| User Reviews (17) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- This network continues to have some of the best looking young girls, doing very hardcore scenes
- A lot of new faces in porn (they somehow continue to find girls that don't show up on other porn sites. I believe this site was the first to show Aspen, Isabel, Eva and a few other popular Russian girls that have since shown up many other places. Still It's nice to see them here first)
-Each site has a niche and delivers what it promises (ass to mouth, DP, etc.) But all of the sites are hardcore and there is a lot of anal and deepthroat (In many of the more recent scenes they make sure the girls make-up runs down their faces so they look all disheveled).
-The videos are pretty good quality (colors are a bit funky, but nothing too major) and you get a ton of images (but no zip files, so you have to use a site ripping tool to get all images)
-Simple navigation and layout that can be a pain in the ass, but does work okay most of the time |
| Cons: |
-Very simple navigation, no way to search for one model across all sites. Now way to preview the videos and streaming is a joke (it leads to another download page)
-The site doesn't load half the time (As I write this the main website is down, but I can log into a few of the member sites)
-They log you out at random intervals and customer support is all but non existent.
-There are no different options for videos so sometimes I have a 2 gb file to download other times it's 300mb... you never know. It sucks when you want to watch a quick video of one girl only to realize it will take an hour to download her particular scene.
-No overall network access (if you're used to 21sextury this network will disappoint).
-Sometimes the videos are too much to the point. I enjoy scenes with no long stories, but every since scene here goes from fully clothed girl to dick in her but within 5 minutes... It's like they are always racing to get it done. Not to mention they go through the same positions |
| Bottom Line: |
I believe I mentioned this before in almost all of my reviews of this network. The girls are hot and they do incredible hardcore.
The make-up team doesn't over do it so the models don't look like the average Hustler porn stars (I hate it when a site takes a cute 20 something year old and plaster her with make-up...why hide the beauty? WHY? anyhow, this site doesn't do that so kudos to them).
The light and settings aren't all pink and bubble gum cute but aren't the run of the mill porn either. In other words you won't feel like a pedophile, but you know you're not watching mainstream Hustler porn either.
Add to everything I mentioned above the fact that these girls do great deepthroats, anal, DP, now they are starting to add threesomes... overall this network should be the best out there.
Notice how I said should be... the sad truth is that their webmasters don't give a shit. The sites feel old, and in over a year of membership I haven't seen any significant updates or improvements. The downloads crash, the site auto logs you out, it won't load properly and there is no network overarching website (you have to log into each site individually and there is no way to get all scenes by one model.)
To make things worse, instead of fixing what they have the owners decided to simply add new sites that are run just the same. In one year I saw Maketeengape, cumholic, defiled18, hardcoreyouth and a handful of other sites many abandoned since, some still updating occasionally. Basically it feels like they only care about saying they have +47 sites bonus even if most have 10-15 scenes and will never be updated again.
There are also some other minor annoyances. All videos are named the same so if you batch download them you have to go back and re-name everything. Downloading images is a pain (use neodownloader to crawl their site and grab everything, trust me it's much easier than anything else) Also the images are plentiful, to the point where you get too many of them. I mean there are 20 images of the exact same scene with just a small variation (I feel like their photographer simply sets the camera on auto shutter and shoots 1000 images of each scene) I love the photos from sites like nubiles and this is just a disappointment by comparison.
Another small issue for me is the male model, who is the same in every scene. He simply doesn't look like he cares, he goes through the motions almost mechanically, he also has a huge scar on his arm and I know this is nitpicky but why can't they get another guy once in a while? The older videos have a bunch of different dudes and somehow it makes it look more interesting.
I guess since I'm complaining about the content of the videos I might as well mention that they get repetitive very fast. Don't get me wrong I love seeing different girls, but why do they all have to go through the same motions. I am at a point where I can skip into almost any video on this site and guess what will happen. Minute 10 usually means anal from behind, minute 12 the dude will jump off her and we get some ass to mouth for 3 minutes or so, then some reverse cowgirl anal... and so on...
The 21 sextury network which also brings a ton of anal videos somehow manages to make it interesting and different. Here the girls are on a boat, here they are in fishnets, here there are two of them and so on... a bit of variation would be nice. At least in the more recent videos the camera man asks the girls a few questions which seem to confuse them more than anything. I guess it's a step in the right direction nonetheless.
Oh, now you can also get the scenes on DVD so there are a bunch of banners advertising just that, I don't know who still buys DVD's but I guess that's nice? Why not download the scene and burn your own though... especially since the streaming is non-existent.
Anyhow, overall I gave the network a lower score than last time I reviewed it. The fact that one year has passed and nothing changed on their technical side is not good. It used to be that this was the bets place for hardcore young sex, but now you can look at many other networks who are growing and don't charge almost $50 for similar content ($9 for 21sextury anyone?)
Sorry to say that if they don't improve their act soon I'll have to move on... such a shame though because the girls are incredible... such a shame. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
dracken wrote 1 review (08-01-09) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Natural looking girls
-Russian and Ukrainian models
-Multiple positions
-Lots of anal sex
-Consistency to scene length and type of action
-Great camera work with multiple angles
-Tons of content
-No acting, no music, no plot, just sex |
| Cons: |
-Slow downloads (wasn't always slow)
-Some sites no longer updating
-Some scenes are brutal (very rare) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is your site if you like natural European girls and anal sex. Period. There are some other good ones, but this one has withstood the test of time. I've been a member since early 2008.
There are some things that set this site apart from others, some might consider them good and some might consider them bad. I'll be as brief as possible.
There are about 6 of their core sites still updating. Some models are only on Young Throats, but if they do hardcore you will see them usually on around 4 of the sites. To me this is a plus because you get to see a little more of your favorite models.
There is a lot of anal sex. Almost all the models do anal on almost all of the core sites, Young Throats is the exception. To me this is a good thing, some sites and scenes are anal only, but a lot of them mix it up.
Generally speaking, the scenes are pretty consistent for each site. To me this is a plus because you won't see one model doing reverse cowgirl and another not, etc. Some might consider this monotonous. You will also get several camera angles on each position. There's definitely something for everybody.
The last thing that sites this site apart from others is actually the biggest maker or deal breaker for most. This site is very realistic and videos are shot in a very natural way, a lot of the time there are less than 5 cuts in a scene. For the most part, most girls are natural looking, I only remember one model with fake breasts on the entire network. Don't expect all girls to be 10s, there are very few girls I would rate 9s or 10s, but the majority are 7s and 8s. All scenes start with a blowjob then go into sex. I would describe it as a guy who probably gets paid to fuck on film, fucking a girl who probably gets paid to fuck on film. It's not tender at all; it's not all fierce sex, but there's not really any kissing, not really any rubbing or touching, just fucking sex. Sometimes the girl is screaming in pleasure, sometimes she is screaming in agony. With that being said on some occasions the scenes are pretty brutal. These are mostly Young Throats or Double Teamed Teens scenes. I won't go into too much detail, but some are not for the faint of heart. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
There are multiple sites that are broken down into various niches, something for everyone.
Most of the models are very attractive and are used throughout the multiple sites.
Videos are very good quality that can be down loaded as a clips or the entire scene.
Well over 150 Gigs of content |
| Cons: |
There is no model directory in any of the sites. Making it difficult to find the model you like at the various sits.
The price was high for 20 sites. It was possible to join some of the individual sites for less money but that only allows access to about 16 of the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I liked the site. It was expensive but there is such a large amount of high quality material.
I recommend this site. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large network with a huge amount of content (all gonzo)
- Attractive, natural and very "girl next door" type of models from russia or eastern europe
- The lighting in each scene is good, unlike some other sites they seem to use proper technical equipment and preparation
- Especially for the anal scenes, you can tell the girls had some preparation before the shooting. Most anal scenes are very clean and the girls seem to be relaxed and not bearing pain.
- Good and reliable download speed
- Videos can be downloaded in 1 File or split in smaller sizes, pictures in single files.
- All videos as WMV |
| Cons: |
- Browsing the network is ok, but could be alot better: No search functions or model listings, just plain listing of scenes on each site
- On the start pages of each site they claim to have "HD Video". This is NOT to be confused with High Definition (720p or 1080p). The best quality they offer for videos would be 540p, which is far from real High Definition. Nevertheless, the video quality still is acceptable and better than sites offering "DVD Quality".
- The price is too expensive, especially concerning their video quality which is lower than the nowaday state of the art in porn
- They have a very "efficient" way to shoot a scene: There are very few male actors, so prepare to almost always see the same guy around. All the scenes from one site are shot in always the same room. All the rooms from all sites look very similar and are obviously furnished from low priced IKEA items.
- Their attempts to speak english are ridiculous at times.
- "Creampie" is fake |
| Bottom Line: |
Biggest drawback is the video quality, which is not High Definition, though they imply so.
Models are natural and beautiful. Scenes are well produced.
Recently added sites like "She Got Six" seem to not include self-produced content.
The whole network seems to move towards retirement with slow updates and non state of the art video quality. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Very attractive new models
Good quality pictures and videos
Some good clothed and softcore pictures as well as hardcore
No DRM or download restrictions
Professional non irritating males
Good download speed
No condoms
A lot of action and no talk
Good billing agents. I used CC Bill
but I believe Epoch is also available
Natural girls with very few plastic breasts and
unsightly tattoos
Exclusive content |
| Cons: |
Lousy/non existent customer support
Annoying log in and navigation
Expensive
Few updates
Pictures are not zipped
Relatively few girls with most appearing
on all the main sites of the network. |
| Bottom Line: |
Please note that my membership ended in August.
The network contains 15 sites but only a handful that are top rate. However the top rate ones are superb IMO. They have the freshest and newest performers who are either first timers or very new to porn. The girls are generally very attractive.
One of the advantages of these sites is the great pics of the girls starting from fully clothed and slowly stripping down. There are plenty of pictures of girls fully clothed, partially clothed, nude, then then hardcore scenes. The picture sets usually contain around 600 pics so there are around 100 fully clothed to partly clothed then around 100 posing nude followed by the hardcore stuff. I think the softcore fans would love the softcore pics here. Maybe this angle gets overlooked because the hardcore stuff is extremely hardcore.
The videos start with the guy undressing the girl and getting down to oral followed by sex straight away.
Ass Teen Mouth is just that. It contains oral followed by anal. Some of the scenes are choking, but are not particularly nasty or excessive. The picture sets still contain the softcore stripping.
The pictures and videos are nearly all the same style and usually set in the same studio. This could be considered a pro or a con. Personally I like it although it could be considered a little samey. I like it because you know what you are going to get.
Compared to some sites there are relatively few models, with quite a few appearing on different sites.
The male performers do what they are supposed to, and the cameraman keeps out of the way.The males are not irritating.
The material has the freshest faces, captured by professionals with great camerawork and bright lighting which results in high quality videos and photos. Some may consider the results to be clinical but I like that look. There is no plot and no build up in the videos. The model sits on the bed, is stripped by the male and it's straight down to action. No pretence. It's just models being paid to do a job and then getting on with it.
The best quality pictures are 853 by 1280 and the best quality videos are 960 by 540 with bitrate of 3000.
The older material has less high spec.
I think the videos and pictures look great although I understand these specs mean they are not really high definition.
Streaming is available.
Some of the sites have not been updated for a long time, and have low spec material.
Some of the girls are too skinny for my taste.
The bad stuff is that the site is run by people who couldn't care less about their customers. Communication with them is impossible. They never answered any of my emails. The log in procedure is a real pain. There are no zipped pics, which means every one has to be individually downloaded.The whole feel about the place is that it is run by people who have complete and utter contempt for their customers. It has great material let down by typical lousy management. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (11 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (16) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Teen Core Club Activity - Teen Core Club Reviews - Teen Core Club Comments - Teen Core Club News
