PU - ICS, Inc. - All Activity

Reality Gang Comment

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:52:19 PST

Reality Gang (0)

03-10-11 04:52pm

COMMENT by insomniacxxx (13)

Not all videos marked HD really are

This is a major edit to a previous comment. It looked like HD videos are no longer available but that is not the case. It is simply that all videos are marked as HD, even ones that are not. And the file sizes listed are completely wrong for the HD videos - they are much larger than what is displayed. For example i am downloading one right now listed as 319 MB but actually weighing in at 572.

So there does not seem to be any video content missing, just some that is mislabeled. And not all photo sets have Zip sets, and the navigation is pretty terrible. Content is great though, all in all still well worth the price if you can get the discount - just be prepared for some minor annoyances.

Visit Reality Gang - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Is the present price about 30 dollars?

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:52:05 PST

Naughty Amateur Home Videos (0)

11-21-10 11:52am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To tangub (103):

There are few limits when it comes to ways people can grab more of your money.

When I bought my first computer, many years ago, I bought it from a mail-order company. The company was out of state, which means it was located in a different state from the one I lived in. I live in the United States. At that time, and it's still the case, out of state sellers did not charge state sales tax (no sales tax from the state of the seller, and no sales tax from the state of the buyer).

But I was charged my state sales tax on the purchase of the PC, by the seller.

In theory, the seller was supposed to turn the "state sales tax" money over to the state I lived in.

On a practical basis, there was no way to check to see if the seller did turn the money over to my state, or just kept the money.

And legally, I believe the seller could keep the "sales tax money", and claim that it was holding the money to turn over to my state. If the matter had ever gone to a court of law.

But my guess is that the "VAT tax" would be kept by the seller, with the intention of turning it over the the British government. This would happen when the seller dies, and goes to heaven, and does pay the British government it's fair share of all revenues.

View Thread (6)

RE: Is the present price about 30 dollars?

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:27:33 PST

Naughty Amateur Home Videos (0)

11-21-10 10:27am

COMMENT REPLY by tangub (103)

To Willard (10):

The price i am seeing is $19.95 plus UK VAT @ 17.50% $3.49 = $23.44.

Seems odd to me that a site which appears to be US based would charge UK VAT, not seen that scam before.

View Thread (6)

RE: Is the present price about 30 dollars?

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:32:31 PST

Naughty Amateur Home Videos (0)

11-21-10 08:32am

COMMENT REPLY by Willard (10)

To lk2fireone (116):

I wish to express my gratitude for your having examined it.

I accessed it in a similar way with you.

View Thread (6)

RE: Is the present price about 30 dollars?

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:18:13 PST

Naughty Amateur Home Videos (0)

11-21-10 08:18am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Willard (10):

I just checked, and I am seeing the $19.95/month special price.
But I live in the U.S.
So I guess you are being hit with regional pricing, if the price you see is about $30/month.

I used the PU hot link to go to the site. Did you remember to use the PU hot link?

My apologies, if the question is obvious.

View Thread (6)

RE: Is the present price about 30 dollars?

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 07:20:16 PST

Naughty Amateur Home Videos (0)

11-21-10 07:20am

COMMENT REPLY by Willard (10)

To Khan (Staff):

I wish to express my gratitude for having given a quick answer.

View Thread (6)

RE: Is the present price about 30 dollars?

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 07:04:51 PST

Naughty Amateur Home Videos (0)

11-21-10 07:04am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Willard (10):

I just checked and am seeing the special price that shows on the listing. If you're not seeing that price, you might try clearing your cache (Temporary Internet Files) and any cookies you have associated with that site, then revisiting directly from one of our links.

If you don't see it then, I guess it's possible the site is using regional pricing.

Perhaps one of our other users can confirm that one way or the other.

View Thread (6)

Naughty Amateur Home Videos Comment

Sun, 21 Nov 2010 06:39:16 PST

Naughty Amateur Home Videos (0)

11-21-10 06:39am

COMMENT by Willard (10)

Is the present price about 30 dollars?

Is a present price one month about 30 dollars?

Is this a price of which countries other than the United States adjust?

I tried several times.
However, the price is about 30 dollars a month.

Visit Naughty Amateur Home Videos - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Best Deal

Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:46:11 PDT

Inexperienced Amateurs (0)

09-02-10 01:46am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To TheSquirrel (30):

Nor me.

In fact, I have reached the point where I will avoid using CCBill if at all possible!

IMO any site that facilitates such a con is just as guilty as the Webmaster who 'requests' it.

Cap'n. :0E

View Thread (3)

RE: Best Deal

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:46:08 PDT

Inexperienced Amateurs (0)

09-01-10 06:46pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To Capn (27):

What TBP says is this.
"Some included sites are not stand-alone sites. Users outside of the US may be charged in Euros, which would be much more expensive."

They also sometimes advertise membership for $7.99, but that is only if you join for a whole year.

They charge VAT of 20% on UK memberships. I found that out by giving a phony email address so I could get to the next join up page and see what it looked like. I didn't want the usual spam, so I gave the phony email address, as I had no intention of joining. It's the "may be charged in Euros" phrase on TBP that caught my eye.

I will not join a site that has regional discrimination.

View Thread (3)

RE: Best Deal

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:21:18 PDT

Inexperienced Amateurs (0)

09-01-10 06:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To TheSquirrel (30):

Regional pricing?

Great.....

Another con!

Cap'n. :-E

View Thread (3)

Inexperienced Amateurs Comment

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:03:30 PDT

Inexperienced Amateurs (0)

09-01-10 03:03pm

COMMENT by TheSquirrel (30)

Best Deal

This is a new site. Go to TBP and you will see the price is $38.80 with no access mentioned to any other sites.

Go to the Reality Gang (which used to be Adult Reality Pass) review on TBP and you will see the price for joining is a reduced $17.99 from $30.00. Scroll down, click the link, and check out the 34 sites listed as part of the membership and Inexperienced Amateurs isn't listed. However if you go to the Reality Gang site you will see Inexperienced Amateurs listed as part of the membership.

The obvious bottom line is it's better to join Reality Gang and get membership to Inexperienced Amateurs for $17.99 rather than pay $38.80 for Inexperienced Amateurs and get no access to any other site.

At least that's what it looks like. I look forward to a review from some brave soul willing to risk being ripped off, for the benefit of all of us. I wont be joining though. Since they have pre checked cross sells and are going to charge me more for being European they can basically do to themselves what is being done to the porn girls.

Visit Inexperienced Amateurs - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: question

Sat, 07 Aug 2010 10:36:38 PDT

Reality Gang (0)

08-07-10 10:36am

COMMENT REPLY by Monahan (37)

To Robbi81 (4):

You can get the site at $14.99 if you click on the PU link, then go to the sign up page, then X out of the site. The site comes back with a "special deal" at $14.99 which you then can accept. It does not say whether that price is just for the first month or if it's good for all renewals.

View Thread (5)

RE: UPDATE: good news and bad

Sat, 06 Mar 2010 10:18:31 PST

Reality Gang (0)

03-06-10 10:18am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To insomniacxxx (13):

We've moved this Comment to the site/network that you say it was intended for.

View Thread (6)

RE: question

Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:09:24 PST

Reality Gang (0)

03-04-10 08:09am

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To Robbi81 (4):

i am not a member of that site, so i don`t know if they have already theire discount price. sorry.

View Thread (5)

RE: question

Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:49:37 PST

Reality Gang (0)

03-03-10 07:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by Robbi81 (4)

To ace of aces (179):

Is the discount still in affect?? Ive gone to the site and deleted my cookies and the discount still does not show up.

View Thread (5)

RE: question

Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:03:43 PST

Reality Gang (0)

03-02-10 09:03am

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (179)

To bruce987 (1):

how slow was slow downloading? i just joined a site where only one dl at time possible is. the speed is arrounf 400kb/s -.-

View Thread (5)

RE: question

Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:58:06 PST

Reality Gang (0)

02-05-10 05:58pm

COMMENT REPLY by bruce987 (1)

To ace of aces (179):

Yes... they still have the discounted price of $14 and something. I was on this site three times in 2009. Wasn't bad. Girls are great and action good. Hi-res movies but slow downloads. Worth the waiting time.

View Thread (5)

Reality Gang Comment

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:53:16 PST

Reality Gang (0)

01-12-10 09:53am

COMMENT by ace of aces (179)

question

does some member of that know if the discount price is working on? how is that site?

Visit Reality Gang - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Are there full vids to download on this network?

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:54:53 PDT

Reality Gang (0)

09-25-09 12:54pm

COMMENT REPLY by james4096 (126)

To realityguy (1):

The newer videos are all full scene. They did a big redesign some time ago. You can still access the old site that has the old videos that aren't full scene as well.

View Thread (1)

Reality Gang Comment

Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:30:06 PDT

Reality Gang (0)

09-25-09 10:30am

COMMENT by realityguy (1)

Are there full vids to download on this network?

I joined a while ago and was very dissapointed to learn that all the vids were cut unto segments for download, that's a dealbreaker for me. I said on the site review that there are full vids, I just wanted to check to see if this is new or what. Thanks.

Visit Reality Gang - View Replies - Add Reply

Motor Tramps Comment

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:24:04 PDT

Motor Tramps (0)

09-08-09 12:24pm

COMMENT by PBPAdult (0)

Still not updating

Right now the update schedule is not at all. It's been two months since launch and they still have nine scenes. All the sites in the network update at a glacial pace though so I wouldn't expect much movement.

Visit Motor Tramps - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Discount not working?

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:39:29 PDT

Reality Gang (0)

08-31-09 03:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by Colm4 (10)

To james4096 (126):

Ah I see, very sneaky of them indeed. Thanks for the update.

View Thread (2)

RE: Discount not working?

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:02:14 PDT

Reality Gang (0)

08-31-09 01:02am

COMMENT REPLY by james4096 (126)

To Colm4 (10):

I don't know if the $17.99 sale price is regional(US but not EU) or not.

But the $8 sale was a little misleading. You have to pay for the whole year and it ends up being around $100 US. If you divide that by 12 you get the $8. It's the price at the bottom.

IMHO, the $18 deal is pretty good. Make sure you clear your cookies and join through the link here at PU to get it.

View Thread (2)

Reality Gang Comment

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:06:37 PDT

Reality Gang (0)

08-28-09 03:06am

COMMENT by Colm4 (10)

Discount not working?

Many sites of this network now advertise with 8 dollars a month. But when I enter the join page, it's 32 Euros (46 Dollars!!!).
Could this be a cookie problem or is it just a scam?

Visit Reality Gang - View Replies - Add Reply

Reality Gang Comment

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:19:17 PDT

Reality Gang (0)

07-01-09 12:19pm

COMMENT by insomniacxxx (13)

UPDATE: good news and bad

This network seems to be undergoing a major update right now. Some of the older content which was DRM'd is reappearing without DRM, and the quality is amazing. Some older content is also now just straight up missing. I assume (hope) that it will be brought back in the new formats eventually.

HOWEVER. Download speeds are a COMPLETE JOKE these days. My average is about 80-90 kbps. Right now it's at 11.4. No joke, and that's not a misplaced decimal point - ELEVEN POINT FOUR. For comparison, downloads from another paysite are at 450 as I type this. The estimated time to finish downloading the newest episode of Contortionist (one of the newer sites on the network) is... oh, haha now it's down to 7.6 kbps and estimated at 31 hours.

Frankly, I should be getting a refund.

Oh, also... The new Flash player sucks. You can't scrub through the content until it has loaded. In light of the download speeds, that basically renders the player unusable.

I'm excited to see the content being brought up to date, but with these download speeds I have to call this a DO NOT BUY. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt due to the transition. But if it continues much longer I think it will warrant editing my review and dropping their score.

Visit Reality Gang - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Kind of limiting with the girls

Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:57:44 PDT

Contortionist (0)

06-09-09 06:57pm

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Lionheart (47):

You may want to take a look at
http://www.pornusers.com/review/perfectflex/
or
http://www.pornusers.com/review/clerotic/

They're run by the same company that has cl-bikini

View Thread (3)

Big Sausage Pizza Comment

Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:16:05 PDT

Big Sausage Pizza (0)

06-09-09 05:16pm

COMMENT by Lionheart (47)

Reminds me of that joke guys play on dates...

Ever hear the joke, you cut a hole at the bottom of your popcorn bag and put you johnson in there and wait for your date to dig down and grab him? Seeing this site reminds of that... I wonder if this will be a spinoff?

Visit Big Sausage Pizza - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Kind of limiting with the girls

Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:13:29 PDT

Contortionist (0)

06-09-09 05:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by Lionheart (47)

To badandy400 (103):

You do bring up a good point, by the way the website you recommended shows some very impressive positions I wish those girls could would do some hardcore stuff, those positions leave a lot of the imagination.

View Thread (3)

RE: Kind of limiting with the girls

Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:01:29 PDT

Contortionist (0)

06-09-09 12:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To Lionheart (47):

Considering all the crazy positions pornstars have to get into it is not surprising that sites like this would pop up. I bet a lot more girls could do this than we may think. Granted these woman may be able to go a little farther, but with a little work I believe many of the usually pornstars could do this.

If you want to see this taken farther check out cl-bikini. The girls can really stretch there, but it is all extreme softcore and very little nude.

View Thread (3)

Contortionist Comment

Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:22:31 PDT

Contortionist (0)

06-09-09 03:22am

COMMENT by Lionheart (47)

Kind of limiting with the girls

I think this site has great thing going for them I love seeing the girls do impressive body contortions, but how many girls can they find that can do stretch like that and be willing to do porn? Right now the site is small, with just a few movies wonder how often they will have updates on movies or will they just a have a same porn stars shooting over again. Hope this site does well!

Visit Contortionist - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: anorexic?

Sat, 23 May 2009 08:49:57 PDT

Club Jenna (0)

05-23-09 08:49am

COMMENT REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To TrashMan (103):

LOLOL I DOUBT this is true.

May 8th take a look
http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawl...s/porno/default.aspx

Ex porn star Jenna Jameson and boyfriend Tito Ortiz are expecting their first babies - yes, twins - due in the spring and Jenna is sharing photos of her growing baby bump.
She was 12 weeks on May 8th there abouts.

Scroll down on the link

View Thread (2)

RE: UPDATE

Tue, 05 May 2009 19:13:22 PDT

MILF Cruiser (0)

05-05-09 07:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by mediafan (8)

To mr3633 (9):

They do NOT have all the scenes, I really didn't count. I'll give you an est. about 24 to 28 full scenes, but they still offer the clip scenes in the archives section. They are also making the other sites with the full scenes, but again they do not have all scenes for any of the MILF CRUISER sites. I did not see any new up dates for like 2 weeks...I think they are using the DVD's they have to get the full scens, as to why they could not do all the scenes your guess is as good as mine.

View Thread (2)

RE: UPDATE

Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:24:25 PDT

MILF Cruiser (0)

04-09-09 06:24am

COMMENT REPLY by mr3633 (9)

To mediafan (8):

Hi, thanks for providing the update to this site. The fact they now offer full movie clip downloads with no DMR (about time they caught up with the competition) is a good thing. My question is how many of the Milf Cruiser scenes are available for full scene download and roughly how many are not? Is there a "cut off" date that scenes are now available as a full download? I wish they would just update all scenes for one click full download and be done with it.

View Thread (2)

MILF Cruiser Comment

Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:15:43 PDT

MILF Cruiser (0)

04-08-09 11:15pm

COMMENT by mediafan (8)

UPDATE

Good news, they are now giving the FULL movie WITHOUT the DRM's, the only draw back is that they do NOT have all of the MILF cruisers movies. And the other sites that go along with MILF CRUISER are also full scenes, but again they DO NOT HAVE ALL of the scenes. And they also DO NOT have picture downloads.

Visit MILF Cruiser - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Discount price is wrong

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:06:49 PDT

Hardcore Partying (0)

03-30-09 12:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by Vegas Ken (Staff)

To slutty (92):

Hey Everyone,

I contacted the people that run this site and got the discount price fixed. It is up and working now. I just tested it.

Thanks for using our site!!!!

View Thread (1)

Hardcore Partying Comment

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:08:01 PDT

Hardcore Partying (0)

03-21-09 11:08pm

COMMENT by slutty (92)

Discount price is wrong

I followed the link from PU and the price listed is not $18, it is $27. This should probably be updated.

Visit Hardcore Partying - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: anorexic?

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:31:29 PDT

Club Jenna (0)

03-15-09 07:31am

COMMENT REPLY by Goldfish (63)

To TrashMan (103):

Does Jenna still make new porn? I figured her time had passed.

View Thread (2)

Club Jenna Comment

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:02:07 PDT

Club Jenna (0)

03-14-09 03:02pm

COMMENT by TrashMan (103)

anorexic?

One of my friends said that Jenna is anorexic (or was...). There apparently are a lot of pictures of a very slimmed and boney Jenna on Google Images (just do a simple search of Jenna Jameson on Google Images...mostly safe for work, depending on the definition of "safe"). Did this translate into anorexic content on her website?

Visit Club Jenna - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: TrashMan's Review

Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:57:41 PDT

Adult.com (0)

03-08-09 07:57am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To TrashMan (103):

As you I'm OK with the "null listings" (names in the dropdown with no content or incorrect content). I saw that when I played with the preview site.

The issue is the number of cases where a particular star is not mentioned at all in the list but who does have content. In my earlier post I mentioned Natasha Nice and Jenna Doll who have content in Adult.com but are not listed in the pornstar list.

Because they chose not to list those two (and others) you can only hope to stumble on them as you surf through all titles.

Mind you, it's more like a treasure hunt than a problem because they become happy discoveries when they show up unexpectedly, but I definitely would not score their tagging as 10/10. Their tag accuracy is not much better than that of VideoBox.

I have run into some other issues with the site as well, but I'll save them up for a complete review after I've given it a full workout.

But having been on the Adult.com site now for 3 days, overall I am very happy with it (I've added a lot of brand new stuff to my stash already), and it's all because of your excellent review. I was unaware of it previously. Thanks for that.

View Thread (6)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:21:05 PST

Adult.com (0)

03-07-09 11:21pm

REVIEW REPLY by TrashMan (103)

To Monahan (37):

I must admit, I did notice that (about some star listings that are blank, lacking any movies/scenes). I really didn't care much about it though. My only thought about it was that movies previously on the site were removed while their references to stars were not. I've seen it before (APornArchive(.com) on Adult Bouncer). I usually like to believe that this is related to a loss of license rather than a blatant move to upset users. While it would be nice to see them physically remove the affected stars it is important to say that if you are looking at a site's potential based on a few stars, Adult.com lets you see everything you want before you join as the tour page is an exact mirror of the members page (sans the lack of the search engine). So if something is a deal breaker (e.g. lack of a particular star, or a listing with no entries) it is something you can see before you join (as opposed to say finding this out only after you join).

See, that's the problem with having different tastes...referring to the fact that I like a certain set of stars and you like others. It lets us see different sides of the story. And on my side I didn't seem to find any problems with the girls I like while there seems to have been a problem (be it exclusion from the cast list, or the victim of a poor tag job, etc.) with yours. This is certainly a good thing as far as reviews go - more reviews with different pros/cons. I just hope the problems weren't a super deal breaker in the end.

True, screencaps are small, but they are sufficient enough (and more than a lot of sites on the site) to make a decision on whether i want to download or not. See, mind you I download movies based on their star power (i.e. i like certain girls more than others).

View Thread (6)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:22:22 PST

Adult.com (0)

03-07-09 10:22am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To TrashMan (103):

I joined the site based on TrashMan's review and on the $14.95 deal in the cross sell on Brazzers and will be posting a review after about a month.

But a few initial observations:

-Very fast download speeds (fastest I've experienced) at 10-12pm Pacific.
-The pornstar list is the longest I've seen. Unfortunately it's also among the most inaccurate as well. Many of the models that appear in their content are not listed. (The first two I looked for were Jenna Doll and Natasha Nice. Although not in the index, they both have two or more videos in the site that do not duplicate videos on VideoBox or other sites.)
-The search engine will search names and genres but there's no video title search. The good news is that it also has a boolean, key word search engine that will search by terms (names and titles) and will list the results in order of relevance. I was able to locate videos with Natasha Nice and Jenna Doll that way.
-The search engine is slow.
-The screen caps are good but are too small to gauge the desirability of the video and there is no flash feature or photo set to see a short preview. One must download the video to evaluate whether it's a keeper or not.

Last thought. As does TrashMan, I'm liking the site so far, especially because it has a lot of new stuff, and better, does not duplicate a lot of stuff I have in my stash. But I'm disappointed with the accuracy of the tagging and the omissions from the star list. I also don't care for the extra step to download that was mentioned by Trash Man in his review, but it's a minor annoyance.

But the shortcomings I mention above will impact my evaluation.

View Thread (6)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:21:16 PST

Adult.com (0)

03-06-09 08:21am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To TrashMan (103):

TrashMan, your scored list of 12 sites will be very useful going forward. Last night I was playing around with the Adult.com preview site's searches checking to see what babes were in their inventory and to see if there were titles that would be worthwhile additions to my stash.

My second search was for Anastasia Christ. First disappointment, she showed up with only two scenes. Second disappointment, one of the two was really Jane Darling (Big Boobs in Prague, Scene 3), also a babe but definitely not Anastasia. I already have the Anastasia scene in that video (she's actually in scene 4 and is identified by Adult.com as Laura Lion).

I really like the head shot index a lot but I couldn't find a title search function if there is one. (My fallback on VideoBox is to check iafd.com or CAVR.com to see a summary of titles for a babe, then search the database for those titles.)

The good news is that, after playing around with Adult.com last night, I went over to Brazzers to see if they posted the Friday update. And what did I find? A cross promotion ad for Adult.com that offered the site at $14.95 a month.

View Thread (6)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:49:20 PST

Adult.com (0)

03-05-09 10:49pm

REVIEW REPLY by TrashMan (103)

To Monahan (37):

Actually, of all the DVD sites I think Adult.com is one of the best if not THE best. Yes I do comment in my reviews of sites like Naughty America or Brazzers that they are excellent in their search capabilities and actress tagging, but reality network sites are in a different league than DVD sites. The responsibilities pertaining actress tagging on DVD sites are much greater than on reality sites - in that at lot less work is required on reality sites so there lower probability of an incorrect name or such (mostly because DVD sites are adding numerous scenes at a time while reality network sites are doing one at a time). DVD sites, especially when it comes to the XPLOR Media Homegrown Video series, require a lot more work and responsibility, and when you get sites (like VideosZ or VideoBox) which just add massive numbers of DVD's, and whose focus is to do such, accuracy with actress tagging takes a back seat.

The difference with VideosZ/VideoBox and Adult.com seems to be the focus. The former seems to focus on adding a lot of movies while latter seems to be more focused on the actress/pornstar directory. With that said, the accuracy is excellent in getting actresses in the search on Adult.com, the problem is that there are not many results (if there are any). So I search for a girl, get excited to see a result, but get disappointed in the NUMBER of results.

So far, if I had to rank the DVD sites out of 10 based on categories:
1) the existence of tagging (VideosZ lacks actress tags on a LOT of movies)
2) correct spelling (e.g. spelling Ann Marie Rios "Ann Marie Rios" not "Anne Marie Rios", or Brodi Kennedy as "Brodi Kennedy" not "Broadi Kennedy", etc.) - this category also includes the act of not having two listings for one girl because of misspellings or lack of last name
3) scene tagging (not only putting names associated with the DVD, but also with each scene, and getting them correct)

Mind you with Adult.com i have not YET found anything to decrease the 10 rating in the three category

#1) Adult.com (10/10/10)
#2) MovieRoom (10/10/10 (I give Adult.com the edge because of the more completeness of headshots. If you are going to put headshots try to be as thorough as possible)
#3) Pornstar.com (8/10/10) (they always seem to forget a name here and there)
#4) VideoBox (10/8/8)
#5) DVDBox (9/9/8)
#6) Ten.com (9/7/7)
#7) PlatinumClub (9/5/8) (there are way too many duplicate listings for girls because of misspellings)
#8) VideosZ (8/7/6) (their old content is very bad and makes up too much of the site)
#9) MovieBox (8/5/7) (way too many tags lack last names and are mashed up into the generic first name)
#10) AdultMovieClub (7/7/6)
#11) Vidz (5/7/5) (they are pretty bad)
#12) Vixeo (4/7/4) (they are very bad. The funny thing is that AdultBouncer leases their content and they do a better job of tagging it)

I skipped all studio sites (Diabolic, Devils Film) because they can obviously excel in this field because they OWN the films.

View Thread (6)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:44:52 PST

Adult.com (0)

03-05-09 06:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To TrashMan (103):

To me the most important part is that there is not too much duplication with other (Video Box) sites. I did a little research on some of my fave babes and found enough new stuff on Adult.com to make a one or two month membership very worthwhile.

Question.

I have found that the search function on other sites have been deteriorating as a result of accuracy issues:

VideoBox - Frequent misspelling (Veronika Raquel shows up on VB as Veronica, Racquel, and in one case Rakel) and out-and-out mis-identification has made VideoBox with their 6,000 DVD's a crapshoot in locating specific talent

X Movies and pornstar.com- Accuracy is not as bad as VB's, but the search takes you to the DVD, not to the scene.

VideosZ - Tracking VB in its accuracy deterioration.

What's your impression of Adult.com's accuracy? Have you had any problems finding the babes and/or seeing obvious errors?

View Thread (6)

RE: RIP OFF

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:27:41 PST

Jr College Lesbians (0)

02-28-09 11:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by rubypup (0)

To TheRizzo (23):

no,still can not log on

View Thread (4)

RE: RIP OFF

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:26:29 PST

Jr College Lesbians (0)

02-24-09 04:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To rubypup (0):

You ever get a followup from them to help you?

View Thread (4)

RE: RIP OFF

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:29:43 PST

Jr College Lesbians (0)

02-22-09 11:29am

COMMENT REPLY by rubypup (0)

To TheRizzo (23):

YES I AM TOO.I HAVE DONE EVERYTHING,UPDATED BROWSER,MADE SURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR LOGIN,COOKIES,ECT..,STILL CAN NOT LOG ON,BUMMER,THANKS FOR REPLY

View Thread (4)

RE: RIP OFF

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:07:15 PST

Jr College Lesbians (0)

02-22-09 11:07am

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (23)

To rubypup (0):

Surprised by the lack of support only for the fact that its a subsidy of Playboy. Interesting.

View Thread (4)

Jr College Lesbians Comment

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:38:20 PST

Jr College Lesbians (0)

02-22-09 10:38am

COMMENT by rubypup (0)

RIP OFF

I JOINED THIS SITE AND CAN NOT LOG ON,NO SUPPORT,CALLED 10 TIMES,LEFT MESSAGES,NO RESPONSE,BEWARE

Visit Jr College Lesbians - View Replies - Add Reply