| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Very attractive teen girls not seen all over the internet.
+ 114 updates to this point.
+ Full movie download option.
+ Acceptable download speeds (300-700 kb/s) |
| Cons: |
- Only 1 pic size (853 x 1280 px) and set per update.
- No option to view all pics on one page, must cycle through multiple pages.
- Monotonous shoots with same position change cycle, locations, etc.
- Camera position and angles can be annoying, not really showcasing the action at times properly.
- Unpredictable and slow updates.
- No video previews and not enough preview pics per video.
- Too much anal focus.
- Only one movie file option (960 x 540 wmv) |
| Bottom Line: |
Meh, this site is a site that could be great, but it's only mediocre in all honesty. If they did some tweaking it could definitely step up a notch, but don't count on that happening since the site is still going in the same vein that it has for the last 3 or 4 years. Some points of interest:
1. To this point there is a decent amount of content since the site has been out for a long time but the updates are very slow so don't expect to join and get blown away by the amount of updates you will get in a month's time. I'm pretty sure there was a stretch for a few years where it barely updated at all. There are no dates to tell or set schedule, but my guess would be about 2 updates per month.
2. Scenes are VERY monotonous, especially in the older updates. Depending on which male actor is in the scene, you can pretty much tell before the scene even starts what cycle of sex positions they are going to do and in what order. You'll also know which positions will have anal and which ones won't.
3. This site focuses heavily on anal so keep that in mind, which I don't quite understand since almost all the other sites on the network this site is in do the same thing. Must be a euro thing since they seem to focus on that more. Might get annoying for people who aren't anal fans.
4. The girls are pretty damn hot for the most part, and thankfully they aren't girls you've seen on a billion other sites before. The only downer is that a lot of the girls don't really seem to be into the scenes and just sit there and take it without really getting any enjoyment, or at least acting like it.
5. Camera guy is annoying. There are many times throughout a scene when I was thinking "move the damn camera over THERE!". That doesn't happen too often to me so when it does I know something is wrong. For example, male actor is having sex with chick doggie style, pulls out to do a gape shot, and instead of focusing on the gape the camera guy moves to look at something else. Just one example of what I'm talking about, and it happens a decent bit.
Overall I give this site a very minor recommendation. It might be worth joining once but don't get too excited based off of the preview page, most of the scenes are way less exciting and interesting than they look. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All White Teens Black Cocks Activity - White Teens Black Cocks Reviews - White Teens Black Cocks Comments - White Teens Black Cocks News
