PU - Vivid Entertainment - All Activity

RE: Fairly convincing

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:19:29 PST

Vivid Parodies (0)

11-24-11 12:19pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To otoh (34):

Actually, that is quite intriguing! :0)

View Thread (1)

Vivid Parodies Comment

Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:09:25 PST

Vivid Parodies (0)

11-24-11 12:09am

COMMENT by otoh (34)

Fairly convincing

Looking at the trailers, some of these parodies actually look pretty good. The latest one here is Batman - a la the 60s series - and the cast and sets look like spent some time and money on it.

Having said that, although I can't argue with Lexi Belle as Batgirl, I still think the the original Yvonne Craig is even cuter (albeit moreso when not dressed as Batgirl...)

There's also axxxparody.com - they have another fairly convincing looking trailer for The Big Lebowski, one of my favourite films ever.

Visit Vivid Parodies - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: nadiencendia's Review

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:16:05 PST

Vivid (1)

11-14-10 04:16pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To nadiencendia (81):

I've commented here before that it seems a lot of the big studio sites seem to be an after-thought. Yes, I know that they are in the business of producing movies and not necessarily distributing them, but it seems to me to be obvious that the internet is the most popular way to distribute porn, and certainly will continue to dominate porn distribution. Sites like Hustler and Diabolic just don't seem to take the internet seriously.

I've used Hot Movies and sites like that before, but they can get pretty expensive and most of them have some DRM attached.

View Thread (7)

RE: nadiencendia's Review

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:20:36 PST

Vivid (1)

11-14-10 01:20pm

REVIEW REPLY by nadiencendia (81)

To rearadmiral (141):

Yes, that could be it. The "funny" thing is that a lot of Vivid's movies are accessible (both for streaming and download) in other sites, for example:

http://www.hotmovies.com/studio/2508/Vivid-Premium/ and
http://www.hotmovies.com/studio/144/Vivid/

Anyway, if the site worked properly all the time, I wouldn't mind the no-download thing; the problem is that a lot of times I can't properly stream the movies either...

View Thread (7)

RE: nadiencendia's Review

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:34:49 PST

Vivid (1)

11-14-10 10:34am

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To nadiencendia (81):

Good point. And I'm sure that they decided that losing some customers over the streaming-only issue is worth it to maintain control of their material.

View Thread (7)

RE: nadiencendia's Review

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:03:08 PST

Vivid (1)

11-14-10 10:03am

REVIEW REPLY by nadiencendia (81)

To rearadmiral (141):

You are welcome, Admiral :) I always feel a bit guilty when someone decides NOT to join a site because of one of my reviews, but in this case, being a big company like Vivid, I won't have to feel sorry for them... :P

View Thread (7)

RE: nadiencendia's Review

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 07:08:41 PST

Vivid (1)

11-14-10 07:08am

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To nadiencendia (81):

Thanks for the great review. This is a site that I would definitely want to join but thanks to your review and the review at TBP I won't. If all they offer is streaming, then my credit card stays in my wallet. I can understand a company wanting to protect their material, but streaming only will limit their customer base.

Again, thanks for the heads-up on the streaming-only issue.

View Thread (7)

RE: nadiencendia's Review

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 01:47:42 PST

Vivid (1)

11-14-10 01:47am

REVIEW REPLY by nadiencendia (81)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks, Drooler. Well, the problem with the viewing area has been solved: now you have a wider and bigger screen, and you can even watch it on full screen. The other problem, with the site not loading properly, remains, and is truly a pain. But when you get to see the scenes you are looking for, you are almost never dissapointed...

View Thread (7)

RE: nadiencendia's Review

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:17:48 PST

Vivid (1)

11-13-10 04:17pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To nadiencendia (81):

Thanks for this review. I joined it once over three years ago. The problems that I noted were that the video viewing area was very small and those streaming-only videos would break down and not be viewable all the way through. Doesn't seem that enough has really changed even after all this time.

Maybe a 50 is too harsh. As you say, it has a large collection and the women are hot. But when you can't download the videos nor even view a single streaming video all the through after waiting for the buffering and all that to complete, well, worthless is worthless. I mean, we can't give it a 10.

View Thread (7)

Vivid Comment

Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:51:03 PDT

Vivid (1)

04-19-10 03:51pm

COMMENT by Iceolemune (0)

Vivid.com Has Changed

I read the reviews and I'm not sure how the site looked back in the day, but based on what I read, I must say that Vivid.com has changed a lot. Just some of the changes I've noticed:

There's thousands of pornstars on vivid.com now, just search for 'em,
The site has a search feature and it works,
The content has been diversified much better for simplicity, - different brands or whatever like Vivid Celeb, Vivid Girls, Vivid Alt, and Vivid Ed categories...
And they now offer HD movies in multiple formats!

Overall I think it's a much better site than it sounded like it was, yes you still can't download porn, but it personally doesn't bother me when you can watch it over and over again.

Oh and not to mention the regular weekly releases going on now.

Visit Vivid - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: No downloads? No thanks!

Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:30:06 PST

Brand New Faces (0)

11-14-09 11:30pm

COMMENT REPLY by malikstarks (8)

To james4096 (126):

This and their parent Vivid site are really still trying to go after the couples DVD market. That's where I bet they make most of their money. obviously there are almost no hardcore porn connoisseurs who go shopping at video stores anymore. The websites they have are really just something to give them a bit of a foothold in the market until they figure out whether the DVD market is sustainable long term.

That is questionable but they'll probably get away with it, most towns have at least one adult book/video store from which couples shop from time to time.

Obviously if they were just relying on the websites they wouldn't be going about it like this.

View Thread (1)

Brand New Faces Comment

Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:11:42 PST

Brand New Faces (0)

11-13-09 03:11pm

COMMENT by james4096 (126)

No downloads? No thanks!

I'm glad I checked out PU before subscribing to this one. I'll never knowingly join a site that doesn't let you download videos. Sure you could use some program to grab the flash files, but that might not always work and the quality stinks.

And this site costs $30, what a joke. Too bad for them. I probably would have joined.

Visit Brand New Faces - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Impression

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:18:21 PDT

Vivid (1)

09-08-09 05:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (213)

To atrapat (110):

Thanks for clearing that up. I was a bit confused as to why Vivid did that but I suspected something like what you described.

Either way their Vivid models are quite hot.

View Thread (2)

RE: Impression

Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:25:17 PDT

Vivid (1)

09-07-09 11:25am

COMMENT REPLY by atrapat (110)

To dracken (213):

Regarding the 22 girls, they are probably singled out as "Vivid Girls" because that's the way they refer to their "contract girls" aka "contract performers" at Vivid. The number 22 is likely how many models they've had under contract over the years.

I haven't been at Vivid in a long time but I was recently at another studio website and their past and present contract models were also singled out from the rest of models that have appeared in their DVDs.

Since studios put a lot of money in marketing their contract models, it's logical their website pays much more attention to them than other models on their DVDs.

View Thread (2)

Vivid Comment

Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:12:52 PDT

Vivid (1)

09-06-09 04:12pm

COMMENT by dracken (213)

Impression

the site is theoretically NEW AND IMPROVED. Since I wasn't a member before they improved I can't really judge the difference. However here are the specs on this site now

22 girls (not really sure what's up with the girls, except that theya re featured in multiple DVD's on the site...I guess they are the main actors in the Vivid scenes...although there are a few other girls on the site...)

252 DVD's with multiple scenes each so around 500 scenes or close to it.

Really fast streaming but no download options.

No search options.

Overall a decent streaming site but there is still much to do such as adding more content and a larger variety. Oh and maybe adding a search function?

Visit Vivid - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Good luck signing up!

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:17:00 PDT

Brand New Faces (0)

08-16-09 05:17am

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (213)

To TheAssMan (0):

hmm, I don't remember having any trouble signing up but their customer support is a bit lacking to put it mildly. Did you try signing up from Europe or the States? I think they have different pages for each continent.

View Thread (1)

RE: Just an impression

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:11:30 PDT

Kim K Superstar (0)

08-12-09 01:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (213)

To mbaya (344):

As the pages wouldn't load for me I can't confirm the existence or quality of that one video :) However, I will rest easy knowing that it doesn't really matter as no one sane would join this site anyhow.

View Thread (3)

RE: Just an impression

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:41:20 PDT

Kim K Superstar (0)

08-12-09 12:41pm

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To dracken (213):

This is a pretty sorry excuse for a website. The one video looks to be of very low quality. Even a trial of $4.95 is far too much.

View Thread (3)

RE: Just an impression

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:31:46 PDT

Kim K Superstar (0)

08-12-09 07:31am

COMMENT REPLY by james4096 (126)

To dracken (213):

I hope you were planning on signing up for the trial and then canceling after downloading the one video.

View Thread (3)

Kim K Superstar Comment

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:29:07 PDT

Kim K Superstar (0)

08-12-09 07:29am

COMMENT by dracken (213)

Just an impression

Tried signing up for this website the other day and it wouldn't load for me. Every other page gave me a time-out. I eventually gave up, but maybe it was just poor timing or something. Either way I though a head's up that it might be slow at times couldn't hurt...

Visit Kim K Superstar - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: What's wrong here

Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:58:49 PDT

Brand New Faces (0)

08-01-09 03:58pm

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (213)

To Denner (227):

If you can't get the videos to stream don't sign up. The content is meant to be streamed.

View Thread (2)

RE: Not Hendrix?

Sat, 01 Aug 2009 01:01:46 PDT

Hendrix Sex Tape (0)

08-01-09 01:01am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To james4096 (126):

Maybe if he's humming "Purple Haze" while getting a hummer!

View Thread (2)

RE: Not Hendrix?

Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:39:18 PDT

Hendrix Sex Tape (0)

07-31-09 10:39am

COMMENT REPLY by james4096 (126)

To jd1961 (95):

Even if it is real, 11 minutes of sex for almost $30 bucks. You'd have to be one serious hendrix fan to pay that.

View Thread (2)

Hendrix Sex Tape Comment

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:00:22 PDT

Hendrix Sex Tape (0)

07-30-09 06:00pm

COMMENT by jd1961 (95)

Not Hendrix?

It has been disputed that the person in this film is Jimi Hendrix. The company that controls the rights to his image and music disputes the claim.

http://www.therockradio.com/2008/05/jimm...ex-tape-is-fake.html

Visit Hendrix Sex Tape - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: oh no, what a shame

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:00:52 PDT

Vivid (1)

04-25-09 04:00am

COMMENT REPLY by DaveToronto45 (0)

To never (7):

I am such a big fan of Vivid and own so many of their DVD's. I was a member of this site for a couple of years and then they upgraded the site a few month's back. I had a couple of billing issues were minor and got resolved. But when they upgraded I had to reinput my password. I asked Vivid for it through the proper channels and the customer service was terrible. I ended up getting rid of my membership.

After being out of this site for 3 months I rejoined. The good point is the movie streams look good if on the small side picture wise. But the problem is I love the pictures and behind the scene videos. I can't find behind the scenes anymore and the pictures are impossible to navigate. The site also constantly asking you to reinput your password which is horribly frustrating so I could not take it and canceled after a week.

View Thread (5)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:09:42 PDT

Vivid (1)

04-01-09 09:09am

REVIEW REPLY by 80slover (0)

To TrashMan (103):

I have to agree with this review. For the money, Videobox is really the way to go. You may not see much Vivid content at that price (though they just started releasing Vivid COntent as a "Premium" channel) the updates are pathetic and searching is impossible (almost all links in scene descriptions return 0 results).

View Thread (4)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:24:15 PST

Vivid (1)

01-11-09 09:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To mbaya (344):

They've got such a big name in the industry because of their stars - they've shelled out to have the hottest contract girls - and wasted the opportunity by churning out crap so they could have a constant stream of stuff out there for business people to rent in hotel rooms - at least that's my theory. It's amazing to think what people with talent could have done with their contract girls. Such a waste.

View Thread (4)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:47:14 PST

Vivid (1)

01-11-09 09:47am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To TrashMan (103):

Good, well written review. And I agree totally.

I signed up and discovered that it was all streaming and low quality. I tried to cancel and get a refund but was denied, so I just canceled and let the membership run out. I think I might have gone in once after the first day just to make sure I didn't misunderstand what I experienced the first time. I didn't.

The $10 would have served me a whole lot better if I spent it on a couple of Big Macs. I know I would have enjoyed the cardboard burgers a lot more than that poor excuse of a porn site.

View Thread (4)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:39:55 PST

Vivid (1)

01-11-09 08:39am

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To TrashMan (103):

I have always thought of Vivid as too soft and not at all my taste. So I probably would never have subscribed to the site anyway. However, considering the size of their archives it seems obvious they don't care about the site. It beats me how they have such a big name in the industry.

View Thread (4)

RE: User's Review

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:05:01 PST

Vivid (1)

01-10-09 07:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by User (32)

To rearadmiral (141):

Yes, agreed, the DRM thing has got to go and it's a good campaign that we should all fight. And, I think we've won some of the battles. I dont know about file sharing sites. I've tried eMule and some Bit Torrent thing, but had a lot of problems with downloaded files. I'm not as techy as most guys though, so it was probably me.

I would like to pick another fight and that is the one against Download Limits. I will NOT join a site with a DL limit. There are too many good sites without them. Why would they have them other than to just milk their customers for more and more monthly fees. I've belonged to VideoBox for two years, at a reasonable monthly price, and they have no DL limits. Why do customers stay there? Because they put up enough damn updates to keep us on board. Sites like Reality Kings, which admittedly, has some great content, imposes these ridiculuous limits on us. I refuse to join a site like that again.

In conclusion, I'm glad this site and TBP exist and I'm very happy that there are users that care enough to help us make our decisions easier and more economical. Thanks to all.

View Thread (9)

RE: User's Review

Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:44:38 PST

Vivid (1)

01-09-09 01:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To User (32):

You're clearly right when you say that some webmasters look at this site. The example of ZTOD is perfect. I remember when they stopped the DRM they seemed to be genuinely interested in what we at PU had to say. The resolution of the files was crappy at first but the ZTOD webmaster caught hell for that too and that was changed.

I do still stand by my comment about companies like Vivid and Anabolic. I don't think they continue to use DRM because they feel a need to protect their stuff, I think that they just don't give a flying fuck about their customers.

BTW - I suggested a user poll that links DRM and file sharing. Almost universally, it seems that PU members hate DRM, so I wondered if we put our money where our mouths are. Does the average PU member bitch about DRM and then post their non-DRM files on a sharing site. If the folks at PU choose to post that poll it will be interesting to see the results.

View Thread (9)

RE: User's Review

Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:55:06 PST

Vivid (1)

01-08-09 12:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by User (32)

To rearadmiral (141):

Mike (rearadmiral),
Outstanding reply and very well stated. My only wish is that Vivid and Analbolic would read this forum and pay attention. I know that some of the webmasters of sites read here because I think it was ZTOD that replied to me on this site.

Keep up the pressure!

View Thread (9)

RE: User's Review

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:43:47 PST

Vivid (1)

01-05-09 04:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by rearadmiral (141)

To User (32):

I can't help but read this is light of a recent user poll where the overwhelming number of members said that DRM issues are their #1 pet peeve. Vivid could have one of the best sites on the 'net but by allowing streaming only and no DRM-free downloads they lose that ability. This is just my opinion of course, but I suspect that this isn't some error in using a 5 year old business model, but this is just showing disrespect to customers. If anything, it puts studios like Red Light, 3rd Movies, Zero Tolerance, Diabolic and German Goo Girls in a better light. Those companies realized that they could keep customers happier AND make more money by losing the DRM. (Funny that link between satisfied customers and making money�)

Down with Vivid (and other companies like Anabolic who thumb their noses at customers); up with Pornusers for giving us a forum to get this important information.

Mike

View Thread (9)

RE: User's Review

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:13:10 PST

Vivid (1)

01-05-09 07:13am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (110)

To PinkPanther (44):

Thanks for the info. I see they haven't changed much over the years except for the somewhat higher resolutions. They always have given more importance to quantity over quality. Also, they've been pulling that bigger preview trick from day one. It doesn't make much sense to have so many picture content and that they care so little about it.

View Thread (9)

RE: User's Review

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:50:54 PST

Vivid (1)

01-05-09 05:50am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To atrapat (110):

I'm a pic fan and this site will drive you bat-shit if you're a pic fan.

Why?

Well, the resolution on their pics has improved over the past few years, but get this - the pics on Vivid's site are smaller than the pics that you'll find that purport to be samples of the pics on Vivid's site - that's a flat-out rip-off, in my book.

The pics on the site are very poorly organized.

Think of what they could be doing - they've got their stars. They're doing promo photo-shoots. They're doing shoots at events.
They're doing "action" pics during filming. They're doing BTS shots.

They could be organizing things in various category by star by movie name and by event. But instead everything is a freaking mish-mash.

You can find galleries by star name that are a mish-mash of stuff, mainly action pics from filming, many of them very repetitive, poorly shot crap.

You can find galleries by movie name that are a mish-mash of stuff, mainly action pics from filming, many of them very repetitive, poorly shot crap.

I've joined for a month at a time a few times over the last few years. They wore me down with the frustration level. I seriously doubt that I'll be joining again ever.

View Thread (9)

RE: User's Review

Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:07:57 PST

Vivid (1)

01-04-09 06:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by TrashMan (103)

To User (32):

Haha, I'm a video guy too. I rarely look at (or download) pictures, unless it is a girl whose content is very hard to come by.

I completely agree with your review (I intend to write one for Vivid sooner or later):
*The flash player is just the mundane one that any junko porn site will install. There is something to be said about the quality of the flash player that VideoBox employs (and that is that it is superb).
*The videos are not downloadable (by conventional means). There are certain freeware tools that can assist in downloading the streams (as they are just simple FLV files, similar to WMV files playing in an embedded Windows Media Player windw), but we shouldn't have to be reduced to using such means. All non-VOD sites should provide straight "save as" links.
*Yeah, the site has not changed at all over the years. Rather disappointing considering that there is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much content they have to offer.
*I can't stand how they have this HUUUUUGE performer listing, yet when you click on most of the girls nothing is offered, either in the form of pictures or videos. Very disappointing.

View Thread (9)

RE: User's Review

Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:41:28 PST

Vivid (1)

01-04-09 10:41am

REVIEW REPLY by User (32)

To atrapat (110):

Yes, you're right, I didn't even look at photos as I am not a photo guy. I join the sites strictly for the videos and only occasionally look at the photos.
I was so disappointed with this site, that I just didn't bother.
I will go back and look at them and add that aspect to my review.

View Thread (9)

RE: User's Review

Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:35:44 PST

Vivid (1)

01-04-09 10:35am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (110)

To User (32):

You don't mention anything about the pictures. What resolutions are there? Are they grouped by movie only or also by star?

I was a member several years ago and I remember they had quite extensive galleries for each movie although the resolution was quite small.

View Thread (9)

RE: What's wrong here

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:13:16 PST

Brand New Faces (0)

02-22-08 03:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Anyway, there are no downloads available (according to TBP), so it's another "Vivid" example. What a shame. I'd probably love to have some of those vids, but if I can't save 'em, it's like, no dice.

View Thread (2)

RE: oh no, what a shame

Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:29:56 PST

Vivid (1)

02-06-08 11:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To jd1961 (95):

Would Vivid still exist if it weren't for the cable market? I rather doubt it. The director that was actually talented (Robbie D) went to work for Digital Playground and Vivid was left to try to cash in on the alt-porn thing - talk about Morbid - Ucccccchhhhh!!

Still the last time I had a one-month membership I thought that they had made some significant improvements to the site - larger, save-able pics and better-looking streaming vid than when I had a trial membership previously.

Still, Vivid's main skill has always been that no company has ever been better at wasting opportunities than Vivid has. They have had many of the hottest women ever to have done porn as their contract stars, including Chasey Lain, Racquel Darrian, Asia Carrera, Kobe Tai, Lanny Barbie, Jenteal, Sunny Leone and they have not done shit with them as compared to what would have been possible if they were contract stars for a company with some imagination.

View Thread (5)

RE: oh no, what a shame

Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:55:57 PST

Vivid (1)

02-05-08 03:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To jd1961 (95):

Wow, and thanks for that word of warning. V$$V$$D has got it bad! Who wants a DVD that forces you to watch ads? (Sure, they exist aplenty, but the question remains.)

View Thread (5)

RE: oh no, what a shame

Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:29:00 PST

Vivid (1)

02-05-08 02:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (218):

I bought a Vivid compilation DVD once, and it started out with 10 minutes of those phone sex commercials and they wouldn't allow bypassing to the menu, so you have to sit through them. Vivid really is a dinosaur in the porn industry. It's for people who never saw porn before and don't know any better.

View Thread (5)

RE: oh no, what a shame

Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:57:59 PST

Vivid (1)

02-05-08 11:57am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To never (7):

It's the Vivid site, but Morbid is more like it.

View Thread (5)

Vivid Comment

Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:59:52 PST

Vivid (1)

02-05-08 09:59am

COMMENT by never (7)

oh no, what a shame

Vivid's mass library of huge stars could make this the best website in the world. However, when you join, you get crappy quality (circa 1999) clips that you can't download. If you've seen the clips on other preview sections, yep, that's the quality, and they're better because at least you can't download them.

Someone mentioned that this site is basically a way to sell DVD's, and I agree. Can't they understand that the DVD market is dead? Man, this site has such potential but has perhaps the worst execution I've ever seen.

Visit Vivid - View Replies - Add Reply

Brand New Faces Comment

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:11:24 PST

Brand New Faces (0)

01-12-08 10:11pm

COMMENT by TheAssMan (0)

Good luck signing up!

If you try to sign up for this site, you will be signing up for vivid.com, an awful-looking old-fashioned site that is impossible to navigate. Send an email requesting help and they will tell you to sign up to kimsuperstar.com. WHAT? Goodbye.

Visit Brand New Faces - View Replies - Add Reply

Brand New Faces Comment

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:05:37 PST

Brand New Faces (0)

01-10-08 09:05am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

What's wrong here

The site looks SOMEWHAT ok - with new models - and some great looking ones.
A very limited content, though - it seems.
But I cannot get the video trailers to work - no matter what browser I use....
All in all - does not look too promissing.

Visit Brand New Faces - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: nygiants03's Review

Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:05:57 PDT

Vivid (1)

09-22-07 04:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To nygiants03 (160):

I was feeling some major lust for Lanny Barbie, saw that Vivd was advertising lots of photo galleries of this incredibly hot fuck bunnie. I'd been terribly disappointed at the quality of Vivid's pics before but the site was advertising high-res, so I hoped that they had increased the size of their pics and figures - what the hell, I'm only risking $10

Good news for me - the pics are quite a bit larger than the last time I was in this site - still not what I would call high-res, but compared to the last time I was a member they certainly are - and I can save them this time. So I'm happy, despite all of the limitations of this site as described by NY Giants and others.

At least they're going in the right direction!

View Thread (3)

RE: nygiants03's Review

Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:20:55 PDT

Vivid (1)

07-19-07 12:20am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To nygiants03 (160):

I always thought that Vivid Video is for people who have never seen porn before. They used to be pioneers in the age of Ginger Lynn, but are behind the times IMO.

View Thread (3)

RE: nygiants03's Review

Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:04:38 PDT

Vivid (1)

07-17-07 03:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To nygiants03 (160):

I signed up early in 2006 for one month and was seriously disappointed as well. nygiant's comments match my recollections almost exactly, especially the video quality which isn't really as good as is available on other sites.

I also agree with a 79 score, based on my recollection. It's not a site I am interested in subscribing to again.

View Thread (3)

RE: nadiencendia's Review

Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:27:45 PDT

Vivid (1)

06-28-07 04:27pm

REVIEW REPLY by DigglerFL (17)

To nadiencendia (81):

Its fine to say you like the site, but giving a site with such terrible quality videos a 90 is simply wrong. You've totally ignored something that should be a key criteria. Obviously vivid has the capability to put up high quality videos. They don't do so on purpose. Its not like its some garage dude who can't afford a good camera. The videos aren't just not that good. They are terrible. Its a disgrace.

View Thread (3)