| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Multiple download formats:
--WMV: low, medium, high quality.
--MPG.
--MOV.
-Streaming: low, medium, high quality.
-Videos and photosets are paired.
-Content is dated.
-Screenshots and a photoset to illustrate each video.
-Zip files for photosets.
-No site timeout. Edit: there is a site timeout, but it takes hours of inactivity before you have to re-login.
-Videos are very high definition: Size 1GB+. But you get high clarity. |
| Cons: |
-Last update is dated 05 September, 2010. That's 2 months ago. Before that, they were updating about every 5 days with a video or photoset.
-Only 1 size for photos.
-Slow-loading system for viewing photos.
-The members page listing the site contents is cluttered with advertising for other sites.
-Models not listed for some videos and photosets.
-No model bios.
-Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Other search parameters are fairly useless (date added, title, top rated, most viewed). |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. About a year ago I posted a comment that joining this site made little economic sense because you only gained access to this single site, and not to any of the other sites in this network, for a price of $29.95/month. And the contents of this site, by itself, did not justify a price of $29.95/month. A year later, for the same price, you can get access to up to 10 of the sites in this network, depending on which site you join through.
The TonyBucks network is teen sites. What makes this site different from the other sites in the network? I don't know. Many of the sites are interchangeable. But as a marketing ploy, they put some videos in this site, some in a different site, and each site is supposed to have a different theme. You could put most of the TonyBucks videos into one giant site, but then it would be much harder to search through all the videos. So separating the videos into different sites makes good consumer sense, except when they rename a video clip and put it into more than one site. But the duplicated videos are not very common.
There are around 73 videos and 73 photosets at this site.
Sample data for a high definition video:
runtime: 25 minutes 14 seconds
size: 1.12 GB
frame width x height: 1600 x 900
total bitrate: 6336 kbps
frame rate: 25 frames/sec
Type of content:
Sex in most normal varieties: vaginal, anal, bj, cunnilingus.
Mainly boy-girl. Some scenes where you have "group" sex, but it's not very groupy: you have a boy-girl having sex, and maybe 1 or more other people watching them, or maybe the other people are having boy-girl sex. A limited amount of 2 guys on a single girl. A few scenes of solo female masturbation or 2-girl lesbian action. But the basic theme is one couple (boy-girl) sex.
The sex is not rough or abusive. It's friendly sex between two horny teens.
The site is your basic hardcore teen site, with high definition videos that are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good colors.
The photosets are basically a record of the video shoot. But the photos are high quality, not screencaps, and worth viewing for themselves. This site has the best quality photos of the entire network. I don't know who the photographer is, but he should have been hired to do all the photos at this network. The photos are large size (about 400-1,000 KB each).
You are not getting the glamor-style videos of X-art or the glamor photos of Met-Art. But the quality is very good at this site.
On the other hand, the sex action is your basic sex, with less roughness than at many hardcore sites, but it doesn't grab your interest, or impress you.
I'm giving this site a score of 83, for the value of the site contents, and the network contents. The site would be very expensive to join if it didn't include network access. |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Women with natural body.
Big size movie.
Sharp photograph.
Natural sex like lover. |
| Cons: |
There are not a lot of works now. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am a fan of Teen Burg.
Because the same company is producing, this site looks like. However, there are not a lot of numbers of works of these sites compared with Teen Burg. Because it is a new site, it is natural. I became a member on this site however because there is a very lovely girl.
She is Adela. She has the movie also in MY Sexy Kittens and ATK Natural & Hariy. However, she in the movie on this site is lovelier than the movie on other sites. She kisses a man named Kristof in kitchen. She makes the stain of the cunt juice in the panty. It can be seen in the photograph.
I thought that photographers were having her relax. It is wonderful. I saw a lot of movies of excessive production on other tedious sites in the past. I do not want to see them any longer. There are her four movies. I like all. There is a scene to which she recollects past sex in the movie. I think that it is an edit of elaborate. I had good feeling.
Additionally, Izabella is lovely.
Her sex is intense. However, it is not unnatural. It is very good.
It is recommended to become the member before it becomes a member on this site if you are not a member of Teen Burg.
If you like Teen Burg, and girls on this site like it, this site is recommended. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Teenamite Activity - Teenamite Reviews - Teenamite Comments - Teenamite News
