| User Reviews (16) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hundreds of incredibly beautiful young women. All of which I've never seen before, and most I suspect who are from eastern Europe.
Outstanding quality. The camera zooms in on a scene and you can see some incredible details down to the tiniest hairs on the models beautiful skin.
Website is clean, colorful and nicely done.
Links work. Extras include 18 Only Girls, and various model pages.
Very real feel to the movies and natural.
Huge film and picture collection.
Best variety of positions I've seen to date. They don't focus exclusively on anal, big plus for me. All positions receive equal time unless anal is in title. |
| Cons: |
Search tool works until you hit back, where you have to start all over again.
Downloading is fast, but still eats up lots of time.
A little pricier than the competition.
Does not support Roku.
Seems to have more picture sets than films. I'd prefer all film. Especially when you see a beautiful model and all you see are her in pictures.
Seems to have more masturbation than male/female.
Updates to sister sites few. |
| Bottom Line: |
The variety and beauty of the young porn stars are the site's biggest asset to me. It's hard to find so much beauty in one site.
For me the down side was too many scenes/models offering masturbation only, or offering pictures only. But that's just me as I lean toward movies as my favorite medium.
The additional sites like 18 Only Girls is an added bonus bringing more beauty to the screen.
The picture quality was outstanding. I recommend this site even with its higher than average price. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Very high quality video and photos - extremely clear.
- Most recent videos (2012) are 1080p, either h264 or WMV format.
- Videos also avail in sd480 and ld360 format
- Variety: Solo, Boy-Girl, Girl-Girl
- Daily updates - usually both video and photo set, although occasionally only one or the other.
- Fairly fast downloads (this depends so much on your ISP that I can only say it felt fast to me.)
- Very cute girls
- Search by “topic”, for example - 69, Bathroom, Dildo, Hardcore, Small Tits, allows selection of multiple criteria.
- Photo sets download in zip files. |
| Cons: |
- I could not get download to work with Free Download Manager.
- Vids have advertisement, short but annoying, for another site.
- Older content, as one might expect, is lower quality / resolution.
- The “ratings” tabs at very top of screen are confusing.
- Photo sets in zipfiles all have the same file names. 001.jpg, 002.jpg, etc. |
| Bottom Line: |
Where to begin? The girls are lovely, beautiful, young! The name of the site is a clear indication of what you may expect. A quick review of the model list shows virtually all are 18 or 19 years old, and European.
In those videos where it is a “boy/girl” scene, even some of the boys are very cute, although I don’t usually focus on the guys, the ones here are worth watching.
Statistics:
- I counted 12 videos listed in a single screen, with the ability to step through 91 screen loads, so that would be about 1092 videos available.
- "The Girls" section had 21 models listed per page, and 17 pages, so about 147 models.
- Photo galleries were 12 per page, and 106 pages so that's about 1272 photo sets or galleries.
I like to save the photo sets in a single directory after downloading, since each file set re-uses the file names of 001, 002, 003 etc within each set, it is an extra bother to have to batch rename each set so that I can store multiple sets in a single directory. I have seen this type of naming at other sites as well, and it may discourage photo set downloads. I would prefer a naming convention of “girls-name, shoot-id, then photo number. For example Karen-02-001.Jpg. But every site has their own methods, this is just a pet peeve of mine.
Another reviewer commented on the relative scarcity of anal sex, and listed this as a negative, it may well be for some viewers, but for others of us this is a positive. Therefore I have listed it in my comments section, as I believe such things are much more in the eyes, or should I say fantasies, of the beholder, rather than attributes of the site. I personally prefer less anal action and more “pussy”.
This site also has live shows, which are clearly scheduled and easy to access. However the video that goes with the live shows if SMALL. If you enjoy the banter and chat, with a number of other guys and the one lady, then you may like this. I found it less than exciting.
I don’t have a very objective scoring system for sites, maybe someone else can suggest a consistent scheme for scoring, so I am going to give this site a good rating simply because I like the videos and found the site fairly easy to navigate. The only real problem that I have had has been the inability to use FDM to control my downloads. BTW it seems to work, but then downloads a very short video that says I am not authorized to download.
The site lists one "bonus site", which contains one girl. There are comments to the effect that the longer you keep your membership, the more bonus sites you will get, but at this point I don't have the benefit of this feature. And if the other sites are like the one bonus that one gets initially, it may not be of particular benefit.
Billing for this site is through CCBill.
Bottom line: The site holds my attention with high quality videos and photo sets. I can let my mind wander, enjoy the beauty of the models, daydream myself into being with them, enjoy a long slow porn watching session. What more could an old guy expect from any site with lovely young ladies. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* True HDTV videos
* A lot of content
* Great looking girls
* Fast download speed
* Lots of updates
* Free access to live shows |
| Cons: |
* Some bugs on the site
* Video quality could be better at times
* Ad watermarks in the videos (very short, but still...)
* Many dead sites in the network |
| Bottom Line: |
The network gives access to 14 different sites. Ten of which are individual model sites, the remaining four have a variety of different girls to offer. Four of the individual model sites and two of the multi model sites are dead sites with the last update from 2007. The rest of the individual model sites are more or less active. I'll concentrate on the multi model sites in this comment, simply because they seem to be the core sites of the entire network.
younglegalporn and 18onlygirls are both photo/video hybrid sites with 1-2 updates per day. The videos are about 30 minutes per scene and are coming in
mp4 640 * 360 1000kBit/s (about 200MB per scene)
mp4 852 * 480 1500kBit/s (about 250MB per scene)
mp4 1280 * 720 3000kBit/s (about 500MB per scene)
mp4 1920 * 1080 9000kBit/s (about 1.2 - 1.6 GB per scene)
wmv 1920 * 1080 12000kBit/s (about 1.6 - 2GB per scene)
note: The video upgrade to 1920*1080 happened recently and the availability of true HD scenes is quite inconsistent. Even some of the latest updates (26/05/2012) are just 720i instead of 1080i.
Pictures are available in
up to 6000px resolution
You can download complete picture sets in one zip archive.
The entire network is featuring young, european amateur or semi-amateur girls who are all sharing a tendency to the skinny side. Occasionally, you'll also find a US model (Sasha Grey, Tori Black), but the overwhelming majority of the girls are from Russia or at least eastern Europe. You will find all kinds of scenes, solo, g/g, b/g, group. The models are fresh and good looking, no tattoos, no fake tits. If you like your girls natural, then you'll be pleased with this site. If you prefer XXL boobs and saussage-lips, I'd recommend to stay away.
The ammount of content is overwhelming. Over 2000 videos are available on 18onlygirls and younlegalporn alone. Enough to keep your ISP and your hdd busy for quite a while.
Most of the scenes are exclusive. However, there are also some non-exclusive scenes. I've spotted one shot from nubiles.net, they didn't even bother removing the nubiles intro logo screen.
From the technical side, the 1080i movies are of pretty good quality, although not quite as crisp and colorful as the movies from brazzers or realitykings. For some reason, this seems to be a general trend in EU productions.
The site offers live shows on a daily basis, featuring some of the girls from the movies. The shows are usually from 6-11PM European time. In addition, you also get free access to seventeenlive.com.
Navigation of the sites is quite ok. However, the sites are suffering from some annoying bugs. Just to name two of them:
a. There is a filter function for "Everything" "video" "Photo" which is set to "Everything" by default. If you change it to "Video", browse the site and change the page at the bottom, the filter will reset to "Everything."
b. When streaming the videos, the scene is split up into small bits, allowing you to click and combine parts of the scene and watch them directly. Sounds like a nice feature. But when you skip parts of the selected videos, you get stuck in the first selected bit. (Sounds a bit complicated, I know).
Watching the videos, I noticed that sometimes during the scene, an advertisement watermark pops up richt at the bottom of the screen. This ad only lasts a few seconds, but it's still something I don't want to see in a video I payed for.
Download speed is very good. I'm using IDM and got full speed downloads (1800KB/s).
Bottom line:
A solid network with a decent ammount of content for a fair price. If you like young and skinny girls, you'll enjoy it. |
| Respond: |
7 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Right here is my review of this site and its network, its nearly perfection.
Almost faultless interface, I think its its called Lioness and seems to be very good and modern certainly better than most of its competition.
Great size choices of movies to choose from All new movies are 1080p, 720p, 480p and even get 380p. Most older vids will be 720p with movies back in 2008 some were just 480p. Certainly good enough though, so good choices of movies now anyway.
The network seems to update 4 movies or photos a day, which seems to be random but at least 1 movie a day and sometimes 2 or 3, but always a total of 4 updates a day altogether.
The quality of ladies is simply superb and they are some girls that could easily pass for catwalk super models, Gloria, Stasha and Nadin being just 3 that spring to mind.
They seem to treat the girls really well and the network seems like a community with some girls having their own sites, I like that and think other sites should take note. |
| Cons: |
Not too many negatives and more really nit picking but for me these sorted would make the site perfect.
The annoying thing was with the interface when looking through a girls say movies and you had them filtered to just movies and then click on a movie when you click the back button the filters had gone and you had to do a search again, gets annoying when lots of vids.
Not major problem but some girls only had photos and me being a movie fan was slightly disappointed to find out she only had pics.
Some hefty file sizes noticed for movies not too long with not much showing nudity, I can live with the content not being full on sex but some file sizes seemed extra large, luckily not many.
Tends to be pussy sex as opposed to anal scenes, I'd love there to be more anal and they didn't have many anal lesbian scenes which I love.
These are very minor and not really bad at all, just me being nit picking. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line is the network is awesome and well worth my money to join back, all in all I have thoroughly enjoyed the sites and rate it in my top 5 sites now (as a network of course), they are moving on to be making some high end erotic movies and if I just saw a few more anal movies I'd give it full marks.
Some of the young ladies here are truly breathtaking and this sites seems to have a rather high number of good looking girls compared to its competition, I would say its on par with teenmegaworld and you see lots of the same girls, which I love as I collect my favs so great to see more of my favs here.
Would I ever return, you bet I will be doing, I hope they carry on doing what they are doing and continue to produce high end erotic porn with these angels they have there and I'm sure this site will go from strength to strength. It certainly has improved lots since I was last a member in early 2011, you could see it was heading in the right direction then with some of its newbies like Stephanie and Nadin but now there's many more new hotties on here. |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
TBP/PU discount price of $19.99 makes the site excellent value
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing.
Daily updates usually alternating between a photo shoot and video
Mostly exclusive content
Most recent photo sets have 3 size options, 1000, 2000 and 4000px
Zip downloads in each size
No watermark/site name on recent photos
Videos usually have a choice of 720p wmv or 720p, 480p and 360p mp4. A few of the latest videos also go up to 1080p full hd.
Videos can also be streamed in 3 resolutions and they also have them split into 1 minute long clips for streaming or download which is useful if you want to preview part of the video before deciding if you want to download it.
Run times and file sizes all displayed
It’s nice to see a site that actually takes the trouble to give the zips and video downloads proper file names matching the name of the scene and now also has the model name included since rearadmiral mentioned it in his recent review.
Responsive webmaster. |
| Cons: |
Upgrading your membership to include the All Sites Access from within the member’s area is expensive at $69 so if you think you might want network access better to pay the extra $10 upfront (see my previous comment and webmaster explanation on this topic)
Download speeds were below average for me.
I found their photo browser awkward to use, i couldn’t move around the photos using my scroll bars or keyboard direction arrows, not sure if that was me doing something wrong
Much of the photo content only has a maximum resolution of 1000px
The oldest videos don’t have the HD option as you’d expect on any site that’s been around a number of years
Nothing much in the way of model info or bios, name and age is about all you get.
Some video files seem unnecessarily large e.g. a video of Beata I downloaded had a bitrate of 33,000 kbps and came in at a whopping 911 MB for an 11 minute video |
| Bottom Line: |
Being a fan of softcore glamour/nude art style photography based sites such as Met, MPL, and W4B it was with some trepidation that I signed up here not really knowing if they had the kind of content that would be to my taste but I was tempted in by the collection of stunning fresh looking young models in the tour. There’s little information on the models in the site apart from a name and age but I’m assuming most of them would be Russian or Eastern European. Most of them have their ages listed as 18 or 19 and to be fair most of them do look teen to early 20s and the site does pretty much stick to the young theme throughout in the way of clothing and scenarios.
Although the site has been around several years with content dating back to 2006 online it’s only really in the last 12 to 18 months that they have been taking the addition of high resolution photo shoots to the site seriously so from my point of view they have some way to go to catch up with my favourite photography sites. I did find plenty of models and photo shoots that I liked but about two thirds of what I downloaded only had a resolution of 1000 x 665 with the rest a mixture of 1500, 2000 or 4000px on the long side. There is a mention on the site that they have plans to increase the photo resolution to 6000px but I’ve not seen any in that size yet.
I found the layout and presentation of the site really nice here. When browsing the model index the models had nice big preview pictures and when browsing the photo galleries the thumbnail previews were a good size and also included a slide control to increase or decrease the thumb size which was a cool feature I’ve not seen before. Each photo set and video also comes with a selection of clickable tags to allow you to easily find similar type content, e.g. solo, striptease, lesbian, hardcore, anal, cum in mouth etc.
If it’s videos you’re after I don’t see how this site can fail to impress, well as long as you’re not looking for busty milfs that is. You can find these hot young models in most types of action including solo, masturbation, toys, lesbian, hardcore B/G, threesomes with niches such as anal, peeing and fisting covered. I’m not hugely into videos but from what I’ve seen the quality throughout the site is pretty decent overall. You’ll need a lot of disk space to save these HD files as they can often be up to 2 GB in size. The only slight downside to these large files is that I found the download speed below average and on a couple of occasions so slow that the site was virtually unusable although it appears that may have been a temporary problem.
Overall a highly recommended site if you’re into the “teen” niche and one I’ll probably come back to again in the future if they keep on growing the amount and quality of the photo sets. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Approximately 800 videos
- Over 1000 photo sets
- Photos zipped
- Each scene usually has a video and a photo set
- Excellent mix of material (solo, girl/girl, b/g, some multiples, vaginal, anal, toy play, peeing, fisting, indoor, outdoor)
- Naturally beautiful models (some natural imperfections)
- Not a lot of variation in models – Caucasian, young, petite. Some larger breasts, but most smaller, proportional (I’m listing this as a pro because I share the site’s taste in women. If you prefer a different look, it might be a con for you.)
- TBP/PU discount
- Excellent value
- Updates daily
- Some photo sets in HD, most lower res
- Helpful webmaster
- Photos and videos are well done – well lit, sound is good
- Models aren’t heavily made up – naturally beautiful
- Didn’t have timeouts with download manager |
| Cons: |
- Download speeds can be slow sometimes
- Some trouble with Free Download manager, but it seems to be resolved and no one else reported it
- Wish the scene names included the model name |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has been getting some attention lately, with a review just last week, so I hope I can add some new information to what’s already here.
I have no idea why I had never heard of this site before because it is large and very well done. It offers a great value at the TBP/PU discount price. I went into it thinking it was a mostly solo girl site but I was wrong. Unlike many other sites that might claim this, this site really does offer something for just about everyone. There are solo, g/g, multiples, toys, b/g, anal, peeing, fisting, indoor and outdoor scenes. One consistency is the models – they are almost all young, Caucasian (Easter European and Russian) and petite. There are a few models with larger breasts, but the majority are petite and proportional. Not all models do g/g or b/g. The site has material for about 300 models. Some of those have only a handful of scenes / sets, but many have a large library.
Each scene usually has a video and a photoset with it, but this site splits material with other sites on its network so the photos may be here and the video on 18 Only Girls, or the other way around.
Videos are offered as WMV (Codec 9) and mp4. WMVs are usually offered in one resolution with 720p being the most common. Older videos are obviously lower. There are some scenes at 1080p. Mp4s are usually offered in three resolutions with the highest usually being 720p, though there are some with 1080p. Bitrates are very high, with most over 10,000kb/s. File sizes can be large with most being near 1GB, but there are some that are bigger than 2GB. Obviously, selecting a lower res will reduce the size. There are about 800 videos on the site now, most average between 20 to 30 mins. Subjectively, the videos look clear and crisp. Lighting and sound are very professional. This is not an amateur operation.
Photos are also available and are usually shot on the same set as the videos. The photos are usually offered in multiple resolutions. While there are some at 2666x4000, most aren’t that high. Subjectively, they look good, with the higher res looking the best, obviously. Zips are offered. Number of photos per set varies.
The site updates daily with a new video or photoset being added. Some days see two updates.
There is a search function (though I didn’t find it all that accurate), and each scene has links to themes. You can also sort by model.
For me, the big selling point of this site has to be the models. I’m usually more into U.S. models doing mainstream hardcore, so this site was a real eye-opener for me. The models are stunning. They are all naturally beautiful and many have slight imperfections that don’t get hidden, which makes them more appealing. Makeup is understated too. Some of the models have a unique look – wholesome even. Whoever lines up the talent deserves a pay raise.
There is a TBP/PU discount offered, and you can buy a membership to this site or for an additional $10 you can add the whole ‘network.’ I strongly recommend spending that extra $10 for two reasons. It makes the membership an excellent value, and the same models appear on the other sites so if you like a particular model you’ll be leaving material behind without access to the other sites. The other sites are Ivana Fukalot, Skinny Super Girl, 18 Only Girls (this is the other large site here), Alice Wonder Bang, Lay the Kat, Sasha Fucks Dasha, Natasha Shy, Vika Nymph, Sasha Blonde, Beata Porn, Kamilla 18, The Sperm Lover and Policeman. I’ll post some stats and a brief review as a comment on some of those that might help you decide whether you want to get full access.
The site isn’t perfect, but it is close. This may be nitpicking, but I wish the scene / set names included the model name. These models are all new to me it was frustrating to see a model I like and not know who she is. I resolved that by being careful to catalogue them by model, but some indication would be helpful.
I also had some membership problems that you can read in the comments, but those were all resolved thanks to a helpful webmaster. And to be fair, with most of those issues it seemed to be only me who had the problems.
If the site has an Achilles heel, it is that many PU members report that download speeds can drop during peak times. I experienced that too. From a comment made by the webmaster, it sounds like the problem is with their third-party network supplier and not the site.
The site is technically very well done. It looks good and it isn’t overly busy. It’s simple, and I mean that as a compliment. The material on the site is also well done. And the models are some of the most beautiful women I’ve ever seen. Not only would I highly recommend this site to anyone who likes models who look like this, I’m going one step further: this will be a site that I come back to regularly. |
| Respond: |
19 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Lovely young teen models.
-The videos have crystal sharp definition, good lighting, good sound control (no random, loud, extraneous background noises). Some of the older
videos have some extraneous background noises and the photography is not always sharp. But the newer videos are well shot photography.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login to the site - with the DieselAccess network. |
| Cons: |
-The cons are minor. rearadmiral and tangub have reported problems with the site (such as poor downloading speeds occasionally), but I have not.
-They should have some posting if the Live Diesel model is late for a public show, or if the show has been cancelled. A simple notice stating
the model has been delayed, and when she might appear online. Or if the show has been cancelled, simply stating that.
-A few videos or photosets might be from years ago, but you couldn't tell it from the posting date. For example, the model Odessa is familiar from years ago. She is also known as Priscilla, Anna, Lily, Yana, Chrissy, Lusy, and Melissa. And she has appeared on more than 25 pay sites.
Anyway, in a video on 18OnlyGirls (a network site to YoungLegalPorn), Odessa states her name as Anna, not Odessa. And she says her age is 18.
She has been doing porn since 2002. The video is dated/posted as 2009-10-07. So the age she states is wrong, or the videos is from years ago. |
| Bottom Line: |
Cons (continued):
But the posted date is a minor problem.
-Some photosets have only one option for downloading, others have 3 options for downloading: 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px.
-In the updates section, I wish they would clearly identify each set as "video" or "photo set". Instead, you have to click on the set to find whether it's a video or photos.
-The search (or listing for a model) is specific to each site only. The model Samantha, for example, shows as one set on YoungLegalPorn. You have to transfer to 18onlygirls to see that she also has a set at that site. It would be easier if a single search returns all the sets for a particular model at that network, with each site being listed with the sets for that model. Instead, you have to visit each individual site and do a search to see if the model appears at that site.
-The rearadmiral reported that he had a problem gaining access to all sites in this network even though he paid for all network sites. But that was straighten after a few email. I did not have that problem.
-Also, rearadmiral reported that he connection to the network was very slow at times. My download speed maxes out about 630 KB/s, and I did not have any problems with my download speed. But admiral has a faster connection than my own. And he was using the connection longer than I was. But rearadmiral saw sustained download speeds of less than 20 KB/sec. The Webmaster replied to rearadmiral's comments on PU, and said there was a technical problem and the problem seems to be fixed.
The Webmaster should be giving credit for responding to PU comments so fast, and with an open attitude of trying to fix those complaints.
-Bottom Line (summary):
-Web site features teen girls. Doing masturbation (1 or 2 or more girls). Doing lesbian sex (2 or more girls). Doing sex with a boy (1 or 2 girls, 1 boy). The girls are OK to very attractive.
-videos:
high quality:
width x height: 1280x720
total bitrate: 11013 kbps
802 MB/13 min 46 sec runtime
The newer videos have a high definition option, 720p, along with 480p and 360p.
The older videos from several years ago only have a standard definition option 480p.
photosets:
4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px on some photosets. But the file size for the 4000 px photoset can be 148-250 MB.
-There are live chat sessions with Diesel models that are free with a paid membership, named "Diesel Girls Live".
There are also, separately, chat sessions with other models. The chat sessions with other models can be free. There can also be a charge for the other model chat sessions, in one of two modes: a non-public mode which is open to all members who pay the fee; a separate private chat which would be a one-on-one session with yourself and the chat model.
I think the site is worth a 90. But if you have the problems that rearadmiral or tangub are having, the site is worth far less. The sites has some great looking models. The recent videos are crystal sharp. The photography is ok, showing improvement over time, but not up to standards of MetArt or MPL Studios. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Archived: |
lk2fireone wrote 1 review (03-08-11) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site admin is responding to it's members demands and suggestions. Ask for a tag to be added for the search engine, and they might add it.
They have a very good chat where you can chat with the porn stars of the site and ask them about basically anything, even have them play with toys and such.
You can write requests for the site, in the forum. I've seen a few of the "be a director" videos, and I so need to write some good scenes up for them.
Exlusive videos, and a lot of them. |
| Cons: |
Not so many pictures as I would like, but the ones they have are good. |
| Bottom Line: |
Exlusive content, and one of the best sites I ever joined. In my opinion, the perfect site if you love teen porn with fresh and sexy models. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (33) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
