| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A lot of content. The membership offers you access to 25 websites (sweet auditions, bukkakepiss, french fisting, max hardcore, angel videos etc. Most of the sites are hardcore and most of the content is of pretty hot girls) Each website has around 10-20 models minimum each one with anywhere from 1 to 5 videos and just as many photo shoots. Add some bonus galleries (both video and photos) and dvd content and you have quite a decent network.
-A lot of cute models/hot scenes and a lot of hardcore scenes (the camera man/interview person was a woman which made the whole scenes somehow much more hot...in fact the interviews I saw on this site are some of the best I have ever experienced...but then again I love interviews.)
- Videos come in various resolutions and types (wmv, quicktime, mpg) and some download very fast. However, the quality of many videos is sub-par. I guess that makes them smaller and easier to download but still....
- Streaming worked very well for me. |
| Cons: |
- The biggest problem I had with this network was it's inconsistency. Some sites had poor quality videos (Athens Angels come to mind, with fuzzy videos at poor quality) While others have up to 640x480. The models are also rather random, there are some chubby girls and some mature women but you have to manually look for them; most of the models are teens or teen-looking. Finally some sites had easy navigation while others made you dig for the content.
- Speaking of navigation it could also be improved. It was a bit buggy at times with pages loading the same models twice, and some sites not letting me use the open in new tab option which made my navigation very hard...
- Finally, the download speed for me was very bad and many of the videos crashed before they were done. However since my connection is very poor right now so I am not going to take points away for it. Just be warned that a spotty connection can result in every video reaching 0 bytes after it's about 25% done. |
| Bottom Line: |
The network has a lot of issues. Most videos are available only in pieces. The fact that there is no real way to search for chubby or mature models (or any kind of models in fact) in the whole network also makes the navigation unpleasant. Sure we have a search model by name but unless you know the girl's stage name this is not really useful. The previews for videos are very poor quality (they reminded me of 70's porn shots). There is no zipped archive for photos and so on...You get the idea, the network could be better.
I personally also had issues downloading videos but I blame that on my poor internet connection.
However, on the plus side I had never seen so many pee, anal and group sex scenes of hot women and teenagers. The female cameraman was also a nice change, but there are also videos of sex without any back story if you prefer that. Overall a nice variety of hardcore porn (including a bunch of Max Hardcore videos which are pretty good if you like female abuse and ridiculous anal)
All and all the network has good content, which can be very interesting if you are into water sports, anal, or bukakke (however it's spelled) but the navigation and user features could be improved. Worth checking out and if you like the Max Hardcore style of videos or the Pierre Woodman. For me it worked for others the issues might be too much to deal with. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Sweet Members Activity - Sweet Members Reviews - Sweet Members Comments - Sweet Members News
