Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Wank Pass

Visit Site

Wank Pass

Type: Network

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Hardcore Sex
2. Porn Videos
3. Young Adults

Wicked Media
55 Sites Listed
Partner: Wank Pass Partners

Trial: $1.00 Limited Access (7 days, non-recurring)
Monthly: $24.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $39.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
1 Year: $99.95 (non-recurring)
Beware of Pre-Checked Cross-Sells! Be sure to uncheck additional offers (if undesired) to other sites when inputting your credit card info.


View all Wank Pass Site Facts at TBP.

62.5
Feedback History  (3)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 1
Review by TheBestPorn:

76.0
TBP Review

Date: 01-18-14

Type: 2.0

Spencer
+  Quite a large collection overall.
+  Lots of daily updates here.
-  Navigation is a bit of a mess.
-  Content seems generic, non-exclusive.

User Reviews (2)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
60
rearadmiral (306) 10-08-12  08:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to 44 Sites
- Interesting niche content
- Updates daily
- Site might be good for people who use streaming rather than downloads
- Photos available
Cons: - No usable search function
- No Stars named
- Meaningless file names
- Doesnít support download managers
- Many scenes appear to be clips but the others in the series arenít readily identified
- Must wait one minute between downloads
- Files only available in one format and size
- Scenes stream and play automatically
- Photos vary widely in quality
- No zips for photos
Bottom Line: There are certain porn niches that I really like; two of those are public nudity and group sex parties. This network has several sites that offer material in those niches and since those sites that have this material are relatively rare I often take a chance when I find one. But given the reviews posted here and the information at TBP I should have avoided this site. Iíll skip right to the bottom line now: with a narrow exception, do not join this site!

Iíve said many times that I think for a porn site to be great it has to have good porn, the site needs to be well laid out and finally it has to be easily accessed or downloaded by the user. A lot of sites hit two of those targets but fail on a third and donít become great sites. Theyíre stuck at merely good. It is arguable that this network offers good porn. I think they do: some of the material available is interesting and looks pretty good. But on the overall layout of the site and the ease of access by members this site falls flat.

The network is made up of 44 sites. Unlike a lot of other networks that follow a formula, this one has unique concepts for many of the sites. Most of the standard porn niches are covered, like teens , MILFs and cumshots, but rarer niches are also covered here, like feet, pubic hair, drunk girls, BBWs and femdom. What drew me in were several sites that feature a strip club motif and sites with public nudity and group sex parties.

While I like many of the unique niches available here the scenes themselves are just mediocre. In most cases the scenes are quite short. Many of the niche sites have scenes that average less than five minutes. The layout of each site is the same: there are 16 medium-sized thumbnails per page with a short, mostly useless description. Clicking on a thumbnail open that page where the scene starts streaming and playing automatically. This is a pet peeve of mine: I donít like that it hogs bandwidth and I donít like the audio surprises that come with sites like this. There is an option to download the scene too. The downloads are only available as mp4s and only in one resolution. That resolution varies from fairly low (720x480 at 1500kb/s) to fairly decent (1280x720 at 3500kb/s). I didnít download a lot of material so I canít really say how much is at the higher resolution.

I have a number of complaints about how the downloads are accessed. First, the file names are meaningless, consisting of just a number. I can live with that, but many of them include ďpart 1Ē as part of the title, obviously implying that there are other parts. I really donít like scenes broken into parts in 2012 because for the vast majority of user it simply isnít necessary, but to make matters worse, if the scenes actually are in clips the other clips in the scene arenít identified. How do I find them? The name gives no clue and there isnít even a usably search function if the names had any meaning.

The biggest flaw in downloading is something Iíve never seen before on a website. The site doesnít allow download managers (which isnít unique but still a very annoying) but the strange thing is a restriction that you have to wait one minute between downloads. This might not be such a big deal if the scenes were all 1GB files, but since many of the files are only 10MB or less that download in a few seconds, it is annoying to have to wait a full minute to download another. If you arenít willing to provide reasonable access to your members then I think you really need to rethink your business model.

One bit of good news is that the network does update regularly with at least a dozen clips being added each day.

I canít tell if the scenes are exclusive or not. Iíve not seen them anywhere else but given the wide variation in quality and the fact that they look like the same kind of clips that are available elsewhere Iím inclined to think that they arenít exclusive. But Iím certainly open to correction on this point.

The site also offers photos. I didnít spend a lot of time looking at them but I can report that the quality varies quite a bit and the site commits the serious sin of not allowing zipped downloads.

As for a recommendation, Iíd only recommend a membership to a narrow group: you like the niches they offer, and you only like streaming video. If youíre a photo guy or you prefer to download videos, my recommendation is to avoid the site. It is disappointing to see some unique porn but to have access limited to it by some bad decisions. I definitely wonít be back.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Active
65
xexbot (36) 06-10-12  02:07am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Fairly diverse collection of sites (see cons about this) with a few niches you don't usually get on other mass sites such as Bisex, Gay, various fetishes.
Cons: No search capability.

Video quality sucks. Hardly any HD material.

Each site in their collection is small, and even the few that have more than four pages of material are recycling some pretty common stuff.

Downloading is a pain because some of the sites are so old they still have their videos divided up into as many as twenty two 2-5mb files.

Download managers will work, but as soon as you start downloading files you can no longer continue browsing.

The interface is the worst part. You're basically looking at 1990s internet at this site. Some random screen caps and a very rough description is all you get for each file. When I say rough descriptions I'm talking about a screen cap of what might be an ass and something like "Two girls fuck a guy." No names, sometimes even no titles of the videos that I know came from specific movies. It's pretty awful.
Bottom Line: There is little good to say about this site, and frankly there's no improving it. The content may be original in some cases, but it's all pretty dated. This is basically a bargain basement porn site that should have died out with Y2K.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (1)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

armydawg (0) 02-22-14  06:35pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

worthless

This site loads streaming videos slower than dial up. Down loads too would take hours. Glad I only paid 7.95 for it, not worth that.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Wank Pass

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Wank Pass (2) 62.5 76.0
2. Girls Only Party (0) N/A 79.0
3. Fap Me (0) N/A 77.0
4. Girls In Control (0) N/A 76.5
5. Party Females (0) N/A 76.0
6. Bang Class (0) N/A 75.0
7. Casting Confessions (0) N/A 74.5
8. Shared Girlfriends (0) N/A 74.0
9. Taped Exes (0) N/A 74.0
10. Scandal Shows (0) N/A 71.0

View All: Company Sites (55)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.36 seconds.