<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - CNE Media - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/site_company.html?id=1195</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_52411</guid>
		<title>Office Girls Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=52411</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/officegirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/officegirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Office Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/officegirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Office Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-03-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:57am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=11748&quot;&gt;Auxilia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=11748&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Updates&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Does anyone know if they still split up their picture set updates over two weeks or more?  That's what really put me off when I subscribed a few years ago
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=3279&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Office Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=52411&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=52411&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:57:17 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_49174</guid>
		<title>RE: Magnifico's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49050#49174</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/officegirls/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/officegirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Office Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/officegirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Office Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-24-10 01:48pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=10830&quot;&gt;Capn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=10830&quot;&gt;27&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=12782&quot;&gt;Magnifico&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=12782&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					Office Fantasy may be a better bet for you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said it is non-nude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/officefantasy2/&quot;&gt;Office Fantasy 2&lt;/a&gt; does go to full nudity, but sometimes their definition of 'nude' is a little shaky. ;0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cap'n. :0)
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49050#49174&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:48:09 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_38794</guid>
		<title>RE: london13's Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=38752#38794</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/officegirls/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/officegirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Office Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/officegirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Office Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-15-09 03:44pm
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3791&quot;&gt;badandy400&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=3791&quot;&gt;103&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=5064&quot;&gt;london13&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=5064&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					Have you visited any sites in the past year that you did like?  So far the only reviews you have posted have been 50's.  This site is about user input good and bad.  Tell us about some of the good sites you have visited.  At this point all we can see is that you are someone who is impossible to please.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While those 50's might have been very much deserved by those two sites we just can not see that you are a fair judge of sites because we are only seeing the bad from you.  Do not get discouraged, just even things out a little so that people can begin to understand who you are and what you look for in a site.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=38752#38794&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:44:39 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24543</guid>
		<title>RE: small website</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24530#24543</link>
		<description>
			&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyhoseinpublic/&quot;&gt;
					&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pantyhoseinpublic.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Pantyhose In Public&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyhoseinpublic/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pantyhose In Public&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-17-08 09:08am
				&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT REPLY&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;253&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					To &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;344&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					Thanks for the info.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24530#24543&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;View Thread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;
			&lt;/table&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			&lt;br&gt;
			</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:08:58 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24530</guid>
		<title>Pantyhose In Public Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24530</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyhoseinpublic/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pantyhoseinpublic.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Pantyhose In Public&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyhoseinpublic/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pantyhose In Public&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-17-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:39am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;344&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;small website&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I was a member of this site months ago and was very disappointed. First problem is that most of the site features just one somewhat attractive, but not everybody's taste, slightly plump MILF. The preview tour leads you to think there is a lot of variety in the models. The site FAQ addresses the issue of models in the tour who are not on the site by saying that they rotate their archives. I don't want to hear that as  the site is just too small. I had no trouble downloading all of it in under an hour and that was before I got a download manager. Also, many of the pictures were NOT in public. There are better pantyhose sites, such as pantythoseaddict.com and better public sites such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicflash/&quot;&gt;publicflash.com&lt;/a&gt;. If I had to rate this site I would give it 60, maybe even less.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16208&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Pantyhose In Public&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24530&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24530&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:39:56 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
