Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
A great network
Most scenes have both masterbation and sex scenes
Video
Pics
Easy to navigate
Cons:
Site is no longer updated
Some lower quality videos
Shrunken number of scene 74 scene up as of review
Listed as amateur is definately not(but it is porn)
Bottom Line:
This is the least favorite of the sites produce by Naughty America just could not really get in to the site.
As for the girls on the site some are today's top notch porn stars of today. Some of the girls made the first XXX performances on this site namely Sophia Lynn.
The site in some ways was very different then the other sites on the network could have been part of the reason why the stopped updating it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A pretty good network site that has a little of everything, solo, hardcore and so on.
- The old famous, "Amateur" claim, though maybe these were filmed before the girls were stars? Sandra Shine is the first video listed on here, by her old stage name, Judit.
- Quality varies depending on age of clip, everything except the first 5 videos are available in full scene download, there are also pictures on the majority of the sets.
- Naughty's clean site design
- DL speeds are above average
Cons:
- Basic site design could be a turnoff for some.
- Some of the older sets do not have full scene downloads
- Most of the content, as with most sites like this one becomes repititive
- Living in So Cal all of my life, but have never seen any of these women!
Bottom Line:
I wasn't as happy with this site as I expected to be. This has been a site I have always heard of and meant to join many times. The network helps the site out and makes it a good value to join, but this site couldn't make it on its own.
The navigation is very basic. Page that lists all the models and a thumbnail. There are several options, especially on the newer sets like MPEG or WMV, different bitrates. Also each set has interview and masturbation clips available.
The girls are you typical, very pretty and young types. Sandra Shine is on here as Judy, but when you download it, it says, "Judit". Most of the models are known porn stars, Kelli Kline, Karina Kay, and one of my personal favorites, Jersey Jaxon. Heck, they even have Mia Bangg on here, seems like she has been in porn forever, so I really think they went way overboard with the amateur pitch.
The quality on the last 20 movies is 720x540 2000kbps, before that, the previous 50 or so are available in full scene downloads as well, but are lower quality MPEGs. Only 5 of the videos are not available in full scene downloads. I'm not for sure if they went back and made full scenes out of some of the old ones, but I had noticed the TBP review says there is no full scene download, but from my count around 95% are available in full scene downloads.
The site is a nice addition to the network, but I found it to be maybe the 4th or 5th best of the network, definitely not the best. Still recommended with network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get videos and pictures of 75 different girls, all with a masturbation scene and most with a hardcore scene
-The newer videos go as high as 2000kbps for WMV files and also include MPEG, MOV, and MP4 files formats for download
-The picture sets are very good on this site including real digital shots with good resolution for all sets save for the oldest ones on the site and all have zip options
-You get full access to the 10 "Tier 1" Naughty America network sites, all for under $25 a month
Cons:
-None of the updates are dated on the main page (although some are on the girl's page) except for the most recent girl and it's about two months old as of this review
-Most of the videos go no higher than 512kbps and many actually run much slower than that (more like 242)
-Some of the older pic sets are labelled high quality, but I think the actual shots deserved that designation about 6 years ago at best
-The site is in desperate need of a redesign with all info being formatted the same way
Bottom Line:
When I first joined the Naughty America network I didn't give this site very much attention. It hadn't been one of the sites I'd joined specifically to see and others drew my attention much more quickly. Eventually I found a very disjointed site with some pluses, but also some negatives that are indicative of the problems with the entire NA network.
The main page of the site has a very simple layout with more advertisements for other NA content than I think there should be. Each girl has merely a thumbnail of her face with names below except for the most current girl who gets a bit more detail. The most recent update to the site was posted about 2 months prior to when this review was written, so updates seem a bit overdue.
In most cases, the girl has a masturbation video, a hardcore sex video, and 2 or 3 pic sets that are zipped. Some older content only has pic sets and perhaps a video taken while the photo shoot was done, but that's the exception and not the rule. The "high quality" shoots from the older sets leave a bit to be desired and show the age of the site.
Overall, the content is decent with very little of the boring scenarios of the other Naughty America sites you get with your membership, 10 in all. The girl tells you she likes to get it on and then she does. There are some amateurs in the oldest sets, but like the rest of NA they quickly give way to pornstars. If they'd kept it going the way it started I'd be here forever. As it is, I'm not staying.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
--150+ SoCal Coeds scenes--
--Every girl has a full masturbation video--
--Older pics were still good quality, and videos not bad either--
--Over 25,00 pics and 300 videos--
--All stunning beauties--
--Videos average just over 30 minutes--
--great video download option--
--access to another 9 sites--
--great price for content--
Cons:
-Not the best updates last update : 04-11-07-
-Like other naughty America vip sites, the faking is evident-
-Not enough amateurs-
-older videos had no full scenes, just clips-
-all facial cumshots-
-site design is plain-
-very limited trial access-
Bottom Line:
Example of newest video set sup:
Pictures:
Picture Sets: Highres 1 | Highres 2 | Highres 3 | Picture set 4
Picture Zips: Highres 1 | Highres 2 | Highres 3 Videos:
Masturbation: 512k| 1000k | Mpeg | I pod | 2000k
| Quicktime Hg
I would not consider these girls amateur by any means. You see many stars such as Gianna Michaels, Lorena Sanchez, Jessica Sweet, Julia Bond, Denise K, Amber Peach, among many other well known porn actress’s.
Overall its an impressive archive of pornstar acting as college coeds. Could really use some real college coeds though, but its a nice looking site regardless. You get great value in the membership price, and it really is worth the join.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* A lot of content to choose from
* Exclusive content
* Very easy navigation. The links to the content are good pictures of the faces with names below them.
* Good quality videos and archived galleries which are High res.
* Video options are WMV 56k, WMV 512k, Mpeg and Ipod. Some even have Quicktime as an option.
Cons:
* Loading the main page with all of the pictures of the girls can take a while on a low speed connection
* Some girls are also featured on the other sites connected to the same network.
* Older videos are split into scenes and aren't available as a full video.
* Could update more frequently and mention update date with every girl.
Bottom Line:
SoCalCoeds.com is certainly a website of magnitude which features more than a hundred different girls.
These girls are sometimes also featured on other websites connected to the same network which make the videos and girls sometimes a bit hard to believe as they play different characters.
The videos are downloadable in various formats such as WMV 56k, 512k and MPEG. Even iPod is represented with the newer videos as well as Quicktime.
You can download the full movies as well as split scenes. Some even feature the masturbation scenes especially split up.
The galleries are high resolution and are zipped in .zip archives and are of course fully downloadable.
If you open the website, the loading of the main page can take some time with a lower speed connection. So my advice is to try to avoid reloading the page as much as possible
They update once in a while but not very regularly which they could pay some more attention to. Sometimes they don't update for a month. Also the update dates aren't mentioned.
All in all the website offers a lot of good quality content and your account gives you access to a pretty big network. But the girls aren't exclusive to the sites which can be a good thing and a bad thing. And the updates aren't regular
But the girls are cute and some really give off that college girl vibe.
I advise to read up on the other websites connected to the network before subscribing though.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (1)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
I just took a gaze at the model directory for this site and did not find any "amateurs". These girls all look like well worn veterans of multiple porn shoots.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feeds : All So Cal Coeds Activity - So Cal Coeds Reviews - So Cal Coeds Comments - So Cal Coeds News
