Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Teen Dreams

Visit Site

Teen Dreams

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Young Adults
2. Soft Content
3. Amateur Girls

Lotza Dollars Co.
49 Sites Listed
Partner: Dream-Cash

Monthly: $19.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.95 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.95 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $89.95 (6 months, recurring)
1 Year: $159.95 (recurring)
Beware of Pre-Checked Cross-Sells! Be sure to uncheck additional offers (if undesired) to other sites when inputting your credit card info.

Details: 2 pre-checked cross-sales.


View all Teen Dreams Site Facts at TBP.

79.0
Feedback History  (56)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 3
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 2
Comments 34
Review by TheBestPorn:

87.5
TBP Review

Date: 03-05-13

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Massive teen collection.
+  High quality material.
-  Not entirely exclusive.
-  Older scenes aren't as sharp.

User Reviews (17)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 11-17 of 17 < Previous Page

Expired
88
JBDICK (20) 04-04-08  03:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
80
Schnitzel (29) 07-11-07  06:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
88
Samuel (In-Active) 07-09-07  08:46pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
55
ramscrota (12) 07-04-07  06:04am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
80
jd1961 (95) 06-12-07  10:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
60*
Fred Fife (2) 03-27-07  12:32pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
79
IKnoPorn (22) 01-15-07  11:54pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 11-17 of 17 < Previous Page
User Comments (34)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 11-20 of 34 < Previous Page - Next Page >

greg909 (2) 11-29-09  03:30pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)

Photos

So what's the actual dimensions of the photos here? And how far back in time do the "ultra HD resolution" photos go? Are they riddled with excessive false sharpening, which I seem to remember from a couple years ago.

Just wondering if it's worth a revisit, although I don't care about the videos.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (218) 10-15-09  12:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Gallery Thumb Previews for Visitors!

The webmaster got in touch with me about a problem they were having during a revision of the site (see replies). I thought that they had decided to discontinue previews of the gallery thumbs for visitors -- a great feature that I wish more sites had. Turns out that hasn't changed. Hurray!

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Capn (28) 09-07-09  01:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

Nice Site for Photosets

Yes, I know I am out of fashion for liking photosets. ;0/

This site is a recent discovery for me, & I was very pleased by the quantity of models & the overall decent quality of the photography.
The model selection streches the Teen label somewhat, with models making return visits years after their initial sets.
I like the fact that they do though. They vary from striking to average to stunning.

Navigation I find intuitive & layout good. There is also a user forum now, but it is not heavily used.
Zip sets are available, but I would advise renaming as they just have a sequential number.

I won't pass comment on the videos becuse I seldom, if ever, look at them.

I like it & will probably maintain membership for some time.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

BabyGetReal (32) 08-24-09  07:19pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)

Worst BG "Porn" Ever!

I joined this site in July, 2009. My interest is solely in BG (boy/girl) videos, not solos and not still photos. See my profile for my tastes. Anyway, I found NOTHING the least bit erotic here. The BG videos were mechanical, and the actors looked bored. The girls never had orgasms. There was no intimacy, and no creativity. Although the same was true of most videos at YoungModels and at KarupsHA, I found enough great gems at each of those (see them listed in my reviews) that my subscriptions were worthwhile. I did not save any of the videos that I downloaded from TeenDreams, and I feel that my money was wasted there.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (233) 08-19-09  09:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)

Progress

Sometimes a sudden impulse can be ok.
In this case with Teendreams - I check out this site regularly and have done that over the years. Once it was a favorite, then it went downhill - especially concerning videos of newer models.
Thanks to a relativly good preview, you can get an ok info about updates - AND it's much better now.
Just joined again - and do not regret - danm fine solo-videos of some known og some not so well known teenmodels..
Hope this is a new trend at Teendreams - but, still looking for videos of others fine teens - who are only in photosets.

And BTW: They still got currency problems when joining outside USA - but then again: write them, and they'll give you a link to EPOCH where the price is still $ 19.95 in Europe....
AND: I miss modelnames in start of movies (like in the old days - it's fine/helpfull when making archives)

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

dracken (246) 08-02-09  06:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)

Hmm...

I asked a friend, who has a subscription, about this site and he told me the content is hazzy at best.
Girls that sometimes are described as hardcore only have softcore shots and the videos lack in quality as well as quantity.

I am uncertain what to do (get a subscription or not) I remember he showed me a set where you were promised sex between a teen and an old guy but the whole set was just the guy dancing around her and kissing her...rather disappointing...is the whole site like that? Can you find some nice hardcore on here?

Thank you for your help

Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (233) 06-24-09  08:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)

New video-models, please

Teendreams has updated the preview - where they have put in a small logo to state photo or video - great!
But for months I've been browsing the site to look for all those new - and fine looking - models that has turned up with a number of photosets - BUT NO videos.
The only video-updates are seen elsewhere - or at least the models here are "old" well-known...
It just a pity.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

ByteMaster (0) 02-20-09  10:45pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)

pics, not exclusive - but with exclusive watermarks!

I've just noticed a photoset of Eva Angel published on 31st Aug 07, watermarked as exclusive to teendreams.com. The same photoset is on KarupsPC.com watermarked as licensed.

Another one :- Veronica Sanchez (Anett) published on 31st Aug 07. The same photoset was published 7th Sep 07 on Xisty.com.

Alexa (Alexis) published on 31st Aug 07. Also available on KarupsPC.com and Babelicious.com.

Barbara, published on 31st Aug 07. Also available on Babelicious.com

I understand theres are lots of licensed content floating around , but why watermark the images as EXCLUSIVE when they are not. Maybe I have interpreted the word EXCLUSIVE incorrectly, or maybe 31st August 2007 was a bad day at the teendreams office.

I think I need to go sit down in a dark room. Sorry for being such a drama queen, it just makes me a bit angry.

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (233) 02-04-09  11:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)

So long

Gotta bring this up again, sorry...
But, Teendreams: your're going down the drain!
Whatever happend to all those exclusive (sometimes licensed) videos that you guys used to put on the site - and all those exiting onces, you promised to bring up start 2009 - of new models, new exclusive solo-videos ect.
Sorry, thing do NOT ad up - the picking is less than slim - instead of fine, new solo-videos, we get a lot of old crap: lez, mostly - and some b/g...
I'm running out of membership shortly, but it'll take a lot of time before I return - sadly.
Will keep looking at your preview - and hope.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (233) 01-07-09  10:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)

Disappointed

One of my all time favorites made me a promiss (how about that)!
Well, anyway Teendreams webmaster stated - both here and in a mail to this user - that the site would really go for it from January 2009 - especially with a new amount/style of videos - and a lot of new girls.
Well, I'm certainly not that exited:
3 new solo videos in this year - and we're now at the 7.th - less than one pr. day. And then some non-exclusive b/g videos.
Had my hopes up higher, but there's not much new on that solo-girl-video front - since I last joined, alas...
Still I keep up these hopes up for the nearest future - that's why I join - again and again.
BTW: A plus: the few new solo-videos are of new and great quality!

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 11-20 of 34 < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Teen Dreams

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Teen Dreams (1) 79.0 87.5
2. My Sex Life (0) N/A 81.5
3. My All Access Pass (0) N/A 80.5
4. XXX Adult Centro (0) N/A 80.0
5. Real Tampa Swingers (0) N/A 79.5
6. Gang Bang Dee (0) N/A 78.5
7. Shemuscle Gym (0) N/A 78.0
8. Teen Girl Photos (0) N/A 74.0
9. Fuck Me Grandpa (0) N/A 73.0
10. Cock Ring Handjobs (0) N/A 72.5

View All: Company Sites (49)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.41 seconds.