| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Quick server most of the time
+Visitor’s preview is a ”tourist-friendly” public space. There’s plenty to browse through.
+Sizable collection (519 updates from site inception in March 2007 through July 2008)
+Exclusive content
+Continuing daily updates
+No videos, so you know for sure that all of the updates will be photos! ;)
+Photos available in three sizes (800px, 1500px, and a large size of 1800px to 5000px – usually at least 3000px)
+Overall good navigation features (view by update or by model)
+Nice site design
+Some very hot women and quite a lot of attention to some splendid ass
+Latina flavors may turn warm and vivacious |
| Cons: |
-No zips (!) and no slide show viewer. (Gallery thumbs open in new windows.)
-No way to set own default pic size viewing preferences for all galleries
-Thumb numbers don’t match pic numbers (a minor complaint since the results tend to be in a better order than the thumb order is)
-Viewing all of a model’s galleries can be tricky since the complete list of the one you’re viewing can be replaced by another model’s list when both models are in a photoset
-B&W or other treatments/effects in about 16% of the content here. Was 3-5 photosets per month until May, June, and July 2008: 6, 9, and 8 photosets – a disturbing trend!
-Gets too “artsy” sometimes in other ways, too.
-Horndog photo roulette: Provocative poses in thumbnails, oh yes! ... Then you see blurriness, graininess, or pixelation in medium- or large-sized pic. Woof!
-A few of the models ain’t so cute |
| Bottom Line: |
Walter Bosque’s work has also appeared at MetArt, where there are 25 photosets between 2003 and 2006. My guess is that post-’06, he decided to forge ahead on his own and got this site going. Could be.
Some of the photosets here are very “artsy” with models doing weird things with paint or plant life or gracing a shallow delta while draping themselves with a colorful sari-like thingy while being photographed from “sniper” distance. You know, that sort of thing.
And it isn’t fair to just complain about that, since it says, “The First Latin American Website of Fine Art Photography” right on the box, so to speak.
Yet of course this is a PornUser’s perspective (what it says on THIS box). And I can say that I’ve been glad to have joined to get a pretty good handful of the content.
Personal favorites include Adriana, Aldana, Cali, Carmen, Carolina, Daliha, Deby Carolina, Emily, Florencia, Juliana 1, Liz, Lola, Melany, Sisi, Tabatha, and Natasha (funny, I didn’t know that was a Latin name, but she's also here separately as Tacha, the name she has at HegreArt).
Lola is especially HOT, but they’re all sexy and have nice round bottoms and you won’t miss any of them here. It's definitely worth a visit for lovers of ASS, which gets more proper attention here than at your average site.
I wish I could score it higher. The absence of zips is why I can’t. But I do recommend the site anyway for people who like softcore photos of lovely Latinas. |
| Respond: |
12 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (3) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|