| User Reviews (9) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif.
+You get access to a large part of the teen core club network for less money.
+They offer an excellent choice of young Eastern Europeans models.
+The sex scenes are well shot and the action is always hardcore. |
| Cons: |
-The site has only 202 videos which is not bad per say but they've only added 58 videos since my review of 2009.
-The content isn't dated and I think that they started using updates meant for some of their other sites.
-You get access to 14 of teen core clubs sites but only 4 are really sites with new content.
-Some of the models have similar scenes on some of their other sites so content can be a little repetitive.
-There are no search options and navigation is basically choosing a page.
-There are pics but you'd have to download them one by one. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I've always had a soft spot for try teens because these guys always manage to get hot models to do hardcore anal sex and they do a decent job of shooting the scenes. This was a constant since their early beginning but my fear is that this may now be over. I think the site and possibly the entire network is dead when it comes to new content. I've been keeping track of TCC for a long time and I started noticing that they would stop updating an older site to then start a new one which they would update for a while to then stop updating that one. They recently added hardcore youth to the network but their content is all leased material availabe on many other sites.
*The most recent try teen update should actually have been for their brand new teen anal casting site because it's the same exact setup as TAC but I guess they already had all those new videso at TAC that they elected to use one to update this site. That's nothing new since I think that they started using content meant for double teamed teens to update trye teens. Another reason why I think the network may be dead is that you always had the coming soon scenes on the site but there are none now.
*I still think that the content is well worth the join price even if they aren't updating because you get plenty for your money but it's important for any returning member to be aware that you may not have as much new content as you'd expect.
*I'm still giving the site a good score because you get access to a lot of great stuff and even the leased content could be worth it if you haven't joined a site where that stuff is. |
| Respond: |
7 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
pat362 wrote 1 review (07-31-09) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Around 200 scenes with new ones still being added regularly (it looks like a new scene roughly every month, although you get a more updates on other sites if you join through the teen core club network)
- New scenes are available at 950 x 540, but back a few years in the database stuff is somewhat lower quality and the first handful of scenes are only available as clips.
- All scenes have many large images 853px × 1,280px (no zip archive though)
- A lot of very very hot girls, including several exclusive models. All scenes are exclusive to the site and almost all scenes include deep throat and anal, with some including DP.
- Great light and camerawork, a bit static in the majority of scenes, but more dynamic recently.
- Web design is simple to a fault sometimes, but works well enough. Downloads are fast although most videos are around 700 mb. No log-outs, no time-out and no daily limits that I could find. Overall decent technical specs.
- Very hot recent updates (see bottom line f |
| Cons: |
- As I mentioned before the design of the site, as all sites in the Teen core club network, is very basic. No options to search for all scenes by one model or even search on the site itself(Aspen Richardsen is available on several of their sites for example...but which ones? and how many scenes? no way to find out)
- No options when it comes to downloading videos, past clips or full scene. No choices of SD or HD videos or different encoders. You get a download link to a video and that’s all. Not even streaming of the entire scene is available.
- A lot of the older scenes include no interview, no stripping or girls playing with themselves, just straight to the sex, very formulaic. For me that was a bit of a downside of the site.
- Somewhat on the expensive especially since nowadays several of the girls also appear on 21 sextury and other sites (they used to have some great exclusive models a few years back, not so much) |
| Bottom Line: |
Lk2fireone's review (should show one or two reviews underneath mine) really hits home for me, especially his bottom line. This is a great network with some great female models, but I always felt like the guys running the site didn't really know what to do with the hot girls. The sex always felt a bit too formulaic to me, almost boring. Girls that on other sites would be incredible become average here because all the sets looked the same, all shots were wide angle and all outfits were discarded within seconds.
That being said I was a member of this network for a very long time because they always managed to get very attractive, young girls and they always had them doing anal, DP and impressive deep throats. The hot models always sold this site for me. In fact I believe this network had several of the girls that now appear on other Russian sites (firstanalquest, 21sextury months before they did and often they do much more intense stuff here than they end up doing for other websites.)
That's the good part, now for the bad part
The updates are very sporadic with some months seeing an update every week and sometimes one scene per month or none at all (to get an idea go to teencoreclub and click to see all updates, they show a date for each new scene and you can easily judge which site is no longer maintained and which receives a lot of love. Looks like Try Teens received almost daily updates in December and since then the number of new scenes has slowed down significantly)
The webdesign is too simple for a modern network and the lack of a model page listing all the girls scenes is a huge downside. An easy way to search for type of content would also be nice. It used to be that all DP scenes went to Double Teamed Teens, Ass to Mouth had the heavy anal stuff and Try Teens got a mix of regular vaginal only/ anal sex. Nowadays it seems like all new updates get posted here and several of the more recent scenes are of the same models one boy-girl scene and one threesome with DP scene. (Stacy and Avery both come to mind, but I’m sure there are more such models.)
This strange update scheme brings me to the several dead sites the network owns. This is traditional TeenCoreClub practices. They launch a new site, update heavily for a while and abandon it in a month or so. In fact out of the older sites Try Teens is the only one still regularly active. The other site heavily updated in the network is HardcoreYouth, which while interesting is very similar to other Russian sites to the point where one can barely distinguish between a scene on Firstanalquest or Hardcoreyouth.
Now, all of that negative stuff being said on my latest subscription I was very pleasantly surprised. The style of the last handful of videos uploaded here has changed quite a bit with the most recent ones including very interesting interviews with the girls. The English is horrible and there is a lot of awkwardness, but for the first time you get a sense of who these girls are. Several of them are surprisingly outgoing and look like they are having fun. They talk about anal sex comfortably and make the whole scene a lot more interesting.
This is only applicable on the latest five or so scenes, but damn it makes the site a lot more interesting, all of a sudden the girls are more than just pretty faces who get fucked in the same standard scene. They now have about 10 minutes of solo girl, stripping and toy play. There is nothing hotter in my opinion than a girl using a dildo on her anus and then asking for a real cock and now this site has that, adding a sense of uniqueness that was seriously lacking.
The camera is also not as static as before, which could be a downside for some, but for me it looks a hell of a lot more interesting to get some close-ups of the girls face, some shots of her ass, a bit of a wide-shot. Overall the last five or so scenes on the site have been more interesting and arousing to me than twenty of the previous ones. If only they could go back in time and get Aspen to do one of those interviews before she gets a serious pounding…
I only hope that they continue with this kind of updates and don’t abandon the site anytime soon. With a few more updates this site would be a great source for young girls in hardcore action. Despite the high price when you consider all the scenes you get by joining I have to recommend Try Teens, especially if you enjoyed Firstanalquest, Teenmegaworld and other similar Russian sites. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
dracken wrote 1 review (08-02-09) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The scenes have spectacular camera angles. They keep the camera nice and zoomed out so you can see the girl's whole body and face. It's so refreshing to find a site where the camera man zooms out and lets you really get a good view of the girl's entire body.
I find the camera work on most sites annoying because most sites focus too much on closeups. It's a shame when you have a beautiful girl but never get to see her body because the camera man just wants to zoom in on her ass and vag. Not a problem on this site.
- The girls are amazing...tight, young, and natural. I didn't find a girl on this site that looked over 19. They use girls who have the look I like - thin, petite, tight bodies with perky tits.
- Spectacular lighting. They really know how to light a porn scene. They film every scene in a very brightly-lit room, so there are no annoying shadows concealing the action.
- Nice slow sex. No hardcore pounding |
| Cons: |
- The frame rate on their downloadable WMV's is 25 frames per second. This is lower than the standard 29 fps that other modern sites offer.
- The site design is fairly simplistic and out-dated. I know this is a big problem for a lot of others who have reviewed sites in this network, but it doesn't bother me that much. As long as the scenes feature hot girls and good camera work, I'm willing to overlook site design issues.
- could use more frequent updates. This site seems to only add about 2-3 scenes per month.
- unfortunately it appears in their more recent scenes they started changing their filming style to be more "gonzo" like major studios. this is a bad thing in my opinion. in their older scenes they kept the camera nice and zoomed out, but in the newer scenes they move the camera around too much waste too much time on closeups. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of the Teen Core Club network. There are various ways to access the Teen Core Club sites. The package I went with gives you access to 3 main sites for 30 bucks: tryteens.com, whiteteensblackcocks.com, and hardcoreyouth.com. They offer another set of sites that you can join separately, also for 30 bucks per month (with the other package you get their other sites like maketeengape.com, girlsgotcream.com, assteenmouth.com, etc). The package I chose offers fewer sites, but I really wanted access to whiteteensblackcocks.com, so I went with this option. You can also get access to all of the Teen Core Club network sites at once for the higher price of 50 bucks a month.
I have been intrigued by the style of the scenes from Teen Core Club for a while, and I'm glad I finally joined. What has always drawn me to their scenes are the excellent camera angles and bright lighting. I just love how they shoot their scenes. The girls are also spectacular. Very young and tight with perfect bodies. This site uses one male actor in most of the scenes, but he does a great job...keeps his dick hard and doesn't go limp. That's about all you can ask for from a male porn actor.
The older scenes from this network are unique for their great "zoomed out" camera angles....but they recently made some slight changes their filming style at this network, so their newer scenes lack the awesome camera angles that made their older stuff so great. The newer scenes are still good, but now they move the camera around too much and waste too much time on closeups (It appears they are now trying to emulate the style of other European sites like firstanalquest.com - meaning more closeup and less far shots). This sucks, because the Teen Core Club sites were to only sites that had the kind of camera work I liked. When I watch porn, I want to get a good view of girl's entire body...I don't just want to watch a closeup of her ass. The newer scenes are still good, but the camera angles just aren't quite as good as they were in their older scenes. The best scenes are the ones from around 2009-2010.
In addition to this new filming style, they have also also recently started filming on different sets. They stopped using their typical set, which used to be a white room with a low bed. In the new scenes they use a couch rather than a bed. I liked their old set better because it allowed them to get great "high" camera angles where you were looking down on the girl...so, maybe these changes are a sign that there was some kind of leadership change at the Teen Core Club network. Perhaps they are now being run by a different crew...I wonder if they are now being run by the same crew that runs various other European teen sites like firstanalquest.com, because in their recent scenes they are using the same female actors from those other sites, as well as a similar style of camera work.
The video files may not be "HD" or whatever, but they are plenty big for me. I don't like huge video files anyway, because they take up too much hard drive space. The newer scenes are 950 x 540 and are about 600-700 MB in size. This is a good size for me...big enough, but not too big.
The hot, young girls and great camera angles make the Teen Core Club network definitely worth checking out...they don't update this site very often, but there are still plenty of good scenes available. I recommend joining for just one month. That is plenty of time to check out all of the scenes here. Another note: about 60 percent of the scenes feature anal.
Despite some slight changes in their set and camera angles in their newer scenes, I still consider the scenes from Teen Core Club to be the best out there. Their scenes offer great zoomed out camera angles that other sites don't...these zoomed out camera angles really give you a good view of the girl's body, as opposed to other sites where they will just zoom in on the ass and vag the whole time. Because they are one of the few sites that utilizes good camera angles, I'm willing to overlook just about any drawbacks. If you are picky about camera angles like I am, you will appreciate what this network offers |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A nice number of fresh-faced girls (Eastern European). Many of the girls I have not seen before. Almost all the girls are ok to nice looking.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Professionally shot videos.
-Choice of streaming, or can download the video.
-Each video has an accompanying photoshoot. |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is clunky and very basic. Each page has 2 videos with thumbnails of the model. That's the layout.
-No zip file for the photosets.
-Slow update rate.
-All videos download with the same name of i01.wmv, so you have to manually rename each video, and keep a manual listing of what each video is (model name + whatever information you want).
-Videos have no title or posting date.
-Videos are straight hardcore sex with same basic script.
-No search.
-Download speed varies widely. On a single file download, using a download manager, not downloading more than 1 file, the speed can slow to 20-50 KB/s, so a 874 MB video file can take 4-10 hours or more, which is absolutely ridiculous.
-Only 1 resolution for video downloads. No choice of hi, medium or low quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Each video follows the same script:a guy walks into the small bedroom of a cute young girl, she smiles and waves, and strips, the guy makes stupid-sounding noises indicating juvenile enjoyment of what he's going to do to that luscious piece of teen meat, girl gives a blowjob, they fuck vaginal, fuck anal, more blowjob, guy shoots over girl's face and makes more noises expressing satisfaction.
The girl poses with cum over her face, smiles, waves goodbye, and leaves the room. End of video.
The videos are well lit, good lighting means good colors for skin tones, good colors for foreground and background (which is just a bed in a small
bedroom). The video is professionally shot: no jittery jumping around, clear view of the entire action, good close-up action, good shots of the
girl's face and body so you clearly see what the girl looks like. The sex is straight-forward fucking, the stunt cock seems to be enjoying himself (with all the grunts he makes), and the girl usually keeps a happy smile on her
face throughout the entire sex. The video ends with the girl smiling, waving goodbye, and leaving the room, while the guy makes happy grunting noises (which translate better in different languages than if he was speaking Russian).
The videos are high quality, the models are all teens and mainly attractive to very attractive. I wish the stunt cock didn't make all those stupid noises trying to show what a good time he was having. I wish there was more variety to the sex. These are luscious young girls, and they are
putting on a good show, but there is little variety and the sex gets to be boring in spite of the crystal clear videos and teen girls with cute or pretty faces and tight young bodies.
I can't empasize enough how clean and fresh-looking and cute these girls are: They are absolutely adorable, and they are as good as anything you will find on the cute-teen level. The girls look like they are the daughter of your next-door-neighbor, or the girls you can see at the mall or in church.
Number of videos at site: 185
Video runtime between 20-35 minutes.
Video file size about 575-790 MB.
Frame width x height: 960x540.
Total bitrate: 3145 kbps.
Each video has an accompanying photoset.
Number of photos per shoot: 140-450.
Only 1 size for each photo (no hi, medium, low).
Size of individual photos: 290 KB; 853x1280 pixels.
The photos are well-shot, much better than screen caps, but simple style, not glamor style photos.
Bottom line:
There are a large number of really cute girls. But the stupid sounds the stunt cock makes, the by-the-numbers-sex, the same setting of a small
bedroom, make the sex repetitive and less meaningful, almost boring. The videos are professionally shot, but some thought should have been given to what the guy does to the girl instead of following the same script time and
time again. |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (8 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (7) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
