PornUsers Newsletter!   Exclusive Discounts, News & Prizes  
E-mail:
Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Teen Models

Visit Site

Teen Models

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Young Adults
2. Glamour Models
3. Sex Toys

Sincomm Limited
1 Site Listed
Partner: Teen Model Cash

Monthly: $29.99  Our Price $24.99 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.99 (3 months, recurring)

View all Teen Models Site Facts at TBP.

88.0
Feedback History  (29)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 2
Comments 21
Review by TheBestPorn:

88.5
TBP Review

Date: 06-20-11

Type: 2.0

Duke
+  Exclusive Solo, Toy, Girl/Girl, Fetish Content, Sexy Models.
+  Excellent HD Quality Videos & High-Res Pictures w/ Zips.
-  Could Use Additional or Advanced Search/Filter Tools.
-  Somewhat Loose Teen Concept, More of a General Collection.

User Reviews (5)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
88
slutty (95) 09-25-10  02:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 09-26-10  12:01am  (Update History)
Reason: Deleted note that bonus content may not be exclusive per webmaster's response
Pros: -Good variety of attractive ladies, mostly younger euro models
-Excellent download speeds (I averaged better than 1 MB/sec)
-Good quality photography, both size and general photography
-Zip downloads of photosets in 3 sizes
-Decent navigation
-Good bonus content
-Good price with PU discount
-Decent quality videos 1280x720 3000 kbps
-No DRM
-Some download mangers work, DTA did, GetRight didn't
-Ladies are natural from what I can tell, there are some tattoos but nothing too nasty
-Decent sized collection, 153 models with most having a few picture sets and a couple of videos at time of review
-Exclusive content as best I can tell
-Good update schedule, 4 photo sets and 3 videos on average
-Decent navigation, model index and search.
Cons: -Bills through netbilling, which I don't like, but I suppose this is personal preference
-While the models are attractive, most are pretty common, it'd be nice if they had some fresh faces
-Bonus content is a bit iffy, "HD" video has the HD frame size (1280x720), but has poor bitrate (2000 kbps or less).
-As exotics stated, it'd be nice if they named the files a little better.
-Not a huge site, still could use some more growth.
-A bit heavy on toy use/insertions for my tastes
Bottom Line: This is a pretty decent site, especially for those that like toy/masturbation content from young attractive european ladies. As with many of these types of sites I'd prefer there were more stripping and eroticism rather than just cramming stuff up in there, but it is a pretty well done site. The quality of the photography is pretty good and the model quality in general is outstanding.

The bonus content is pretty hit-or-miss. While it does provide some additional hardcore content for those that are looking for that type of material, the quality of the content is generally subpar and the navigation/use of the bonus sites isn't the best.

As Cap'n stated in his comment, if you are looking for a good quality softcore site, this isn't it. This site pretty much fits the definition of midcore.

Overall I'd say this is a pretty good site, it could use some improvement and expansion, but worth joining if you are into young fit european ladies, especially if you like harder lesbian and solo material.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
94
exotics4me (439) 01-08-10  11:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
85
dracken (223) 10-17-09  05:00pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
99
xbigvmanx (14) 08-15-09  11:36am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (12 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
93
MargulisAZ (84) 07-22-09  01:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (9 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (21)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 11-20 of 21 < Previous Page - Next Page >

Denner (229) 11-23-09  07:06am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (0)

Sorry - certainly NOT in the 90 (but no review)

Joined some time ago with the 'greatest of expectations'.
But it fell down like a baloon loosing hot air...
I cancelled after a month and guess I'm not comming back (for quite a while, anyway).
The tech quality of videos and photosets are just great, but:
The scenes and the general selection of models are not so damn rare or fine. Models we've seen elsewhere and when I (rarely) go back to those saved video-files, I am - again generally - bored. Saved about 16 videos - now I deleted most and are left with three.
The site looks damn fine in design and navigation - but the joy cools off too fast.
I'm not a member anymore, so no review - but still, in my book it could never go above 80....

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

crackman (0) 11-23-09  06:41am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)

they claim real orgasms

I'm very skeptical about this, as few sites actually deliver it. Also, euro-models are noted for faking it, and the vid samples don't lend any credence to their claim.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

toosexy4u (0) 10-23-09  11:12pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

download issues

Hi,
I just joined the site and I noticed some issue to download 1920X1080 videos. I thought it was coming from my download manager, bur even without using it the problem remains. this is still an issue for the files posted June 15th, May 27th and May 20th....

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Drooler (218) 10-18-09  08:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (78), NO (0)

Don't Forget the Butt Shots!

This site has a lot going for it in image quality, but there aren't enough good butt shots. Why not have them as often as the toy play and pussy fiddling? (Like, in just about every gallery!)

I've found a scant few that ARE good at this site:
Sandra DeMarco, "Abstract" 2576890.JPG
Veronika Fasterova "Little Bo Peep" 2266784.jpg
Cherry Jul "Paradise" 2438698.JPG

In all of them, you can at least see some of the girl's face, and her rear is nice and evenly displayed. The one of Sandra DeMarco is especially riveting.

Toys AND ass. Can they co-exist for a change? Please???

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

MargulisAZ (84) 10-08-09  01:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (1)

Site keeps getting better.

They now have a new blog feature similar to Alsscan where you can hear about what's going on with shoots and see some preview pics and vids. Very nice feature and glad they added it. The content continues to be good as well. The Alisa/Lara fisting vid was unbelievable, hope there are more like that scene coming down the pipes.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

hardog (3) 09-03-09  08:43pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)

Over rated at 90+

If you base your decision to join this site because of the extra 22 sites forget about it.

The extra sites are all duplicate material relabeled from the main site. So if you think the main site is worth the $$ then best wishes.

A realistic rating based on unique content would be closer to 70 than 90++

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Drooler (218) 08-22-09  05:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (78), NO (0)

Full Thumb Previews

Here's something that reminds me of LSD or Post-It notes: It was discovered completely by accident.

As a visitor, you can preview all of the thumbs of the galleries here! That's a very nice feature that should not be overlooked!

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

ace of aces (179) 08-06-09  08:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)

question

does anyone know if the use of a downloadmanager(DAP) is possible?

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

MargulisAZ (84) 07-17-09  01:56am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (1)

Looks good from what I can see.

Was impressed with the site and plan to join soon. Was very glad to see in the preview that the site seems to have an extreme edge with fisting scenes and large toy use. I highly recommend continuing to add those kinds of updates to appease fans of that sort of thing such as myself. However, I did notice that a lot of the fisting scenes seem to be just 5 fingers to the knuckles instead of FULL fisting. Still nice, but would love to see more full fisting scenes. And please continue to have girls on the site masturbate with big fat toys. lol Will be joining soon and will write a full review.

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

jd1961 (95) 07-13-09  01:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (1)

Another Fake Teen Site

Seen many of these models for years, if they are teens you better avoid prosecution by destroying all your old sets of Eufrat, et al.

Seriously though, this is BS. False advertising. Name it "Pretend They Are Teens" or "Women In Their mid-20's to 30's Masquerading As Teens".

This is not acceptable. Totally unethical like selling water described as milk. How about a site of Transvestites named "The Most Beautifull Women In The World"?

Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Shown : 11-20 of 21 < Previous Page - Next Page >

RSS FeedsAll Teen Models Activity - Teen Models Reviews - Teen Models Comments - Teen Models News

Visit Teen Models

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  TeenModels (14), TMDirector (5), laxteen (2)

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Teen Models (1) 88.0 88.5

RSS Feed : Sincomm Limited Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.56 seconds.