Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit X-Art

Visit Site


Type: Pay Site


1. Nude Photography
2. Glamour Models
3. Hardcore Sex

BC Media
2 Sites Listed
Partner: X-Cash

Monthly: $24.95  Our Price $19.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $29.95 (non-recurring)
1 Year: $99.95 (non-recurring)

View all X-Art Site Facts at TBP.

Feedback History  (66)

Active Reviews 3
Newbie Reviews 12
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 3
Comments 28
Review by TheBestPorn:

TBP Review

Date: 12-05-14

Type: 2.0

+  Awesome Artistic Photography.
+  Updates Daily.
-  Navigation Could be More Advanced.

User Reviews (31)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 31 Next Page >

pinkerton (41) 10-02-15  06:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Beaufiful, natural girls who seem to be enjoying themselves in very nice settings.
-Well presented site with good navigation (but see cons).
-Video and photo production quality is very good.
-Photos can be downloaded as ZIP files.
-Variety of video download options - the HD MP4 video files are quite small whilst still high quality.
-Content can also be streamed.
-Scenes are not overly long; some of the shorter scenes at less than 20 minutes are especially hot.
-Most scenes are more "romantic" than "porno", with lots of kissing, so this site may be more likely to appeal to women.
-Good value for money with TBP member discount.
-Plenty of girl-girl action if you're into that.
-Works well with my download manager (I use Firefox/DownThemAll) and fast download speeds.
-Can leave comments on scenes and save models/scenes to a favourites list.
-Good usability on mobile phone device.
Cons: -Navigation isn't as comprehensive as other sites: you can't search for specific types of scene (e.g. anal, interracial etc) though there is a navigation menu option for group sex scenes.
-Scenes can be a bit samey with not a lot of variation, with some scenes being just kissing, blowjob then fucking in one position to end.
-I didn't like the continuous scrolling of pages of content and the models listing, modern though it is; much prefer numbered pages with previous-next navigation as it's much easier to get back to where you were after clicking on a particular scene to watch.
Streaming in HD could be bit choppy more often than not.
Updates don't appear to be daily, but perhaps that's asking for too much?
Group sex and interracial content is a bit thin on this site, though having said that, the interracial content that is there is very hot - check out the scene with Ana!
Not much anal or DP but then that's not really this site's focus.
I'd like to have seen more girls in stockings.
Bottom Line: This is a great site with plenty of hot content that's a bit different to your average porn site. Models are mostly US and European and the scenes are less "porno" and more "people having and enjoying sex", so not many scenes have facials or anal/DP, but having said that, there are a few anal and DP scenes and some of the US girl's scenes all end with facials. Most scenes end with the guy cumming on her ass, back or on her pussy, with some scenes ending in creampie, which is more "natural" I guess.
Whilst quite a few of the models are recognisable from other sites, most of the models I've never seen on other sites.
Scenes tend to be natural (that word again!) so no sex in every position, just kissing, oral (usually mutual), then fucking in a few positions to the end.
Compared to your average porn site, there's very little chat during the scenes which start with the performers naked, so there's little or no build-up to the action. But having said that, the performers don't tend to make over-faked noises during the action, so not many screaming girls here.
I did find that when I cancelled, I was offered a continuing membership for an extremely low price that was very tempting.
Overall a site worth joining for at least a month.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Artie Fufkin (0) 05-24-15  01:03pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -absolutely beautiful natural girls who appear to be enthusiastic and well looked after
-well presented site with multiple streaming/download options
-good value for money compared to some others
-high quality shoots, excellent production values
-good mix of established and unknown girls
-Angelica's "Goodnight Kiss" is almost worth the subscription alone!
Cons: -very little variation in themes/scenes/styles/locations. if you're looking for anything other than two people having tasteful sex in a white room with white sheets then maybe try elsewhere
-website could be improved with a better tags and filters system
-sister site colette.com is now being heavily promoted and standards on x-art seem to have gone down slightly since its launch
-it's definitely more "x" than "art" these days, I'd like to see a little more artistic license being used
Bottom Line: If you are looking for high quality content with stunning, natural girls then I would recommend this all day long.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Jazz (0) 06-24-14  10:28am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Holy. Crap. This site is absolutely insane. I'm a girl and love watching porn so having a sexy, young, ever-new site like X-Art is essential for me.

I've never seen hotter girls anywhere. They get the top top models from all over the world and they do the dirtiest stuff. I can stay on there for hours.

I love the production value and how real the girls look. They actually LOVE doing what they do.

They have every type of video for whatever mood you're in: solo, girl-girl, threesomes, orgies... it goes on and on.
Cons: It's hard to think of something they can improv on but I guess I'd say I wish they had 3 updates a day :)
Bottom Line: You MUST join. Even for 1 month and you'll know what I'm talking about. Even if I'm not horny I'll log on to check our their new videos and I automatically get turned on and have to play with myself. Both the guys and the girls are sexy and irresistible.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

pat362 (375) 01-07-14  11:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The scenes are very well shot with multplie camera angles and good lighting
+They appear to have all exclusive content(at least video wise).
+Over 530 videos and 550 photosets that can be downloaded.
+Videos can be downloaded in MP4 they offer a wide variety of video resolutions from 640x480 all the way to HD 1920x1080.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and they offer you 3 possible resolution(4000x2667 is the highest one)
+All content is dated and they appear to update with one new video or photosets once every day.
+Nearly 200 different models to choose from.
+Lots of kissing.
Cons: -Content may be a litle too glamorous for some.
-The videos are on the glamorous side of things but this is still gonzo porn with no premise, no dialogue and basically just sex.
-The lighting on a few of the videos leaves a lot to be desired.
-Their models are all teenagers and women in their early 20's so anyone looking for more mature performers will have to look elsewhere.
-Not all the models have accompanying videos and/or photosets.
-If anal is your thing then be advised that they only have 17 videos and they probably try not to shoot these type of scenes.
Bottom Line: *I've been aware of this site for a couple of years but I kept putting off joining because I was afraid that I wouldn't enjoy their content. I can't say that I was wrong because I find that their content is mostly hit or miss for me.

*One of the reasons why I had reservation is that I had expectations that the content would appeal a lot more to me and they were unable to do that. Not their fault since I may not be the person this is meant for.

*Now the second reason is that these videos are for the most part gonzo porn with not many things to distinguish them from other gonzo videos. I know some will disagree but let me demonstrate what I mean.

1-There's no dialogue in these videos.
2-It's common for the performers to be naked or semi-naked at the very beginning of the scenes.
3-The girls give a BJ to a guy who already has a hard-on.
4-The videos show a variety of sexual positions but I couldn't help but feel that they are there so that the camera operator can show a different shots then a proper evolution of a real sex scene.
5-The last thing but the most important one to me is that it's common to see facials and a cum shot to the mouth.

*Sorry but facials should never be included in glamorous porn because there's nothing glamorous about shooting cum all over the face of the woman you had sex with since there's no way you are going to kiss that mouth and obviously neither do the guys in these videos.

**Now the two important things that distinguish these scenes from other gonzo type videos is that the performers actually kiss multiple times in the scene and the guys orally service the women. It is actually common for them to do that prior to the women returning the favor on the guys. Just these two things elevate these gonzo style videos to a level that most gonzo studio never go and may make joining well worth it.

**Now I am giving this site a pretty high score which might look strange after I said so many negative things but there is no denying that the people responsible for this site strive to offer a very good product and even if I am not that satisfied myself. I do recognize that this may be more because of my personal taste then their efforts.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply

Arlen84 (2) 12-17-13  02:10pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: 1)Really hot girls
2)HD videos + pics with nice posing & directing
3)Video bitrates are among the best that I've experienced
4) Easy downloads
5) Regular updates
Cons: 1) Could use more variations in girls' bodytypes
2) Slight decrease in recent video quality/bitrate (avg. now 7-8000K, before 8-9000K)
Bottom Line: This is probably my favorite go-to site for what I'd like to refer to as "artistic porn". With really attractive, young-looking ladies with soft, petite bodies, X-Art provides a nice balance between hardcore action & art. There is a nice mixture of hardcore & softcore sets that can satiate whatever you're in the mood for. Video quality has taken a slight dip in recent months (they seem to have downgraded the bitrate slightly or have switched to another post-processing method), but they're still top-notch compared to others in the industry. I highly recommend this site if you're into the genre.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Parsnip (12) 11-06-13  01:44am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - All attractive models, mostly well known, although many are now mainstream porn performers without quite the same class.
- Usually avoid models with bad piercings and tattoos, when they do use tattooed models they do a pretty good job of hiding them.
- As far as I can tell, there are no models with breast enhancements.
- Good archive of some of the most beautiful photography I've ever seen.
- Site doesn't seem to time out. When I first joined I stayed logged in for several days while downloading the old material.
- Easy navigation and basic search facilities. All updates are clearly dated.
- Big clear thumbnails on updates & model pages.
- Very active member community, with lots of comments.
- Multiple sizes and resolutions of photos & videos, up to 1080p, although I only ever download the highest.
- Streaming available.
- No logos on films, very small logos on photos.
- All content seems to be exclusive.
- Plenty of material, around 400 films and rather more photo sets.
Cons: - Very slow and unreliable downloads.
- Little variety of models - almost all white, slim, 18 - 25.
- Model bios are a joke, even more so than most sites.
- There has recently been a huge increase in the volume of material, and a great drop in quality control.
- Some photo sets still very good, but an increasing number of out of focus & poorly lit sets.
- The voting is blatantly fiddled, with all updates being posted with large numbers of 10/10 votes
- Comments are pre-moderated, and while they allow through some mild criticism there is much more leeway given to those who follow the party line.
- Over the last year the material has become much more sexually extreme.
Bottom Line: Don't get me wrong, X-Art was good, but there are now serious issues.

It is odd to find a major site as slow and unreliable as this. I never get much more than 200 KBytes/sec (every other site I am on maxes out my internet connection at 2 MBytes/sec), and it often takes several attempts to download. I travel a lot and am home briefly, and often don't manage to download the backlog. There are several films I never have got downloaded - this is using 3 different pcs, 3 different browsers, and several internet connections - I've even tried in hotels (which I don't like doing) with no improvement.

The technical and artistic quality of the films has dropped a lot recently. It has gotten so bad that there are a lot of complaints on the site, but in reality it has been dropping for several months. This isn't just about the bunch of films released that are supposedly HQ but are very pixelated and really very low quality, in general the quality has dropped. Obviously no-one looked at the films before uploading them. There have been several films released with terrible lighting problems, including one that was completely unwatchable due to purple lens flares across the entire image. The film editing has become very basic, and many films don't even end smoothly with a fade to a "the end" screen, the film just stops suddenly 1 second after the action finishes. Clearly much less time is being spent in post-production and no checking is being done at all.

It seems strange that site blog keeps boasting of how quickly they are producing material. They say that large numbers of films & photo shoots are being done in a day, clearly with little preparation. Almost all the updates are produced in one house in Malibu, or one studio in Prague. The same sets are being used over and over, and the updates are clearly being filmed in a few minutes with minimal attention to detail. There is no longer any scene setting, they just put people in front of the camera and make them get on with it. Many films just have one camera from the side doing a longshot, and one from in front doing a close up, and all they do is cut between the two.

The voting is a joke. Many sites pump up the votes a bit, but this site is ridiculous. Updates appear around midnight, and have between 30 and 100 10/10 votes. They give more 10/10 votes to the more extreme material which is what they prefer. It means that the site, rather than the membership, is choosing what is more popular. It also makes the older material, when they didn't do this, seem poorly rated. Members can make up a new name whenever they comment, and I get the feeling that some people are having conversations with themselves, or putting up multiple positive comments for the material they like. There are a suspiciously large number of comments with female names which never appear again, especially on the nastier material. The moderation of the comments is uneven, and it is noticeable, for example, that comments insulting members who don't like anal are allowed through while responses aren't. The pre-moderation and blocking of anything that mentions other sites in a positive light is comical, as Colette recently went onto SexArt to take advantage of their lack of pre-moderation to advertise and try to poach members - when she got a negative response she became very aggressive and made wild allegations. Eventually SexArt, who are very tolerant in their comments, had to remove most of the thread.

The material has become much more sexually extreme, and a significant portion of the recent updates are clearly aimed at the mysoginistic male mainstream porn market. There is a lot of anal now, several DPs and rough looking facials, and the blog shows that this is clearly the direction the site wish to go. A lot of the current material just looks harsh and aggressive and like mainstream porn. Material like this used to attract negative comments, it doesn't any more apart from a couple of sad sounding members. Either the comments are blocked or the old members from the artistic days of a few years ago have left.

X-Art was the benchmark glamcore site. Over the last year or so it has left this behind, and is now marginally upmarket mainstream porn. I say marginally because good mainstream sites wouldn't put up the technically poor films that have been posted recently. If you are coming from regular porn, looking for something that seems a little classy, you may well like it. If you're coming from erotica, and fancy something a little more explicit, or have seen some magazine articles or adverts and are considering porn/glamcore for the first time, SexArt or Joymii would be much more likely to suit. I find little artistic or erotic on here now, and my wife will only watch films if I have checked them out first. My annual membership is coming to an end (it's my second time on the site), and I won't be renewing.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

BobA (7) 09-30-13  02:56pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

metem (4) 08-20-13  04:47pm
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

loverboy69 (0) 07-30-13  02:26pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

lk2fireone (196) 05-06-13  06:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (6 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 31 Next Page >
User Comments (28)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 1-10 of 28 Next Page >

Twotails (2) 07-17-15  08:30am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Best Site I know

Just signed in and feel that this is the best Porn Site I've ever signed in :)

+ 4000x2667 Pixel images (about 1 MB each) very good photographic quality ("Art" is merited, without exaggerating in any way, it's all very natural)
+ FullHD Videos
+ Only the most beautiful young girls, perfect selection (for my taste) without the need to search the pearls in a "heap of disgust". Beautiful hair, pure skin, healthy models, good shape, nice smiles - everything very stylish and neat.
+ fast download (1.2 MBps, the maximum my line allows)
+ Girl introduction set / Masturbation / Lesbian / Lovely fucking / VERY PRETTY Blowjobs / 3 BEAUTIFUL Girls, GGB
+ almost no anal
+ no tricks, no cross-selling (as far as I can tell now)
+ Files are named
+ Enormous amount of material.
+ There are nice and tasteful comments for each scene.
+ Seems they make the material themselves (=exclusive).

Nearly 100 Points!

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Parsnip (12) 04-11-15  11:16am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)

I think it's just hit the pits

Maybe against my better judgement I rejoined briefly on a discount to pick up some updates I liked the look of. Seriously this site has gone downhill, but now they seem to have stopped bothering completely.

There have been loads of days recently with no updates, lots of old stuff being reposted (without stating it is old), and almost all the blogging is about the rough new site Colette.com.

In the last 4 days there has been 1 update, and that was a reject from Colette.com which wasn't hard enough for that site - it was with Aubrey who had just done an anal scene and been so hurt by it that she couldn't do the anal planned in this scene so they just stuffed it up on x-art instead. It really is just rough hardcore porn now, and Brigham Field seems to have almost nothing to do with the site any more.

They seem to have given up on this site completely - why shouldn't the members do the same?

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

lk2fireone (196) 12-09-14  01:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

X-Art raising prices?

Using the link from PU or TBP, when you hit the join page at X-Art, the prices displayed are:

One week for $9.95.
One month $39.95 single payment.
Three months $59.85.
One year $149.95.
Two years $199.95.

Compare the new prices to the prices listed at PU/TBP:

Monthly: $24.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.95 (non-recurring)
1 Year: $99.95 (non-recurring)

My guess is that new subscriptions/renewals will drop off significantly, if they keep those prices.
That's a shame, because X-Art is my favorite glamcore site.

But I certainly won't be paying the new listed prices.

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Baboom (3) 10-08-14  12:56am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Gotta love this site.

The way they film the video is get amazing. I like that they don't get into the useless staged conversations to get to the sex. They just let the models do their thing, and the models have great chemistry with each other. Great stuff.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

CWH75 (0) 07-16-14  10:06pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Technical Issues

Anybody else having trouble downloading from this site. It's terribly slow and can take upwards of 15-20 minutes just to download even the 960X540 file format. I really enjoy the site but I had to cancel my subscription because of this issue.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

audrina69 (2) 03-12-14  10:48pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)

Anyone else having trouble accessing the site?

I tried several different browsers, keep getting, "sorry, Google Chrome(or whatever browser) can't find x-art.com"

I tried to access it from the link on the TBP review page, same response.

I sent Colette a tweet, got no response. Understandable if there are technical issues to address.

Thanks in advance

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

streamingeagle (0) 01-20-14  03:53am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

only .mp4-Files available (since today)

Since today you can download only .mp4-Files. There are no .wmv-Files available. They have also removed the .wmf-.Files from the history. There was no Information on the Website or blog.

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Parsnip (12) 11-27-13  05:36am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)

Final thoughts on leaving

Following my recent review, my subscription ends in a few days and this is my last time home, so I've just downloaded the last material I will get from here....

We kept a film with my favourite model Susie (Dido elsewhere) to watch at the end... what a shocker. It was a washed-out, blocky, pixelated mess - I can't believe anything this technically poor was put on a professional site, effectively unwatchable. As I said in my review, clearly no-one is bothering to check on the quality of the material any more.

I also quickly looked at another film - it was a DP scene with James Deen, so it had a pretty high uggh factor to start with but it did have a sort of creepy fascination. The girl was a scraggy little thing with buck teeth, an average little porn girl and a long way short of the standard x-art used to have. It was just shot from the middle distance with no style, and the end was careless - a guy came on her face, a quick clunk edit to a shot of her with obvious fake cum for 2 seconds and clunk, the film stopped. No time or care taken at all.

These two films sum up why I am out of this site... It really isn't glamcore any more.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Cum Play John (3) 09-21-13  01:10pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

X-Art gorgeous but could be harder...

I for one wish X-Art would hurry up and launch their harder-hardcore version -- it that is indeed still in the pipeline.

I keep looking for videos that explore more vigorous anal and facials but with X-Art models, style, production values and beauty.

One idea I've become increasingly drawn to is seeing "glamour bukkake" or high-end, high-quality art videos devoted to women consuming semen slowly from their faces. It doesn't have to be a gross-out 20 men who provide the semen, but it might be from 2 or 3 guys.

The point is there really aren't any HQ artistic videos exploring the semen fetish today out there. Glamorous facials that take some camera time (like 5-15 minutes) and show lots of semen worshiping and slow semen eating -- this sort of fetish I would love to see from X-Art.

All with lots of eye contact.

Many men get off only after the male actor has ejaculated. For that very reason, X-Art and other glamour sites ought to spend more time on the post-cum head and various fetishistic ways of eating cum. Perhaps from champagne glasses or pacifiers, perhaps just right off another female model's face, perhaps off a glass table top.

But something harder-edged and more fetishistic is in order. Not gross and mindless, like "1000 Facials" or some German/Japanese bukkake high-volume site, but something artistic and expressive of the love a woman can show for a man's sperm.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

JosiahE (2) 09-04-13  03:06am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)

Link timeouts?

So i rejoined X-Art and i queued like 30 videos, and they all started downloading ok. But 30 minutes later the links start timing out...

Last time i joined this site in 2011 i remember queuing like 50gb and leaving it to download for the next few days?

has X-Art moved to session based logins? because this is shit, i can barely queue videos...

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 1-10 of 28 Next Page >

Visit X-Art

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. X-Art (3) 81.7 90.5
2. Colette (1) 80.0 83.0

View All: Company Sites (2)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.44 seconds.