Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Velvet Ecstasy

Visit Site
Velvet Ecstasy Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Amateur Girls
2. Hardcore Sex
3. Porn Videos

Velvet Ecstasy
1 Site Listed
Partner: Velvet Ecstasy Partners

Monthly: $14.95 (recurring)

Special Price! The Monthly membership cost is a special low price option available to our users. The regular price is $19.95.


View all Velvet Ecstasy Site Facts at TBP.

92.0
Feedback History  (19)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 9
Review by TheBestPorn:

84.0
TBP Review

Date: 11-04-09

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  All exclusive content.
+  Large collection!
-  Content quality varies.

User Reviews (10)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
91
BabyGetReal (13) 11-20-09  03:19pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -I agree with the previous reviews. There is real amateur porn here, some of it quite refreshing.
-There are several hundred videos here.
-About 1 in 8 of the videos have real chemistry, affection, and the woman gets aroused and in some cases has orgasms.
-The price of $14.95/month is great.
-Some of the bonus photos (from other sites) are 1024 pixels and quite worth saving, especially from Met-Art and Hegre.
-If you like facials (I don't) you can download the facial excerpt from every video here, separately from the long main video.
-Good support. Victor thanked me for pointing out a couple of errors, and responded politely and substantively to my suggestions.
-The super closeups don't last very long, and they hush the annoying music when the action gets hot so you can hear the actors.
Cons: -Victor, the proprietor, insists on a facial in every video, which I detest. He seems to insist that every woman say "I want you to come in my face" in every video. This seems to me ridiculous and demeaning to both parties.
-Victor's direction seems to me to push many of the amateur couples into attempting standard (boring) porn. In particular, the guys hold off too long and end up jacking themselves off, which I find very unerotic. I wish he'd let them do what they want. Some of the more creative couples do manage quite interesting things anyway.
-So even for the amateur couples, the sex is usually unrealistic (guy holding off for way too long, no creampies, running thru standard positions mechanically).
-About half of the videos consist of a non-amateur giving a BJ to Victor, ending in a facial. These don't appeal to me at all. But the other half are mostly real amateur couples, and about 1 in 4 of those I found to be erotic.
OUT OF ROOM -- CONS CONTINUED IN A "REPLY".
Bottom Line: I have never kept my subscription into a second month except here. The quantity of videos, photos, and bonus photos kept me going thru the 2nd month. I ended up keeping about 90 videos. Thus I rate this site better than KarupsHA (I kept 40-some) and YoungLibertines or YoungModels (I kept only about 20 from each). VelvetEcstasy is fantastic for the money!

They have real amateur couples and it could be great porn if they would only stop forcing them into porn cliches -- let the couple do sex the way they like it (not trying to make "porn"), let the guys cum when they want to, no facials, some creampies. There are a handful where the guy comes more than once (nice!). If the girl likes it after the guy cums, let him satisfy her orally or use a vibrator or both. Also, like most sites, it would help so much to have accurate descriptions of the videos. Do the girls orgasm in an obvious and convincing way? More than once? This is hardly ever mentioned in the descriptions, and "Orgasms" is not one of their categories!

There are very few girl-girl videos and few solo girls that really cum. I don't mind this, but don't come to this site if you want these.

OK, if your taste agrees with mine (boy/girl scenes with real chemistry, laughing, fun, real arousal, real female orgasms, no fake moaning, guy coming from sex not jacking) here are some lists that will give you a huge advantage. My picks for the best are grouped first. (Numbers like _06, _07 are years released, but I stopped keeping track in later years -- the good videos span all years of the site.)

bodyrub_sensual_not_the_usual_06, dancingdick_08, laptease_06, laptease-bonus, mysistersfriend, oilylizzie, pointsofinterest, quickdraw, rainysunday_08, squealsofecstasy_07, squealsofecstasy_interview_07, taketwo, velvetkarma, witchyways_07.

autumnshakes_07, backyardbang_06, bellyrub_07, birthdaybuttfuck, lovelyrita, morningpayback, newyearpop, sexualhealing_07, studybreak, tremors, wyldfire_07, wyldfire_bts_07, zombigasms.

anteupmyass, barelynineteen, beantownbang, blindpresent_06, bustinout_08, chocolateoil_08, comeoutswinging_06, flooded_06, foothold, gisellesrub, gisellesrub_introduction_07, havingfaith_06, homemade_06, lovebites, lubingcallie, milkandhoney, poleposition, prettymama, redpassion, squirtgirl, tightfit, wetnwild, whippedfudge.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Active
93
Willard (6) 11-03-09  10:31pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good price.
A lot of women of young Caucasian are there, and there are some middle-aged women, too.
And, there are a black, Latin, and Asian, too.
Video and photograph where a lot of amateur couples were taken.
The angle and the recording of the lighting technique and their taking a picture are good.
Comprehensible, quick search function.
As for the download of the video, a high-resolution and a low image quality can be selected.
Those unique points are things that have divided into Introduction, Main, Facial, and Aftermath.
Some bonus contents.
Cons: The photograph of the search function is small though it is not a major problem.
Bottom Line: I am writing these sentences with a translation software.
Please forgive me when there are a sentence not understood easily and a wrong sentence.

First of all, I came to like this site very much.
A lot of couples are enjoying sex.
I thought that I looked like the B/G video of my favorite Little Mutt a little.
It seems that it is a video shooting by the professional.
I hate only genitals to be shown at long time.
Velvet Ecstasy doesn't do it.
They show me the changing expressions of externals and women from whom women shake oneself by pleasure.
Of course, genitals also show it.
They are very good balances.

I love externals where the couple who relaxed enjoys sex to be seen.
Exactly, this site is it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
88
exotics4me (361) 01-21-08  06:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
73
turismo (55) 05-12-07  05:50pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (11 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
95
powerman (Disabled) 03-17-07  08:36pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
95
jonesyboy (23) 01-27-07  07:19am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
89
jojox (6) 01-19-07  11:07am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
90
bjorn7 (19) 01-13-07  09:47pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
85
BostonPJR (72) 01-09-07  07:09am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (7 Replies)

Expired
90
DpornGuy (34) 01-08-07  10:06pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (4)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (9)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

stuka75 (0) 01-09-10  07:43am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Viva la Difference!

I was a member several years back when the site was quite new and enjoyed it thoroughly. The scene endings in facials in all movies gets a bit over scripted and routine but the variety of couples and bodies is great.
As to the couples not being perfect lookers, let me give you an old farts view. Trust me as you get older, you get tired of plastic boobs, blonds and the California look. Your fantasies will change with time. I'd rather see boobs moving and swaying erotically than rigid bolders. Im not perfect, and its the diversity in looks that makes people erotic. Viva la difference.
That said, and being an obsessive archivist, the download limits tend to intimidate me. I am one of those who like to download all the site content(videos, told you I was obsessive) but a daily limit of 5 gigs is OK, I just worry about going over limits, and getting locked out.
That said, I intend to join again and enjoy the newer content added since my last membership.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

hardog (1) 11-24-09  08:40pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

not worth 14.95 a month

What a disappointment. Unless you like trying to find a needle in a haystack. You might as well flush the 14.95 down the drain.

All I can say is anyone rating this site in the 90's is easily amused or a "ringer".

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

fiou (0) 09-24-09  03:05pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (1)

2 GB not 3

Annoying download limit. I guess you get what you pay for.

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Wittyguy (67) 07-24-08  12:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (46), NO (0)

Site Just OK

I was a member here about 6 months ago and was not all that impressed with it. The pics were good sized (full screen or larger) but they did tend to be grainy as others have noted and the lighting is sort of hit or miss. The still photography wasn't that good either for my tastes. For me, the site was too amateur. By this I mean the models were mostly average and the production not terribly good. For those who like real couple sex then I could see that this might be a turn on but I thought that the production value could be better. I didn't download very much and kept even less.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

exotics4me (361) 12-18-07  01:56am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (0)

I'm liking it

Well, we've had our debates on here about how big a limit should be on daily downloads, and so far on this one, I've been getting around 2.5 gigs per day which will equal out to around 60 gigs for 14.95 and I can definitely deal with that. I believe the limit is 3 gigs. Overall, the content for a amateur site is pretty high quality. This is a good site for those who are married and their spouse likes to watch movies with them. I will post a review in a few weeks, but for now, I'm thinking high 80s, maybe 86-88, which is really good for an amateur site under $15!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

turismo (55) 05-09-07  07:11am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (1)

Charges?

I signed up for a 30 day package, and have received a receipt for a 12 month subscription, having been charged over $100.
I am fortunate that I looked at this receipt - normally I just file them in my email folder in case there is a transaction I don't recognise on my ccard bill.
*Addition*
However, I am happy to report that I emailed the support desk and within 24 hours this problem had been rectified and the charges had been refunded in full - so it would appear that the customer service is excellent

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Pornjackker (37) 03-01-07  09:59pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)

Rare real couple porn is great!

It's always a pleasure coming back as a member to this site.
Seeing real couples have sex beats watching boring POV and
non-exclusive crap porn anyday.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

powerman (Disabled) 01-22-07  05:28pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (1)

An alterna gal site that is excellent

I like this site because the people are real and the sex is real - some couples really love each other plus the girls come in all types and all ages but they specialize in alterna geeky, nerdy, chunky, younger girls which I love! But don't let that put you off - these girls - who look like college gals really know how to get it on! Some funny things I have notice in the site - which seem to be standards there:
1. they make the guys shave their heads - lots of bald guys
2. the girls wear black chokers - which is kinda cute.
3. I think the girls smoke weed before the vid shoots because a lot of them have glassy water eyes.
4. They really like bean bags and cushy futons in the studio - everything is filmed onsite in their studios.
With the exception of several gals, you won't find center fold types here - but that is not a bad thing because the girls are cute and the sex is hot, hot, hot! There are several episodes where the girls look really preppy and WASPY who totally rock - and you know you are watching someone's 18+ daughter rebelling and getting her freak on. There is also a politeness and nice feeling about the site - a good thing for a porn site - this is a happy adult site that can actually be good for younger 18+ viewers to actually see what real sex is like between folk who dig each other not some silicone infused sex starlet (not that there is anything wrong with that.)
Go to this site - trust me you will like it! And get your toilet tissue ready.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Bacchus (30) 01-10-07  06:54pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)

Nice site

Very amateur. Nice quality of the videos. The amateur couples are really believable and seem to really enjoy each other. Updates are often.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Velvet Ecstasy Activity - Velvet Ecstasy Reviews - Velvet Ecstasy Comments - Velvet Ecstasy News

Visit Velvet Ecstasy

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  Victor (6)

Date News Title Replies News By
01-10-07 Updates 0 Victor

View All : Site News (1)


      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Velvet Ecstasy (2) 92.0 84.0

RSS Feed : Velvet Ecstasy Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.18 seconds.