*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (9)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Just to further Denner's last comment about this site that still has a ton of potential. They have improved their update schedule a great deal. You now get a video and photo set every week, there for awhile, you were lucky to get one video per month. With the added site discount, if you haven't joined it, it has some really good content from years past, pretty softcore for the most part, but the improved update schedule and lower price at least shows they are moving in the right direction.
Joined the much discussed Super Glam - but only because exotics4me hinted a cheaper way via the Rabbit ($19.95) and not the outrageous normal price of over 38 bucks. (thanks, exotics4me)
But very disapoiting in updates and amount of content - especially in regards to their heavy promotions og promisses. I don't bother with a review, but just some short info:
Only 15 video-updates in 2008
ONLY 23 photoset-updates in 2008
And, man - we're alomst in the middle of the year!
(But, Drooler: the zip works ok, now)
They have a tag called "Future Updates": It's empty
The videos are still only in mpg - and certainly NOT in todays quality standard - not even the newer videos
Just for the heck of it.
We've had some cons. about this site - with good reason. (Do not freak out now, Drooler)
But I still wonder: Are they getting any better since our discussions in late summer/fall last year!......or is it still the same old, yeah, some kind of bullshit regarding this probably most persistent promoted sites of all.
Reason I ask the PUs is I stumbled over some fine eateuropean escort-girls (site-wise) and they all have their videos/photos here - maybe again bullshit. Bottom line: Anybody been here lately?
Just joined SuperGlam, figuring that by now there would be enough content buildup to be worth it.
-There are no more than 23 really new photo galleries since June 22, 2007. Twenty-three. Everything else is older, redated content.
-There's only one size photo on this site: 1536px. That includes all of the new material. Anyone who tells you differently is not telling you what is so. The links to 1000, 2000, and 4000 px mean NOTHING.
-The zips don't work. Download them, and they ask you for a password, which you don't have, to open them.
I've had it. Sick of lies, sick of tricks, sick the cynical shits that rip all of us off.
But it's not enough to complain. It's time to do what some might call "overreacting," and feel free to say so if you like. I don't care. I'm gone. Completely. From signing up for ANY more sites for the next 9 months.
I've just read through the 3rd follow-up reviews at TBP, dated Sept. 04. They tell me that SuperGlam has added (get this) 7 models over the past 7 months, and the number of photos has gone up by about 5,000 in that time (which sounds good). But Vanessa even said that they'd increased to 1536px in photo size, as if that's news. It's been the large size for most of the site's life -- for years now!
Other than such general figures, the follow-up review is the usual TBP "happy talk" about how the site continues to "improve." I'd read that blather back in Feb. (the 2nd follow-up review), joined, and found that it had hardly improved AT ALL in terms of content. Hadn't added much at all for MONTHS!
It's become clear to me that you don't spend a lot of time on at least some of the sites that you follow-up review. You can make all of the claims you wish to the contrary, but I know better.
SuperGlam itself still offers no tour worth jack squat, and they've raised the price to nearly $40! Let me think abou-- I'll pass!
One more thing. I've found it's much easier to put my trust in reviews done by the best of the PU reviewers. I take the TBP reviews less seriously. This follow-up is but one example of why.
Fellow PU's: Got a link as a former member of Superglam where they offer a free membership.
They state, that the first 111 (onehundredeleven) using this link to join Superglam can get three month free access.
I tried it the minute, I received the mail - but all I got from this link was an ordenary join up for $29.95.
I'm fed up with hoaxs like this - and by the way - this Superglam site are really "busy bees" trying to gain members/money.
I've been to that site a couple of times - no big deal....
About 10 days ago, got an email from SuperGlam for a $19.90 membership, so I rejoined.
It's being revamped, apparently by the same people who do Babelicious. But unlike at Babelicious -- a great site -- the pic sizes are all 1536 at the long end, just like in the old SuperGlam, even though they've set up the links for a variety of pic sizes (1000, 2000, and 4000 px). And they say they'll be doing 3000px, but when they don't say.
Confusing? Yes. It seems like one of those situations in which different people have different ideas as they all work on the same project.
VERY LITTLE new content has been added since my last join ended mid-October last year -- that's six months ago! And future updates are nil.
So what's up with that, SuperGlam? And thanks for the cheaper membership offer. What a deal!
Anyone else care to pony up redevelopment capital for a site redux that's not ready yet?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.