| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- True to the niche
- Very pretty girls.
- Lots of content, updated regularly.
- Good quality video, and quality seems to be improving steadily.
- These girls seem to really love smooching with one another. Can't blame them for that now can we? |
| Cons: |
- Too much outdoors material. Kinis are for sunning and swimming, panties are for indoors. Or maybe I'm just crazy?
- Too many tats. Tattoos are nasty, dang it.
- Pic quality needs to be taken up a notch or two.
- *Some* of the best quality vids are DRM protected. |
| Bottom Line: |
TNV rates a higher score than its sister site, Virginal Visions, because there is so much more material here and because the vids are more varied and of higher quality, generally speaking. I think the pics are better (content-wise) at VV, but that's because I'm an old schooler when it comes to ladies' skivvies.
I ended up keeping almost 6 gigs of video and 261 zipped pic sets. The pic sets are numbered up into the 800's, so I obviously didn't get anywhere near all of them. Newer vids come in at 1000 to 1600kbps, 640x480, and run from 15 to 20 mins, and you can usually get them in one file. I don't know if 20 minutes is the 'whole' video in any particular case, but these files are big enough. Most of the pics are small, but the bigger ones are 1024x768. Despite their size they are very nice, for the most part.
I don't care for the fainting vids. There's something creepy about a guy feeling up a girl while she's out cold. I know it's fantasy, but it still bothers me.
The site is very softcore and heavy on soft-lesbianism, and only recommended to those who appreciate pretty girls getting it on in their underwear.
One more note: when I joined the site it was having technical problems: pics not opening, links not working, etc. I emailed the webmaster and by the next day everything was fixed. There was even a message posted at the site about maintenance problems which were being attended to. Good work, and good customer service. Few points extra for that. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- frequent updates every 2-3 days
- a few hd videos
- some very erotic content especially the fainting videos
-you can zip download pics, pics looks fairly good
-over 20 extra streaming cams and galleries( nothing to write home about)
- lots of content
- mostly good looking girls |
| Cons: |
- only 2 full length movies as of now. Supposedly it says more will come soon
-older videos in lots of clips
-almost all videos are in wmv video format, some avi
- site navigation is very difficult
-hardly any of the girls are big boobs. only one girl that i see with a d cup
-mostly all softcore even though there is some lesbian oral |
| Bottom Line: |
Video categories by girl, panties, nude, girl play, girl on girl, parties, fainting, long play, and special
-37 party videos , 58 long play videos ,38 by girl, 82 girl play videos , 154 girl-girl videos , 42 fainting videos , 73 panties vidoes, 8 nude videos, 2 special
-Pic categories by girl, panties, nude, girl play, girl on girl, panties
-The full videos are 403 mb and 652 mb long
-the upcoming pics and vid section is empty
-Lots of lesbian videos, a few solo, a few of a guy touching the girl which is during the fainting videos, and many other softcore vids and pics.
-The fainting videos are of a girl pretending to be passed out and a guy taking advantage of her by rubbing her body and touching and kissing her.
-site has lots of content and potential. Lots of young girls in erotic situations, and natural settings but the videos are all over the place with different clips it makes it very annoying and confusing. If they can fix that and put give every a video a full scene option and more download options this site will be Great! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All TNV Girls Activity - TNV Girls Reviews - TNV Girls Comments - TNV Girls News
