebrship to these sites, or get billed. I worked through them all, but 2 escaped the net, and I got billed. Luckily, one of the credit companies refunded me.

Interesting that Denner's review, although more comprehensive
than mine, is similar in the fundamentals.

Visit Naked Novices - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Denner's Review

Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:19:52 PST

Naked Novices (0)

12-30-08 07:19pm

REVIEW REPLY by ramscrota (12)

To Denner (227):

I agree, Denner. The site's a total dog. It's good we have this forum to give some of these sites the reviews they deserve.

View Thread (3)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Sun, 04 May 2008 14:54:15 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

05-04-08 02:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To ace of aces (179):

Okay, ace of aces then! :-)

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Sun, 04 May 2008 14:06:48 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

05-04-08 02:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To messmer (123):

aoa? i only know aloha :)

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Sun, 04 May 2008 12:02:31 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

05-04-08 12:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To ace of aces (179):

Thanks for the tip, aoa!

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Sun, 04 May 2008 05:35:58 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

05-04-08 05:35am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To messmer (123):

as i surfed arround in the net i was at My Lovely Girls. that`s quite a good site. it`s a little bit eastern europe style but i like sometimes the cheap settings and those kind of girls ;).

what i expected on that site i rated was what i found on this site. (ok a little more ... i alway epect more :) )

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Sun, 04 May 2008 05:30:11 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

05-04-08 05:30am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To Denner (227):

thanks for replie. i am alway happy if i can help other users with my review.

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:49:25 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

04-28-08 10:49am

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To ace of aces (179):

Let me be added to the chorus of "thank you's" for warning about this site. Might have tempted me, but your review warns me away. Thanks!

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:40:16 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

04-24-08 10:40pm

REVIEW REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (88)

To ace of aces (179):

Thanks for the review, ace. I'm hard-wired to respond to the word "panties" like one of Pavlov's dogs, and I've been semi-tempted to try this place out. I'll probably ignore it for a good while now, before the word "panties" brings me salivating back...

WWW

**by the way, it's what's in the panties that counts, not the panties all by themselves. I don't huff them or wear them (OK, one time, when I was very drunk). Men in panties is a travesty! Nor do I hang around playgrounds in Highgate looking for Cross-eyed Mary! ;)
18+ please.

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:48:13 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

04-24-08 08:48am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To ace of aces (179):

Ace - I like your review. Short, sweet and to the point.

Messmer - I feel the same way. If they can't do a good job on the promotional side, it's not likely the full product will be any better.

Denner - Maybe there should be a method to keep track of what has been saved by using member reviews like this and a "MVPU" (Most Valuable Porn User) prize awarded each year.

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:05:21 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

04-24-08 08:05am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To messmer (123):

Again, you said it, messmer....

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:03:14 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

04-24-08 08:03am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To ace of aces (179):

Thanks for the review because their name fit one of my favorite niches and I might have been tempted to give them a try, so you saved me a bundle. I checked just out of curiosity and their "free tour" is a farce, that alone is usually an indicator of how poor a site is. Only two pages, not a single picture or movie clip to view or download! They got to be kidding!

View Thread (11)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:02:03 PDT

Flower Panties (0)

04-24-08 08:02am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To ace of aces (179):

Great review - this is - also - what we need concerning not recommended...
Thanks for the fine warning!!!
You wasted your money - I won't waste mine....
Owe you one....

View Thread (11)

RE: Denner's Review

Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:53:12 PDT

Naked Novices (0)

09-27-07 12:53am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To Jay G (63):

Thanks Jay G
... and yeah - most of the times I try to experiment out there with "unknown" sites I get disappointed. And high price after the "you get what you pay for" never garantee quality. Mostly the opposite.

View Thread (3)

RE: Denner's Review

Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:46:46 PDT

Naked Novices (0)

09-25-07 06:46am

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To Denner (227):

As usual, I appreciate and enjoy your reviews. This one seems to be another example of how higher-priced sites generally are of far less quality than medium (or even lower) priced sites and networks.

Has your experience shown you this also? The few times I've paid for higher priced sites have ALWAYS been a disappointment. Seems webmasters that charge a higher price are relying on us when we are hungover or just being stupid, and are not really interested in large audiences for quality work. The quick buck from a few is preferred to lots of customers.

Thanks again for the heads up.

View Thread (3)