PU - Slick Cash Co. - All Activity

RE: Old videos continue to be released as new.

Mon, 10 May 2010 22:45:44 PDT

Young Models (0)

05-10-10 10:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (99)

To BabyGetReal (22):

While the review cannot be edited, I believe you did the right thing by writing this comment with the information and details included. I think most who may read your review will probably see the comment as well. Another suggestion is to write a reply to your review with a point in the direction of this comment, or even copy and pasting this comment in your review as a reply to your review. Thanks for the heads up.

View Thread (2)

RE: Old videos continue to be released as new.

Mon, 10 May 2010 21:20:15 PDT

Young Models (0)

05-10-10 09:20pm

COMMENT REPLY by yadayada321 (8)

To BabyGetReal (22):

cool, thanks for the heads up!

View Thread (2)

Young Models Comment

Mon, 10 May 2010 19:14:20 PDT

Young Models (0)

05-10-10 07:14pm

COMMENT by BabyGetReal (22)

Old videos continue to be released as new.

I'm sad to say that 6 months after my last report, it appears that probably none of the sites in this group have any new videos. They continue to label old videos as new updates. At YoungModels, the latest "updates" were Felicia Flynt "Added May 10, 2010", Renee "Added May 3, 2010", and Madison Monroe "Added April 26, 2010". I had downloaded all of these in June, 2009. On to some bonus sites. At Interracial Sluts, recent "updates" were Christie Lee "March 25, 2010" and Lisa Marie "February 24, 2010". I had downloaded these in March, 2009. At Creampie Fucking, Lorena Sanchez "May 5, 2010" I had downloaded in March, 2009. At Amateur Couples, I found Dana Marie & Tony "April 27, 2010" and Kasey Kox & Johnny "April 13, 2010", which I had downloaded in March, 2009. In conclusion, while these sites have some worthwhile videos, they are apparently a fixed set with no real updates. I'm knocking 10 points off the score of my review. Well, I would if I could. I'm up against the PU rule that you can't edit a review more than 6 months old. Seems to me this is a case where I should be able to!

Visit Young Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Cute Couples Comment

Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:07:21 PST

Cute Couples (0)

02-03-10 12:07pm

COMMENT by Wittyguy (83)

Seems to have stopped updating

Duke just posted a review on this site and I had been a member several years ago and posted a prior comment on this site. Since my last comment in 2008 (and stretching my memory) it looks like only a few updates have been added in the last few years. I doubt very much that they are adding anything new or, if they are adding updates, that they're probably recycled. Not a great site to begin with (certainly not worth the price of $30 a month) but I'd probably write this one off as a permanent "no go" if in fact they have stopped updating.

Visit Cute Couples - View Replies - Add Reply

Young Models Comment

Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:28:38 PST

Young Models (0)

12-02-09 05:28pm

COMMENT by BabyGetReal (22)

Old videos released as new.

I returned to this site in November, hoping for some good new boy/girl videos. I was surprised and disappointed to find many old videos that I had downloaded months earlier being represented as updates in October or November! Many of those videos are quite good (to my taste) but still, it is dishonest to represent them as new. Destiny & Drifter, "added Nov 23, 2009", Madison & Derrick "added Nov 16, 2009", and Sabrina & Lucky, "added Oct 20, 2009": I had downloaded these videos when I was a member in June, 2009! Even worse, I had downloaded videos featuring Ginger, Sammy Cruz, and Aubrey (represented as recently added) in March, 2009. Although I kept no record of the site from which these were downloaded, the video filenames begin with "ym_" for YoungModels. Also, YoungModels is releasing content from their other sites, e.g. MacKenzie and Daisy/Nick which I had downloaded in March from AmateurCouples. That would be OK if they were not labeled as exclusive content. As you can tell from my review, I thought this was one of the better sites, so I am really disappointed to see what is happening there.

Visit Young Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Young Models Comment

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:34:24 PDT

Young Models (0)

10-26-09 11:34am

COMMENT by OneMan (27)

Hmmmm

It is still a shame that it takes intervention from Khan and Co to get a satisfactory repsonse.

So firm are still a little too dodgy for my liking.

Visit Young Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Erroneous Charges Refunded!

Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:09:44 PDT

Young Models (0)

10-03-09 03:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by OneMan (27)

To BabyGetReal (22):

That's great news. Some webmasters are honest, and mistakes DO happen of course.

Some, unfortunately, are not so scrupulous....I had one guy in South America, whose "independent merchant" ripped off some of his customers - including me - and disappeared. Did we receive any compensation ? No....nada....not even an apology....just procrastination and "wo is me!!" bs.

Fair play to you, for pointing out that this site is run by a decent guy. maybe we should have a section devoted to publicising decent sites in terms of customer service ? It's all too easy to criticise, but we are less likely to take the time to commend and recommend !

View Thread (2)

RE: Erroneous Charges Refunded!

Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:50:08 PDT

Young Models (0)

10-02-09 12:50pm

COMMENT REPLY by ControllingMind (18)

To BabyGetReal (22):

Result!

Good job you mentioned it here on PU. Well done and good on the webmaster for sorting it out.

View Thread (2)

Young Models Comment

Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:54:28 PDT

Young Models (0)

10-02-09 09:54am

COMMENT by BabyGetReal (22)

Erroneous Charges Refunded!

This is the followup to my previous comment about YoungModels titled "Warning: Fraudulent/Erroneous Charges!". Immediately upon complaining, I received a direct email response from a YoungModels staffer, who is also a PU member, khf2004. He promptly refunded the two erroneous monthly charges to my Visa account, and the erroneous membership was canceled. Further, he gave me a bonus gift. Therefore, I consider that this error was resolved promptly, courteously, professionally, and to my full satisfaction.

Visit Young Models - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Warning: Fraudlent/Erroneous Charges!

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:59:07 PDT

Young Models (0)

09-29-09 03:59pm

COMMENT REPLY by khf2004 (Webmaster)

To BabyGetReal (22):

BabyGetReal,
Please check your yahoo,
I just sent you an email...
Should you have any more issues questions or need anything else please feel free to contact me directly.

I have issued a credit to you account for the full amount.

Again thank you and the Porn User staff for bringing this issue to my attention.

View Thread (4)

RE: Warning: Fraudlent/Erroneous Charges!

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:04:34 PDT

Young Models (0)

09-29-09 03:04pm

COMMENT REPLY by BabyGetReal (22)

To khf2004 (Webmaster):

Dear khf2004, I cannot find the message you sent me via PU. I don't know where to look for it, I guess. However, I did receive your message at my yahoo email, and replied there. Thanks for dealing with this issue!

View Thread (4)

RE: Warning: Fraudlent/Erroneous Charges!

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:15:05 PDT

Young Models (0)

09-29-09 02:15pm

COMMENT REPLY by khf2004 (Webmaster)

To BabyGetReal (22):

BabyGetReal,
Thanks for posting this message, if you could please reply to the message I sent you VIA your Porn User's account.
I will look into this billing issue and have any issues corrected ASAP.

Thanks again

View Thread (4)

RE: Warning: Fraudlent/Erroneous Charges!

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:42:31 PDT

Young Models (0)

09-29-09 06:42am

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To BabyGetReal (22):

Let us know what happens. It's one thing for sites to have poor book-keeping and make mistakes. It's another for them to have systems that are all about taking advantage of people that had the mis-fortune of giving them a credit card.

Private.com was so bad that even when they offered me a free month's membership later, I wanted nothing to do with them. They have an auto-cancel feature at their site. I cancelled, received no e-mail confirmation, then they wouldn't respond to e-mails for weeks on end.

Mystique.com is another site that's built to rip you off, from my experience. They offer deals, then they charge you "erroneously" over and over and it's up to you to prove they were wrong each time - when they reverse the charges, their responses are always surly - no apologies for making their customers do their book-keeping for them.

View Thread (4)

Young Models Comment

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:05:09 PDT

Young Models (0)

09-28-09 08:05pm

COMMENT by BabyGetReal (22)

Warning: Fraudlent/Erroneous Charges!

I subscribed to this site on 6/13/09 and canceled on 6/16/09. My membership was good thru 7/12/09. I was billed for one month ($29.95) in June, by cybersecurepayment.com. Other names used by this site are slickcash, netbilling, elecbillpayment. I was not billed for this site in July. In late September, I noticed that I had been billed on 8/21/09 and 9/20/09 by CMD-AZ.NET, $39.95 each time. I went to http://cmd-az.net and sent an email complaining. They responded that I have an active membership in YoungModels.Com! I then went to cybersecurepayment.com and was able to locate my original membership account, which confirmed that I had canceled it within the first month. Today I have sent a snapshot of the cancellation confirmation both to CMD-AZ.NET and to cs@slickcash.com (which sent me an email confirming my request to cancel in June). I am awaiting their responses. A SATISFACTORY RESPONSE WAS RECEIVED RESOLVING THIS MATTER -- PLEASE SEE MY SUBSEQUENT COMMENT.

Visit Young Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Cum Shot Blast Comment

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:11:35 PST

Cum Shot Blast (0)

01-10-09 10:11pm

COMMENT by pissedatporn (2)

Nope

Looks like every other facial site. Chick smiling with a teaspoon of cum in her mouth. I hate facials and I really hate sites that are mislabeled. This is hardly a CS Blast. It is a Cumshot pewpew

Visit Cum Shot Blast - View Replies - Add Reply

Cute Couples Comment

Tue, 27 May 2008 18:36:15 PDT

Cute Couples (0)

05-27-08 06:36pm

COMMENT by Wittyguy (83)

Probably Not Worth It

I joined this site about 18 months ago. My experience then was that the usual 3rd party content was probably better than the site. The pics were small and most of the couples were not very cute. The vids were average at best. The site advertises as an amateur sex site but some of the models have done other porn shoots. I downloaded only a little and saved even less.

I recently looked at the site and it looks like updates are very few and very far between (only about 10 more sets added since I joined). Unless you're really into amatuer porn I would probably pass on this one.

Visit Cute Couples - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Makes you wonder

Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:31:02 PDT

Break Her Hymen (0)

10-19-07 07:31am

COMMENT REPLY by cblodg (9)

To jd1961 (95):

Yeah, i'm sure they'd enjoy investigating this further. LOL

View Thread (2)

RE: Makes you wonder

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:35:07 PDT

Break Her Hymen (0)

10-18-07 09:35pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To cblodg (9):

There is still an element in porno that think the customer is a sucker. Report this site to the Better Business Bureau!!......Lol

View Thread (2)

RE: Don't use MILFS...

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:51:21 PDT

Break Her Hymen (0)

10-18-07 08:51pm

COMMENT REPLY by cblodg (9)

To williamj (9):

Hahah! Wow that sweet cherry pie with hot gravy dressing is a great line! Can I save that one for future use.

You are so right!

View Thread (1)

Break Her Hymen Comment

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:50:03 PDT

Break Her Hymen (0)

10-18-07 08:50pm

COMMENT by cblodg (9)

Makes you wonder

It kind of makes you wonder how sites like these can get away with what I'll call false advertising. Many of these girls (erm I mean women) are not virgins by a long shot!

Visit Break Her Hymen - View Replies - Add Reply

Break Her Hymen Comment

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:45:05 PDT

Break Her Hymen (0)

10-18-07 03:45pm

COMMENT by williamj (9)

Don't use MILFS...

LOL one of the girls on the video previews had mommy marks on her belly! She's a hottie but trying to pass her as a virgin Please stop. A decade ago thats being kind drrange, those cherry's are dust many moons ago. This site is trying to sell sweet fresh cherry pie with hot pork gravy dressing. It don't sell unless your deaf dumb and blind with no taste buds. PornUsers should start a dummy book for porn producers. These guys could be the test study on the do's and don't.

Visit Break Her Hymen - View Replies - Add Reply

Break Her Hymen Comment

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:14:21 PDT

Break Her Hymen (0)

10-18-07 12:14pm

COMMENT by drranger (1)

Give me a break.

Perused this to see what's up but not to buy. Saw that Lucy Lee (the Asian one) was on the site. She's a prolific pornstar and these weren't any old pictures.

Her hymen was busted a decade ago. What a fraud this site is.

Visit Break Her Hymen - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Contradiction In Terms?

Sun, 01 Jul 2007 05:47:34 PDT

DP Babes (0)

07-01-07 05:47am

COMMENT REPLY by RoseAnn (Staff)

To SnowDude (214):

Hi there SnowDude,

I just wanted to get back to you on your comments about the categories. Usually the categories are chosen when the sites are first added and without the ability to see a member area, so we do our best to put the sites into the most appropriate 3 category choices we can.

Sometimes we make technical mistakes in that process and inadvertently let the dropdown field for category selection land on an incorrect choice. Obviously that's what may have happened in this on the 3rd category listing for DP Babes, as its definitely hardcore content. The listing has been corrected now...thanks for the catch!

View Thread (2)

RE: Contradiction In Terms?

Sat, 30 Jun 2007 23:55:27 PDT

DP Babes (0)

06-30-07 11:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To SnowDude (214):

Hey SD, I sure hope those pretty models weren't paid for just "soft" sex ha ha! I can hear some old perverted guy now, "But this is softcore in 2007!"

View Thread (2)

DP Babes Comment

Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:13:33 PDT

DP Babes (0)

06-30-07 03:13pm

COMMENT by SnowDude (214)

Contradiction In Terms?

Ok, this is one really makes no sense to me. In the description for this one, which would have the full title of "Double Penetration Babes", it is listed at being an amateur site (see my previous comments for my feeling on this one), but the more shocking descriptor is "Soft Content". What? How can a site where a girl lets two guys penetrate her at once possibly be soft?

I gave it the benefit of the doubt figuring that someone may get off on something like that being implied and not shown, but even the tour shows the penetration without any little blurry spots to make it R rated as opposed to XXX. I understand the problem figuring out if a site is amateur, I really do. However, how can a site like this possibly be described as soft content?

Visit DP Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: strange billing

Wed, 09 May 2007 20:09:47 PDT

Sweet Pink Holes (0)

05-09-07 08:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To senorim (19):

Ok, I'm showing that site was recently added to TBP. You can add your remarks at: http://www.pornusers.com/review/lsgmodels/ Clicking the link on that page goes to lsgmodels.com so if that's not the one you're talking about, I've missed something.

As far as your question ...
I'm not technically a part of the TBP team though my wife is an editor for them. I worked with Rick (the founder of TBP and PU) in the early years of the adult web. I'm pleased to again be working with him and the team he's put together at TBP.

View Thread (7)

RE: strange billing

Wed, 09 May 2007 19:42:03 PDT

Sweet Pink Holes (0)

05-09-07 07:42pm

COMMENT REPLY by senorim (19)

To Khan (Staff):

Hola Khan:The URL is lsgmodels.com Launched Jan.07,pretty new with
a small content,between soft-softcore and "artistic nudes".I hope
you find it out.Khan I have a question:You're part of TBP Team or
just a simple mortal porn user?
regards,senorim

View Thread (7)

RE: strange billing

Sat, 05 May 2007 05:13:26 PDT

Sweet Pink Holes (0)

05-05-07 05:13am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To senorim (19):

Well, it you'd care to send me a URL (here or privatly via email) I'll ask the TBP editors to take a look and see if the site you're talking about qualifies for a listing.

View Thread (7)

RE: strange billing

Fri, 04 May 2007 20:39:22 PDT

Sweet Pink Holes (0)

05-04-07 08:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by senorim (19)

To Khan (Staff):

Hola Khan:Thanks,not it isn't.But I get it now.It's a new site
from England-launched Jan.07-A small site yet.Maybe that's the
reason why nobody knows it.In advanced:it has nice and fine design,
beautiful girls-some well knowed euro pornstars as:Suzie Carina;
Viktorie,at the most,I didn't know them (fresh good point).I think
in 6-8 months more it will be a good choice for perverted users
who enjoy softcore classy women nudity,instead vulgar or lousy
bang-bang!hardcore.Khan keep in touch,regards senorim.

View Thread (7)

RE: strange billing

Thu, 03 May 2007 04:54:58 PDT

Sweet Pink Holes (0)

05-03-07 04:54am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To senorim (19):

Is this the one you're looking for?

LSG Models
http://www.pornusers.com/review/lsgmodels/

View Thread (7)

RE: strange billing

Wed, 02 May 2007 18:32:34 PDT

Sweet Pink Holes (0)

05-02-07 06:32pm

COMMENT REPLY by senorim (19)

To Khan (Staff):

Hola Khan:Thank you! Yes,I did clean the cache but -I don't remember-
maybe I clicked from elsewhere.When promo-prices I'm always in TBP,
THE BEST porn site reviewers! isn't it?
By the way,do you know "LSGModels" porn site? I did look for it in
different reviewer sites and nothing,even here TBP.It's similar to
DDgirls or M&B sites.They are from England (London Studio Group).
regards,senorim.

View Thread (7)

RE: strange billing

Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:39:11 PDT

Sweet Pink Holes (0)

04-22-07 04:39am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To senorim (19):

I just asked one of the TBP editors to check and here's what they came back with ...

It's showing as "Special $19.95 Monthly Access" in bold, under membership type. The third one down. If you don't see it, it's possible you'll need to empty your cache and click the link from TBP (or PornUsers) again.

Hope that helps.

View Thread (7)

Sweet Pink Holes Comment

Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:12:56 PDT

Sweet Pink Holes (0)

04-21-07 12:12pm

COMMENT by senorim (19)

strange billing

I entered from TBP to this site SPH,tried to join but the
price is not $19.95 USD (DISCOUNT from your site to the TBP
users)the price is $435 MX!!? P/MONTH??!
I don't know what happened.

Visit Sweet Pink Holes - View Replies - Add Reply