Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Student Sex Parties

Visit Site

Student Sex Parties

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Parties and Drinking
2. Group Sex
3. Hardcore Sex

Serious Partners Co.
53 Sites Listed
Partner: Serious Partners

Trial: $1.00 Limited Access (2 days, recurs $34.95/mo.)
Monthly: $34.95  Our Price $19.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
Beware of Pre-Checked Cross-Sells! Be sure to uncheck additional offers (if undesired) to other sites when inputting your credit card info.


View all Student Sex Parties Site Facts at TBP.

N/A
Feedback History  (15)

Active Reviews 0
Newbie Reviews 2
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 8
Review by TheBestPorn:

80.0
TBP Review

Date: 03-27-12

Type: 2.0

Duke
+  European Hardcore Party/Drinking Groupsex, Long Episodes.
+  High-Quality Video Files Available, Numerous Formats.
-  Scene Parts/Segments Only, Large Files, Video Quality Varies.
-  Average Sized Site, No Update Schedule/Info Provided.

User Reviews (6)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Newbie
60*
Jaimes (3) 11-10-13  01:48pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Cute girls.
Girls (for the most part) don't look like porn stars.
Exclusive content.
Bonus sites with WTF pass.
Cons: Unbelievably bad camera work on the majority of videos.
Photo albums are often incomplete AND redundant.
Often videos contain girls that don't get naked or only topless.
Distracting and annoying subtitles and MOVING watermarks.
Other peoples niche chocolate in my porn peanut butter.
Bottom Line: STUDENT SEX PARTIES has every single problem that modern porn is guilty of:a propensity to try to satisfy too many niches that should NOT be part of porn sought by the demographic that seeks orgies: I would say MOST of this demographic do not want to see CFNM,(clothed females naked males)urination or worse.(seriously, what kind of a twisted twist wants to see girls getting "sick" in porn) We want to see naked girls! Often girls don't even get naked, or the camera is at an angle so we only see men's butts. Not a pretty sight.Also,girl's stripping (one of the most erotic ingredients to good porn) is often either completely missing, avoided or badly botched in extreme close-ups. Speaking of camera work. Hire a professional please! None of their "frat boys" seem to know a thing about head space or framing and the constant attention-span whiplashes often made me sea sick. In some videos it was so bad, it ruined the video and I deleted it. The ONLY time the camera seemed to stop for any period and hold still, was for the many, many, many blow jobs. Then there is the distracting subtitles (who cares what inane things they say! And trust me, they say quite a plethora of inanities)and ESPECIALLY the site's little MOVING postmark that mar EVERY single video. The downloads were incredibly slow.(one site took me 2 months to get through-often wasting hours only to find that that video could not download and I had to try a different download option) As to the rest of the "bonus" sites. Only ONE reason I even bothered to look at any of them: to find girls that didn't get naked in Student Sex Parties for "completion." Sometimes I did. Many times I was frustrated. Oh,one more thing:WTF stop insisting these parties are real and not staged with porn actors. Stop insulting our intelligence so you can get away with all of the stupidity above! Overall, a few decent picture sets and video, but A LOT of garbage to wade through. If you are OCD like me and a completest, you will have many hours editing the videos to subtract the redundant, gross and annoying watermarks.Not worth more than a month of your time.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
90*
Bolingbroke (2) 11-11-11  07:45am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
83
elephant (64) 09-04-11  07:15am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
85
RustyJ (145) 02-09-11  07:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (6 Replies)

Expired
75
pat362 (365) 12-31-10  10:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies)

Expired
74
slutty (111) 12-04-10  11:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (8)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

RustyJ (145) 02-02-11  07:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

Site little slow?

What kind of download speeds have you managed to get out of this site? Mine seem to take ages sometimes...

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RustyJ (145) 12-05-10  05:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

How are the older videos?

This site looks very interesting and I generally like the fooling around and such so the slow starts on scenes are ok to me. What I'd like to know is how are the video resolutions in scenes? Are the new ones 720p, 1080p or something else? Are the old ones viewable and how old are they actually?

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

slutty (111) 11-28-10  12:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)

Hardfucktales is on network

With regard to elephant's comment they did add hardfucktales to the network, however there are only 11 scenes. Gangbang isn't really my niche so I haven't downloaded any of the scenes, but based on the file sizes it appears as though this site doesn't suffer from the same excessively long scene problem as the other sites on this network. Although there are only 11 scenes.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

elephant (64) 09-26-10  01:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)

HardFuckTales needs adding to the network

I just found their new site, which at least looks more interesting because they actually looks to be more action, still I've not joined so it might be a build up for a half an hour and hour I don't know, I don't mind a bit of a build up but some of the SSP vids take it too far and it becomes annoying cause hard drive space is short and having vids nearly 2GB and taking up all that room with only sex right at the end is annoying I find. If they are doing something remotely sexy its fair enough I can accept it.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

SUKUMVIT (0) 03-28-10  02:59am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)

LOW QUALITY

Light is horrible, resolution is low, camera work really bad. You can see beautiful pictures, but inside quality is very low. I've seen one clip 5 hours long, but ĦĦactors talk about 3 hours!!. Sorry but I think this web is not worth, really expensive AND low quality

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

jutter (0) 02-05-10  06:11am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)

OK if you have the spare cash

Some stunning babes on this site but variable quality.avi files and they take a lifetime to d/l, sometimes not even managing it-bit pricey if you ask me.Quite a few of the models will be familiar to those of you who have trawled through the eastern european web sites.1 month too long for me.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

jeppegutt (0) 01-30-10  06:29am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)

more updates now

Lately they have started to update this site more.

But I have problems with viewing the new videos. They are not clear and contains a lot of colours when i try to play them in windows media player or divx player (avi-files).

I tried to write to site support and got a link to the codes required. I installed a new version of these but it did not help!
So, I have to cancel the membership because of this.

new videos are also quite dark and not good picture quality!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

jeppegutt (0) 02-28-07  03:58am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)

updates

Be aware of that the company of this site starts new web sites and then update only a few times (maybe 10 updates). Then there are no more updates and sometimes the update dates are changed so it would appear that is has been recent updates. This site has not updated for long time.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Student Sex Parties

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. The Classic Porn (2) 74.0 81.0
2. Upskirt Collection (0) N/A 83.0
3. 100 Upskirts (0) N/A 82.0
4. My Pickup Girls (0) N/A 81.0
5. HQ Upskirt (0) N/A 80.5
6. Private Home Clips (0) N/A 80.0
7. Student Sex Parties (0) N/A 80.0
8. Cash For Sex Tape (0) N/A 79.0
9. Hentai Video World (0) N/A 79.0
10. Classic Porn Scenes (0) N/A 78.5

View All: Company Sites (53)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.4 seconds.