| User Reviews (7) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Some hairy models are forthcoming and natural. Many are attractive or beautiful. There is no download limit. Videos are mostly solos, which is fine, and there a fair amount of time is devoted to closeups, which I like. |
| Cons: |
Files have a different name than they appear in at the site. Thus the site might refer throughout to “This Model playing with hairy pussy on bed” but delivers “ThisModel_HiddenPinkPanties”. This, combined with a URL system that disarms cookies, makes it all but impossible to keep track of which files you’ve downloaded and which you haven’t.
Videos plagued by artificial masturbation with lots of sighs and moans: really irritating. Also the site often instructs women to ‘masturbate’ by snaking their hands around their thighs from behind, a move as artificial and labored as it sounds.
Despite assurances to the contrary, downloads break under any Macintosh download manager I’ve tried.
Too few women of color (or age).
Minor- files are named according to some object in the room, not by date, so there’s no sequence to the files, as is the case at a major competitor. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not a naturalistic site, which I prefer, especially for hairy models. If you don't mind very artificial masturbation videos with -lots- of ooooh's and aaaah's for no reason, you'd do fine here.
Hint to somewhat improve your ability to see your download history- delete the nonsense string ahead of "members" in the url and reload before downloading. |
| Respond: |
8 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Clean layout of site.
Has a good proportion of higher resolution pics. |
| Cons: |
Hit and miss on the video quality.
No standard in terms of poses. You will not get similar poses from set to set. The thing about that is you will not get the poses that you want.
Focusing issues throughout.
There is rarely any ethnicity on the site.
Not enough models.
Not enough attractive models. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I was very disappointed with the site mainly due to the quality of the photos.
In my opinion most of the woman on the site are not too attractive. 50 - 75% of the woman is a 5 out of 10. 5 being average. If you like stunning women from time to time - look else where.
If you like a standard among poses from set to set , you will be very frustrated here. You'll be lucky to get a nice boob shot or butt shot on every set let alone the common poses. The poses are very random, because of this, you will never know what you're going to get on the daily updates - I know that some people likes this however. I was disappointed more times than not.
This is a hairy site, therefore, I thought they would be superb when it comes to seeing a clear detailed shot of the vagina. They were just good enough on the closeups. On most of the shots when zoomed out to more of a full body shot - the quality went down the toilet - and the vagina were of pretty bad detail. This was frustrating because the photos were very large, yet they were lacking in detail.
There were terrible lighting issues throughout. Some of the photo shoots were so bright that the details were burned out and blinding. Some of this may be due to photo editing. On many occasions the photo editing ruined detail, such as not being able to see detail of the woman's hair.
There were too many occasions of the hairy extreme, which included hairy legs, hairy asses, and arm pits.
If you like female masturbation videos - stay away from this site. Theses are among the most boring women masturbating that I have ever seen; the females will not utter a word; they rarely make moaning sounds; you could hear a pen drop they're so quiet; the females rarely looks into the camera nor interact; seams like they pull on or play with their pubic hair more than masturbating; the masturbation seems very fake on most videos;
The worse part of the videos is the extreme closeup shots. They stay zoomed for half to 3/4 of the videos in many cases. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ A good range of hirsute content to suit most tastes in this niche,.
+ Wholesome, pretty, amateur models.
+ Large Database of Photosets and videos.
+ Clean and efficient site design and layout.
+ Customizable user settings and search features provide a nice user experience
+ Custom zip files for downloads
+ Multiple Daily Video/Photo updates
+ Free Cam Shows
+ Good customer service |
| Cons: |
- Older photo content can have issues with soft-focus and stray focus.
- Lack of any substantial ethnic diversity in models.
- Web cam show scheduling conflicts with most schedules in north America. |
| Bottom Line: |
I found myself really hard-pressed to come up with any specific negatives beyond those listed above. This is one of the best sites--if not the best--I have come across in terms of the user experience and range of content available to a subscriber. There are extensive photo sets, videos, free interactive web shows, all for a single subscription price. The user experience I can only classify as top-notch, at least relative to the sites I have subscribed to in the past. There are utilities for just about any feature at the site. There are customizable search tools, gallery tools, favorite lists, and custom zip downloads where you are free to choose to select(or deselect) which images go into a zip. There is also a user forum and web masters are very quick to respond to any questions.
The content here is traditional solo softcore posing with some dildo and masturbation action. There is the occasional girl-girl scene as well. If your preference is softcore erotica, the content will meet your demands. If you demand hardcore action, this is not the place to find it and you will be disappointed.
If you are looking for the traditional airbrushed porn star look, this site will likewise not meet your needs. Makeup is used in moderation--it is of the kind you will see on any girl on the street-- and there is no attempt tot hide any blemish or mole with post-processing. The models are pretty and wholesome amateurs but they are not over-glamorized. That is not the look that this site aims for and it would detract from the natural theme. Most of the models appear to be in their mid-twenties, with a few MILF and a few of the just-turned-legal variety.
There is an abundance pf photo and video content and updates happen daily. Galleries are nicely done with semi-pro level photography. Super-high resolution images bring out every subtle detail and nuance on the models. Some of the older sets, however, do suffer at times from stray focus or a soft focus. This issue does not appear in most of the photosets posted after 2010, however. The videos are of high quality and they are clips of roughly 10 minutes in length. The main attraction here, however, is the photography. I found the DL speeds to be more than adequate.
Beyond the occasional image quality issue of older sets, the only other negative that stands out is the lack of diversity in the ethnicity of the models. Most are from Eastern Europe, the UK, or California. It would be nice to see the site expand this range a bit and offer more Latin and ethnic models in the galleries.
There are interactive web cam shows that happen a few times a week. These last an hour Unfortunately, the scheduled times appear to be centered around European time zones. Outside of the 4 PM Saturday show, if you are in North America, you will likely find it hard to attend during the week, out of personal work schedules. Never having attended a cam show in the past, I wasn't sure what to expect as I have no experience with cam media. I did sit in on the Saturday show with the model Raven. One can type questions or comments--or requests--and the model seemed willing to oblige(within reason). The feed quality was decent. The flow could be easily interrupted, however, when users ask questions(or act like toolbags)' Once you find the ignore user option, however, it is less distracting. If you are into cam shows, this is certainly a nice bonus, especially given that it is free of charge and from what I can tell, most fees for cam shows can be ridiculously expensive. Being able to interact with the models adds a personal touch to the site experience.
I chose to join this site as I prefer natural femininity over the glossed-over and heavily-toned airbrushed look of the majority of porn available today. What many people interested in this niche probably want to hear most about is the actual hirsute content available. Based on comments I have read here and elsewhere, it seems that what people find attractive in this niche is all over the board, which one would epect, given the broad scope and relative meaning that the word 'hairy' invokes. There is probably not a niche that has more diversity of tastes and opinions. When reading the review comments for various sites in this niche, I see complaints about models being too hairy or not hairy enough, or not having hair in the right place. What is hairy enough? What is too hairy? What is the right place? The answers are so relative to an individual that I cannot tell you if the content here meets your criteria. What I can say is that this site appears to cater to the middle of the road and it avoids extremes as a predominant feature. This is the way it should be, IMO, as there are so many tastes. No preference is given to any fetish and the content strikes a good balance. You will find just about anything here for most users in terms of hair. However, its unrealistic to expect to see every model always conform to your ideals. |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (8 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (9 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (24) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
