| User Reviews (3) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good archive of content
- Decent mix of content - videos, photos etc
- Well-established site, seems fairly reliable update-wise (...but please see cons...)
- Patty is very hot and a great tease |
| Cons: |
- Not many updates, probably averages out to one a week
- Very poor quality. Photos are small, videos are extremely small. Seems very behind-the-times in this respect
- Videos are generally quite short, galleries are small, and many videos are 'limited time' meaning they won't appear in the archive |
| Bottom Line: |
Pattycake is a great tease, and in this respect everything's perfect. But the website technically seems to be stuck in the 1990s with awful resolution videos and photosets.
I cannot think of any website that uses such low quality for new content. It's a shame because I think Patty has become hotter and there are a substantial amount more slips than there used to be.
She is adorable and it is definitely worth joining the website if you are prepared for low quality videos. The content is fine, the shooting is fine, but the video size (640px) is pretty disappointing and behind the times. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+plenty of galleries
+plenty of vids
+new blog
+twitter feed (scraping the barrel as a pro)
+still alive and updated maybe once a week |
| Cons: |
-video quality is terrible (even newer vids)
-updates are too infrequent for sub cost
-blog is updated to infrequently
-forum is barely active |
| Bottom Line: |
this is a real struggle for me, i love patty, i love her vids and her pics. the teasing panty shots, the bum slapping, the dancing and the cheeky facial expressions.
creatively speaking i'd say the site and model are a gem.
but in 2011 they are producing horribly low quality videos (more recently vids are mp4 but still no better than wide 640x480).
the galleries have way too few pics, usually about 30 to 40, also generally no bigger than 1024x768.
no zips are provided and all pics are stored on seperate html pages so you'll need a plugin like DTA and some batch download jiggery-pokery to get all the images.
updates come in the form of gallery, video or webcam, the webcam update is just a series of very low res vidcaps which i still don't see the point in. just pissed me off that it was used an update slot. maybe i missed a selling point, does she do live webcam sessions?
i joined for 3 months and i was excited about updates as they were so few and far between, but i was consistently dissapointed to the degree that i had to cancel my sub.
i *wish* the site was better and i *wish* i could give it a better score, I genuinely hope she ups her game and i'll be back like a shot. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (3) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|