PU - Nikki Jackson - All Activity

RE: roseman's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:58:30 PST

Nikki Jackson (0)

01-20-08 03:58pm

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To roseman (252):

The things with the video-parts sounds really irritating - but she's looking great, so I think I'll try it.....
Thanks.

View Thread (3)

RE: roseman's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:42:24 PST

Nikki Jackson (0)

01-20-08 02:42pm

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (252)

To Denner (200):

Photosets quality is pretty good, photos are very sharp and their sizes are pretty large, but surely videos quality needs improvement.
I personally think that videos don't look so sharp and generally are too short. On some videos I though that some parts are missing because I was downloading for example part one and part two of a hardcore or a solo video and by its ending I was supposing that a part of that video is missing.

View Thread (3)

RE: roseman's Review

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:02:10 PST

Nikki Jackson (0)

01-20-08 11:02am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To roseman (252):

NOT because roseman just send me an "awesome" on a former review, but:

This Nikki - whom I have not seen before - looks great. I'm more and more into solo-models site - and with hc included. Just ended a membership of hotwiferio.com.
This looks a bit like it - with a different model (wow!) and with a better site in navigation and content, from what I understand in rosemans review.
The quantity is ok by me, but on thing, roseman:
Guess the preview of the one video is NOT what the quality is about?
You state:
"Also their quality needs improvement."
But is it much better than in preview?

View Thread (3)

RE: very bad experience

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:46:28 PST

Nikki Jackson (0)

01-18-08 05:46pm

COMMENT REPLY by nikkijackson (Webmaster)

To mistake62 (0):

I don't see any record of this happening. I received no email from you, and no one who works for me did either. If you had a problem I would've emailed you back immediately, or within 24 hours at the latest. CCBILL is very quick to respond and is always very helpful. In fact if a person complains a lot they will contact the site owner.

View Thread (5)

RE: very bad experience

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:26:26 PST

Nikki Jackson (0)

01-16-08 02:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by mistake62 (0)

To asmith12 (117):

" quite cooperative " possible but in my case they won't get along with me. however, thanks again!

View Thread (5)

RE: very bad experience

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:16:51 PST

Nikki Jackson (0)

01-16-08 11:16am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (117)

To mistake62 (0):

> ccbill do not want help me ( very dissapointed for them).
Usually they're quite cooperative in cases like this (when it is not content being disputed, but site doesn't provide access). Personally I'd give CCBill another try, making it crystally clear what is the problem.

View Thread (5)

RE: very bad experience

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:06:46 PST

Nikki Jackson (0)

01-16-08 11:06am

COMMENT REPLY by mistake62 (0)

To asmith12 (117):

ok! thanks for assistance asmith. For, ccbill do not want help me ( very dissapointed for them).

View Thread (5)

RE: very bad experience

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:53:32 PST

Nikki Jackson (0)

01-16-08 08:53am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (117)

To mistake62 (0):

If you paid with a credit card, I would suggest to go to CCBill first and explain situation in detail. If CCBill doesn't help, go to your bank with explanation along the following lines: "this was a payment for subscription service which I paid for a month and access was terminated after 2 days. All my numerous attempts to contact merchant didn't succeed"; as the service wasn't really provided, they should be able to revert original credit card transaction.

View Thread (5)