| User Reviews (3) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Very broad range of content (more or less there is something for everyone): Bondage, BBW, Gangbanging, breasts of all sizes, trannys, pissing, dogging, anal, oral, (almost) whatever your perversion
- Large quantity of content
- Some bonus content (2 sites), ChickPass and Alanna Thomas' Nymphos Network
- No DRM/Most videos are downloadable
- Content is largely exclusive
- Frequent updates site wide
- Models are (often) contactable
- Content is (almost all) truly Amateur which is good. |
| Cons: |
- Relatively expensive
- Navigation is clumsy
- There are a lot of "dormant" models, i.e. they are not updating any more
- Quality is highly variable
- Some media is only available streaming :(
- Site is quite inconsistent and really needs to be redesigned
- Links are often repeated several times on a "category" page (more a poor design feature)
- Pictures have to be downloaded individually, no zipped sets
- Site is effectively split into two, TAC and TAC2 (not a real sign of honesty)
- Download speed isn't brilliant
- You cannot download more than 6 files at once without one of them getting truncated
- You have to reload the page you are downloading from before downloading more files if you have been idle for some time. This is frustrating and inconvenient as often when you reload the page you will be returned to page 1 of however many. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site you would sign up for for a specific model, and then explore for a bit. I signed up for a specific model, and then spent quite a while bumbling all over the place in no particular order.
There are a number of rather good, and high quality sub-sites- Curvy Claire for one, JaneyWeb, Barby etc. However there are many sites which have been put up, and then have been left to accumulate digital dust.
TAC is very much like its neibour TAC2, and one is often encouraged to go over the TAC2 to have a look at something and one could easily forget that one does not have a login and password to the other site which can get frustrating. You are encouraged to sign up for both early on. This is probably the best policy, however it is more expensive. The package of TAC and TAC2 being ~$45 for 30 days, I chose to go with 60 days at ~$70 to make sure I got sufficient bang for my buck.
The bonus content sites are ok, ChickPass is a good and large source of amateur content however it is majorly poorly designed. Nymphos Network is effectively a blog, and while far more modern and better designed than the other sites on this network over all, It is irritating to navigate, effectively you need to know what you are looking for or you browse by tags.
I have found a number of models who I like, however over all, I think that the value for money is not really here on this site.
The bottom line is this: This is a bit of an expensive time-consuming and inconvenient wank. Sign up for one billing cycle. Download all you can. Leave. Admittedly this is my opinion mainly because I signed up for BBW content, and the BBW content, while reasonable, was somewhat limited. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Fairly extensive range of content
- Good cross section of different women
- No DRM
- Good d/l speed |
| Cons: |
- Navigation
- Network design
- Range of recent content |
| Bottom Line: |
TAC, is a network of amateur porn stars. Basically women who could live next door to you who upload their own content.
As such you can find different and at times refreshing content in different situations ranging from cute sets up to bukkake gangbangs.
But (and this you'll know if you read other reviews of mine) I'm heading rapidly to my biggest set of bugbears with amateur portals and many porn sites in general.
The webmasters at TAC are sorely letting the side down. They appear to be afflicted by the same level of laziness or apathy that is sweeping through porn sites 3yr old+ across the whole of cyberspace.
The design is tired, navigation is infuriating thanks to quite possibly the worst breakdown of categories that I have ever seen, no tags or a search function!!!! That's abysmal.
The individual sites vary in quality according to age and willing of the models so I'll not get too bogged down with content and instead stick with the appeal of the network and management.
There are very few updates for a network style of site, this is because I can find very few newer models. And I think I know why; and it points straight back to the design and implementation of the main portal.
If me and my wife were to launch a swing site we'd probably want to shelter of a network such as TAC as we are no webmasters by any stretch of the imagination.
But we wouldn't in a million years choose TAC to host our content. It looks neglected, disinterested and don't feel that we would be able to promote our work enough.
MANAGERS OF TAC, hear your public speak! Until you modernise your portal you are stopping content providers from signing up and keeping your revenue down. You have the potential of a great network, but not until you get your arses in gear and breathe life back into your project. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All TAC Amateurs Activity - TAC Amateurs Reviews - TAC Amateurs Comments - TAC Amateurs News
