Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Sinnistar

Visit Site

Sinnistar

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Young Adults
2. Amateur Girls
3. Hardcore Sex

2K Media LLC
1 Site Listed
Partner: None

Monthly: $29.95 (recurs at $14.95/mo.)

View all Sinnistar Site Facts at TBP.

67.0
Feedback History  (5)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 1
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 1
Review by TheBestPorn:

79.0
TBP Review

Date: 09-12-11

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Exclusive teen action.
+  Good-sized collection.
-  No browse tools.

User Reviews (4)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
63
jberryl69 (12) 01-10-13  03:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Found 6 scenes which I rated 7.0 /10 or better that need editing.

* Found two new models I was unaware with good skill.

* 189 scenes currently available for download

* Downloads pretty quick

* 2 scenes Buck shot are now mp4

* Some scenes were shot in the role playing mode.

* Purchased content is better quality video production values than original vids.
Cons: * Not very easy to find models except to open up the download screen and see the title attached to the file.

* Video quality very poor - not much better than what you'd see on a tube site.

* Scenes are starting to get recycled - one scene was repeated three times (his famous Kalyn cheerleader, head over the couch, throat fuck with her throat bulging, while she flails away, to no avail, in panic).

* While each scene has a description you can't tell the original content from the purchased content.

* Two ways to see if scene has entertainment value - view online (very frustrating) or download. No thumbnails to even give you a hint.

* While Buck tried, I think, to make his original content "Roll Playing Amateur", his POV, lighting and editing leaves a lot to be desired.
Bottom Line: Last night was my first night and I started thinking about this review, I remembered a 3 card monte game I came across in Mexico. After thinking I knew what was going on I threw down a 100 peso bill and immediately lost. That's how I felt like my $30 was taken.

Today however, I've covered all the content (took about four hours) and feel like the price is still a little over the top considering the age and quality of the content but I'm okay with it.

I will edit down the "keepers" for content and will post the $/min I got out of it.

It's hard to figure out how old the scenes Buck shot but seeing that Aaliyah Jolie and Carmen Minor were a couple of his repeat models, at least 3 years old (They both left the biz in 2010).

I found it interesting that another model of interest, Kaitlyn (or Kaitlynn) is not traceable (no last name) though she was the most used model. While I realize that some sites like to give different names, I find that following a model under those circumstances most frustrating. One humorous aside, Kaitlyn had the craziest eyebrows I've ever seen - they looked like they were drawn on by a very drunk person.

FYI - the famous over the couch throat fuck of Kalyn lasted 21 seconds and consisted of 30 thrusts down her throat.

Purchased content is teen anal themed for the most part and as far I was concerned pretty standard fare. It also brought home how much I hate the European male awww & hiss dialogue that permeates these type of films. I did find humor in the one scene where they couple goes from anal doggy to reverse cowboy anal and he inadvertently smacks her head against the headboard. Just about the only real thing I saw happening.

This site would be hard to recommend to my neighbors though if you are intrigued by what some of his original content contains (dirty atm, painful anal, force throating, mostly young inexperience teens, pregnant sex) then there is really only one way to find out and it will cost you $30 bucks.

As I said earlier, I'm going to edit though some of what I downloaded into one extended scene and will tell you then what it cost.

Of the approximately 3852 mins of content, I came away with 21 mins of stuff I wanted which works out to $1.43 a min.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
83
rearadmiral (242) 12-30-11  12:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (62), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Simple design (perhaps a bit too simple)
- Just under 200 videos
- Approximately 60-70% of the videos appear to be exclusive
- Updates weekly with two updates added each time
- Good scene descriptions
- Subjectively, files look good
- Many licenced scenes are widely available on DVD sites
- Supports download managers (I use Free Download Manager)
- Costs $30 for the month but rebills at $15 for following months
Cons: - Different price for non US / Canadian users
- Not all exclusive
- No search function
- Only one file option (wmv)
- No HD offered
- Unknown primary and secondary billing companies
Bottom Line: Sinnistar is a small but growing site that caters to a fairly narrow niche – rough anal, ATMs and throat fucking. I’m well aware that interest in this niche isn’t shared by everyone or even the majority of PU members.

Currently the site has just under 200 scenes. I estimate that between 60 and 70 percent of the scenes are exclusive and produced by the site with the remaining scenes being licenced material from mainstream porn that features scenes that fit the site’s theme.

The site is very simple in that there are nine pages of scenes with there being just a single column of scenes per page. The scenes have a large thumbnail and a brief description (which adds a lot of value). The file is downloaded right from the thumbnail, which makes things simple, but the downside is that there are no options for file downloads. The only option is wmv. The default resolution is 640x480 at 2000kb/s though there are several older files at lower resolutions. I’m not technically-minded so normally I’d scoff at the low resolution, but subjectively they look pretty good. The video is clear and there is no obvious pixilation. There is, obviously, no HD available.

The exclusive scenes usually feature an unknown (to me anyway) model or models. The models are usually late teens or early twenties and are usually fairly petite. The scenes often boast of it being a girl’s first porn scene, first anal or first ATM, or some combination of those. I have no reason to think that these claims aren’t true. The only well-known model who appears (in several scenes) is Hailey Young. Jamie Elle appears in what looks like an exclusive scene but I’m not certain about that.

One warning for prospective members is that the site has a bit of a sub-niche in that they seem to cater to people who like to see ‘dirty’ anal sex or ATMs. This isn’t a scat site by any reasonable measure, but the site does seem to take some delight in seeing an accidental discharge during anal sex. To each his own, I guess…

Several of the scenes feature deep-throating and face-fucking that are very hardcore. So much so that I suspect Max Hardcore and the guys at Facial Abuse would cringe. There are a few scenes with fisting and watersports too.

The non-exclusive scenes follow the same theme as the exclusive scenes: they prominently feature anal sex and usually deep-throating and ATMs. Well represented are the “Babysitter,” “Naughty Little Nymphos” and Teacher’s Pet series’, all from Notorious and all made around 2000. Subjectively, having these scenes is a plus because these were all great series’, but the negative is that these titles are also widely available on other DVD sites so a member with a large collection and who likes these titles likely already has them in their collection.

While the site is simple, it might be too simple: there is no search function at all. If you’re looking for a particular model or specific thing you’ll be sorting through the entire website manually. While a site this size doesn’t need a high-power search feature, being able to sort and search by star, at least, would be welcome.

The site does appear to update, with two scenes being added once per week. While other PU members have criticized this as being too sparse, for a small site that appears to make some pretty good niche porn this seems very reasonable to me.

I use Free Download Manager to queue up the scenes I want and had no trouble with this. The site supports this, and I didn’t experience any timeouts while downloading.

There were a couple of things that caused me some concern when joining. Trashman and bently both scored the site low and Trashman said that there were hidden download limits. I don’t think the low scores are warranted, but there is obviously a degree of subjectivity in both the previous scores and in my score. As for download limits, bently told me in a reply that they were gone and I can confirm they are. The second concern was they use two unknown billers. If I have problems cancelling later I’ll add that as a comment to warn others. (I joined through “paystar” or “paywide.”)

One billing quirk is that there is a link for U.S. customers to join and one for everyone else. That’s no big deal except that the price for non-U.S. members is $5 higher. I’m in Canada but tried the U.S. link and it worked. I can’t report how that might work for others. My suspicion is that this is a flaw imposed on the site by the billers, and not a cash grab by the site.

I’d definitely recommend this site, with the normal caveat that you have to like this niche. The site is small(ish) and somewhat simple, but the basics are well done. The exclusive scenes are very well done and worth the $30 fee (recurring at $15). After coming from a site that was ‘cookie-cutter’ porn, this site was a pleasant surprise in being well done and unique.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Expired
65*
bently (3) 03-09-11  12:27pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies)

Expired
50
TrashMan (Disabled) 02-05-09  03:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (1)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

jberryl69 (12) 01-04-12  04:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)

Actually a Question about Updates.

The updates you mention, are they new content (as in NOT third party content) or is it just recycled stuff?

Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Sinnistar

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Sinnistar (2) 67.0 79.0

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.5 seconds.