|User Reviews (1)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||Gorgeous models performing exactly as advertised.
Expert videography and photography
High quality files, both video and audio
No download limits
The free membership to the other sites is a real value.
||Most of the sequences are too baroque for my taste: too many odd toys and props.
Ghastly-poor file naming habits: costs the user a lot of time cleaning up.
||ON EDIT, May 2013: I remained a member of this site for several weeks until my membership lapsed. File names were never improved in any way at all. Excepting his public posts here, he owner/webmaster never responded to any of the messages/emails I sent concerning the filenaming problem, or on other topics.
ORIGINAL REVIEW: Wow, this is a fabulous site for those who take an interest in the subject matter. Gorgeous models, excellent images- soaking wet. Most of these models are familiar from other European sites and at times it's a surprising pleasure to see a famous star get down and dirty with herself in this way. While updates are not frequent, given the availability of willing models and the quality of the output this is understandable. Free membership in the sister sites is a major bonus.
(FWIW my very fast late-model Mac can have a hard time playing some of the largest "MP4 HD" videos. I find the .wmv files to be more reliable and of perfectly good quality.)
If it weren’t for the file names I’d give WAP a much higher score than it received here*. However, videos and pictures are so badly named as to require a lot of time at the back-end, so to speak, and this really needs to be corrected.
Image zip files all decode to folders named "Images". Not "Goldilocks - Three Bears": "Images". The images in that folder are named "001.jpg", "002.jpg" and so on. The next zip expands the same way, and the next. You can imagine the mess this creates: a pile of folders named “Images1” “Images2” and so forth, with no idea what's in them.
If all of these "001.jpg" files ever get intermingled by user error (trashed accidentally, for example), it's game over for you. The image files should carry the model's name and shoot title.
It's easy to create a zip file which expands to a folder's real name; perhaps it takes a little more effort. Given the slow rate at which content is produced at WetAndPissy, that effort would be nothing at all.
The net result of this is spending a LOT OF TIME back on the site, figuring out what the real name of what you've downloaded is, so you can file it away correctly. (I just happened to download my files in update sequence and thus had a chance at figuring out the real names of all those "Images" folders from the updates webpages. If I'd chosen any other method (favorite models, random choices), it would have been much much worse.)
As to video files, they are inconsistently named and because of this almost equally hard to square away after downloads.
Prepare to spend a lot of time 'on cleanup' after downloads from this site.
If WAP puts a bit more effort into this one serious problem, they'd be a really fabulous place to visit.
*This is the second site I've joined on the basis of a good TheBestPorn review, and the second where the owners can't be bothered to properly name their files. Given the trouble this can cause, I feel TBP needs to make this matter a review criteria.
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|User Comments (1)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.