| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Videos are high quality (480p)
+Videos offered in WMV, and MPG. Sometimes iPod M4V is available.
+For the most part, associated HQ image sets are linked with the videos. There are some that are not (the ones with iPod downloads since the iPod download link is parked where the location of the gallery link would be...kind of stupid if you ask me since there is space to have both links)
+You get 10 sites with your membership (see the list on TBP). 4 asian, 1 latina, 1 tranny, 1 IR-white male, 1 IR-black male, 1 anal, and 1 generic big ass/big tits.
+Image galleries downloadable as ZIPs, and when viewing in the webpage the page has the age-old controls (next, previous, gallery) that allow you to go see the next and previous image without going back to the gallery.
+Each video has description of what is to come.
+Downloads work with download managers |
| Cons: |
-Videos watermarked
-Images watermarked
-Not that many videos on each site. Small network library.
-Poor update schedule. Each networked site is updated on a different day of the week, making each day of the week an update day...but 7 updates per week (or 10 I guess since there are 10 sites) sucks.
-Some sites only offer content in split scene (StickyLatinas for one)
-No bonus material
-So who had the idea of adding a tranny site to a network that has 9 standard sites with b/g porn? Mind you TrannyFluid was the 8th site created based on WhoIs data for all the sites. The last one, ForbiddenTokyo, is another question mark. With three asian sites, you feel the need for a fourth? How about some diversity for a change?
-Video files generically named
-Most sites don't tag videos with actress names. None of the videos are tagged with dates.
-Expensive - $30/mo |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, a decent network of sites, but if you are looking to spend $30 on a network of sites you are better suited spending it on a quality network like RealityKings or NaughtyAmerica, or Brazzers for that matter (mind you all three of those network sites are cheaper than Digital Dope).
For those interested this is the order which the sites were created (thanks to WHOIS data, mm/dd/yy):
racknrump - 06/14/01
thedirtywhiteboy - 07/24/02
asianbabymakers - 06/10/03
bangkokstreetwhores - 06/10/03
stickylatinas - 09/23/04
siamslam - 12/25/04
blacksoneverything - 08/23/05
trannyfluid - 11/6/05
assholemassacre - 02/13/06
forbiddentokyo - 02/24/06
Comparing the networks:
The three aforementioned networks (RK, NA, Braz) all have:
*better price
*better organization
*better site design
*better update schedule
*better download options
*available streaming/preview options
*better job of linking images (meaning 100% of their updates have linked images, where as Digital Dope is something like 80% the way I estimate it)
*better job of tagging with dates
*better job of tagging actresses
*better job of hiring KNOWN actresses (I barely recognized anyone on the Digital Dope sites. I saw one scene from Kaylynn, that was about it)
*probably better selection for mainstream tastes (Digital Dope's selection really didn't suit my tastes, I really didn't find much to download. It is not hard to find stuff I like on RK, NA or Braz.)
*etc.
By itself it is a decent, I guess, but you can't grade a porn site without comparing it to similar sites in the business. It is like saying Computer Maker A is good without comparing it to Computer Makers B, C, D and E. It is comparison which makes things strive to be better and become better. So hopefully this network will look at its competitors and change things up a bit. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Pic sets range from around 40- 100 pics
-zip download for pics
-big & clear pics, best come in at (1000 x 750)
-access to a network with 10 other sites
- updates every Friday
- Amateur girls from what I can tell
- screen caps for every video ( 600 x 400)
- solid download speeds
-WMV hi- speed, and MPEG hi- speed
- the network its on updates daily, twice on Sunday |
| Cons: |
- no full scene download
-all videos broken up into three parts
- you can only stream in mpeg
-video quality isn’t good, a bit grainy
-same white guy fucking in all the videos
- only19 pic sets as of now
-only 18 videos as of now
- The site design is slightly below average. All pics and videos on one page. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a new site. Started this year I believe.
-I wish the girls they had in there photo gallery were the ones in the videos. The girls in the photos are a lot hotter then the ones in the videos. The ones in the videos are not bad though.
-The cumshots range and are either on the face, pussy, tits or ass.
-Three threesome videos as of now
-Pretty much all young girls, but there is a milf on here.
-Most recent video is a good video, the guys condom falls off in her pussy when fucking and it isn’t till the end where he pulls it out.
-Models are only named by there first name
-Girls have mostly average size tits with the exception of 2 big chested, and 1 flat.
- It’s a new site so its hard to rate these. It will only continue to improve its score with amount of content. However the sex scenes are not anything to special, per say. The videos are taped sort of amateur like, which makes it a little better then if not. The pic sets are surprisingly pretty nice, which is good. At 24.95 maybe you can give it a try if you love Latinas. I mean you are getting 10 other fairly well developed sites with it. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (0) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Be the first to comment on Sticky Latinas!
Add Comment
|