+ European Hardcore Party/Drinking Groupsex, Long Episodes.
+ High-Quality Video Files Available, Numerous Formats.
- Scene Parts/Segments Only, Large Files, Video Quality Varies.
- Average Sized Site, No Update Schedule/Info Provided.
User Reviews (6)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Girls (for the most part) don't look like porn stars.
Bonus sites with WTF pass.
Unbelievably bad camera work on the majority of videos.
Photo albums are often incomplete AND redundant.
Often videos contain girls that don't get naked or only topless.
Distracting and annoying subtitles and MOVING watermarks.
Other peoples niche chocolate in my porn peanut butter.
STUDENT SEX PARTIES has every single problem that modern porn is guilty of:a propensity to try to satisfy too many niches that should NOT be part of porn sought by the demographic that seeks orgies: I would say MOST of this demographic do not want to see CFNM,(clothed females naked males)urination or worse.(seriously, what kind of a twisted twist wants to see girls getting "sick" in porn) We want to see naked girls! Often girls don't even get naked, or the camera is at an angle so we only see men's butts. Not a pretty sight.Also,girl's stripping (one of the most erotic ingredients to good porn) is often either completely missing, avoided or badly botched in extreme close-ups. Speaking of camera work. Hire a professional please! None of their "frat boys" seem to know a thing about head space or framing and the constant attention-span whiplashes often made me sea sick. In some videos it was so bad, it ruined the video and I deleted it. The ONLY time the camera seemed to stop for any period and hold still, was for the many, many, many blow jobs. Then there is the distracting subtitles (who cares what inane things they say! And trust me, they say quite a plethora of inanities)and ESPECIALLY the site's little MOVING postmark that mar EVERY single video. The downloads were incredibly slow.(one site took me 2 months to get through-often wasting hours only to find that that video could not download and I had to try a different download option) As to the rest of the "bonus" sites. Only ONE reason I even bothered to look at any of them: to find girls that didn't get naked in Student Sex Parties for "completion." Sometimes I did. Many times I was frustrated. Oh,one more thing:WTF stop insisting these parties are real and not staged with porn actors. Stop insulting our intelligence so you can get away with all of the stupidity above! Overall, a few decent picture sets and video, but A LOT of garbage to wade through. If you are OCD like me and a completest, you will have many hours editing the videos to subtract the redundant, gross and annoying watermarks.Not worth more than a month of your time.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (8)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
This site looks very interesting and I generally like the fooling around and such so the slow starts on scenes are ok to me. What I'd like to know is how are the video resolutions in scenes? Are the new ones 720p, 1080p or something else? Are the old ones viewable and how old are they actually?
With regard to elephant's comment they did add hardfucktales to the network, however there are only 11 scenes. Gangbang isn't really my niche so I haven't downloaded any of the scenes, but based on the file sizes it appears as though this site doesn't suffer from the same excessively long scene problem as the other sites on this network. Although there are only 11 scenes.
I just found their new site, which at least looks more interesting because they actually looks to be more action, still I've not joined so it might be a build up for a half an hour and hour I don't know, I don't mind a bit of a build up but some of the SSP vids take it too far and it becomes annoying cause hard drive space is short and having vids nearly 2GB and taking up all that room with only sex right at the end is annoying I find. If they are doing something remotely sexy its fair enough I can accept it.
Light is horrible, resolution is low, camera work really bad. You can see beautiful pictures, but inside quality is very low. I've seen one clip 5 hours long, but ĦĦactors talk about 3 hours!!. Sorry but I think this web is not worth, really expensive AND low quality
Some stunning babes on this site but variable quality.avi files and they take a lifetime to d/l, sometimes not even managing it-bit pricey if you ask me.Quite a few of the models will be familiar to those of you who have trawled through the eastern european web sites.1 month too long for me.
Be aware of that the company of this site starts new web sites and then update only a few times (maybe 10 updates). Then there are no more updates and sometimes the update dates are changed so it would appear that is has been recent updates. This site has not updated for long time.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.