PU - Spunky Productions Inc. - All Activity

Shyla Jennings Comment

Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:53:37 PST

Shyla Jennings (0)

01-09-12 06:53pm

COMMENT by RLane (2)

No trial

There is no more trial offered and beware of checked sites when on the paying site.

Visit Shyla Jennings - View Replies - Add Reply

Craving Carmen Comment

Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:18:29 PST

Craving Carmen (0)

12-15-11 09:18am

COMMENT by RLane (2)

Cute Girl

Is there anyone a current member a past member in the last year? I'd like to join this site, but the UP reviews are dated in '09 and I'd like to know what this site offers, like: resolution sizes, quantity of pictures, how many videos, bonus items and similar things.

Visit Craving Carmen - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Interesting preview

Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:53:47 PST

Spunky Angels (0)

01-08-11 01:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by tangub (103)

To otoh (34):

They certainly have some cute models there and i noticed one of my favorites Faye Reagen in the preview, the sample pics are only around 1100-1200px though and according to TBP site facts no zips...grrrrr.

View Thread (1)

Spunky Angels Comment

Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:11:40 PST

Spunky Angels (0)

01-06-11 01:11pm

COMMENT by otoh (34)

Interesting preview

Anyone a member here?

The preview looks good; pretty, natural models, with some smart lingerie, as opposed to the cliched stuff that we see so often. I like also that each model has a rating: Tease/Topless/Full nude/Explicit - looks fun to have a range of styles like that one one site.

Ultimately, I think the model base is too young (and too entirely hairless) for my liking, but it looks like a good format nonetheless.

NB fellow UK folk: this is not what the site name might suggest :D

Visit Spunky Angels - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Jeffrey99's Review

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:04:40 PDT

Craving Carmen (0)

03-14-09 03:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by TrashMan (103)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

I hate websites which advertise for junko cam sites in the members page...come on now, people are PAYING to see a members page, ads shouldnt be there.

View Thread (1)

RE: Monahan's Review

Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:34:24 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-22-08 11:34am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To PinkPanther (44):

After further review, the original call stands. Libido wins. Looking forward to checking out much, much more this babe.

She's one of those rare little sweeties with a fabulous face, nice body and ohhhhh those puffy nipples that just drive me totally wild. And she's one of the very few who I would not like to see doing hardcore with some hairy balled retard with tattoos and stringy hair.

I suspect I could handle a b/g scene with a Tom Byron type (early on when he looked like a clean cut teen aged kid; not after he did drugs and got gnarly looking.

But so long as she sticks with solo and g/g, I'll remain a devoted fan.

Thanks, Pink Panther. Your comments really helped.

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:03:59 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-22-08 09:03am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Monahan (37):

As I said originally, this is an active site - the pic sets aren't in the thousands of pics, but they are average size pic sets for an internet model site. This is a professionally done site. I was a member for a month, had no complaints. If you can check out her cam shows, those are really fun. She'll talk about anything you want to talk about, leads rather a crazy life - gets kicked out of hotels at adult conventions for being too rowdy, etc. And her bod looks awesome on web cam.

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:54:17 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-22-08 08:54am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To PinkPanther (44):

Sorry. I worded it badly. The update schedule listed only past dates and did not state if they were photos or videos...or how many. Having been burned many times where an "update" consisted of a single photo I was hoping you, or someone else, may have direct knowledge of how the site operates.

I guess I'll have to take one for the team and sink $25 into the site and check it out.

As you suggest, there's a Hellofalot more potential for this site than that POS JennaRocks.com site.

My wallet says, "hang on, big fella, you already dropped $15 on a piece of crap."

But my libido says, "Go for it. You know you really want so see much more Jana Jordan. And what's $25? That's just one lap dance with that skank at the titty bar, including tip"

Sigh. The libido always seems to win these arguments.

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:51:36 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-21-08 11:51pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Monahan (37):

You don't see evidence that it's an active site? What about the detailed listing on the home page of photo set updates on 11/17, 11/14, 11/10, 11/03, 10/31, 10/27, 10/24, 10/20, 10/17, 10/16, etc? That isn't a clue? Then there's the cam show schedule, which is accurate.

I'm not currently a member, but there was at least 1 new vid a week, sometimes more.

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:45:00 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-21-08 11:45pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To PinkPanther (44):

I checked out the Club Jana Jordan site but I see mo evidence at all that it's an active site with reasonably frequent updates apart from a sole announcement that she was appearing on November 20 at the Hustler in DC., and an "update" calendar that says nothing at all about what they updates are...photos, videos or whatever.

There's also a list of Cam shows that looks good, if it's accurate and if it's complied with.

Are you a current member? If so, can you provide an estimate of the number of video updates per month?

Thanks.

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:24:05 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-19-08 10:24am

REVIEW REPLY by Pinche Kankun (0)

To Monahan (37):

GREAT!! So she doesn't get naked!! :) Great!

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:18:54 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-19-08 09:18am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To Denner (227):

Thanks.

I have to admit something. I am fascinated by Jana Jordan's chicks cute body and even cuter face, especially with her blonde bangs in the early days. So I actually spent more time last night checking out some of the individual photos on the site which are, despite her body parts being fully covered, rather sexy anyway. And they are, indeed, early in her career because she has some rather distinctive tattoos today that were not in the photos I checked out.

So, although not worth the $15 by any means, it wasn't a total loss. (When it comes to porn, I'm a "glass is half full" kinda guy.)

[Just occurred to me. Perhaps I should do an academic study on Ms. Jordan tracing her body art and public displays of her body parts as they have occurred over her career and submit it to some elite University for publication! ;o)]

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:54:37 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-19-08 08:54am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To Monahan (37):

A fine and very well put review - AND warning, thanks.
A somewhat nice looking preview hides the fact that this site sucks, excuse my french.
Generally we do not see too many replies (if any) of reviews with low or middle scores, but the trafic here shows different - ok, maybe because this review gives us all the necessary fasts.
Keep it up, Monahan....but sorry you wasted your money!

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:00:22 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-19-08 05:00am

REVIEW REPLY by Jay G (63)

To Monahan (37):

Your review was great! One of the reasons I log onto Porn Users just about every day is to read the clever writing of reviewers like you who let me start off my day with a smile or laugh because, yes, all of us pornusers have made some of the same mistakes you did in our years of searching for the perfect porn. Thanks for sharing!!

View Thread (14)

RE: A Sub-Rosa Site - Checking It Out

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:05:55 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-19-08 01:05am

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To Monahan (37):

I checked out the site preview and I can see why you took a chance. I agree that she is really cute. You are not the only one who might throw out a few bucks to see her. We all have gambled and lost on sites that seem interesting, but don't deliver. My sympathies, but thanks for the heads up.

View Thread (2)

RE: Monahan's Review

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:04:05 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-18-08 11:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Monahan (37):

as with the comment I posted to the comment about this site, this is an old dead site - 2-3 years old, probably. After Jana left this webmaster, she had IDreamOfJana.com, then left that when she was gettin more frisky and Ninnworx built a site around her when she was a contract girl with them and now she has a new site that she's running with Sandy Summers and her webmaster called ClubJanaJordan.com with frequent updates, hot girl/girl and masturbation stuff, webcam shows, etc.

If you're a Jana fan, don't waste your time with the dead sites, check out her new active site.

View Thread (14)

RE: A Sub-Rosa Site - Checking It Out

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:59:20 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-18-08 10:59pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Monahan (37):

Yeah, too bad you didn't post a comment first asking if anybody knew anything about this site. I could have told you that it was a dead site. This was actually 3 sites ago for Jana. She did this site, then she did IDreamOfJana.com, then Ninnworx built a site around her when she was a contract girl with them. Now she has a site that she's operating with Sandy Summers, formerly Naughty Girl Sandy, and her webmasters, called ClubJanaJordan.com. That site is updating multiple times a week and has more than Jana Rocks already, most likely, including hot girl/girl & masturbation vids.

Oh, well. If you're a Jana fan, that's the site that I would recommend.

View Thread (2)

RE: Monahan's Review

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:15:04 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-18-08 07:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To Monahan (37):

Yeah, about the only good thing about it from your point of view is at least you can have the satisfaction of knowing you steered away some potential customers from throwing away their money. You let your libido get in the way of your common sense?! No surely not. That's never happened to me....well.. not usually..err...

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:01:45 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-18-08 07:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To Monahan (37):

In the interest of full and fair disclosure I must note that I misstated a few details.

- The total combined run time of the site's 9 videos is closer to 10 minutes, not the 25 minutes I said in the review.

- In one video (the Valentine's Day 30 second one) if one watches very carefully one can detect an accidental flash (about 1/2 second) of a small portion of Jana's right nipple. But ya gotta be very quick.

- In one video (the black dress one) she actually lifts up the back of her dress and pulls down her panties so that we get a long shot of her ass crack (nothing else, but she does have a nice ass) for about 2 or 3 seconds.

So I suspect that, if this site were to be shown on Mr. Roger's Neighborhood, they might need to block out about 3 seconds of material.

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:23:14 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-18-08 06:23pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To TheSquirrel (30):

Thanks Squirrel.

I knew, going in, that I was probably pissing my money away because there are no reviews on PU, TBP or any of the other porn site review sites on the web. That's a good indicator that the site is probably pure garbage.

But because my libido seems to be more powerful than my common sense, I went ahead and signed up. My consolation, as I suggested in my review, is that I may have steered others away from this waste of time site.

View Thread (14)

RE: Monahan's Review

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:14:30 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-18-08 06:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To Monahan (37):

Great review. This reminds me of the truly bad old days. You know, the time when video was just catching on, and if you weren't careful you'd pay a lot of money for a real pile of old rubbish - pretty much what you have just described on this site. Thankfully, if people read this review, they wont waste their money.

View Thread (14)

Jana Rocks Comment

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:06:42 PST

Jana Rocks (0)

11-18-08 05:06pm

COMMENT by Monahan (37)

A Sub-Rosa Site - Checking It Out

This is just a note about a site - JanaRocks.com - which is a single girl site for Jana Jordan, who is a babe I found on Twistys (Jana Foxy) and a fabulous set of photos and video on FTV Girls (Yana).

My libido got the better of my common sense so I decided to drop $15 for one month on this site (no trials).

About 15 minutes ago my charge through CCBill went through and during that 15 minutes I drained all 9 videos. All nine are G rated (not even her bra comes off in any of them) and the site looks like it would be tame even by You Tube standards.

I will be checking out the 61 photo sets and the "Jana's Friends" section and will prepare a formal review when I'm done.

Bottom line at this point is that I think i may have just blown $15 that would have been better spent on 3 supersized Big Macs.

If you had any thought about signing up for JanaRocks.com, I suggest you wait for a day or two until I post a review.

Visit Jana Rocks - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: troglodite's Review

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:02:41 PST

Craving Carmen (0)

01-16-08 06:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by Radgeta (1)

To King (27):

Amateur Allure recently got a movie of her up.

View Thread (2)

RE: Lack of Updates

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:52:30 PDT

Trista Stevens (0)

07-09-07 02:52pm

COMMENT REPLY by troglodite (69)

To PinkPanther (44):

I joined this site when it was brand new and there were about 10 videos on the site. I think there was 1 video update while I was a member and a few picsets. I've got it bookmarked and check the frontpage periodically, because I told myself I'd join again once she got up to 30-40 vids. I'd say it probably stopped somewhere around 20 though, with most of the updates in the past few months being "wallpaper" updates. Seriously - does anyone actually download these and use them on their desktop? Wallpaper updates don't count!

But yeah her content was pretty hot while it lasted. I agree it looks like she must have moved on :(

View Thread (2)

RE: Lack of Updates

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:48:32 PDT

Trista Stevens (0)

07-09-07 06:48am

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Radgeta (1):

Taking a look at the site, it's pretty clear right on the main page that the last pic update was 5/23/07 and the last vid update was on 5/05/07. Given that webmasters tend to shoot stuff that can be released over time, that's usually an indication that the model has moved on. Oh, well.

View Thread (2)

Trista Stevens Comment

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:09:28 PDT

Trista Stevens (0)

07-09-07 03:09am

COMMENT by Radgeta (1)

Lack of Updates

Trista is one of the hottest solo girls I have seen on the internet. It's simple to download the movies (although you must download the entire movies it is not broken up). The sites pretty new and I would recommend not joining until the site has been around for awhile longer. She has few hardcore movies but the ones they have on their are some of my favorites.

Given time Trista's site could become a great website but it still needs time to collect some more content.

Visit Trista Stevens - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: troglodite's Review

Sat, 26 May 2007 15:58:32 PDT

Craving Carmen (0)

05-26-07 03:58pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To troglodite (69):

Wow! Full HD with 5Mbit/s? Vid quality must be awesome!!!

View Thread (2)

RE: Now Showing Off Her Assets?

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:18:01 PDT

Diddylicious (0)

04-24-07 08:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To marquis58401 (23):

Thanks for the info on that one. It's not what I was hoping for, but maybe she'll be doing more in that direction.

View Thread (2)

RE: Now Showing Off Her Assets?

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:44:50 PDT

Diddylicious (0)

04-20-07 07:44am

COMMENT REPLY by marquis58401 (23)

To SnowDude (214):

Snowdude:

I've seen the three bj vids you refer to in your comment. They're all POV style with Diddylicious on her knees facing the camera. She's topless in the vids but is wearing panties. The vids center on her face and mouth and don't show a whole lot of her chest - although you do get a peek every once in a while. She has nice breasts and her nipples are pierced too.

View Thread (2)

Diddylicious Comment

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:51:15 PDT

Diddylicious (0)

04-17-07 07:51pm

COMMENT by SnowDude (214)

Now Showing Off Her Assets?

I'm not usually a fan of girls in their teens or early 20s since I prefer a more mature group, but in my never ending search for girls with short hair this site has stayed on my list for lack of much material in this genre. You'd be surprised how few girls there are with hair just to their shoulders let alone any shorter!

When I first put this site on my list she didn't even reveal her breasts in any of her picture shoots, but when I did a recent revisit of her tour I see that she has three blowjob videos but I still didn't see whether she's started doing fully nude sets. Although anything is possible, I can't say that I've ever seen a site where the girl gives head and doesn't show her chest!

So, if anyone has a report on that please let me know. She's definitely in the small breast genre which also usually isn't my thing, but as they say beggars can't be choosers. ;)

Visit Diddylicious - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: dusty004's Review

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:25:22 PDT

Kate's Playground (0)

03-27-07 10:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To dusty004 (1):

One other thing to keep in mind with this site is that if you want to see Kate fully nude, showing her really lovely pussy, you will have to buy zip sets at extra cost. This is pretty common in the world of solo-girl sites, but I know some people consider it a real ripoff, so it's worth noting.

Kate used to be really active in her members' forum, which was fun, though I don't know if she continues the level of activity that she had when I was a member well over a year ago.

View Thread (1)