| User Reviews (35) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful, clean women as convincing lesbians.
- Great speeds (can saturate my 6Mbps DSL)
- Allows full use of download managers. Downthemall in my case, and the site didn't restrict me from setting up videos to download overnight. Well done, sapphicerotica.com.
- No gonzo mascara-running, gagging, put-a-foot-on-her-head-while-penetrating-her nonsense.
- Very few fake breasts. Two thumbs up. The women are young, slim, and (mostly) natural.
- Did I mention beautiful women smooching on other beautiful women? |
| Cons: |
- Some scenes are a bit too "charged" to be convincing. Being so immediately orgasmic is likely a medical condition.
- Some scenes are a bit silly. Not typical American XXX silly, but a bit much. I enjoy looking at four gorgeous women in tennis outfits coming in after a vigorous match and stripping/licking, but it's a bit unbelievable. |
| Bottom Line: |
- A great site. Seriously. Especially the older stuff, and especially for the price. I think it's one of the few sites that everyone who enjoys XXX and finds women attractive should join at one time.
- Flashiness and web design are personal style preferences, but I really like the simplicity of the site.
- A pretty good model index.
- "Clean" was used above, but I can't stress enough how nice it is to see attractive models who look like they've used shampoo within the last eight hours on a site.
- The approach that some of the older, wonderful oral scenes used is being a bit neglected. Now there seems to be lots more fingers and toys and anal-licking. That's fine, but when you join and see the older vids and the girls sucking their lover's entire labial folds into their mouth and really dwelling on them... well, you'll see. The older videos have something the new ones lack.
- Most women are fairly unknown, so it's a bit odd to see big stars in a few scenes. Kathia Nobili (although in my top 5 favorites) and Nessa Devil seem very out of place.
- Probably 90% of the women are completely shaved in their pubic area. A personal preference thing, but I'd like for more of the women to have hair down there. Nothing unusual or fetishistic, but just natural and trimmed adult women. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Large high-quality photo-sets and videos
- Compared to my first review in 2009 they have increased their "hardcore-level" (intense pussy & ass fisting for example)
- Clear, focused & consistent style: Young, sexy girls with small or medium sized tits "teeny"-style.
- regular (dated) updates, which allows the user to find out how often the site is updated.
- these two pros also have their DRAWBACKS as described below! |
| Cons: |
The cons consist, in my opinion of two different apects: (1) the site´s style and (2) the transparency of the updates:
- the clear style, which I also mentioned as a pro can become a little boring, if you subscribe to the site on a regular basis or for a long amount of time. You get the sapphic-erotica-style. No less, but also no more!
- There seems to be hardly any "evolution" or (positive) "sursprise" concerning the kind of models featured and the porn´s style:
You will find sweet, nice, "teeny"-style girls, very clean & enjoyable but sometimes a little too "innocent". Some of them seem to appear on a regular basis.
- The site feautures, say, 80%-hardcore as it has been for the last year or so --
while some other sites also keep their style but adapt to the overall development in the industry (some new exciting "porn stories" for instance or a different kind of girl here and there...). But it seems that their customers like it that way. |
| Bottom Line: |
The cons consist, in my opinion of two different apects: (1) the site´s style and (2) the (missing) "transparency" of the updates:
- the clear style, which I also mentioned as a pro can become a little boring, if you subscribe to the site on a regular basis or for a longer amount of time. You get the sapphic-erotica-style. No less, but also no more!
There seems to be hardly any "evolution" or (positive) "sursprise" concerning the kind of models featured and the porn´s style.
It stays, say, 80%-hardcore as it has been for the last year, while some other sites also keep their style but adapt to the overall development in the industry (some new exciting "porn stories" for instance or a different kind of girl here and there...). But it seems that their customers like it that way. So maybe they won´t change a working system... :-) |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
enigma wrote 1 review (03-09-09) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There are many models here who are extraordinarily beautiful and nearly all of them are showing affection for one another. The scenes are natural all the way and you never get the feeling the models are ever doing it just for the money. |
| Cons: |
You sometimes hear the guys behind the cameras, which is extremely annoying. Some years ago, the models were more free to look the way they wanted and do what came most natural to them and didn't have to act for the camera. Scenes played out a lot more organic and felt more real then. |
| Bottom Line: |
The best sapphic site out there, but sadly not as good as it used to be. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (7 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (26) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
