Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Super Glam

Visit Site
Super Glam Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Glamour Models
2. European Girls
3. Soft Content

ONECOM BV
1 Site Listed
Partner: Glam Cash

Monthly: $19.90 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $79.95 (6 months, non-recurring)

Special Price! The Monthly membership cost is a special low price option available to our users. The regular price is $38.80.


View all Super Glam Site Facts at TBP.

69.0
Feedback History  (14)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 9
Review by TheBestPorn:

78.0
TBP Review

Date: 11-08-09

Type: 2.0

Vanessa
+  Exclusive Euro Softcore, Toy Play & Girl-Girl Content.
+  Quality Is Pretty Good.
-  Site No Longer Appears To Be Updating.
-  Video Quality Ranges And Could Use An Update.

User Reviews (4)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
69
xbigvmanx (20) 12-31-09  03:06pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great Photo Quality
Hot Euro models
Decent price of 19.95 (used with coupon)
Most content are exclusive
Cons: -No more updates
-only 100+ plus models
-Not download friendly
-No HD videos
-Videos SDV quality
-No bonuses worth checking

STAY THE HELL AWAY FROM THIS WEBSITE IT WILL ROB YOU BLIND
Bottom Line: STAY THE HELL AWAY FROM THIS WEBSITE IT WILL ROB YOU BLIND. I mean what I say on this. I was tricked when I purchased my subscription. I went and purchased the 80 dollar subscription i would already taken the whole website before then. I should of done more research when I first signed on. I guess what pulled me hook line and sinker because I had an obsession for European porn models. I figured from the ads the hype was legit and believe me don't believe the hype. The website is similar in design to sexy-babestv.com or babelicious.com to any who subscribe.
The photo quality comes in three different pixel size 1000, 2000, and 4000 however the 4000 isn't as big as I thought it would be which is unusual when I download the zip files. Downloading zip files is troublesome at times. It would give you the option of which of the pix sizes to download but you would have to do this twice on internet exploer because of the irritating pop-upblocker. Even if I disabled it would still block the download for the next gallery and you would have to approve for download every time. Firefox wouldn't allow me to route the file to its destination or try to edit the name of the file. The last update to this website was November 9, of this year. Sounds to me the webmaster got broke or something.
The videos are not too bad. The quality are SDV type. There are about about 260 videos length and quality tend to vary 10-12 minutes. File sizes 100-200 mb MPEG format. Mostly masturbation and lesbian action. No Hardcore action. Unfortunately there is no HD movies to be had. The only bonus content are some live show feeds and HD streams provided by Silver Sinema.
I think the only saving grace to this website is that the content is exclusive. You would think it was copied from some other website but for a porn veteran like me the pictures and videos are not copied from anywhere else.
If you plan to purchase a subscription, I would only recommend it for 1 month subscription of 19.95 (find a coupon at hoes.com or somewhere else). You can download the entire website within that time frame. Honestly you can find other sites better then this one.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

Active
69
IKnoPorn (22) 07-07-08  09:03pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Excellent quality photos
+ A few very hot models
+ Possibly exclusive content
+ Streaming bonus content section (although the section is small)
+ No music in the videos
+ Good TBP price of $19.90, but arguably that's still too expensive
Cons: - Not alot of models
- Not alot of content
- Base price of $39.95 (without TBP discount) is outrageously too expensive
- Videos are low resolution by today's standards
- MPG video format only
- Many gaps in the alphabetical model index, many letters have zero models (I'm not just talking 'Q' or 'X' here, but letters like 'F' and 'P'. 'D', 'G', and 'R' only have 1 model each).
- Slow downloads
- Not download manager friendly
- Updates infrequently, 1x to 2x per month
- Interview videos are repetitive and uninspired, they ask each model the same questions ("Who do you cook for at home?") and the model never looks at the camera. Sophie Moone's interview is dubbed! A huge disappointment, I've always wondered what her voice was like.
Bottom Line: I joined this site in spite of reading others reviews here, mainly because I was after collector's level content of Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine, Brittany Stone, and Nikki Summers. Well, that's about what I got, but not much else.

Read the intro page carefully - they state they have "63 SUPERGLAM GIRLS - 3510 VIDEOS - 157459 PICTURES" - I could have sworn it said more models at first. I believe the "SUPERGLAM GIRLS" count is correct, but I am skeptical of the other numbers. The average model has 3 videos, so just do the math and that's only 189 videos. But it's not just the numbers that don't add up with this site.

The amount of content is much smaller than I thought from the preview pages. You could easily clean this site out in an afternoon, if the download speeds were better. I had alot of trouble with "DownThemAll" + Firefox, I had to set max chunks to 1 (which cripples performance) and could only queue up the video sets. The photo sets, which are by far their best offering, have to be painstakingly downloaded the old fashioned way, one ZIP file at a time. On the plus side, they do offer multiple photo formats, with the highest being 4000px - looking at these, they do look great, but in reality they are nowhere near this resolution.

Overall an extremely disappointing site that I should have paid more attention to other's reviews.

Bottom line: Excellent photo sets, low res vids, poor site performance, too little content for the money.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
84
exotics4me (361) 06-17-07  06:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
89
DivBZero (13) 02-21-07  01:16pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (9)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

GCode (77) 08-10-09  04:40pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

So what's the verdict?

I've heard a lot of making progress, getting better, etc etc. But, not a lot of recent reviews or an actual yea or ney.

So, if anyone can voice their opinion on the site, THUMBS UP or THUMBS DOWN?

Thanks.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

exotics4me (361) 03-02-09  01:52pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (0)

Definitely making forward progress

Just to further Denner's last comment about this site that still has a ton of potential. They have improved their update schedule a great deal. You now get a video and photo set every week, there for awhile, you were lucky to get one video per month. With the added site discount, if you haven't joined it, it has some really good content from years past, pretty softcore for the most part, but the improved update schedule and lower price at least shows they are moving in the right direction.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (200) 06-07-08  03:29am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)

Still trying, but.....

Ok, now Super Glam also has a price of $19.90 here at TBP - I joined for that price via the Rabbit a couple of weeks ago.

Normal price: 34.95
But even at this new bargain I still consider Super Glam a joke and an insult to pornusers.
Just look at the updates compared to major sites:

Videos added:
April 27 - May 28 - June 7

Photosets:
May 6 - May 24 - June 7

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (200) 05-20-08  03:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)

Not much new here!

Joined the much discussed Super Glam - but only because exotics4me hinted a cheaper way via the Rabbit ($19.95) and not the outrageous normal price of over 38 bucks. (thanks, exotics4me)

But very disapoiting in updates and amount of content - especially in regards to their heavy promotions og promisses. I don't bother with a review, but just some short info:

Only 15 video-updates in 2008
ONLY 23 photoset-updates in 2008
And, man - we're alomst in the middle of the year!
(But, Drooler: the zip works ok, now)
They have a tag called "Future Updates": It's empty

The videos are still only in mpg - and certainly NOT in todays quality standard - not even the newer videos

Glad I did not waste 38 bucks here....

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (200) 05-17-08  08:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)

What's new?

Just for the heck of it.
We've had some cons. about this site - with good reason. (Do not freak out now, Drooler)
But I still wonder: Are they getting any better since our discussions in late summer/fall last year!......or is it still the same old, yeah, some kind of bullshit regarding this probably most persistent promoted sites of all.
Reason I ask the PUs is I stumbled over some fine eateuropean escort-girls (site-wise) and they all have their videos/photos here - maybe again bullshit. Bottom line: Anybody been here lately?

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 10-17-07  01:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Just joined SuperGlam, figuring that by now there would be enough content buildup to be worth it.

WRONG!

-There are no more than 23 really new photo galleries since June 22, 2007. Twenty-three. Everything else is older, redated content.
-There's only one size photo on this site: 1536px. That includes all of the new material. Anyone who tells you differently is not telling you what is so. The links to 1000, 2000, and 4000 px mean NOTHING.
-The zips don't work. Download them, and they ask you for a password, which you don't have, to open them.

I've had it. Sick of lies, sick of tricks, sick the cynical shits that rip all of us off.

But it's not enough to complain. It's time to do what some might call "overreacting," and feel free to say so if you like. I don't care. I'm gone. Completely. From signing up for ANY more sites for the next 9 months.

It's my way of protesting this kind of crap.

See you in July 2008!

Respond: 14 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 09-20-07  02:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

TBP Follow-up review

I've just read through the 3rd follow-up reviews at TBP, dated Sept. 04. They tell me that SuperGlam has added (get this) 7 models over the past 7 months, and the number of photos has gone up by about 5,000 in that time (which sounds good). But Vanessa even said that they'd increased to 1536px in photo size, as if that's news. It's been the large size for most of the site's life -- for years now!

Other than such general figures, the follow-up review is the usual TBP "happy talk" about how the site continues to "improve." I'd read that blather back in Feb. (the 2nd follow-up review), joined, and found that it had hardly improved AT ALL in terms of content. Hadn't added much at all for MONTHS!

It's become clear to me that you don't spend a lot of time on at least some of the sites that you follow-up review. You can make all of the claims you wish to the contrary, but I know better.

SuperGlam itself still offers no tour worth jack squat, and they've raised the price to nearly $40! Let me think abou-- I'll pass!

One more thing. I've found it's much easier to put my trust in reviews done by the best of the PU reviewers. I take the TBP reviews less seriously. This follow-up is but one example of why.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Denner (200) 09-17-07  08:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (60), NO (0)

Another Free or not

Free?????????? - No way!

Fellow PU's: Got a link as a former member of Superglam where they offer a free membership.

They state, that the first 111 (onehundredeleven) using this link to join Superglam can get three month free access.
I tried it the minute, I received the mail - but all I got from this link was an ordenary join up for $29.95.

I'm fed up with hoaxs like this - and by the way - this Superglam site are really "busy bees" trying to gain members/money.
I've been to that site a couple of times - no big deal....

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (192) 04-28-07  05:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)

An update on SuperGlam

About 10 days ago, got an email from SuperGlam for a $19.90 membership, so I rejoined.

It's being revamped, apparently by the same people who do Babelicious. But unlike at Babelicious -- a great site -- the pic sizes are all 1536 at the long end, just like in the old SuperGlam, even though they've set up the links for a variety of pic sizes (1000, 2000, and 4000 px). And they say they'll be doing 3000px, but when they don't say.

Confusing? Yes. It seems like one of those situations in which different people have different ideas as they all work on the same project.

VERY LITTLE new content has been added since my last join ended mid-October last year -- that's six months ago! And future updates are nil.

So what's up with that, SuperGlam? And thanks for the cheaper membership offer. What a deal!

Anyone else care to pony up redevelopment capital for a site redux that's not ready yet?

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll Super Glam Activity - Super Glam Reviews - Super Glam Comments - Super Glam News

Visit Super Glam

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Super Glam (2) 69.0 78.0

RSS Feed : ONECOM BV Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.17 seconds.