+ Mix of solo girl, extreme, & fetish sites.
+ Use network hub w/ site & update info.
+ Good quality videos, full-movie files. - Mix of exclusive & non-exclusive sites. - Update consistency varies by site. - Limited vid options, few preview thumbs.
User Reviews (3)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
$5 2 Day Trial
20+ Sites
Good Download Speed
Mediocre Search
Download Manager Compatible
Dedicated Site to Mya Pornstar
I love the Mya site, although it is not updated anymore. She is one of my favorite pornstars.
Cons:
Most sites do not update.
A lot of sites are 90% BJ
50% of videos are non exclusive. Pornstar IQ site is a waste
Mediocre Videos
There are better sites for old "DVD Box" videos. Why waste time with the ones on this site.
Bottom Line:
The content quality is average. The actual video and download are high quality. A lot of the recent updates have been for Pornstar IQ, which is not hardcore, and Swirlie Girls, which is 90% BJ. If listening to girls talk and suck is your deal this is still a mediocre site for that.
Is this site worth it? It is definitely worth $5 for the unlimited trial. Just make sure to cancel, or you will be stuck paying over $30. Pillage for 2 days once a year, and this site has served its purpose.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Decent 2 day, $5 full access trial through TBP
+ Mostly exclusive material (more than 50% I'd say)
+ No DRM
+ 5 sites have HD video
+ 13 sites to choose from
+ Network wide search function for girls, acts, etc.
Cons:
- Primarily a video site, although they advertise pics they generally aren't that good
- Quality varies from excellent to total crap
- Prechecked membership boxes on signup form
- Some of the usual 3rd party bonus sites but can't view the content (lure to sign you up only)
- Pics have no zips and all pics for the set appear on one page and individual pics come up in separate window
- Sporadic updates
Bottom Line:
This is a network that doesn't quite know where it's going. It has some more mainstream sites but then throws in some more extreme sites. The network advertises pictures but for the most part the quality is average at best while sizes go from 1600x1200 to useless small screencaps. The vids are the most consistent in quality and quantity with the standard being 640x480 wmv with decent download speeds and some HD sites tossed in.
The following are the sites I'd score in the 70's:
Iloveyouceleste; Iloveyoumya; Iloveyoumelanie; Iloveyoumadison. All sites have about 32 vids and 22 pic sets (1000x720). The vids go HD here (up to 1440x1080). All the girls are relatively attractive and they do solo, HC, toys and lesbo. The girls often appear in each other's sites so there is a lot of overlap. Each also has a pointless and brainless diary.
Attackmyass. Has pics, 35 sets, up to 1500x1000 but most are 1000x750). Vids, about 80, are average. Mostly outside content with known pornstars.
Pleasebegentle. Younger pornstar sex with 66 vids and only a couple of photosets. Vids are average but good quality.
Chopsticksluts. Nonoriginal asian porn with average quality at best.
The following, in my opinion, fall at or below the "Mendoza Line" score of 70:
Pornstarsolos: 77 average sized vids and 60 pic sets (most 800x1200). Nothing original here and some photo sets are just partials.
Asssmoothie: This I don't quite get. You see girl, girl strips, girl fires up the blender, girl lays on floor and dumps goo in her booty, girl pushes goo out the tail pipe and then it goes down the hatch. Breakfast of champions, mmmm. This is the same setup for virtually every set; all 150 vids and 52 pic sets. They have HD vids here which is a waste because if you've seen one you've seen 'em all.
Swirliegirls: High school nerd abuse? Not really, just another site I don't get. Every scene (25 pic and 25 vid which are OK) has a girl in a toilet doing some violent bj stuff and then getting her head flushed. Tries to be brutal but most of it isn't. Again, everything is the same in every scene.
Herlastfuck: This is like a slow motion car wreck, you know it's going to hurt but you just have to peek. The vids are average at best and the pics are worthless. It's all seriously ancient eastern euro women looking for some rubles after the Soviet Union collapsed and their pensions disappeared. I couldn't bring myself to wach the 86 yr old woman give a bj. Fat and nasty is the theme here.
There are a few more sites here which, again, have varying quality and pretty standard content and rate high 60's or low 70's but they don't merit any real discussion. With such a range of quality, only OK photos, and sporadic updates I couldn't score this site in the 80's. Given that so much is average, average be the score.
I did the 2 day trial and that was more than enough to take what I wanted and get out. Don't bother with the month here
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-2 day full access trial for under 5$.
-Access to 19 sites.
-Downloads are really fast
-Quality of vids is pretty good
-Some of the content is really original(see Ass Smoothie).
-They have pics and videos.
-Access to its different sites is made real easy from the main one. Does not require the user to identify himself each time.
Cons:
-Only 1/3 is exclusive. The rest is mostly, if not all, scenes taken from different dvds.
-There is no zip files for the pics.
-The most original site for this network is "Ass
Smoothie", and eventhough they advertise over 40 stars. In fact only 27 of them actually do the deed. The other are only interviewed on the
subject.
-There is no date on the material so now way to judge most of the material.
Bottom Line:
I gave this network a higher rating only because of the low cost full access trial. Let me tell you that 2 days is one day more than you'll need to download the full content of the network. The exclusive content is either solo or mostly lesbian sex. The girls are young and good looking. Their scenes are pretty hot with anal sex being the main theme. I have no problem recommending this network as long as they keep their full access trial at this low price.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (1)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
I was about to give this network a look, but just noticed that while the TBP page for the individual sites make mention of getting 18 sites with your membership, the TBP page for the network only mentions 5. I thought it might be that the network is only the smaller number of sites and that the others are just owned by the same company, but when going through the tour it mentions all 18. Any idea what's the deal here? I also checked some of the individual site names in the database and they don't come up, which seems odd since the network was given an express review. Am I missing something?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feeds : All The Hardcore Network Activity - The Hardcore Network Reviews - The Hardcore Network Comments - The Hardcore Network News
