PU - Virtual Site Holdings Ltd - All Activity

RE: Jeffrey99's Review

Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:18:13 PST

Ron Harris (6)

11-06-08 10:18pm

REVIEW REPLY by IKnoPorn (20)

To Jeffrey99 (11):

Hi Jeffrey,

I was a member of this site a couple of years ago - and totally agree with your comments. I don't understand why TBP gives this site an 87.1.

The models are HOT, but like you said, HE WON'T STOP TALKING! Plus the camera is constantly jiggling around everywhere, very unprofessional.

I remember being so disappointed with this site. I remember watching "20 minute workout" back in the 1980's (Ron Harris production) and thinking how extremely hot the models were working out and how excellent the photography was. Ron got famous from this as well as his Aerobicize videos.

But with his website, the videos are very amateurish. If he would just buy a tripod, and close his mouth, and zoom out just a little further (so you can see more than the upper left corner of her mouth and the lower right corner of her pussy) it would be awesome.

The photo quality however is top notch, he really is a gifted photographer. Perhaps if he hired someone else to do the videos?

It's so hard to find really good solo content these days, one thing or another always seems to spoil it. Usually it's over-production or too much makeup. In this case, it's the guy holding the camera.

View Thread (3)

RE: Jeffrey99's Review

Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:12:59 PST

Ron Harris (6)

11-06-08 08:12am

REVIEW REPLY by Jeffrey99 (11)

To Cybertoad (58):

Sorry don't have much to add about Ron Harris. Was really disappointed after such hype, especially for the price.

As for the videos they are available in 720p and 1080p to download. I've never had problems playing hd videos on my pc but the 1080p wouldn't play on my machine. Quality was good for the 720p if you could get past the stuff I said in my review. As for how many, just depended on the model. Some like his main girl Kara(who he shoots alot compared to everyone else) had probably 10-12, while most girls had 2-3.

While the videos look great, I couldn't get past the jerky cam, bad zoom and him talking all the time.

View Thread (3)

RE: Jeffrey99's Review

Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:29:58 PST

Ron Harris (6)

11-06-08 07:29am

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (58)

To Jeffrey99 (11):

Review a little short,
Hi, what size videos ? How many etc?

Thanks

View Thread (3)

RE: PosterDude's Review

Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:30:38 PST

Ron Harris (6)

12-10-07 04:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To PosterDude (14):

I've been a member a couple of times, and I also felt the site was lacking. I don't like the small updates and the repetitive way he does things. Plus you pointed out that it went a week without updates.

This site has always been inconsistent in that way, in my experience.

Also, I thought the webmastering was really, really poor with lots of new windows opening, among other problems. It can get really confusing.

What you said really reminded me of how I experienced the site, too.

View Thread (2)

RE: PosterDude's Review

Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:36:18 PST

Ron Harris (6)

12-05-07 05:36pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To PosterDude (14):

This site does some great stuff, but has some real negatives for me:

1) The excess photo-shopping/painting of images - frequently takes all the erotic charge out of the pics

2) Ron himself ruins many vids. He's not a guy that tends to get women to want to get sexy. He has sexy models and if he just turned on the camera and pretended he didn't exist and focused on the camera work, the site would be hotter than it is. Nobody - including the models, it seems - wants to hear him talking.

View Thread (2)

RE: nygiants03's Review

Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:31:25 PST

Ron Harris (6)

12-03-07 01:31pm

REVIEW REPLY by PosterDude (14)

To nygiants03 (154):

I heard from before Ron was a older man so you might be right. He is a good photographer and probably been shooting many years. Good artsy photography. I do not agree site is similar to ftv girls. Ron Harris site is much better. ftv has amature photography and video that is not much in focus and Ron is a profressional. Ron does have not to good site design inside members section. ftv has better site design. At times Ron does not seem nice to girls but maybe they do not work hard enough so he gets mad.

View Thread (5)

RE: nygiants03's Review

Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:01:30 PDT

Ron Harris (6)

06-28-07 09:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To nygiants03 (154):

This is another one of those sites, like Pier999, where the painting in the pics is so extreme as to completely do away with the eroticism for me. I found the vids to be the aspect of the site that I liked the most because vids don't offer the same opportunity for messing with a woman's appearance and cause he gets in nice and close. But Ron H doesn't have nearly the skill that Alex of ALS Scan/ALS Angels does at bringing out a models' personality - watch vids of the same girls shot by both guys and 9 out of 10 times, the model is much more vibrant and sexy and FUN when she is being shot for the ALS sites.

I'm tempted to re-subsribe to this site for just a month for the vids, but then I think "Naaaaaaaa" and don't regret it.

View Thread (5)

RE: nygiants03's Review

Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:40:28 PDT

Ron Harris (6)

06-28-07 04:40pm

REVIEW REPLY by qualsite34 (25)

To nygiants03 (154):

Regarding the quality of the HV videos, I consider the HV MOV files featured on the Simonscans website to be significantly superior to those found on Ron Harris.

View Thread (5)

RE: nygiants03's Review

Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:26:50 PDT

Ron Harris (6)

06-27-07 05:26pm

REVIEW REPLY by nygiants03 (154)

To exotics4me (301):

yes they do.

View Thread (5)

RE: nygiants03's Review

Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:45:12 PDT

Ron Harris (6)

06-27-07 02:45pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (301)

To nygiants03 (154):

Great site and review, I've been meaning to re-join, my favorite is Tylar and also like that little thick one Kayla. Sandra is always great too. Do you still get the Harris Archives with it?

View Thread (5)